Showing posts with label leg. Show all posts
Showing posts with label leg. Show all posts

Sunday, April 1, 2012

Responses to Oscar Qs combined

Combining her responses to EW, HuffPo & Time gives us a more complete picture of her reaction to the Oscars commotion.

"No (hadn't heard of Jolie-ing). "I honestly didn't pay attention to it. You know what I mean? I don't watch those TV shows and if I go online and see something about myself, I don't click on it. And the people I surround myself with don't really talk about that kind of stuff.  I don’t pay any attention to that stuff.

[Laughs].

 I just heard something as simple as that and thought, well, I don’t know. I do what I feel like doing, but don’t actually consider the effect.  What’s funny is when you have no actual, conscious thought of anything [like that].

“I was just having fun on a night you should have fun at,” I just try to, you know, be as I feel like being on a night like that.

It's as simple as a being a woman picking a dress you like and having a night, and not really thinking about anything else. You just feel like, ‘Eh, I like this dress. I feel comfortable in this one.’  It's funny.  That was actually the backup dress. I decided to go for the one that was less attention-grabbing.

 “You can never understand why certain things become something,” “It’s totally weird.”  "It’s interesting that you just really never know … 

[Laughs.]

Of course (found Jim Rash funny) No, I had a great night. It was a really fun night.


This crazy lady is clearly obsessed with me. Ugh.



Thursday, March 29, 2012

Cyberfame & Cybershortcuts

Cybershortcuts can shortchange learning


Digital information substitutes virtual reality for the real thing

By Suzanne Fields
The Washington Times

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 

The Internet is the latest tool for compassionate activism. When the sight of Angelina Jolie’s legs goes viral, she magnifies her female celebrity by focusing attention on the miseries of Darfur. She teases and titillates in a celebrity culture and uses her fame for a good cause.
But the Internet is not necessarily the best means for educating the public about injustice. It confuses and deceives as well.
When a remarkable documentary video called “Kony 2012” circulated on Facebook and YouTube, promoted on Twitter by Hollywood celebrities, it drew more than 80 million viewers. Jason Russell, the young filmmaker who made the video, became an instant hero for telling the world about Joseph Kony, a brutal Ugandan warlord who kidnapped unsuspecting children and forced them into prostitution and a children’s army to wreak murder and mayhem.
Instant fame is not always benign. It turns out that Mr. Russell, a co-founder of Invisible Children, an organization trying to find Kony and rescue the children, was not careful with the facts. His video contains errors; its history is outdated; and the African conflicts are dangerously simplified. Kony fled Uganda six years ago and hasn’t been seen there since, and the children’s army is diminished and scattered.
The sloppy research seems aimed at a kindergarten mentality, literally, as the filmmaker uses his son, age 5, to act as a “commentator.” Commercial shortcuts peddling feel-good slogans inscribed on bracelets and splashed on posters protesting the warlord’s evil deeds eventually drew questions about the filmmaker’s finances. He collapsed with a mental breakdown. He was videotaped running naked down a street in San Diego. He was diagnosed with a “reactive psychosis” and put in a hospital.
This is a story reflecting unintended consequences of the digital age run amok. It has farcical and pitiful dimensions of an Internet melodrama rising from undisciplined, unedited, uneducated electronic overload, when there are no responsible gatekeepers to make sense of high-speed information moving swiftly like a racing car without brakes on the digital superhighway. When videos go viral, they command a huge audience, generating a digital din more like barroom babble than serious debate.
The “Kony 2012” phenomenon has lessons for how we absorb and apply information transmitted electronically. The medium is not the message, but an untamed process. Thoughtful analytical engagement gets lost in a frenzy of self-indulgence in the self-absorbed social media. The digital revolution has been hyped as ushering in a utopian world of knowledge that would expand minds with facts faster than the speed of sound and light (and far faster than Superman’s speeding bullet). Cyberprophets promised a future world illuminated by wizardry and magical teaching, as if consummate hand-to-eye coordination could turn John Locke’s tabula rasa into a human encyclopedia.
We’re beginning to discover that computers have limitations, and it’s time to compute that, too. In South Korea, which leads the vanguard of digital education, education thinkers are reconsidering their idea to digitize all traditional textbooks.
“The concern about the digital textbook is that young students won’t have as much time to experience real life and real things,” a school administrator of a pilot digital program in elementary schools in Seoul tells The Washington Post. “They’ll just see the whole world through a computer screen.” Koreans, whose children famously achieve high scores in math and science, have found that 1 in 12 students between the ages of 5 and 9 is so addicted to the Internet that the child suffers depression when access to a computer is withdrawn. Similar findings for Internet addiction among schoolchildren have been cited in the United States, too.
We’ve only scratched the surface of the ways the nature of electronic teaching will change not only what children learn, but how they learn and how that will affect focus, concentration, motivation and memory. Another problem is the way the Internet creates opinions and obsessions while at the same time digital words are easily erased from the screen and knowledge is deleted from the mind. Fleeting feelings disconnect from deeper emotions.
Kony 2012” exposes one way a video gone viral can do harm and cloud critical understanding. We don’t yet know what will follow in its wake, but we should be paying scrupulous attention to what the electronic media is telling us. What we need to see is not necessarily what’s in front of our eyes.

