Random Fuzzy
Every time there is an interview appearing in
a foreign language publication, we run into the same problem. Her
answers were in English, translated to French, and now we are translating them back to English. Even with interviews in
English you have to trust that when the Q & A is not
presented verbatim, that the summary accurately captures
their true intended meaning. That is critical especially in a situation like this where they are being purposely vague. When you then place two translations
on top of that, the problem gets magnified thrice over.
I am sure there will be an English interview coming out very soon that will be more enlightening -- where we can see her actual
words and phrasing. (And speaking of which, with less that 2 weeks before release, her usual cover and in-depth interview for Maleficent Mistress of Evil is coming out a bit late. Brad's NY Times interview appeared Sept. 4, over two weeks ahead of Ad Astra's Sept. 20 release.) They've progressed much further since July as manifested by Brad's rings and bracelets. He was
more open in his September NY Times and various later interviews than he
was with GQ in July, and that took place after Angelina's trip to
Paris. It will be interesting to see what she will be willing to say
given that those interviewing her during Maleficent's press day
were told she would not be answering personal questions.
One thing that stands out without need of translation is that she never mentions "divorce." She makes no reference to the filing or the case. She does not
give so much as a hint of the incident on the plane, the children's trauma
or the efforts to restore Brad's relationship with the children.
She
avoided any reference to the divorce case because it
doesn't reflect their true situation. But at the same time she could not yet
reveal what their situation really is, so she referred to them obliquely, euphemistically. She used "the end of my relationship with Brad" to stand for the incident on the plane -- because the incident led to the filing and the filing implies the end of the relationship. "Separation" stands for everything that resulted from that incident. The end thus led to "the beginning of our separation." So when she said "with the
separation, I had to reassess my choices: I find it necessary to be
present with my children and not to be absent constantly" what she meant but couldn't say was: the children needed counseling to help them
recover from the trauma and she needed to stay home with them. And when she said "the circumstances of my separation mean that I had to relocate to Los Angeles, because Brad wants to continue living there" what she was referring to was: Brad
can't be away from L.A. for too long because that's where his therapist, AA meetings, Dr.
Katz, and the mental health
professionals who are guiding the effort to
restore his relationship with the children are based. She also said, "I'd rather travel more often, but it's not compatible today with Brad's work. I'm cooperating." The earlier sentence pertains to why she is based in L.A. instead of "Europe, France, Paris." The latter sentence pertains to why she does not travel more often even though she would like to. It is because Brad needs and wants her by his side and cannot "work" without her, and she places his needs ahead of her own. Both ways, that spells love.
Referring to the immediate aftermath of the plane incident, she said "It was a complicated time. When I didn't recognize myself anymore, when I had become smaller, insignificant." She was the only one who didn't
need counseling or therapy but there was not much she could do to speed up
everyone
else's recovery. She tried to help "bridge the gap" between Brad and the
kids, but the effort still progressed very, very
slowly. In reply to a Twitter question on whether she kept her horns, she said, "I do have my horns and staff. Just for...You know...It'll be that moment, you think: 'Is that going to be me? My kids grow up, they're out of the house, I'm feeling sad, I'm feeling: I wish I were powerful, I'm feeling small.'" She equates feeling powerless with feeling small and that was how she felt when the efforts to reconcile Brad and the children stalled. They had to think of a more creative and drastic way to force the children to open up to Brad, and that led to the May 30 Order and then the Judgement on status.
She said, "I felt a deep and genuine sadness, I was hurt." Going back to Sept. 2016, a "family member" spoke to People right after she filed: “Her family is broken and she is in agony,” the relative says. “Her
children are recovering from the events that brought about the filing of
the divorce.” If she wanted to describe her reaction to Brad's behavior on the plane she would have probably said she was very upset. That she was sad and hurt is her reaction to the family being torn, and while Brad's behavior was the initial event, it was the DCFS who forced them apart and "brought about the filing." She was shielding and protecting Brad in this and all other interviews and so never hinted that it was his problems that put them in this situation. That was left to him.
He essentially turned most of his Ad Astra interviews into a confessional, albeit still guarded. He was penitent and remorseful but without saying exactly what for. He said he
grew up with a definition of masculinity that led him to hide his
weaknesses and vulnerabilities from the children -- hinting that it made his task of reconciling with them more difficult
because they didn't understand what happened to him. He went on to detail his efforts to be "better with the people I love," a better father and husband. That he cleaned up -- he joined AA and "withdrew his drinking privileges," and apologized and made amends
to everyone he needed to.
