Showing posts with label Anthony Breznican. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Anthony Breznican. Show all posts

Friday, March 14, 2014











EW


Beware the unloved.

If there is a lesson to be learned about the cruelest among us, it might be that one. Most villains, when you find them in real life, are born from pain, and pour it back on the world to keep from drowning in it. A few are heartless sociopaths who derive their power from persecution, and care about nothing else in the world but their own force of will.

And some are just mad they didn’t get a party invitation.

Consider Disney’s Maleficent in this latter category. Unhinged, and irrational. Or at least, she was.

For all her sophisticated grace and simmering seductiveness, for all the bombastic magic she wields at her razor fingertips, the thing that really grinds her horns, both in the Brothers Grimm folk tale and in 1959’s animated Sleeping Beauty, is not being welcome at the christening of the king’s newborn daughter, Princess Aurora. But she shows up anyway, pet crow in tow, mad enough to curse a baby.

As monstrous motivations go, it’s pretty thin. So credit her enduring appeal mainly to the elegant design of the late Marc Davis, one of Disney’s original “Nine Old Men” animators (who also brought Tinker Bell, Cinderella, and Cruella De Ville to life) and the icy purr of voice actress Eleanor Audley (who previously was Cinderella’s wicked stepmother.) Plus, Maleficent turned into a badass dragon who breathes green fire. Her status as one of the best of Disney’s worst is a triumph of pure style. And maybe her shallow reasoning made her seem a little more evil. She attacked that infant over nothing, man.

But the evolution of folk tales is never complete, and on May 30th a new $200 million, PG-rated version of the Sleeping Beauty story – titled simply Maleficent — will fill in the blanks on that wicked (and wickedly hot) evil fairy, with Angelina Jolie sporting the yellow eyes and ruby smile of the self-declared “Mistress of All Evil.” It turns out, there is a deeper agony at play than a social snub.

“What we wanted to do is not reinvent that character,” says director Robert Stromberg, the Oscar-winning production designer of James Cameron’s Avatar and Tim Burton’s Alice in Wonderland. In other words, this film isn’t trying to show Maleficent was secretly good all along, like the revisionist Wizard of Oz novel and musical Wicked. “Instead, we wanted to try and create layers of that character that you didn’t think existed,” Stromberg tells EW. “There are two sides to every story. This is about examining the other side. And once you ‘ve become dark, how much hard it is to see the light again.”

For his leading villainess, he has Jolie, 38, in perhaps the greatest casting since Danny DeVito played The Penguin (only just a tad sexier.) In the midst of editing Unbroken, the true-life tale of World War II heroism she has directed, she sat down with Entertainment Weekly for lunch on the Universal Studios lot to discuss good girls who go bad, the fun (and heartbreak) of menacing child visitors, and finding something to like about a woman who is loved by no one – maybe not even herself. While preoccupied with evil, Jolie also talked about doing some good in the world, speaking for the first time about the double mastectomy that likely saved her life – and perhaps many others.

ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY:  When word came out you would be playing the role of Maleficent, people said: ‘Oh, she’s perfect for that!” So, is that a compliment or insult?
ANGELINA JOLIE: [Laughs] It is really funny when people say you’d be obvious for a great villain. She was just my favorite as a little girl. I was terrified of her but I was really drawn to her. I loved her. There were some discussions about it before I got the part, and I got a phone call from my brother who said “You got to get your name on the list for this!”

Were you like, “Geez, thanks a lot?” Or did you see it, too?
What’s interesting about her that what I do relate to, and what I think everyone relates to, is she’s not what you assume she is.

But she’s so cruel.
She has a darkness. And how do you make a film about someone who curses a baby and make them relatable? It’s like the worst thing you could possibly do! But I think the script that Linda [Woolverton (The Lion King)] wrote, has quite a deep understanding. The exercise wasn’t how can we have fun with a villain? It was: what turns people evil and vile and aggressive and cruel. What could have possibly happened to her that would get her to that moment in the christening? She wasn’t invited, so she’s pissed off?

Without spoiling anything, there is a betrayal early in her life that involves Sleeping Beauty’s father [District 9’s Sharlto Copely]. So when you say she is relatable, are we meant to have sympathy for this devil?
I think what you hope to do is to make a film that has themes that are sophisticated enough for adults but for the children watching, they can learn and embrace something about being a fighter, about being abused, about what it is you protect –because there’s another side of her. I was reading it, and I actually had moments where I got emotional reading it and that was really surprising to me. It’s about the struggle that people have with their own humanity and what is that that destroys that and kind of makes us die inside.

You’ve got six kids at home. What did they think of their mom as this villain?
I told my kids I was playing Maleficent and they went “She’s so scary!” and I said “Let me tell you the real story but you can’t tell anybody” so I put them in the room and I told them the [film’s] story. So this was my test too, like any parent. And the next day, I heard Shiloh getting into a fight with another kid, defending Maleficent. Saying, “You don’t understand her!” They got into a bit of an argument and I thought that’s the reason to do the film. It’s not just that there’s more to people than meets the eye, but that there’s injustice in the world and children get fired up about injustice. [They] want the character they believe in to get up and fight. And when that character makes mistakes — which Maleficent does, and crosses many lines — you want them to be angry at her and concerned and confused and in the end, somehow understand something that they didn’t know before.

Kids entertainment rarely has much nuance. Usually, characters are either good or bad.
Children have always been told she’s pure evil. And she is evil, but it’s not all she is, and it’s not fair that her story was left there. For kids, it will be like unwrapping a mystery, unwrapping a present, finding out what was really going on. It’s a fun discovery.

What did it feel like to be in her skin?
Maleficent was always so elegant. She always was in control. And to play her was difficult. I worked on my voice a lot. She’s bigger than me. She’s on a different level of performance that I have never done. She’s very still. She’s very sure of herself, but I couldn’t figure out her voice, I kept playing with these different types of British voices, making my voice darker and scarier.

How did you ultimately find the right voice?
I was giving my kids a bath, and I started making up other stories about Maleficent — and they weren’t really paying attention to me, as children often do. You can bore them to death, until I started to mess around with this playful [sing-songy] voice.

Sounds a little Mary Poppins-like.
A little. It gets very, very dark. But it had these colors. My kids started laughing. And that’s how I would rehearse my scenes. I would do it until my kids were somehow smiling or thought that was funny, because you have to do that and go there with her. Then it was really fun; it was actually quite freeing as an artist to do something so completely nuts.