Suzanne Fields is a syndicated columnist.

© Copyright 2012 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.







Home
Thursday 29 March 
RNW - NEWS AND ANALYSIS FROM THE NETHERLANDS IN 10 LANGUAGES, WORLDWIDE 24/7 ON RADIO, TV AND ONLINE

Moreno-Ocampo and Jolie
Lauren Comiteau's picture

Stop the genocide, I'm famous

Published on : 28 March 2012 - 3:00pm | By Lauren Comiteau (Photo: ANP
 
George Clooney testifying before the US Senate earlier this month that the Sudanese government is launching repeated and unlawful attacks on unarmed civilians (and then getting arrested outside the Sudanese embassy while protesting in Washington).

By Lauren Comiteau, Hilversum

Angelina Jolie in the public gallery of the International Criminal Court (ICC) as its first ever verdict—against former Congolese militia leader Thomas Lubanga—is being handed down.
And of course, P Diddy, Rihanna and Oprah twittering Ugandan rebel leader Joseph Kony into the social media stratosphere by re-tweeting the Kony 2012 film.
What is it with superstars and war crimes? Do they deserve all the bad press they get, or do they genuinely help draw attention to under-reported conflicts?
“ Yes, it’s a general rule,” says Charlie Kaye, Executive Producer for Radio with the mainstream American broadcaster CBS. He cites Clooney’s focus on South Sudan as the best recent example of star wattage shining the light on often neglected issues. “It forced news organizations to address issues that wouldn’t normally get time.”
And he means the issues—not just the arm candy du jour. “I don’t know how you can write about what he did without offering the background.”
Like flies to a cowpat
It is exactly the kind of publicity that stars attract that has NGOs vying for their support. “Clooney says when he travels the cameras follow him, that he can’t get away from the cameras. But many of the people who are in most need of attention, no matter what they do, they can’t get the attention of the news,” says Jonathan Hutson, Director of Communications of the Enough Project, which Clooney supports. (The project aims to end genocide and crimes against humanity.)
“So his idea is to simply go where people are facing human rights crimes and drag the cameras and microphones behind him in his wake,” says Hutson.
But critics of the star phenomenon say it’s not only the equipment being dragged through the mud, but the facts. “The problem with Clooney in Sudan is he was [in his Save Darfur campaign] saying everywhere that genocide was being committed, while it’s the ICC prosecutor who has to prove that genocide occurred in Sudan, and it is the role of judges to say that something really happened--not celebrities,” says one graduate student in international humanitarian law who comes from Rwanda and doesn’t want to be named. “Celebrities misrepresent the facts. And they contribute to what we call victor’s justice. That’s a very big problem with these trials—they’re considered victor’s justice back home.”
VIP seats
When Angelina Jolie turned up in the public gallery of the ICC to hear its first-ever verdict against former Congolese militia leader Thomas Lubanga, her appearance generated an unusually high volume of traffic on RNW's international justice FB page,   Helen Park: “Why would the OTP [Office of the Prosecutor] talk about her before even talking about the case itself?” She was referring to the first press release put out by prosecutors following the verdict—announcing Jolie’s appearance in court.
While the OTP didn’t respond to repeated requests from RNW about why they announced Jolie’s appearance in court before reacting to the verdict itself, it is clear that the court welcomes the attention that follows in the star’s wake.
“If it helps give more attention to the victims and crimes, then there’s no reason to be against it,” says ICC spokesman Fadi El Abdallah on Jolie’s appearance in the public gallery. Jolie is indeed a Goodwill Ambassador for the UN, and the court neither paid for her appearance nor publicised it beforehand.
“The problem with her presence is that this case is about Lubanga and the Congolese. How many Congolese mothers were in the public gallery?” asks the Rwandan legal student. “She has a right to be there. But Congolese people should have been given the first role, not her.”
Media Justice Complex