(He also never mentioned "divorce" -- in response to a direct question he referred to it as "A breakup of a family." They have been consistent from the very start.) He apparently went through a fragile period and that may be why Angelina caters to him. She indicated her support: "I think it is not said
enough how much we need the men in our lives to be strong and capable and the best they can be.” And added "we're all human and very flawed." Just a few days ago she said, "The real truest love pulls out your best self.
It's what you value, what you're loyal to and what you're willing to
fight for."
Related to the topic of her acting, she had said in an interview with Hello also in early July: "I can't be what my family needs me to be while I'm directing -- it takes a lot more time and effort to direct and I look forward to being able to do that again when things are better."
So it is interesting that the L.A. Times wrote after the premiere "Come
the next “Maleficent,” Rønning may be out of a job, as Jolie
told reporters her next ambition is directing, and she’s already begun
to think like a visionary." That may be a sign that things are
already good enough for her to consider her next directing project. And
that this period of separation may be officially over soon.
On the matter of her desire to travel more often, Brad said recently, "We settle in places or get sucked into a place sometimes
because of a job or for family,
speaking of which, my kids have probably eight more years of school to
keep us relatively in one spot." So when all
the kids are in College they should be able to travel more freely. He does not have films lined up at the moment and has said he will
be doing less and less. So he should be free to travel with her wherever
it is she wishes to go before they retire in a mountain somewhere. In this interview she expressed a desire to
live in France (she has also expressed her love for Samlout in the Cardamom mountain region of Cambodia). Miraval -- which they plan to transform into a "leading artistic venue"-- is of course in France, and it is also on a mountain.
-- Fussy
Madame Figaro
(via Microsoft translator)
Angelina Jolie. - It's been a while since I came here, and I miss Paris terribly.
Mrs. Figaro. - Especially since you are a little French by your mother...
Paris
has a I-don't-know-what that does good to the soul. In your city, we
are immediately encouraged to adopt a different, more open, freer
approach... Suddenly, I feel more like a woman. Because my femininity
can vary depending on the context. I have to juggle several statutes:
the actress, the director, the activist, the mother of six children. And
then, the circumstances of my separation mean that I had to relocate to Los Angeles, because Brad wants to continue living there. Europe, France, Paris, it's a whole different life, it's not my daily life, alas...
Is there a hierarchy between all these different roles and activities?
I answer without hesitation that my role as a mother
predominates over everything. In the morning, I wake up, Mom. Today,
tomorrow again and forever, in my opinion. Because once you become a
parent, you belong to other beings, you don't belong to everything. My
whole life and my choices condition the lives of my children. Their
needs and priorities are my priority, and I am very attentive to
anything that might influence or offend them. So I'm a continuous
mother, and it's only when they're in school that I can start my
humanitarian and political work. I call my office, write editorials for
Time magazine and move forward on many administrative issues. Once all
this is over, I can finally devote myself to film.
At the time of the release of the film Unbroken, which
you had directed, you had implied that you were going to give up your
acting career. Is this still relevant?
That was indeed the case at the time. But with the
separation, I had to reassess my choices: I find it necessary to be
present with my children and not to be absent constantly. This is
not a good time to get involved in long-term projects. In a way, being
an actress is easier today, because it's an activity that takes me a
little longer. It's been a while since I've been shooting for the
movies, and it's a great exercise when you're not doing very well,
coming out of a bad patch. Playing a strong character as the evil queen
of Maleficent is a form of therapy. Surprisingly, playing a powerful
character can really help you rebuild when you don't feel at your
best...
Have you rebuilt yourself?
I'm more resilient than before, but it's still a difficult time.
Your image is constantly evolving, you get lost
between all your facets: actress, director, activist, editorialist...
Did you expect to go down such a path?
I feel like I'm living a cyclical story. For this new
Guerlain campaign, I asked the following question: what is expected of
me? And the answer was that they wanted me as I had always been. So
instead of mitigating my "wild" side, it was accentuated. But you know, I
see my life as a path. I'm always looking for freedom, and if I can
sometimes seem bold, it's because I don't really choose caution or measure. I own a house deep in the jungle, and I have never refused to go to conflicting territory.