In the animated film, Maleficent curses Princess Aurora by saying she will prick her finger on the spindle of a spinning wheel “and DIE!” But in your version, she says she will prick her finger “and fall into a sleep-like death.” Why the change?
It’s actually more evil. It’s hard to explain. But before, it was a [good] fairy who said she can be woken up by true love’s kiss, now it is me. They gave me that line because she finds [love] the most preposterous, ridiculous bulls–t that doesn’t exist. So, when she says it, it’s a curse on top of a curse. She’s very angry, she’s got a very black heart when it comes to true love in that scene.
Elle Fanning plays grown-up Aurora, and she has a similar exotic appearance to you – only she seems ethereal and light, and you project this intimidating fierceness.
I take that as a high compliment. I think she is magic. You can’t take your eyes off her on screen. I’d like to think that I’m a calm and sweet person. I tend to be very playful at home with my children, but in life … we have to fight our battles. Our work battles, our political battles, our personal battles, and we’re focused. So I tend to be someone who can be very private and in my space, not in any way trying to be rude, that’s just how I walk my way though life. When I’m outside my home, I can be somewhat serious. Elle, the first time we met each other, she ran across the hallway and hugged me and jumped on me and we joked later like it was like being attacked by a thousand cute gorgeous bunnies.

And how did you react?
I was just frozen. I never had someone see me like that. When she sees me, I’m like a mom, a friend, a girl, and she just wants to be another girl. She’s just full of love and happiness and cuteness and belief and sweetness and when I was her age, I was the complete polar opposite — quite dark at that age. So, it’s kind of a perfect match. It’s a part of the film that’s interesting, the struggle to deal with this light and love that she is, because Aurora is so strong in her light that it’s a difficult thing to fight. I adore her.

Your daughter, Vivienne, played the toddler version of Aurora. How did that come about?
We think it’s fun for our kids to have cameos and join us on set, but not to be actors. That’s not our goal for Brad and me at all. I think we would both prefer that they didn’t become actors. But she was 4 at the time and other 3- and 4-year-old [actors] really wouldn’t come near me. Big kids thought I was cool! But little kids really didn’t like me. So, in order to have a child that wants to play with [Maleficent] but I don’t want to play with her — to have that scene– it had to be a child that really liked me and wasn’t afraid of my horns and my eyes and my claws. [Shrugs.] So it had to be Viv.

What was it like freaking out those other kids? Honestly — kinda fun?
I had a friend come with their children, and when I met the kids, the kid froze and screamed so much that I had to go wait in my trailer. When [my son] Pax saw me for the first time, he ran away and got upset — and I thought he was kidding, so I was pretending to chase him until I actually found him crying. I had to take off pieces [of the make-up] in front of him to show him it was all fake and not freak out so much.

What part bothered the kids the most?
It’s the [yellow] eyes that are the most frightening, and the horns. And I do have pointy teeth in the back that you’ll see close up. There’s just something with the horns and the heels, so she’s very big.

Your face is also physically different in the movie. They enhanced your features.
The cheekbones were glued on every morning and her nose is different. She has a stronger nose than me, though it’s subtle. We wanted to take away the things that were softer on my face. I have green and yellow and blue in my eyes so it’s an extreme color of my actually color.

What was it like carrying those massive horns on your head?
It was pretty funny, because I kept on hitting my horns on things, the framing was very strange.

I love the awkward Angelina Jolie!
[Laughs] They were actually kind of heavy. There had to be [lighter weight] ones that you could ride horses in because if you fall with something [heavy] attached to your head, that’s it — it could break your neck. There were softer horns for the fights. The harder ones were magnetic so I could actually clip them off and walk around, but then I looked like a little bear. It did not look half as cool.

So you sacrifice a little coolness for comfort.
Because they were magnetic, I could take them off for lunch or I could just give my neck a break. When they weren’t the magnetic ones, I did almost knock myself out quite a few times. It’s not just that you’re a foot taller on top, you’re also in five-inch heels so you are really big. I was out of whack for a bit. Definitely, it took me a while to become graceful with her.

Two of your other children appear in the christening scene, right?
Yeah, they’re with their teachers. The idea of that day was the prince and princesses from around the world show up for the christening, so there will people of all races, all creeds. It was Pax and his teacher, who is Vietnamese, playing the Vietnamese Queen and Prince and then Zahara and her teacher playing the African or Nubian queen and princess. I love that christening scene so much and of course we’ve watched it at home [in the animated film] as a family. I had to walk by them being very mean. Of course, I wanted to stop and wink at them.

And what did Brad think of costume?
I don’t know! You know, I never asked him. He thinks she’s cool. I loved being Maleficent. I was quite sad to put my staff down and put my horns away because somehow, she just lives in a different world. But I did have to take my staff home to practice walking with it in my cloak, and then I would go outside and scream at the bushes to expand my voice and play with my voice. So, mom was a bit nutso for a period.

You’re a producer on the film too – what was the nature of the reshoots that were done, where The Blind Side‘s John Lee Hancock was brought in to rewrite some of the opening?
I wasn’t a part of the reshoots. I was off preparing for Unbroken. Basically, they wanted to go back and make sure that they clarified certain things with certain characters. But it wasn’t anything to do with [adult] Maleficent because I just couldn’t be there. But my story was quite clear — there were just a lot of other characters in the world itself we have to explain.

Are you ever surprised when you go back and see how the footage came together, featuring all the visual effects?
I’ve had to go in now and look at the magic — it’s a funny thing because my performance is half in the magic, and it’s not something I make. It’s something somebody else makes in an office. So it was a little frustrating. I had to go in for that to talk through it because some of it I wouldn’t understand. ‘Why have you decided that that looks like pixie dust?’ ‘When does the green [mist] appear?’ Or, ‘I intended this, so it should come out of me this way.’ When does [the sorcery] start, you know? Because for me, it doesn’t’ start just when I’m screaming — the magic may be simmering before I start screaming.

I wondered what this movie says about the vilification of women. You know, the double standard – ‘If a guy does it he’s tough; if a woman does it, she’s a bitch?’ Is that part of Maleficent’s story? Is that something you connect to?
I didn’t think about it that way, but I do think that people can read into certain things and I do think that there’s something in me, that … I’d like to be as soft as I am at home with my children, the first thing in the morning, my whole day. I’d like to not be challenged where I have to become hard and strong and fight. I’d like to not be put in situations where I have to get ugly and mean. My mother [Marcheline Bertrand, who died in 2007] was very soft and female and I was always very aware when things would happen and there would be fights with my father [actor Jon Voight]. She kept thinking she needed to get harder to deal with life and I kept saying I didn’t want her to do that — I would rather get hard and I’d rather fight. But it was really important that she stay kind and soft and open and sweet because it’s a horrible thing to have that. Have the world harden you.