But ICC prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo is a clear supporter of celebrity endorsements for his court. Besides several public appearances with Jolie, Moreno-Ocampo appears in the Kony 2012 film—an effort he whole-heartedly supports and which he has said “mobilised the world.”
Joseph Kony is wanted by the ICC for crimes against humanity for using child soldiers in his Ugandan guerrilla group, the Lord’s Resistance Army. To date, the Kony 2012 video made by Invisible Children, whose goal is to get Kony to the ICC to stand trial, has been viewed more than 85,000,000 times on YouTube, despite coming under criticism for both its accuracy and financing.
But many people in Uganda found the film patronizing. “The problem is with the victims,” says the Rwandan student of international humanitarian law. “In the Kony case, the victims in Uganda say everything that Invisible Children did is not representative of their suffering. So why do it, if the people who you say you represent don’t even relate to what you’re doing?”
But accurate or not, the film’s impact — largely started by celebrity re-tweets - is undeniable. After its star turn on YouTube and Twitter, says CBS’ Charlie Kaye, the broadcaster had no choice but to cover it. “Twitter is helping drive the news agenda these days,” says Kaye. “There’s a delicate balance between what people need to know and what they want to know, with celebrities falling in the want to know category.”
Diamonds are for courtrooms
Take the case of supermodel Naomi Campbell. Reluctant to appear in court, she was subpoenaed to testify at the trial of former Liberian president Charles Taylor for allegedly taking a gift of blood diamonds from him. Although she claimed she didn’t know what the “dirty-looking stones” were, her appearance in court (made to contradict Taylor’s own testimony that he never possessed uncut diamonds except as jewelry) brought with it satellite trucks and hordes of journalists.
It gave the trial unprecedented attention if only for a few days in the summer of 2010. Journalists conveniently hung around for the following witnesses—actress Mia Farrow and Campbell’s former modeling agent Carole White, who both contradicted Campbell’s testimony.
Solomon Moriba, the Press and Outreach Officer for the Special Court for Sierra Leone, says Campbell wasn’t used to give the court celebrity status and her appearance never led to further funding. But, he says, “I can’t dispute the facts, the media attention was there. People who hadn’t been in court before, like celebrity bloggers, came.” Still, he says she was a witness like any other—“the people who lost loved ones and limbs, those who were raped or sexually violated. They all came to explain their ordeals and contribute to the judicial process.”
Rays of light
While Campbell received more coverage than most of those victims Moriba refers to, star wattage is sometimes converted into real action. "It's rare that we have literally millions of Americans calling for more engagement in Africa," said Senator Chris Coons, chair of the Senate Foreign Relations subcommittee on African Affairs, following the Kony 2012 film. Similarly, the African Union pledged 5,000 troops in South Sudan to help track the fugitive Kony down in the wake of the viral video.
Lisa Ann Richey, author of “Brand Aid: Shopping Well to Save the World”, says stars’ involvement in causes or court cases can indeed have a wider impact. “Maybe people who didn’t know anything about Africa or the history of Sudan would then, for whatever reason they were attracted by George Clooney, start to look into more detail and educate themselves on these issues.”
Even if celebrities’ motives are sometimes suspect, in the end, it may not really matter. People do the right things for the wrong reasons all the time. And maybe sometimes, that’s good enough.

Monday, March 26, 2012

Breznican's EW Interview


The day's most shameless lead: "Angelina Jolie is getting a little horny." (It's about 'Maleficent') 
Angelina Jolie also learns all about trend of 'Angelina Jolie'ing': 
I like that Jolie can admit to just showing off her gams, but also talks in depth abt more serious things. Few do both.




Angelina Jolie on 'Maleficent,' crying her eyes out in Sarajevo, and her Oscar leg-pop -- EXCLUSIVE Q&A


Image Credit: Jason Kempin/Getty Images


Angelina Jolie is getting a little horny.

Okay, okay, okay — forgive that shamelessly provocative intro. We’re just talking about preparations for Jolie’s new role as the devilish Maleficent in an upcoming Disney film. “Wait until you see the horns,” she laughs.

