Child Custody Evaluation information is tightly controlled by the January, 2017 Order sealing all custody-related issues and orders. Therefore in their S&O re Limited Disclosure of Child Custody Evaluation Information, they are asking the court to allow the limited disclosure of evaluation info. This means they wish to disclose evaluation results to select parties outside of "the Court herein, the parties, the parties' respective counsel of record, and the parties' respective experts or the Court's appointed experts" to whom all custody-related info is strictly restricted under their seal Order. The DCFS -- which made sure "safeguards are put in place that will allow the children to heal" -- would be one very interested outside party.
They have been having custody evaluations since December, 2016. Dr. Stan Katz filed his declaration with the court as their private custody evaluator in January, 2017 and again in October, 2018, at which time he was listed as an "other" party in the case. The recommendations of the custody evaluator served as the basis of the Judgement on Child Custody and Visitation filed November, 2018, designed "to keep things moving along in the right direction." Their latest S&O suggests that after 3 1/2 years, they may finally have the evaluation results they've been working for and are thus ready to share the info.
There was no court proceeding held. The S&O may have been simply approved and signed into an order by Judge Ouderkirk. The Order would partially unseal Child Custody Evaluation Information to grant the specified outside party/parties access. The last court proceeding was in October 25, 2019 which, in the absence of any other filing, would have been for the extension of the Judge's appointment per the S&O filed Oct. 8. Unlike previous extensions, the hearing took place 2 weeks after the S&O was filed instead of the same day and shows "Held - Order Made" instead of "Granted." In general, the wording of the entries in the Court listing lacks consistency.
03/03/2020 Responsive Declaration (Ex Parte Responsive Declaration to Request for Order *Filed Under Seal* )
Filed by Petitioner
03/03/2020 Stipulation and Order (Limited Disclosure of Child Custody Evaluation Information *Filed Under Seal* )
Filed by Petitioner
A Stipulation is an agreement between the parties, a Stipulation and Order is an agreement to jointly request an Order. Ex Parte is a Latin legal term signifying "on behalf of one party." Very simply, the parties' joint request was filed by one of the parties -- Angelina -- who added her declaration in support.
The Judgement on Child Custody and Visitation was filed Nov. 21, 2018:
11/21/2018 Appearance, Stipulations and Waivers (*Sealed Document* This appearance stipulation and waiver is submitted with and relates only to the judgment on the bifurcated issue of child custody and visitation )
Filed by Respondent
11/21/2018 Notice - Entry of Judgment (*Sealed Document* *Judgment on bifurcated issue of child custody and visitation. Jurisdiction is reserved over termination of marital status and over all financial issues. )
Filed by Respondent
11/21/2018 Judgment - Reserved Issues - Uncontested (*Sealed Document* Jurisdiction is reserved over termination of marital status and financial issues )
Filed by Respondent
Samantha Bley DeJean said in a statement: “A custody arrangement was agreed to weeks ago, and has been signed by both parties and the judge. The agreement, which is based on the recommendations of the child custody evaluator, eliminates the need for a trial. The filing and details of the agreement are confidential to protect the best interests of the children.”
A source close to Jolie said that she “is very pleased to be entering the next stage and relieved with progress for the health of their family.”
A source tells PEOPLE, “It is not permanent but rather a temporary agreement in place, for now, to keep things moving along in the right direction.”
When they filed the Judgement - Status last year, they obtained an Order the same day from the regular court to seal the Judgement and 4 attachments.
04/12/2019 Judgment - Status - only (Sealed Copy )
Filed by Petitioner
04/12/2019 Judgment - Status - only (Per Court order of 4-12-19, attachments to Judgment - Status only are sealed (4 pages).
04/12/2019 Minute Order
04/12/2019 at 1:30 PM in Department 2, Lewis, Thomas Trent, Presiding
Non-Appearance Case Review - Held - Order Made
When the court rejected Brad's ex-parte request for an order to seal records on December 7, 2016, it said "the proposed broad sealing order fails to meet the requirements of the California Rule of Court 2.550." It added that "the Court recognized the privacy rights of the minor children and will be guided by what is in the minor children's best interests." For the Court to agree to seal the Judgement and attachments, they would have had to successfully convince the Court that it was in the children's best interests to do so. That means the Judgement - Status and 4 attachments substantially involve the children. The only statement they gave after the Judgement - Status was: “Both parents are focused on what’s best for the kids."
Stipulation and Order to Seal Records regarding Custody issues (September 2016 draft)
....
9. In accordance with the provisions of California Rules of Court 2.550
et seq., the following portions of the file Marriage of Pitt, Los
Angeles County Superior Court Case No. BD646 058, are ordered sealed and
shall not be disseminated, disclosed, published in any way, or the
substance thereof otherwise communicated in any manner other than the
Court herein, the parties, the parties' respective counsel of record,
and the parties' respective experts or the Court's appointed experts,
whether through informal discovery, formal discovery, and whether
produced by the parties or any third party:
a. Records relating to all child custody issues and orders, including,
without limitation, records relating to the mental and physical health
of either party or the parties and any and all of their minor children;
b. The identity of the parties' minor children, their location,
including without limitation, their places of residence, school and
other activities; and
c. The location of the parties, including, without limitation, their places of residence.
10. Only those documents and pages or, if reasonably practicable,
portions of those documents and pages that contain material relating to
child custody issues shall be placed under seal. All other portions of
each document or page shall be included in the public file.


















