I work at the UN, I work with the military, I push myself to live
experiences that I feel are necessary for my construction as a human
being. I force myself to do things every day that intimidate me and sometimes frighten me. I have never confined myself to physical or emotional comfort: I seek the test of reality.
Do you think you have a destiny?
I don't really know, but since I have children, the
only thing that worries me is to lead by example, to be honest, to carry
a sincere voice and to guide them in the same way, a path where it is
important to be kind to others, to know how to look at them accurately,
not to hurt them. And to understand that one has one life and that it
is important to fulfill it as usefully as possible. To answer your
question, I do not know what my destiny is made of, but what I am
convinced of is that I am in a period of transition, like a return to the roots, a return to myself. Because I got a little lost...
that is to say?
I think it happened at the end of my relationship with Brad, then the beginning of our separation. It was a complicated time, when I didn't recognize myself anymore, when I had become... how to say... smaller, as insignificant,
even if it was not necessarily seen. I felt a deep and genuine sadness,
I was hurt. On the other hand, it was interesting to return to that
humility and even that insignificance that I felt. Finally, maybe that's
what's human... On top of all this, I have had some health concerns.
All these things settle in you and remind you of how lucky you are to
be alive. This is yet another lesson to pass on to my children: the idea of renewal, and then, above all, a possible return to the joy of life. I have to rediscover joy...
Last year, I attended your master class in Toronto.
You were wearing a long white dress, you were lit by a projector and, at
the end of the conversation, everyone stood up and surrounded you
kindly, in total silence, just to approach you. You looked like a
saint...
(She laughs.) I'm a deeply humanist. I am very touched by
people, by turns tender or upset by what is called the human condition.
I may take this from my mother, who was absolute goodness, grace and
generosity - and that I will never be able to match, even if I try.
Society puts enormous pressure on women by requiring them to combine
femininity and omnipotence. It is not an easy thing. Along the way, life
makes you have to fight, resist, harden. It takes so much effort to regain the sweetness. I see people every day who don't have a gift in life, but I wish us - I hope - to soften in such a violent world.
What do you think of the meToo movement's hegemony in
Hollywood? At times, marketing or political correctness seem to trouble
the party...
I think Hollywood should have launched an
investigation with an outside investigation. That has not been done. It
would have taken a more independent look. I often deal with
international women's affairs and I think a lot of things need to be
reviewed in Hollywood...
Maybe it's up to you to conduct this investigation?
It's not a city I want to focus on...
What does your life look like in Los Angeles?
I'm not really attached to this town. I'd rather travel more often, but it's not compatible today with Brad's work. I'm cooperating.
Maleficent: The Power of Evil, by Joachim Running, with Angelina Jolie, Elle Fanning... Released on October 16.
====
Original
Angelina Jolie. - Cela fait un moment que je ne suis pas venue ici, et Paris me manque terriblement.
Madame Figaro. - D’autant que vous êtes un peu française par votre mère...
Paris possède un je-ne-sais-quoi qui fait du bien à l’âme. Dans votre ville, on est tout de suite encouragé à adopter une autre tournure d’esprit, plus ouverte, plus libre... Soudain, je m’y sens plus femme. Car ma féminité peut varier selon les contextes. Je dois jongler entre plusieurs statuts : l’actrice, la réalisatrice, l’activiste, la mère de six enfants. Et puis, les circonstances de ma séparation font que j’ai dû me réinstaller à Los Angeles, car Brad veut continuer d’y vivre. L’Europe, la France, Paris, c’est une tout autre vie, ce n’est pas mon quotidien, hélas...
Existe-t-il une hiérarchie entre tous ces différents rôles et activités ?
Je vous réponds sans hésitation que mon rôle de mère prédomine sur tout. Le matin, je me réveille maman. Aujourd’hui, demain encore et pour toujours, à mon avis. Car une fois devenu parent, on appartient à d’autres êtres, on ne s’appartient plus tout à fait. Ma vie entière et mes choix conditionnent la vie de mes enfants. Leurs besoins et leurs priorités sont ma priorité, et je suis très attentive à tout ce qui pourrait les influencer ou les heurter. Je suis donc une mère en continu, et c’est seulement lorsqu’ils sont à l’école que je peux commencer mon travail humanitaire et politique. J’appelle mon bureau, j’écris des éditos pour le magazine Time et j’avance sur de nombreux dossiers administratifs. Une fois tout cela terminé, je peux enfin me consacrer au cinéma.