In a wide-ranging interview with EW, Jolie explains why a live-action film focusing on the villainous witch may be good for young viewers.

She also describes her fears (and tears) while bringing her Bosnian War movie In the Land of Blood and Honey, to the people who lived through that conflict. [The film debuts on DVD and Blu-ray tomorrow.]

And of course, she reacts to all the commotion surrounding her infamous leg-pop at the Academy Awards.

“It’s interesting that you just really never know …” Jolie says.

This is her response to the response to her leggy pose at the Oscars, which became a viral phenomenon, inspiring various websites, a Twitter account, and countless imitators (both ironic and sincere.)

the-land-of-blood-and-honey

But that quote might also apply to what she was doing just a week before the Oscars: taking Blood and Honey, the harrowing and heartbreaking war film she wrote and directed, to premiere in Sarajevo, a city that was under siege for four years during the 1992-1995 war.

Before she was sticking her leg out, Jolie was sticking her neck out.

That ethnic conflict claimed the lives of nearly 100,000 in the former Yugoslavia, and emotions are obviously still raw for survivors. Any first-time filmmaker would be nervous facing that audience, but Jolie was particularly on-edge, especially since wild rumors about the story provoked controversy during filming.

“War is so complex, human nature is so complex. There’s no filmmaker who has ever figured it out perfectly,” she tells EW. “We just try to shed a light on one corner of something. And that, hopefully, makes you think of all the other corners you’re unable to see.”

Jolie shot every scene in In the Land of Blood and Honey in both English and BHS, (Bosanski, Hrvatski, Srpski, a.k.a. Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian) the official language of the former Yugoslavia. In theaters, she only released the subtitled version (picking up a Golden Globe nomination for best foreign language film in the process). Tuesday’s DVD and Blu-ray discs will make the English version available for the first time.

Considering all the pressure she felt a week before, it was funny to Jolie when the whole world decided to talk about her gams.

 JOLIE-LEG
Image Credit: Ethan Miller/Getty Images



ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY: Wow, so you caused quite a stir at the Oscars. That’s usually a pretty stuffy affair, but you definitely widened people’s eyes.
ANGELINA JOLIE: [Laughs.] I don’t pay any attention to that stuff. I just heard something as simple as that and thought, well, I don’t know. I do what I feel like doing, but don’t actually consider the effect. I just try to, you know, be as I feel like being on a night like that.

Fashion websites say that pose is becoming a trend. Other actresses and models, like Jennifer Lawrence at The Hunger Games premiere, are wearing dresses with the high slit and posing with their legs out.  So on behalf of guys everywhere, allow me to say, thank you very much.
[Laughs] That’s funny, very funny.

You’ve heard of Tebowing, right? Where people imitate Tim Tebow by getting down on one knee.
Uh-huh, I have.

There are whole websites that popped up where people were striking your pose. That must have caught you by surprise.
What’s funny is when you have no actual, conscious thought of anything [like that]. You just feel like, ‘Eh, I like this dress. I feel comfortable in this one.’ It’s interesting that you just really never know …

You pulled it off much better than Jim Rash [pictured, the best adapted screenplay winner who struck her provocative pose onstage after shepresented him the Oscar.] Did you find what he did funny?
Of course!  [Laughs.] No, I had a great night. It was a really fun night.

 jolie-rash



Just before the Oscars, you came home from the European premieres of In the Land of Blood and Honey. I imagine that must have been pretty emotional. It’s a heavy movie to live with for a couple of years, but you were finally showing it to the people who lived through the Bosnian War.
Yeah, it was more challenging because we knew we’d be going face to face with the region itself. We went to Berlin first, then Sarajevo, then Paris and also Croatia. This whole process has been very nerve-wracking because it’s my first film, and I’m not that confident, but I wanted to do this because I love the subject matter and I wanted to learn. I had these great two years where I learned so much about a region and history and worked with these actors from another part of the world.

Let’s start with how it was received in Paris and Berlin.
It was also difficult for them. They were right next door. So there’s a question of when [the U.S.] got involved, but they were right next door and didn’t get involved. There are a lot of feelings for everybody, deep-seeded guilt in all of us. Nobody walks away feeling good about this time in history. [The film] is supposed to make us look back and question what went wrong.

During filming, you dealt with a lot of false rumors that this was a twisted romance about a rapist. First it was a Bosnian women’s group…
It was the Bosnians at first, but then it switched to the Serbian side later, though not all Serbian people. Both times when things got heated, neither side had seen the film.