It sounds like it hardened you for a while. You said earlier that when you were young, you were darker, more introverted …
Yeah, I got hard when I was — I was hard.

What do you think changed you?
When I got older?

Yeah.
Um … well, when I started to travel and see what other people — I got out of myself and saw how other people struggle in the world.

In your speech at the Academy’s Governors Awards, when you received the Jean Hersholt honorary Oscar for humanitarian work, you mentioned all this. Being changed by your travels to much more desperate places around the globe.
That — and having children. The moment you have a child, in an instant, your life is not for you and your life is completely, 100 percent dedicated to another human being and they will always come first. It changes you forever. It changes your perspective and it gives you a nice purpose and focus. I am disheartened by many things but I wake up, like I woke up this morning, to kids and we talk and we laugh and we play and I’m light again, and I’m a kid again, and I’m loving and soft again because they’ve brought that back in my life.

So you don’t anymore, but does your Maleficent like being evil and dark?
I think you get to a point where you think, please don’t make me angry — please let me be, leave me alone. And then you go through a period of, which we all have as people, you know, feeling hurt and feeling judged and feeling attacked and then there is that moment of: Well, if you’re gonna call me evil, then I’m gonna be evil — and watch how evil.

Self perpetuating.
Sure, like if you decided that’s who I am, then I’ll embrace it and throw it back in your face because that’s the only thing I know how to do. And that’s what happens at the christening — she just completely, fully embraces what she’s become.

As actors, you get to be the target of a lot of criticism. For the choices you make, the relationships you have, the way you look on a red carpet. There’s kind of a hater-culture out there. The public makes people into sweethearts, and then tears them down. Could you relate to that? Is that part of Maleficent, too?
You know, I’ve been in this business for such a long time and I like entertainer people and I love my job but I’m also very, very happy to be home with my kids and I wish everybody well so I don’t really pay attention to — I never know about that stuff, I never read about it, so I don’t really you know, I just — I think if you mean well, you get through everything. If every choice you make comes from an honest place, you’re solid and nothing anybody can say about you can rock you or change your opinion. It doesn’t shake me because I know why I do the things I do and I know I come from a good place and so people can judge me however they wish. But I know I’ll continue to do the best I can and be the best I can.

I think there’s a part of humanity, a part of our society that just likes to hate. There’s a hater culture. We like to make villains. The minute you see somebody successful — whether it’s a famous actor or your best friend who gets a promotion and you don’t. There’s a bitterness out there. We like to make Maleficents, to push people to the outside, because it means we’re not outside.
It feels like memories of how people would behave in high school. Once we grow up and realize how human we all are and how similar we all are and how individually flawed we all are, there’s no time for that, you know? There’s real hate in the world — there’s real violence and there’s real inhumanity. I leave for Lebanon tomorrow, tomorrow morning for the Syrian border, when you see that kind of suffering, when that exists, the more people would just meditate on that, the less time there is for certain kind of petty judgmental hate because there just simply is enough cruelty and ugliness in the world. We really need to try to protect and be better to each other.

We’ve talked about being evil, now let’s talk about something good that you did. Exactly a year ago, you were in the middle of some serious medical procedures – the double mastectomy you chose to have after tests determined you were genetically likely to develop breast cancer. First of all, I’m just wondering — how are you today?
I’m great!

Good? You’re 100 percent?
Yeah! I’m very happy I made the decision. I was very fortunate to have great doctors and very, very fortunate to have a good recovery and have a project like Unbroken to have something to be really focused on, to be getting healthy for, to be able to just get right back to work.

Nobody knew — you could have kept your decision a secret. You got away with it. But in May you wrote that essay for The New York Times, My Medical Choice, revealing the procedure and urging other women to get tested. What kind of reaction have you personally gotten from that?
I feel very, very close — much closer — to other women, and women who are going through the same thing. Wherever I go, usually I run into women and we talk about health issues, women’s issues, breast cancer, ovarian cancer. I’ve talked to men about their daughters’ and wives’ health. It makes me feel closer to other people who deal with the same things and have either lost their parents or are considering surgeries or wondering about their children.

You talked about very intimate things. In the piece you said, “On a personal note, I do not feel any less of a woman. I feel empowered that I made a strong choice that in no way diminishes my femininity.” That’s something patients certainly think about when making those decisions, but it’s not always easy to talk about.
Sure, and I did want to. The reason that I wrote it was to try to communicate and help and connect with other women and other families going through the same thing. And … I was very, very moved by all the support and kindness from so many people.

It makes you embarrassed to talk about that part, doesn’t it?
[Smiles] Yeah, a little bit.

I just imagine you must get mail –
I do, and it’s lovely.

Was all that reaction helpful for you, too? Healing?
There’s still another surgery to have, which I haven’t’ yet. [Jolie is also genetically at risk for ovarian cancer, which is what took her mother’s life at age 56] I’ll, you know, I’ll get advice from all these wonderful people who I’ve been talking to, to get through that next stage.

So you did this to support them, and they’re a support for you too, because you’re still facing your decisions.
Sure, of course — yes!

I think there are a lot of ways every one of us can make small, positive differences in people’s lives, but it’s rare to get a chance to come out and do something on a big scale that a lot of people see, that changes lives. Maybe saves them.
Every one of us has something.

I think sharing your story the way you did was extremely cool. It’s the closest we get in real life to magic, you know? So, nice job. [Extends fist over table.]
[Laughs] Thank you. [Fist bump, with explosion. Laughs.]

You have since directed Unbroken – the story of Louis Zamperini, a street fighter, turned Olympian, who meets Hitler at the 1939 games, and ends up serving in World War II. He crashes in the Pacific, survives being lost at sea, and is placed in a brutal POW camp … The story is inspirational, and true, and almost unbelievable.
I’m drawn to fighters. Strength of will — what we need to pull us through. I don’t know how anybody could not be drawn to that man’s story—it’s just—there’s so much—so many different people pulled something from his story whether it be faith, forgiveness, resilience, athleticism, pure heroics or also, someone who is quite a troubled youth, who didn’t know whether or not he was worth anything, you know?

Before you signed on to Unbroken, there were these rumors circulating that your directorial follow-up to 2011’s In The Land of Blood And Honey would be 50 Shades of Grey. That turned out not to be the case, but how close did that actually come to happening?
I — I was just — [laughs and shakes her head – for a long time. Jolie fully blushes.]