Au moment de la sortie du film Invincible, que vous aviez réalisé, vous aviez sous-entendu que vous alliez abandonner votre carrière d’actrice. Est-ce encore d’actualité ?
C’était effectivement le cas à ce moment-là. Mais avec la séparation, j’ai dû réévaluer mes choix : je trouve nécessaire d’être présente auprès de mes enfants et de ne pas m’absenter constamment. Ce n’est pas le bon moment pour m’engager dans des projets à long terme. D’une certaine façon, être actrice s’avère plus simple aujourd’hui, car c’est une activité qui m’accapare moins longtemps. Cela faisait un certain temps que je n’avais pas tourné pour le cinéma, et c’est un excellent exercice quand on ne va pas très bien, qu’on sort d’une mauvaise passe. Jouer un personnage fort comme la méchante reine de Maléfique est une forme de thérapie. Étonnamment, le fait d’incarner un personnage puissant peut vraiment aider à se reconstruire lorsqu’on ne se sent pas au meilleur de sa forme...
Vous êtes-vous reconstruite ?
Je suis plus résiliente qu’avant, mais ça reste un moment difficile.
Votre image évolue perpétuellement, on s’y perd entre toutes vos facettes : actrice, réalisatrice, militante, éditorialiste... Vous attendiez-vous à parcourir un tel chemin ?
J’ai l’impression de vivre une histoire cyclique. Pour cette nouvelle campagne Guerlain, j’ai posé la question suivante : qu’attend-on de moi ? Et la réponse était qu’on me voulait telle que j’avais toujours été. Donc, au lieu d’atténuer mon côté «sauvage», on l’a accentué. Mais vous savez, j’appréhende ma vie comme un chemin. Je suis toujours en quête de liberté, et si je peux parfois paraître audacieuse, c’est parce que je ne choisis pas vraiment la prudence ou la mesure. Je possède une maison située au fin fond de la jungle, et je n’ai jamais refusé de me rendre sur un territoire en conflit. Je travaille à l’ONU, je collabore avec des militaires, je me pousse à vivre des expériences que j’estime nécessaires à ma construction d’être humain. Je me force à faire tous les jours des choses qui m’intimident et qui parfois me font peur. Je ne me suis jamais cantonnée dans un confort physique ou émotionnel : je recherche l’épreuve du réel.
Pensez-vous avoir un destin ?
Je ne sais pas vraiment, mais depuis que j’ai des enfants, la seule chose qui me préoccupe, c’est de leur montrer l’exemple, de me montrer honnête, de porter une voix sincère et de les guider dans le même chemin, un chemin où il importe de faire preuve de bienveillance pour les autres, de savoir les regarder avec justesse, de ne pas les blesser. Et de comprendre qu’on a une seule vie et qu’il est important de la remplir le plus utilement possible. Pour répondre à votre question, je ne sais pas de quoi est fait mon destin, mais ce dont je suis convaincue, c’est que je suis dans une période de transition, comme un retour aux sources, un retour vers moi-même. Car je m’étais un peu perdue...
C’est-à-dire ?
Je crois que c’est arrivé au moment de la fin de mon couple avec Brad, puis au début de notre séparation. C’était un moment compliqué, où je ne me reconnaissais plus, où j’étais devenue... comment dire... plus petite, comme insignifiante, même si cela ne se voyait pas forcément. J’ai ressenti une profonde et véritable tristesse, j’étais blessée. D’un autre côté, il était intéressant de renouer avec cette humilité et même cette insignifiance que j’ai ressentie. Finalement, voilà peut-être ce qui est humain... En plus de tout cela, j’ai connu quelques soucis de santé. Toutes ces choses s’installent en vous et vous rappellent la chance que vous avez d’être vivante. C’est encore une autre leçon à transmettre à mes enfants : l’idée du renouveau, et puis, surtout, un retour possible à la joie de vivre. Je dois redécouvrir la joie…
L’an dernier, j’ai assisté à votre master class à Toronto. Vous portiez une longue robe blanche, vous étiez éclairée par un projecteur et, à la fin de la conversation, tout le monde s’est levé et vous a encerclée gentiment, dans un silence total, juste pour vous approcher. Vous aviez l’air d’une sainte...