And you lost your permits to film until you showed the script to the Bosnian cultural ministry to prove it wasn’t anything like that.
Leading up to it, there were lots of questions on all sides, and lots of speculation. That speculation was causing people to be threatening toward the movie. They didn’t know, and heard rumors, and of course they’re scared and they’re sensitive. The war is still very fresh. We all got caught in the moment of that [controversy], but fortunately it was more of a moment.

When you were finally showing the public at large what the movie was really about, I imagine you felt some relief in addition to nerves.
In Serbia and Croatia, I just walked in with arms open and said I had no ill intentions, so strike as you will. I love Bosnia so much, so emotionally for me, if this was going to be a place I might hurt in some way, or not be welcome in any way, it would have really broken my heart. That’s really hard when you care and have become close to so many people there.



Image Credit: Jolie at Sarajevo premiere — Elvis Barukcic/Getty Images

Where did you show the film?
They wanted to screen it for over 6,000 people in what was the Olympic stadium [used in the 1984 Winter Games]. During the war it became a morgue, so to go back and walk out on stage in front of 6,000 people … You don’t know if they going to throw something at you, or God knows what. I was there with the cast, who are all from different sides of the conflict. But we had a beautiful positive reaction, and then we all broke down and cried.

During the movie?
When we came out after. We didn’t know what we were going to walk out in front of, but it was very, very moving. Then we met with victims from the war after, and basically stayed up until three in the morning crying, with people telling different stories about their experiences. That’s the most beautiful thing that could come out of this, getting people talking again, even if it means sometimes getting people upset. You debate again.

You’ve said you’re writing a script about the war in Afghanistan next. How’s that coming along?
I have been writing something, because I’ve been there a few times — Afghanistan and Pakistan — in the last 11 years, and it’s a part of the world we’re all quite aware of now, but … I’m not sure. I’m going to actually see this weekend what people think of [the script.] But I like it and I’ve enjoyed doing the research.


Image Credit: Everett Collection


What’s next for you as an actor? You were in talks to do a Luc Besson film?
I do hope to work with Luc one day, but we haven’t figured out what that is.  The next thing I’m doing is Maleficent for Disney. I start it in June, and it’s a really great script. I’m having a lot of fun. I’ve already got my horns fitted. My kids are very happy.

In this version, Sleeping Beauty is the nemesis instead of the good guy …?
It’s not anti-princess, but it’s the first time they’re looking at this epic woman.

Is it sympathetic to her, or is she a straight-up villain?
It’s both. I hope in the end you see a woman who is capable of being many things, and just because she protects herself and is aggressive, it doesn’t mean she can’t have other [warmer] qualities. You have to figure out the puzzle of what she is.

So there are some redeeming qualities to Maleficent the witch?
It sounds really crazy to say that there will be something that’s good for young girls in this, because it sounds like you’re saying they should be a villain. [Maleficent] is actually a great person. But she’s not perfect. She’s far from perfect.

There’s a tradition of taking a classic character who is a villain and telling the story from his or her perspective. John Gardner did it with the 1971 novel Grendel, and more recently we got the witch’s story in Gregory Maguire’s Wicked, and the musical it inspired. We like it when the bad guy is deeper than we thought.
In general, it’s a very good message to say, “let’s look at something from the other side.” But then also, what our challenge will be — and the script writer [The Lion King and Alice in Wonderland’s Linda Woolverton] has already cracked it — is not to simplify it, not to just reverse the story but tell a bigger story that doesn’t point the finger [at Princess Aurora] either. It doesn’t flip it.

Since it’s a Disney film, will this version of Maleficent be close to the one we know from their 1959 animated film?
We’re still figuring out the look. We’re experimenting with different things. But the horns are the horns – you can’t deny them. You have to have horns.

Follow @breznican

Friday, March 23, 2012

The Final Words About the Pose


Angelina Jolie Responds To Leg Meme: 'I Didn't Pay Attention To It'

Posted: 03/23/2012 4:10 pm Updated: 03/23/2012 5:29 pm Filed by Youyoung Lee

Much ado was made post-Oscars about Angelina Jolie's bare leg emerging from her inky black Versace gown, spawning one of the Internet's silliest memes: Jolie-ing. The leg (right, if you must know) subsequently generated its own Twitter handle and was even superimposed onto great artworks like Leonardo da Vinci's "Vitruvian Man," all to hilarious effect.
But what does the actress have to say about it? Turns out, not much. In an interview with The Huffington Post, Jolie says good-humoredly:
I honestly didn't pay attention to it. You know what I mean? I don't watch those TV shows and if I go online and see something about myself, I don't click on it. And the people I surround myself with don't really talk about that kind of stuff. [Laughs]. I heard something, but I didn't pay any attention. It's as simple as a being a woman picking a dress you like and having a night, and not really thinking about anything else.
***
The woman, the dress and oh what a night!  Her brief response is once again covered everywhere.