There’s a story here! I can see you almost want to tell it. Do it!
[Laughs, after another long, contemplative pause ... ] I came very clear out of the gate: after Blood and Honey, if I ever directed again, it would have to be a certain kind of film. You know, I’m looking forward to seeing what Sam [Taylor-Johnson] does with 50 Shades and she’s amazing. I — I think they’re just … it’s funny, I think with directing, you just think: I’m better at telling some stories than others but um, who knows?

Both movies you’ve directed are very heavy. Somber dramas about serious subjects.
I think about that, too. The films that I’ve directed are both real stories. Even though the first one I wrote, it was based in history and you have such a responsibility — you have to be very careful of how you balance it. One day it might be fun to direct something where I don’t have to be so careful. I can be completely, completely um … bold and wild and irreverent and dark.

It’s good to know you still have that dark side if you need it.
[Laughs.] I know!



Read the full interview at EW





Friday, March 7, 2014



EW screencaps of digital edition via TeamJolie


Click to view full size















Wednesday, March 5, 2014




ew

Angelina Jolie recounts 'all the kindness' that helped her through her health scare -- EXCLUSIVE


In this week’s cover story, Entertainment Weekly explores Angelina Jolie’s new role as the Disney villain in Maleficent — frightening small children (including her own), and trying to find the human side of someone so evil.
But at the end of our exclusive interview with actress, we also talked about something good she did: coming forward last May in the New York Times op-ed “My Medical Choice” to detail her decision to have a double mastectomy after genetic tests showed she was at risk for breast cancer.
The surprising revelation? The very people she had hoped to help ended up helping her.

ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY: Exactly a year ago, you were in the middle of having your surgeries. I’m just wondering, how are you today?ANGELINA JOLIE: I’m great! I’m very happy I made the decision. I was very fortunate to have great doctors and very, very fortunate to have a good recovery and have a project like Unbroken [the World War II survival story she is directing] to have something to be really focused on, to be getting healthy for, and to be able to just get right back to work.

You could have kept your decision a secret. But you wrote that essay for The New York Times, urging other women to get tested. What kind of reaction have you gotten from that?
I feel very, very close — much closer — to other women, and women who are going through the same thing. Wherever I go, usually I run into women and we talk about health issues, women’s issues, breast cancer, ovarian cancer. I’ve talked to men about their daughters’ and wives’ health. It makes me feel closer to other people who deal with the same things and have either lost their parents or are considering surgeries or wondering about their children. … The reason that I wrote it was to try to communicate and help and connect with other women and other families going through the same thing. And … I was very, very moved by all the support and kindness from so many people.

It makes you embarrassed to talk about that part, doesn’t it?
[Smiles] Yeah, a little bit.

I imagine you must get mail …
I do, and it’s lovely.

Was the reaction helpful for you, personally?
There’s still another surgery to have, which I haven’t yet [Jolie is also genetically at risk for ovarian cancer, which is what took her mother’s life at age 56]. I’ll, you know, I’ll get advice from all these wonderful people who I’ve been talking to, to get through that next stage.

For all these stories and more, pick up the new issue of EW, on stands Friday, March 7.







People

Angelina Jolie: Family Makes Me Feel 'Like a Kid Again'

03/05/2014 at 01:00 PM EST

Though she's facing another surgery (she's at risk for ovarian cancer, from which her mother, Marcheline Bertrand, died in 2007), she's focused on the little joys of her life: her children Maddox, 12, Pax, 10, Zahara, 9, Shiloh, 7, and twins Vivienne and Knox, 5.

"Outside my home I can be somewhat serious," she admits. But with her family, "We laugh and we play, and I'm light again, and I'm a kid again, and I'm loving and soft again because they've brought that back in my life."

Read the rest in People


















When someone says: You would be perfect to play one of the cruelest fantasy villains of all time — is that a compliment or an insult?

In the case of Disney’s Maleficent (out May 30), the whole world pretty much agreed Angelina Jolie should play the black-horned bad-girl. ”It is really funny when people say you’d be obvious for a great villain,” she says with a laugh (not a cackle).

In this week’s issue of Entertainment Weekly, the actress gives her first in-depth interview about Disney’s revisionist take on Sleeping Beauty, which retells the classic folk tale from the wicked point-of-view. “The exercise wasn’t how can we have fun with a villain?” Jolie says. “It was: What turns people evil and vile and aggressive and cruel? What could have possibly happened to her?”

In the wide-ranging conversation, Jolie also discusses Unbroken, the true-life tale of World War II heroism that she directed and is currently editing, and addresses the cancer worries that led her to undergo a preventative double mastectomy last year — penning a New York Times op-ed afterward about the experience, hoping to inspire and encourage others facing such a choice.

“Wherever I go, usually I run into women and we talk about health issues, women’s issues, breast cancer, ovarian cancer. I’ve talked to men about their daughters’ and wives’ health. It makes me feel closer to other people who deal with the same things and have either lost their parents or are considering surgeries or wondering about their children,” she says. “I was very, very moved by all the support and kindness from so many people.”

The new issue also includes EW’s Oscar coverage, with our report on the show behind the show — all the drama that took place just offstage in the wings of the Dolby Theatre as the presenters went on and the winners came off. Plus: ”Burning Questions” from the show, the best and worst of red carpet fashions, and behind-the-scenes shots from rehearsals leading up to the ceremony.

For all these stories and more, pick up the new issue of EW, on stands Friday, March 7.






When Angelina Jolie told her kids she was thinking of playing the live-action version of Sleeping Beauty’s villainess in Maleficent, her six children all had the same response: NO!

“They went, ‘She’s so scary!’” Jolie tells EW this week, in her first in-depth interview about the film (out May 30).

Only Vivienne, one of her and Brad Pitt’s youngest children, proved not to be scared by the intimidating black horns and icy cackle. The now-5-year-old even ended up playing a young version of Princess Aurora in the film (as seen in this exclusive new image). But that casting was done more out of necessity than ambition.

“We think it’s fun for our kids to have cameos and join us on set, but not to be actors. That’s not our goal for Brad and I at all,” Jolie says. “But the other 3- and 4-year-old [performers] wouldn’t come near me. It had to be a child that liked me and wasn’t afraid of my horns and my eyes and my claws. So it had to be Viv.”