(Elle rit.) Je suis profondément humaniste. Je suis très touchée par les gens, tour à tour attendrie ou bouleversée par ce qu’on appelle la condition humaine. Je tiens peut-être cela de ma mère, qui était la bonté absolue, la grâce et la générosité - et que je ne pourrai jamais égaler, même si j’essaie. La société met une pression folle sur les femmes en exigeant d’elles qu’elles allient féminité et toute-puissance. Ce n’est pas une chose facile. Chemin faisant, la vie fait qu’on se retrouve dans l’obligation de se battre, de résister, de s’endurcir. Il faut autant d’efforts pour retrouver la douceur. Je vois tous les jours des gens à qui la vie ne fait pas de cadeau, mais je nous souhaite - je me souhaite - de nous adoucir dans un monde si violent.
Que pensez-vous de l’hégémonie du mouvement MeToo à Hollywood ? À certains moments, le marketing ou le politiquement correct semblent troubler la fête...
Je pense que Hollywood aurait dû lancer une enquête avec une investigation extérieure. Cela n’a pas été fait. Il aurait fallu un regard plus indépendant. Je m’occupe souvent des affaires féminines internationales et je pense que beaucoup de choses sont à revoir à Hollywood...
C’est peut-être à vous de mener cette enquête ?
Ce n’est pas une ville sur laquelle je souhaite me concentrer...
À quoi ressemble votre vie à Los Angeles ?
Je ne suis pas vraiment attachée à cette ville. Je préférerais voyager plus souvent, mais ce n’est pas compatible aujourd’hui avec le travail de Brad. Je coopère.
Maléfique : le pouvoir du mal, de Joachim Rønning, avec Angelina Jolie, Elle Fanning... Sortie le 16 octobre.
=====
"My questions were how to be more open and more vulnerable.....more appreciateive, I'm certainly with my kids, my parents, the loves in my life. And what were my personal hindrances that were keeping me from being better that or leaving that fully."
Angelina Jolie est un curieux paradoxe. Une star sculpturale, telle qu’en produit l’époque, aussi à l’aise sur les red carpets que sur les tarmacs des aérodromes du Darfour. Une beauté glamour qui inspira autrefois à un George Clooney pince-sans-rire cette phrase immortelle : « Angelina sera toujours la bienvenue à la maison. Brad (Pitt), en revanche, peut rester chez lui. »
Une rescapée des gouffres de la postadolescence (John Voight, son père, génial acteur de Macadam Cowboy, n’était pas le plus équilibré des hommes), qui la conduit sans doute aujourd’hui à s’impliquer auprès des plus désarmés. Pour la voir truster les covers des magazines people, flanquée de ses six enfants en grappe au bras de son prestigieux mari, on en oublierait presque le principal : Angelina Jolie, qui fit ses débuts en short, en marcel et en pilleuse de tombes dans le personnage de Lara Croft (Tomb Raider), a su gagner la confiance de réalisateurs comme Robert De Niro (Raisons d’État), Michael Winterbottom (Un coeur invaincu, sur le meurtre du journaliste américain Daniel Pearl), ou Clint Eastwood (l’Échange, une nomination à l’Oscar – oscar qu’elle reçut d’ailleurs, tout le monde l’a oublié, pour Une vie volée, de James Mangold en 2000).
Ces jours-ci, elle défend à Los Angeles, son premier long-métrage, Au pays du sang et du miel, histoire d’amour ambiguë entre un Serbe et une Bosniaque, pendant le siège de Sarajevo, en plein conflit des Balkans.
Réalisatrice : son nouveau défi
Elle entre dans la pièce de ce palace de Hollywood, superbe et amaigrie, sanglée dans une petite robe noire stricte d’executive woman. Le message subliminal est clair : ici, la star internationale s’efface devant la réalisatrice débutante. Et la réalisatrice débutante devant son impérieux sujet : « Depuis dix ans, explique Angelina Jolie en faisant rouler une petite bouteille d’eau entre ses mains, j’ai eu la chance de travailler sur le terrain avec des membres du Haut Commissariat des Nations Unies pour les réfugiés. Ils m’ont ouvert les yeux sur les plaies du monde. Et permis de côtoyer d’innombrables victimes de guerre. Toutes m’ont tenu à peu près le même discours : combien de conflits aurait-on pu éviter si les forces internationales étaient intervenues en amont ? »À la fois devoir de mémoire et plaidoyer, Au pays du sang et du miel (le nom que donnaient à leur pays aujourd’hui morcelé les ex-Yougoslaves) ne fait l’impasse ni sur la violence ni sur les viols, les Serbes en perpétrèrent des milliers entre 1992 et 1995. La réalisatrice a recruté des acteurs qui avaient vécu sur Sniper Alley (l’artère centrale de Sarajevo d’où Serbes et Bosniaques se canardaient et où les voitures descendaient à tombeau ouvert). Elle a choisi pour décor de vrais camps pénitentiaires.