***

Angelina chatting with HuffPo founder Arianna Huffington backstage at #WIW12.
 

Walking by with Tina Brown below



Interview: Jim Rash


AVC: Going back to Oscar night: You’re onstage, about to accept the Oscar for Best Adapted Screenplay. Was it just an old improv instinct that kicked in, encouraging you to strike the Angelina Jolie pose?
JR: You know, it’s weird. Some people agree with me, understand what I’m saying—but as you’re waiting for that moment, for that envelope to be opened, Angelina got onstage, and with her pose and stance—I just thought it was fun because I thought she was owning and having fun with and rocking her outfit. When I got up there, we were proud, it was this long journey and all of a sudden your name is read and you’re outside of your head, and I thought “What a great way to just show off a proud moment”—with the Oscar on my leg. [Laughs.] I guess I didn’t see it as mocking. [Jolie] was doing it and owning it and having fun, so I thought that would be fun to see my version of it. I wouldn’t call it mocking, like everyone did. I felt bad that was the reaction. I was just having fun, so hopefully she took it all in good fun.
AVC: Have you heard anything from the Pitt-Jolie camp?
JR: I can’t imagine. Most people I’ve spoken with who have met her and him say they have a great sense of humor. All I was doing was doing my version of that proud moment, whatever it is. Doesn’t mean I won’t write her a letter. [Laughs.] Why not.
AVC: How would that letter start?
JR: “Dear Angelina. I’m the bald, bespectacled guy.” Probably something I would do, though, because I just want her to know what I was thinking. Neurotic.
AVC: Is there any chance that Dean Pelton will end up in a similar dress?
JR: Not in season three, because that’s already been shot. But I don’t know. That would maybe make us too meta, if our personal lives were inching their way into the world of the show. But who knows? I’ve already worn more revealing dresses than that. And I’ve even made a stance like that when I was in the dean’s sister’s Fourth of July outfit—leg cocked to the side. I feel like you could even look at that Oscar pose as a nod to Dean Pelton


Angelina Jolie Discusses Her Leg

When Angelina Jolie proudly thrust her leg out onstage at the Academy Awards this year, her lower limb galvanized the telecast, inspired a meme (screenplay winner Jim Rash was quick to copy her), and somehow, won all the Oscars. (It was sad when Angelina Jolie's leg took that Academy Award away from a deserving Viola Davis, but there's nothing we can do about that anymore.) The woman attached to the appendage, however, appears unaware of the revolution her leg caused at home, in the Kodak Theater, and in District 11. "I honestly didn't pay attention to it," Jolie told the Huffington Post. "I don't watch those TV shows and if I go online and see something about myself, I don't click on it. And the people I surround myself with don't really talk about that kind of stuff. I heard something, but I didn't pay any attention." So there was no master plan? "It's as simple as a being a woman picking a dress you like and having a night, and not really thinking about anything else," said Jolie, who then leaned forward and seductively purred, "LEG." (We're guessing.)

Angelina Jolie discusses her leg. Her leg remains quiet and mysterious.




Angelina Laughs Off Jokes About Her Right Leg

By KRISTA WICK
March 23, 2012
While it only took a few days to uncover the mystery behind Gwyneth Paltrow's bizarre Oscar cape, nearly a month passed before someone had the guts to ask Angelina Jolie what in the what was going on with her camera-happy right leg at the 2012 Academy Awards.
As expected, Angie laughed off the jokes made about her attention-seeking limb.
Best & Worst Oscars Fashion: Winners & Sinners
"I heard something [about the right leg jokes], but I didn't pay any attention. It's as simple as a being a woman picking a dress you like and having a night, and not really thinking about anything else," Jolie told The Huffington Post.
As for the internet memes spawned by the pose (hilariously deemed Jolie-ing), Angie says she has no time to pay attention to that nonsense.
"The people I surround myself with don't really talk about that kind of stuff," she laughs. "I honestly didn't pay attention to it. You know what I mean? I don't watch those TV shows and if I go online and see something about myself, I don't click on it."
And there you have it.