To convince her brood of little ones that mom should take the part, the actress says she gathered them together for story time to explain the fantasy film’s take on the self-proclaimed “Mistress of All Evil.” By the time she detailed the character’s new origin, there was definitely sympathy for this devil.

“I said, ‘Let me tell you the real story but you can’t tell anybody,’” she recalls. “So this was my test too, like any parent. The next day, I heard Shiloh getting into a fight with another kid, defending Maleficent, saying, ‘You don’t understand her!’ They got into a bit of an argument and I thought, that’s the reason to do the film.”

It’s not that Maleficent is justified, but this story shows how she became misguided. “When that character makes mistakes — which Maleficent does, and crosses many lines — you want them to be angry at her and concerned and confused and in the end, somehow understand something that they didn’t know before,” Jolie says.

It still took awhile for the older kids to get used to her malevolent new appearance, though.

“When Pax saw me for the first time, he ran away and got upset — and I thought he was kidding, so I was pretending to chase him until I actually found him crying,” Jolie says. “I had to take off pieces [of the makeup] in front of him to show him it was all fake and not freak out so much.”

Eventually they got used to it. Pax and Zahara also turn up as extras in the famous christening scene, when Maleficent appears to place the sleeping curse on the kingdom’s infant princess. “I had to walk by them being very mean,” Jolie says. “Of course, I wanted to stop and wink at them.”


eonline

"We think it's fun for our kids to have cameos and join us on set, but not to be actors," she says. "That's not the goal for Brad and me at all. I think we would both prefer that they didn't become actors."
According to Jolie, it was only out of necessity that she and Brad Pitt put their little girl in the movie. "She was 4 at the time, and other 3- and 4-year-old [actors] really wouldn't come near me. Big kids thought I was cool—but little kids really didn't like me," says the Academy Award winner, who has five more children with Pitt. "So in order to have a child that wants to play with [Maleficent]...it had to be a child that really liked me and wasn't afraid of my horns and my eyes and my claws. So it had to be Viv."
Some of the Jolie-Pitt kids were afraid of the Sleeping Beauty villain, however. "I told my kids I was playing Maleficent, and they went, 'She's so scary!' and I said, 'Let me tell you the real story, but you can't tell anybody.' And I put them in the room and told them the story. So this was my test too, like any parent. And the next day I heard Shiloh getting into a fight with another kid, defending Maleficent. Saying, 'You don't understand her!'"
After witnessing the argument, Jolie felt compelled to take the role. "It's not just that there's more to people than meets the eye, but that there's injustice in the world and children get fired up about injustice. [They] want the character they believe in to get up and fight. And when that character makes mistakes—which Maleficent does—and crosses many lines, you want them to be angry at her and concerned and confused and, in the end, somehow understand something they didn't know before."
Jolie also opens up about what life's been like after getting a preventative double mastectomy in 2013.
"I'm great!" she says. "I'm very happy I made the decision. I was very fortunate to have great doctors and very, very fortunate to have a good recovery and have a project like Unbroken to have something to be really focused on, to be getting healthy for, and to be able to just get right back to work."
...
"I feel very, very close—much closer—to other women, and women who are going through the same thing. Wherever I go, usually I run into women and we talk about health issues, women's issues, breast cancer, ovarian cancer," Jolie tells Entertainment Weekly. "I've talked to men about their daughters' and wives' health. It makes me feel closer to other people who deal with the same things and have either lost their parents or are considering surgeries or wondering about their children."
Jolie adds, "The reason that I wrote it was to try to communicate and help and connect with other women and other families going through the same thing. I was very, very moved by all the support and kindness from so many people."

Read the rest in eonline






Friday, November 16, 2012

Anthony's Oscars



EW's Anthony Breznican, one of the more well-connected, knowledgeable and level-headed of the usually highly excitable group of Oscarologists has launched a new section that analyzes the leading contenders.

Oscar Guide: EW's Prize Fighter on the four-way battle for Best Picture

 




It’s going to be a brutal battle to the finish this Oscar season.

Right now, at least four films have an even chance of claiming the Academy Award for best picture — Ben Affleck’s Argo, Ang Lee’s Life of Pi, Steven Spielberg’s Lincoln and David O. Russell’s Silver Linings Playbook  — with a handful of challengers such as Les Miserables, Zero Dark Thirty, and Django Unchained coming soon.

Today we’re launching EW.com’s Prize Fighter, a new fixture that aims to be the movie-lover’s front-row ticket to the showdown.  Since this is the inaugural post, let’s do a little introduction and then dive into the state-of-the Best Picture race so far.

Prize Fighter’s mission statement is simple:  We’re still going to track who’s up and who’s down in the Oscar race, but the goal is to use Hollywood’s award season as a way to explore why these films are the best of  2012, and tell the stories of their storytellers.
To me, the question “What’s going to win Best Picture?” is more interesting than the eventual answer. Truth be told, I’ve never cared very much about who goes home with a trophy, but I love the Oscars and award season because it’s a fiesty winter-long conversation about the films that get under our skin, into our heads, and make our hearts pump a little faster.

A lot of writers at EW will be contributing to Prize Fighter (and we’re also going to highlight some of the best award-season reporting done by outsiders), but as the chief Oscar correspondent you’ll be hearing from me the most. That’s me, smile-squinting at you from the banner above. (Hi, Grandma!)
After the impeccable Dave Karger departed EW for Fandango, I’ve taken over the Oscar beat. Dave leaves big shoes to fill, and all I can do is try not to scuff them up. I’ve been covering movies for 12 years, and my tastes are as broad as they come: Sundance is my favorite movie marathon of the year, and my personal Top 10 is more likely to follow the Independent Spirit Awards than the Oscars, since I’ve got a thing for underdogs. But I’ve also got a serious cinematic sweet-tooth for big, crazy blockbusters. I can’t resist Marvel superheroes, Star Wars, James Bond movies, and anything with giant, killer robots or aliens. I don’t know if Transformers of the Southern Wild would be a good film, but I would pay money to find out.

My goal with EW’s Prize Fighter is not just to predict winners, though I am out there talking to voters at every opportunity, trying to get an accurate read on where the race stands. I’m eager to expand the awards season conversation at this point to include smaller movies that you should put on your must-see list before making your best-of list.
I also intend to look beyond just the celebrity categories to highlight the work of brilliant “below-the-line” artists – the costume designers, cinematographers, editors, and visual effects and sound supervisors who work behind the camera to bring these stories to life. We’ll also be taking you behind the scenes of the Feb. 24 Academy Awards telecast, with Ted and Family Guy creator Seth MacFarlane hosting for the first time.