Résultat : le film retient l’attention outre-Atlantique pour de bonnes raisons. Une plongée dans le plus grand génocide depuis la Seconde Guerre mondiale. Et non pour d’autres motifs plus discutables : c’est du (Angelina) Jolie et donc un objet de curiosité.
Michelle et Barack Obama ont d’ailleurs reçu M. et Mme Pitt dans le bureau ovale de la Maison-Blanche pour évoquer le travail mené par l’actrice contre les atrocités de masse et les violences sexuelles contre les femmes. Fine mouche, la moitié des « Brangelina » adopte un discours officiel et fait profil bas. « Je n’ai jamais programmé de devenir réalisatrice, insiste-t-elle. J’étais dans notre maison du sud de la France (NDLR : une bastide varoise protégée comme Fort Knox) quand un coup de froid m’a contrainte à la quarantaine. Je me suis mise à écrire d’une traite, sans réfléchir. En deux jours, j’avais les grandes lignes de mon scénario. Je l’ai montré à Brad qui m’a dit : “Tu sais, ce n’est pas si mal, chérie.” » Elle sourit et son sourire gomme ce que la remarque pourrait contenir de condescendance. Sur le plateau, la direction d’acteurs et la mise en scène reviennent à Angelina Jolie.
La gestion des enfants, toujours prompts à courir partout, relève du domaine de Brad (il s’improvise aussi photographe). Comme le chanteur Bono qui, pour éviter de se faire taxer d’amateurisme lorsqu’il vint évoquer l’Afrique au G8, prit des cours accélérés de macro-économie à la Banque mondiale et auprès d’éminents spécialistes, l’actrice s’est, bien évidemment, informée sur le conflit bosniaque, soumettant ses comédiens à la question. « Avec Brad, nous avons un accord tacite : mener à bien nos projets chacun notre tour », raconte-t-elle. Le deal dure depuis leur rencontre explosive – ils incarnaient des agents secrets qui avaient pour mission secrète de s’entre-tuer – sur Mr.&Mrs. Smith, de Doug Liman, en 2005.
L’actrice la mieux payée de Hollywood
À l’époque, elle n’est pas tout à fait une inconnue. Le public n’ignore rien de ses relations houleuses avec son père, de ses tentatives d’automutilation, de son premier mariage avec l’acteur Billy Bob Thornton (un siphonné de première), de sa filmographie encore très inégale et de sa légende (elle cultiverait un goût immodéré pour les serpents et les tatouages). Ensemble, Angelina Jolie, la starlette, et Brad Pitt, l’acteur de Seven et d’Entretien avec un vampire, vont devenir invincibles. Ils adoptent des enfants en Afrique ou ailleurs (les paparazzis se livrent une bataille sans nom pour obtenir la photo officielle du premier bébé et de ses parents). Ils tournent des films de plus en plus ambitieux avec le gotha des cinéastes hollywoodiens (la moindre de leurs apparitions électrise le Festival de Cannes). Ils s’engagent dans des projets humanitaires : elle en Afrique ou en Irak, lui dans un programme de reconstruction à La Nouvelle-Orléans après le passage de l’ouragan Katrina. Angelina Jolie évolue avec une facilité déconcertante des premières de films aux camps de réfugiés de Sierra Leone ou d’Afghanistan, de Vanity Fair au board du Council on Foreign Relations – un think tank qui compte Bill Clinton dans ses rangs.Elle troque aussi son aura rock and roll et borderline pour l’image plus consensuelle d’une mère de famille sexy et « hobo chic », qui n’oublie pas pour autant les sans-grades. « It’s payback time », ont coutume de dire les Américains, prompts à ouvrir leur portefeuille et à rendre ce qu’ils ont reçu.
Les « Brangelina » sont de cette trempe. Au cours des dix dernières années, les deux acteurs auraient versé 15 millions de dollars aux causes venant en aide aux indigents.