Angelina Jolie shrugged off Oscar leg jokes

Angelina Jolie doesn't care about your leg jokes

Angelina Jolie's wandering right leg from February's Academy Awards registered with critics and fans, but don't expect those giggles to penetrate her glossy bubble. She didn't really notice.
Jolie says she doesn't pay mind to that kind of chatter, nor does she consume media that would feature such content. And does not surround herself with people who would subscribe to her famous limb's Twitter feed.
"I honestly didn't pay attention to it. You know what I mean? I don't watch those TV shows, and if I go online and see something about myself, I don't click on it. And the people I surround myself with don't really talk about that kind of stuff," she told HuffPo.
"I heard something, but I didn't pay any attention. It's as simple as being a woman picking a dress you like and having a night and not really thinking about anything else."
So perhaps with her dismissal of the silly (but hilarious) pop culture event we close the chapter on her leg and usher it back inside the folds of that black Versace number. But remember, Angie: There's always another carpet.

RELATED:
Angelina Jolie honored at Producers Guild Awards
Diane von Furstenberg: Leave Angelina Jolie and her leg alone
SAG Awards after-party: Brad and Angelina dine, 'The Help' shines

— Matt Donnelly
twitter.com/MattDonnelly

Photo: Angelina Jolie poses on the red carpet at the 69th Annual Golden Globe Awards on Jan. 15. Credit: Chris Pizzello / Associated Press.



QUOTED: Angelina Jolie Laughs Off Those Oscar-Night Leg Jokes

Saturday March 24, 2012 02:40 PM EDT
QUOTED: Angelina Jolie Laughs Off Those Oscar-Night Leg Jokes
Angelina Jolie
RD/Orchon/Retna

"I honestly didn't pay attention to it. You know what I mean? I don't watch those TV shows, and if I go online and see something about myself, I don't click on it. And the people I surround myself with don't really talk about this kind of stuff. I heard something, but I didn't pay any attention. It's as simple as being a woman picking a dress you like and having a night and not really thinking about anything else."

• She's putting her foot down! After her right leg managed to outshine Hollywood's starriest at the 84th Annual Academy Awards, Angelina Jolie, 36, tells The Huffington Post that she isn't hopping on the Angie-bowing bandwagon – or following updates from @AngiesRightLeg on Twitter.
Alison Schwartz

POP BLEND
Author: Mack Rawden
published: 2012-03-24 13:33:31
There may have been plenty of worthy winners and disappointing snubs at the Academy Awards, but the real star of the show turned out to be Angelina Jolie’s leg. For a solid three or four days after the ceremony, people couldn’t stop arguing over whether it was very sexy or frightfully self-indulgent for her to strike a pose prior to presenting the nominees. If one is willing to listen to Angelina Jolie however, the answer is neither.

In a new interview with The Huffington Post, Jolie says there actually wasn’t a whole lot of thought that went into her dress choice or her behavior. She just picked out the black number and went with it without second guesses the night of and without listening to critics afterward. She apparently ignored the hundreds of stories and thousands of opinions because, well, that’s what she always does.
I don't watch those TV shows and if I go online and see something about myself, I don't click on it. And the people I surround myself with don't really talk about that kind of stuff. I heard something, but I didn't pay any attention.

Famous people say they don’t read stories about themselves all of the time. In most cases, I don’t really believe them. Most people are at least a bit narcissistic, but in Jolie’s case, I actually wouldn’t be shocked if this were true. She and husband Brad Pitt actually blocked their own names on the family computers the kids use, and given their long-term A-list status, there’s probably not a whole lot of value in keeping up.


Monday, March 19, 2012

Maleficent + The Leg & HQ Photos


Disney could commission a slightly more modest version of this fan-made image which effectively conveys what Angelina brings to Maleficent -- a big boost to the film's appeal among the coveted male +/-25 yr old demographic.