If all that interests you, please bookmark EW.com/PrizeFighter and check back with us for all our Oscar coverage.
Right now, here’s some intel on where the Best Picture race stands right now.
In past years, it seems like one movie has run away with the prize early. But this time, it’s shaping up to be a knock-down, drag-out.


I hesitate to rank the contenders from most to least likely at this point because we’re still almost a month-and-a-half away from the close of nominations on Jan. 3. Academy voters have seen a lot already and have a few heavy favorites, but some potential contenders haven’t even begun screening for them yet. (Reporters sometimes get to see rough cuts, but voters always wait for the finished product.)
Based on the voters I’ve talked to, we’re close to a four-way tie between Ben Affleck’s Iran rescue drama Argo, Ang Lee’s mystical Life of Pi, Steven Spielberg’s Lincoln, and David O. Russell’s manic romance Silver Linings Playbook. (See here if you want a run-down of how votes are tallied. And check out Gurus O’ Gold and Gold Derby for aggregate rankings from others.)
If voting were held today I think it would go down like this. Again, this is not my personal preference, but an estimation based on anecdotal sampling of voters. The safe thing would be to make this prediction now and stick with it for the long term, but voters seem to change their minds constantly. I think a lot could change, so I’m going to take a risk on an alternate scenario for how the final ranking could shake out. (More on that later.):

1. Argo
2. Lincoln
3. Silver Linings Playbook
4. Life of Pi

Both Argo and Silver Linings Playbook debuted in September at the Toronto International Film Festival to raves, but Argo has the advantage because it has already opened nationally to solid and enduring box office, is one of the best-reviewed wide releases of the year, and has been out long enough to build into  a consensus choice. It’s a safe bet, so if you ask voters to rank their favorites of the year, it’s usually the first one they say. “Solid” is the word I hear again and again from admiring Argo voters.
The downside to being the early frontrunner is having to maintain that momentum.
Argo is a sure-fire nominee, but Warner Bros. has to walk the line between maintaining its support and not wearing out its welcome. It’s easier for a film like The Artist to cling to front-runner status in a year when there isn’t a lot of major competition, but this season Argo will face an especially strong line-up of heavy-hitter challengers.

Silver Linings Playbook opens in limited release today (expanding wider on Nov. 21), and also has rave reviews on its side, but it remains unclear whether the movie will be embraced by average moviegoers. This story of bi-polar Bradley Cooper’s offbeat romance with an equally unstable Jennifer Lawrence is smaller in scale than Argo and many of its rivals, but the Oscars love to make room for intimate films among the epics.
Those who have seen Silver Linings Playbook love it with the same frantic energy the movie emanates, and that’s a good thing. Radical passion endures. I know a number of voters who are slam-their-hands-on-the-tabletop certain that this movie will not only be nominated, but win. First, it absolutely must connect with moviegoers at the box office, and that is still a question mark.
Its limited debut this weekend will undoubtedly be strong, based on the word-of-mouth already out there, but it will need a solid nationwide expansion to catch the attention of Academy voters who aren’t already sold. If it tanks, or struggles, there are just too many other crowdpleasers with equal acclaim that could roll over it.

Read the rest at EW

Saturday, June 2, 2012

G.I. Joe & tentpoles calendar

As Paramount redeploys 'GI Joe 2' to next spring, is summer the only place for tentpoles?


TheRock-GIJoe

Does a studio need at least one big-budget, summer tentpole film to stay competitive?
Conventional Hollywood wisdom says yes, and when Paramount Pictures decided to shift its upcoming sequel G.I. Joe: Retaliation from June 29 — mere weeks away — to next March, ostensibly for reshoots and a 3-D retrofit that would draw in higher ticket prices, that left only the distribution of DreamWorks Animation’s Madagascar 3 and a Katy Perry concert film to prop up the studio’s summer.

Wall Street and box office analysts say this was an unusual move, but they also agree that abandoning one lucrative season won’t be a problem if they can make it up at a later date. Will it work? Paramount has done it before.

The evolution of that conventional wisdom is that when a studio makes money is no longer as important as if they make it.

“Distributors are starting to look at the year as a 52-week release calendar. Instead of having all the big tentpole blockbusters in the summer competing, now it’s, ‘If we can make it work in March and April, maybe we’ll make more money that way,’” says Phil Contrino, editor of Boxoffice.com. Recent examples include Universal debuting Fast Five in April 2011 and Lionsgate releasing The Hunger Games in March of this year.

Although tentpoles may be migrating to other parts of the year, summer is still prime season. 20th Century Fox just announced sequels to Rise of the Planet of the Apes and X-Men: First Class for summer of 2014, but it also dated Steven Spielberg’s Robopocalypse for April of that year — a shift from its original target in the middle of summer 2013.

More than any other studio, Paramount — whose executives were unavailable for comment — has shown a willingness to make dramatic changes when a planned release date becomes problematic, rather than stay the course toward potential trouble.

shutter-island
Image Credit: Andrew Cooper

Martin Scorsese’s psychological thriller Shutter Island was poised for an award-season bow in October 2009 when Paramount bumped it back to February 2010, just two months before its was to be released. Last-minute postponements always raise questions about the quality of a film, but when it finally did come out, Shutter Island earned $294 million worldwide — usurping The Departed as Scorsese’s biggest box-office hit to date. Although critics were mixed (only 69 percent of critics gave it positive marks on Rotten Tomatoes), the date shift seemed to successfully attract the older moviegoers Paramount needed.

Studios are constantly shuffling release dates, but since Paramount’s gamble with Shutter Island paid off handsomely, executives there have made three other major moves. Hansel and Gretel: Witch Hunters was bumped from March 2012 to January 2013, reportedly to capitalize on Jeremy Renner’s improved star-power after The Avengers and this summer’s The Bourne Legacy. Brad Pitt’s zombie thriller World War Z recently shifted from the holidays of 2012 to the summer of 2013, with several weeks of reshoots set for unspecified changes.

And now comes the G.I. Joe: Retaliation switch, which will allow for reshoots to add more Channing Tatum, who has also seen his marquee value skyrocket after the hits 21 Jump Street and The Vow (with the upcoming stripper film Magic Mike potentially helping even more, instead of competing with it on the same weekend.)