Une tactique payante sans mauvais jeu de mots. Mais l’actrice la mieux rémunérée de Hollywood – la seule, aussi à pouvoir tenir la dragée haute aux hommes dans des films d’action (cf. son rôle dans Salt, de Phillip Noyce, une Jason Bourne au féminin dans un sous- la Mémoire dans la peau) – ne néglige pas pour autant sa carrière : au dîner des derniers Golden Globes, Angelina Jolie et le réalisateur espagnol Pedro Almodóvar se promettent sur un ton badin de travailler ensemble. L’information est aussitôt reprise par les blogueurs du monde entier. Et elle s’apprête à tourner dans le prochain Luc Besson.
Jolie militante ?
L’actrice prépare aussi son deuxième long-métrage qui se déroulera... en Afghanistan. « Ma famille aurait bien voulu que je choisisse un sujet plus léger, glisse-t-elle, car la préparation d’Au pays du sang et du miel a été plutôt intense. Mais, que voulez-vous, je me trouvais au Pakistan deux semaines avant le 11 septembre 2001 sur le tournage d’Un coeur invaincu, j’ai suivi le retour de plusieurs familles à Kaboul pendant dix ans, j’ai rencontré des soldats américains blessés, en particulier des femmes. Et tout cela est en train de mûrir en moi. » Bref, on ne se refait pas. Alors, qui est vraiment Angelina Jolie ? Une comédienne qui se bonifie, les années aidant ? Une militante sincère prompte à suivre l’exemple d’un George Clooney, désormais appliqué à mettre sa notoriété au service des combats qui lui tiennent à coeur, tout en tournant des longs-métrages sur les remugles de la politique américaine (maccarthysme ou scandales) ? Il y a fort à parier qu’Au pays du sang et du miel, tourné en serbo-croate et au casting peuplé d’inconnus, ne battra pas de records au box-office.Mais Angelina Jolie s’en moque. Elle évolue désormais dans une autre galaxie. Celle de la liste A des acteurs de Hollywood dont la conscience leur dicte que l’engagement vaut encore le coup. Et que notre vieux monde à la dérive mérite qu’on lui sacrifie un peu.
The new challenge of Angelina Jolie
The actress defends her first feature film, "In the land of blood and honey", as a director
By Margaux Destray and Sistine Leon-Dufour
A goddess of the star system and humanitarian pasionaria, this Wonder Woman is also a committed director. In the land of blood and honey, her first film, tells a love story during the war in Bosnia. It is neither silent nor responsibility for atrocities the international community. Meeting with a clear conscience made in Hollywood.
Angelina Jolie is a curious paradox. A statuesque star, such as would be produced at the time, as comfortable on the red carpets on the tarmac of airports in Darfur. A glamorous beauty who inspired George Clooney used to be a tongue-in-cheek the immortal phrase: "Angelina will always be welcome at home. Brad (Pitt), however, may stay home. "A survivor of the chasms of post-adolescence (Jon Voight, her father, a great actor in Midnight Cowboy, was not the most balanced of men), which leads probably to get involved today with more helpless. Truster to view the covers of celebrity magazines, flanked by her six children clustered on the arm of her prestigious husband, you almost forget the main: Angelina Jolie, who made his debut in shorts, in marcel and pilleuse of graves in the character of Lara Croft (Tomb Raider), has earned the trust of directors like Robert De Niro (The Good Shepherd), Michael Winterbottom (A Mighty Heart, about the murder of American journalist Daniel Pearl), or Clint Eastwood (Changeling, an Oscar nomination - she received Oscar for that matter, everyone has forgotten, for Girl, Interrupted, James Mangold in 2000).These days, she stands in Los Angeles, her first feature film, In the land of blood and honey, an ambiguous love story between a Serb and a Bosniak during the siege of Sarajevo in the midst of conflict in the Balkans.
Director: the new challenge
She enters the room of the palace of Hollywood, beautiful and thin, strapped in a little black dress in strict executive woman. The subliminal message is clear: here, the international star fades before the debutante director. And debutante director at her imperious about: "For ten years, says Angelina Jolie rolling a small bottle of water in her hands, "I had the chance to work in the field with members of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. They opened my eyes on the wounds of the world. And allowed to mix with countless victims of war. All have told me pretty much the same speech: how conflicts have been avoided if the international forces intervened upstream? "Both duty to remember and advocacy, the land of blood and honey (the name given to their country now divided the ex-Yugoslavs) does not deadlock on violence nor rape, Serbs perpetrated thousands between 1992 and 1995. The director has recruited players who had lived on Sniper Alley (the central artery of Sarajevo where Serbs and Bosnians are sniping and where the cars down at breakneck speed). She chose a backdrop of real prison camps.Result: the film holds the attention across the Atlantic for good reason. A dive in the greatest genocide since World War II. And not for other reasons more questionable: it's (Angelina) Jolie and therefore an object of curiosity.