 
Ya de onde sacó la pose de "piernita pa ajuera" Angelina Jolie cc








Angelina Jolie: The mistress of all evil
Carolyn Robertson
Moms on the Edge

posted: 03/19/2012, 2:19 pm


With 6 young kids at home, actress Angelina Jolie has likely read her fair share of fairy tales over the years. Now the Oscar-winner is set to star in one, taking on the title role in Disney’s upcoming Maleficent.
Based on the story of Sleeping Beauty, the film is said to be a darker take on the tale of the sorceress Maleficent, the self-proclaimed “Mistress of All Evil,” and her unwitting target Princess Aurora (aka Briar Rose).
AJ Maleficent Angelina Jolie: The mistress of all evil
What drew Angelina to the evil role? Her kids, of course. She’s admitted that they’ve urged her to sign on to the film, even calling her “Mom-elicent” around the house.
As for Sleeping Beauty herself, rumor has it that 13-year-old Elle Fanning, younger sister of Dakota, is in talks for the role.
AES 056147 Angelina Jolie: The mistress of all evil

Wednesday, March 7, 2012

Leg bits






CLAIM: Angelina Jolie’s Leg Comes Between Her and Brad Pitt


(GettyImages.com)

Angelina Jolie’s right leg has become one of the most powerful forces in nature since its frequent appearances at last month’s Oscars, and now it’s a central part of the two most persistent tabloid rumors about Jolie – that she’s pregnant, and that she fights constantly with Brad Pitt.
As Gossip Cop reported, some webloids are (absurdly) insisting that Jolie put her leg on full display to distract from her alleged pregnancy.
Now Star magazine claims her “leggy stance” was a source of tension with Pitt.
“They got into a huge argument about it,” a “source” tells the tab, explaining, “Usually Brad isn’t the jealous type, but he wasn’t happy that everyone was focusing on Angelina’s sexy pose.”
According to Star, Pitt effectively shamed Jolie into submission by reminding her that the red carpet really should have been a forum to discuss important matters like his Best Actor nomination.
“The disagreement ended the very next day – when a sheepish Angie admitted she may have gotten a little carried away,” writes the magazine.
Uh-huh.
We’re still waiting to hear about how “sheepish” Star was after wrongly publishing a cover story in January proclaiming that Jolie was heading to rehab.
In any case, sources close to the couple tell us the tabloid’s tale of a Pitt-Jolie fight about her Oscars outfit is “100 percent inaccurate.”


Angelina Jolies Magic Leg Pose At Oscars Totally Unplanned

Posted on Feb 27, 2012 @ 11:00PM  


INF/Pacific Coast News
By Jen Heger - Radar Legal Editor

Just a day after stealing the Oscars with a sexy pose showing off her right leg, A-lister Angelina Jolie was shopping in Beverly Hills with her twins Vivienne and Knox, and RadarOnline.com has learned the impromptu leg show was completely unplanned!

As we previously reported, Jolie made international headlines at Sunday's Oscars, when she struck the now-famous pose while presenting an Academy Award, and an insider tells RadarOnline.com exclusively Jolie was simply vamping it up for the audience -- and oblivious to the controversy.

"Angie was vamping it up, no more, nothing less," the source said. "There was no hidden meaning in what she was doing. The photographers went crazy for her on the red carpet and were screaming for her to 'Show some leg,' and so she did.
PHOTOS: Angelina Jolie Hits The Shops With The Twins & Brad’s Mom
"It was totally unplanned for Angie to do it again when she was presenting, she was having fun, living in the moment, like she always does. She is absolutely oblivious to the controversy and attention the sexy pose has created."
As we previously reported, the Internet has been abuzz following Angelina’s onstage Oscars appearance, as she made sure everyone could see when she flashed her gorgeous leg -- including her partner Brad Pitt, who was sitting in the front row.
The striking provocative pose wasn't the only reason why Jolie was making news, as Angelina's pin thin arms also made headlines.
PHOTOS: Brad Pitt And Angelina Jolie Bring Hollywood Glamor To Berlin
"Yes, Angie is thin. She has a lot going on with the kids, Brad, and work. Angie understands that going to award shows is part of the business, but it's not at the top of her list of favorite things to do. She is relieved that it's now over," the insider said.
In Beverly Hills Monday, little Knox was dressed in a black motorcycle jacket and sweatpants while Vivienne rocked a beige trench coat, white dress and cute pink shoes.
PHOTOS: Oscar Winners Show Off Their Academy Award-Winning Gowns
Not to be outdone, mama Angelina looked super-stylish in a black pant suit and white shirt, with her hair pulled back in a knot and large sunglasses firmly in place. (This time, however, Angelina's arms and legs were covered.)
Also along for the trip was Brad’s mom, Jane.