GI Joe will also be post-converted to 3-D, which has proven to be a major moneymaker for studios, since those tickets are sold at a $3 to $5 premium over 2-D screenings. It will also dodge two likely behemoths – The Dark Knight Rises and The Amazing Spider-Man — in a season when the superheroes of The Avengers were a vastly bigger draw than the military warriors of Battleship.
Having a dry summer season may be unusual, and it’s certainly not ideal, but Wall Street isn’t worried about the studio’s long-term prospects.

“It would be atypical for Paramount to largely sit out the summer,” says David Joyce, media analyst for the investment advisory firm Miller Tabak & Co. “Transformers has been one of their huge summer franchises, and Star Trek and G.I. Joe did well for them in the summer. While it’s not an overly crowded tentpole summer for the industry, [Warner Bros.'] The Dark Knight Rises will be big in July, and it’s better for Paramount to take its time, make the G.I. Joe sequel right, and protect the long-term value of the franchise.”

After Sacha Baron Cohen’s The Dictator underperformed in May, Paramount’s summer will consist of distribution fees from DreamWorks Animation’s Madagascar 3: Europe’s Most Wanted (out June 8) and the candy-colored musical documentary Katy Perry: Part of Me (out July 5).

Those movies are unlikely to replicate the mammoth season Paramount had last year, led by the release of Transformers: Dark of the Moon — unless one of Perry’s costume changes is into Optimus Prime. But after the surprise success of The Devil Inside, which Paramount picked up for $1 million and turned into a $101 million global hit, and factoring in that they will collect a percentage of The Avengers as part of the deal that passed Marvel Studios to Disney, the studio isn’t in crisis either.
“It’s not such an orthodoxy as it used to be that you have to have one or two big summer movies,” says Eric Volkman, who wrote about Viacom and Paramount’s slate for the investment analysis firm The Motley Fool. “Maybe Paramount and Viacom lose a little prestige, but in terms of operations and finance and pure business, I think it’s going to do pretty well with this approach, and I think [moving G.I. Joe] was a smart thing for them to do.”

The latter half of the studio’s 2012 slate will bring Tom Cruise’s crime saga Jack Reacher, based on Lee Childs’ series of best-selling novels; Paranormal Activity 4, the latest in the cheap-to-produce moneymakers; Denzel Washington’s airline crash drama Flight, directed by Robert Zemeckis; and the Seth Rogen/Barbra Streisand comedy The Guilt Trip, among others.

Contrino predicts many of those will do well, although there’s unlikely to be a record-breaking blockbuster in the lineup. “It’s a lot of doubles, but nothing is a full-on home run.”

Volkman was more bullish on the rest of Paramount’s 2012 titles. “Some of these smaller movies do have a lot of potential: Name stars, good directors, good writers. And there are a few franchises among them.”

Both analysts believe 2013 will be much brighter for the studio. That’s when Paramount will (of course) have G..I Joe: Retaliation in March, targeting the same period Lionsgate used to make The Hunger Games a hit, J.J. Abrams’ Star Trek 2 on May 17, Pitt’s World War Z on July 21, and a new Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles movie set for the holidays.

transformers

“When people compare Paramount’s 2012 to its 2011, it’s not going to be pretty. But that’s a superficial analysis. It’s very short-sighted to look at previous year and say a studio is failing,” Contrino says. “Paramount should not be judged on one year. They’re still a very strong studio that knows how to pick valuable properties.”

They’ve already put out the call to the Autobots for help. Michael Bay is currently shooting the dark comedy Pain & Gain for the studio, but once he finishes that he’ll begin work on Transformers 4 for 2014.

As for G.I. Joe, which has already spent money on a Super Bowl ad and other marketing, investors will be happier to have Viacom eat that cost and spend some cash on reshoots if it means Paramount can turn the film into a bigger hit in the spring. “All they’re leaving is the ante on the table. In relation to the cost of the movie, it’s not so much,” Volkman says.

In other words, when you’re playing box-office poker, sometimes it’s better to fold than lose even more to the guys in the fancy suits — namely Batman and Spider-Man.

Monday, March 26, 2012

Breznican's EW Interview


The day's most shameless lead: "Angelina Jolie is getting a little horny." (It's about 'Maleficent') 
Angelina Jolie also learns all about trend of 'Angelina Jolie'ing': 
I like that Jolie can admit to just showing off her gams, but also talks in depth abt more serious things. Few do both.




Angelina Jolie on 'Maleficent,' crying her eyes out in Sarajevo, and her Oscar leg-pop -- EXCLUSIVE Q&A


Image Credit: Jason Kempin/Getty Images


Angelina Jolie is getting a little horny.

Okay, okay, okay — forgive that shamelessly provocative intro. We’re just talking about preparations for Jolie’s new role as the devilish Maleficent in an upcoming Disney film. “Wait until you see the horns,” she laughs.

In a wide-ranging interview with EW, Jolie explains why a live-action film focusing on the villainous witch may be good for young viewers.

She also describes her fears (and tears) while bringing her Bosnian War movie In the Land of Blood and Honey, to the people who lived through that conflict. [The film debuts on DVD and Blu-ray tomorrow.]

And of course, she reacts to all the commotion surrounding her infamous leg-pop at the Academy Awards.

“It’s interesting that you just really never know …” Jolie says.

This is her response to the response to her leggy pose at the Oscars, which became a viral phenomenon, inspiring various websites, a Twitter account, and countless imitators (both ironic and sincere.)

the-land-of-blood-and-honey

But that quote might also apply to what she was doing just a week before the Oscars: taking Blood and Honey, the harrowing and heartbreaking war film she wrote and directed, to premiere in Sarajevo, a city that was under siege for four years during the 1992-1995 war.

Before she was sticking her leg out, Jolie was sticking her neck out.

That ethnic conflict claimed the lives of nearly 100,000 in the former Yugoslavia, and emotions are obviously still raw for survivors. Any first-time filmmaker would be nervous facing that audience, but Jolie was particularly on-edge, especially since wild rumors about the story provoked controversy during filming.

“War is so complex, human nature is so complex. There’s no filmmaker who has ever figured it out perfectly,” she tells EW. “We just try to shed a light on one corner of something. And that, hopefully, makes you think of all the other corners you’re unable to see.”

Jolie shot every scene in In the Land of Blood and Honey in both English and BHS, (Bosanski, Hrvatski, Srpski, a.k.a. Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian) the official language of the former Yugoslavia. In theaters, she only released the subtitled version (picking up a Golden Globe nomination for best foreign language film in the process). Tuesday’s DVD and Blu-ray discs will make the English version available for the first time.

Considering all the pressure she felt a week before, it was funny to Jolie when the whole world decided to talk about her gams.