Michelle and Barack Obama have also received Mr. and Mrs. Pitt in the Oval Office of the White House to discuss the work done by the actress against mass atrocities and sexual violence against women. Sly, half of "Brangelina" adopt an official speech and a low profile. "I never programmed to become a filmmaker," she insists. "I was in our house in southern France (note: a country house Var protected like Fort Knox) when I had a flu and I was forced to quarantine. I started to write in one go, without thinking. In two days I had the outline of my script. I showed it to Brad who told me: "You know, it's not so bad, honey. '" She smiled her smile and gum that the remark could contain condescension. On the set, directing actors and the staging back to Angelina Jolie.Management of children, always quick to run around, fall within the area of Brad (he also improvised as photographer). As the singer Bono, to avoid being accused of amateurism when he came to discuss Africa at the G8, took a crash course in macroeconomics at the World Bank and with leading experts, the actress is, of course, aware of the Bosnian conflict, subjecting her actors to the question. "With Brad, we have a tacit agreement to carry out our projects each in turn," she says. The deal lasts from their explosive encounter - they embodied secret agents whose mission was secret kill each other - on Mr. & Mrs.. Smith, Doug Liman, in 2005.
The highest paid actress in Hollywood
At the time, she was not quite a stranger. The public knows of her stormy relationship with her father, her attempts at self-mutilation, her 2nd marriage to actor Billy Bob Thornton, her still very uneven filmography and legend (she would cultivate an immoderate taste for snakes and tattoos). Together, Angelina Jolie, the starlet, and Brad Pitt, the actor of Seven and Interview with the Vampire, will become invincible. They adopt children in Africa or elsewhere (the paparazzi waged a battle for the first official photo of the baby and its parents). They make films more and more ambitious with the elite of Hollywood filmmakers (any of their appearances electrifies the Cannes Film Festival). They engage in humanitarian projects in Africa or Iraq, he in a reconstruction program in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. Angelina Jolie is changing with disconcerting ease of the first films to refugee camps in Sierra Leone or Afghanistan, Vanity Fair board at the Council on Foreign Relations - a think tank that counts Bill Clinton among its ranks.She also barters her will rock and roll and borderline for more consensual image of a mother and sexy "hobo chic", which does not neglect those without degrees. "It's payback time," are wont to say the Americans, eager to open their wallets and give back what they received.The "Brangelina" are of this caliber. Over the past decade, the two actors would have paid $ 15 million to causes that assist the needy.Tactics without paying pun. But the highest-paid actress in Hollywood - the only one who can hold a candle to men in action films (see her role in Salt by Phillip Noyce, a Jason Bourne in the feminine in the sub- Bourne) - does not neglect her career: at a panel before the last Golden Globes, Angelina Jolie and Spanish director Pedro Almodóvar promised in a playful tone to work together. The information is taken up by bloggers around the world. And she is about to star in the next Luc Besson.
Pretty militant?
The actress is also preparing his second feature film to be held ... in Afghanistan. "My family would have liked me to choose a lighter subject," she slips, " because the preparation of the land of blood and honey was rather intense. But, what do you, I was in Pakistan two weeks before September 11, 2001, on the set of A Mighty Heart, I followed the return of several families in Kabul for ten years, I met American soldiers injured, especially women. And all this is ripening in me." In short, we never change. So who really is Angelina Jolie? An actress who gets better, helping the years? An outspoken quick to follow the example of George Clooney, now applied to use her fame to the service of fighting close to her heart, while turning feature films on remugles of American politics (McCarthyism or scandals) ? It's a safe bet that in the land of blood and honey, shot in Serbo-Croatian and the cast populated by strangers, will not beat the record at the box office.But Angelina Jolie does not care. She is now moving in another galaxy. That of the A list actors in Hollywood whose conscience tells them that the commitment is still worth the shot. And that our old world adrift deserves a little sacrifice.