 JOLIE-LEG
Image Credit: Ethan Miller/Getty Images



ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY: Wow, so you caused quite a stir at the Oscars. That’s usually a pretty stuffy affair, but you definitely widened people’s eyes.
ANGELINA JOLIE: [Laughs.] I don’t pay any attention to that stuff. I just heard something as simple as that and thought, well, I don’t know. I do what I feel like doing, but don’t actually consider the effect. I just try to, you know, be as I feel like being on a night like that.

Fashion websites say that pose is becoming a trend. Other actresses and models, like Jennifer Lawrence at The Hunger Games premiere, are wearing dresses with the high slit and posing with their legs out.  So on behalf of guys everywhere, allow me to say, thank you very much.
[Laughs] That’s funny, very funny.

You’ve heard of Tebowing, right? Where people imitate Tim Tebow by getting down on one knee.
Uh-huh, I have.

There are whole websites that popped up where people were striking your pose. That must have caught you by surprise.
What’s funny is when you have no actual, conscious thought of anything [like that]. You just feel like, ‘Eh, I like this dress. I feel comfortable in this one.’ It’s interesting that you just really never know …

You pulled it off much better than Jim Rash [pictured, the best adapted screenplay winner who struck her provocative pose onstage after shepresented him the Oscar.] Did you find what he did funny?
Of course!  [Laughs.] No, I had a great night. It was a really fun night.

 jolie-rash



Just before the Oscars, you came home from the European premieres of In the Land of Blood and Honey. I imagine that must have been pretty emotional. It’s a heavy movie to live with for a couple of years, but you were finally showing it to the people who lived through the Bosnian War.
Yeah, it was more challenging because we knew we’d be going face to face with the region itself. We went to Berlin first, then Sarajevo, then Paris and also Croatia. This whole process has been very nerve-wracking because it’s my first film, and I’m not that confident, but I wanted to do this because I love the subject matter and I wanted to learn. I had these great two years where I learned so much about a region and history and worked with these actors from another part of the world.

Let’s start with how it was received in Paris and Berlin.
It was also difficult for them. They were right next door. So there’s a question of when [the U.S.] got involved, but they were right next door and didn’t get involved. There are a lot of feelings for everybody, deep-seeded guilt in all of us. Nobody walks away feeling good about this time in history. [The film] is supposed to make us look back and question what went wrong.

During filming, you dealt with a lot of false rumors that this was a twisted romance about a rapist. First it was a Bosnian women’s group…
It was the Bosnians at first, but then it switched to the Serbian side later, though not all Serbian people. Both times when things got heated, neither side had seen the film.


And you lost your permits to film until you showed the script to the Bosnian cultural ministry to prove it wasn’t anything like that.
Leading up to it, there were lots of questions on all sides, and lots of speculation. That speculation was causing people to be threatening toward the movie. They didn’t know, and heard rumors, and of course they’re scared and they’re sensitive. The war is still very fresh. We all got caught in the moment of that [controversy], but fortunately it was more of a moment.

When you were finally showing the public at large what the movie was really about, I imagine you felt some relief in addition to nerves.
In Serbia and Croatia, I just walked in with arms open and said I had no ill intentions, so strike as you will. I love Bosnia so much, so emotionally for me, if this was going to be a place I might hurt in some way, or not be welcome in any way, it would have really broken my heart. That’s really hard when you care and have become close to so many people there.



Image Credit: Jolie at Sarajevo premiere — Elvis Barukcic/Getty Images

Where did you show the film?
They wanted to screen it for over 6,000 people in what was the Olympic stadium [used in the 1984 Winter Games]. During the war it became a morgue, so to go back and walk out on stage in front of 6,000 people … You don’t know if they going to throw something at you, or God knows what. I was there with the cast, who are all from different sides of the conflict. But we had a beautiful positive reaction, and then we all broke down and cried.

During the movie?
When we came out after. We didn’t know what we were going to walk out in front of, but it was very, very moving. Then we met with victims from the war after, and basically stayed up until three in the morning crying, with people telling different stories about their experiences. That’s the most beautiful thing that could come out of this, getting people talking again, even if it means sometimes getting people upset. You debate again.

You’ve said you’re writing a script about the war in Afghanistan next. How’s that coming along?
I have been writing something, because I’ve been there a few times — Afghanistan and Pakistan — in the last 11 years, and it’s a part of the world we’re all quite aware of now, but … I’m not sure. I’m going to actually see this weekend what people think of [the script.] But I like it and I’ve enjoyed doing the research.


Image Credit: Everett Collection


What’s next for you as an actor? You were in talks to do a Luc Besson film?
I do hope to work with Luc one day, but we haven’t figured out what that is.  The next thing I’m doing is Maleficent for Disney. I start it in June, and it’s a really great script. I’m having a lot of fun. I’ve already got my horns fitted. My kids are very happy.

In this version, Sleeping Beauty is the nemesis instead of the good guy …?
It’s not anti-princess, but it’s the first time they’re looking at this epic woman.

Is it sympathetic to her, or is she a straight-up villain?
It’s both. I hope in the end you see a woman who is capable of being many things, and just because she protects herself and is aggressive, it doesn’t mean she can’t have other [warmer] qualities. You have to figure out the puzzle of what she is.

So there are some redeeming qualities to Maleficent the witch?
It sounds really crazy to say that there will be something that’s good for young girls in this, because it sounds like you’re saying they should be a villain. [Maleficent] is actually a great person. But she’s not perfect. She’s far from perfect.

There’s a tradition of taking a classic character who is a villain and telling the story from his or her perspective. John Gardner did it with the 1971 novel Grendel, and more recently we got the witch’s story in Gregory Maguire’s Wicked, and the musical it inspired. We like it when the bad guy is deeper than we thought.
In general, it’s a very good message to say, “let’s look at something from the other side.” But then also, what our challenge will be — and the script writer [The Lion King and Alice in Wonderland’s Linda Woolverton] has already cracked it — is not to simplify it, not to just reverse the story but tell a bigger story that doesn’t point the finger [at Princess Aurora] either. It doesn’t flip it.

Since it’s a Disney film, will this version of Maleficent be close to the one we know from their 1959 animated film?
We’re still figuring out the look. We’re experimenting with different things. But the horns are the horns – you can’t deny them. You have to have horns.

Follow @breznican

Friday, March 23, 2012

Breznican teases new interview



Anthony Breznican  

Today I talked to Abraham Lincoln and Maleficent.


Oddly, both have an affinity for Russian directors.