Showing posts with label reviews. Show all posts
Showing posts with label reviews. Show all posts

Thursday, November 4, 2021


SPOILER WARNING: Do not read until you’ve seen Marvel Studios’ “Eternals,” currently playing in theaters worldwide. Major spoilers are ahead.

NYT What to Know About ‘Eternals’

Who are they? How long have they been here? Where do they fit in the Marvel Cinematic Universe? We have answers.

The Film
Chloé Zhao’s movie (which drops the “The”) makes some key adjustments to Eternals lore: The Celestials are responsible for all intelligent life in the universe, and they created the Deviants to protect humans from predators. The Deviants rebelled, so the Eternals were created to fight the Deviants and help guide humanity in its evolution. Set after the events of “Avengers: Endgame,” the film reveals flashbacks to how the Eternals interacted with humans over the course of history while in the present, they try to stop a cataclysmic event from destroying the Earth.

An idea featured in the original Eternals comic and in the film is that the Eternals are secretly the inspiration for humanity’s greatest myths. Many of the characters have names resembling mythological figures, and in the film, Ikaris (Richard Madden) even says he’s responsible for creating the Icarus story (though he also gets mistaken for another modern mythic figure: Superman).

The Characters and Their Powers
The movie features 10 Eternals, including Ikaris, who can fly and shoot laser beams out of his eyes; Sersi (Gemma Chan), who can transmute matter into other forms; Sprite (Lia McHugh), an eternally adolescent girl who can create illusions; and Thena (Angelina Jolie), a skilled warrior who can conjure weapons out of energy. The leader of the Eternals is Ajak (Salma Hayek), the only one who can communicate with the Celestials. All these characters were introduced in Kirby’s initial run on The Eternals, albeit with some notable differences. Ajak, Sprite and their teammate Makkari (Lauren Ridloff), male characters in the comic, were changed to female for the film. The cast is also more diverse than their characters’ original depictions.

While the Eternals have had a relatively small cultural footprint compared to other Marvel superheroes, they count at least one infamous villain among their ranks: Thanos, who previously menaced the MCU for the last decade, is a mix of Eternal and Deviant in the comics.

Additional Characters
Spoiler alert: The remainder of this article includes revelations about characters that appear in the post-credits scenes of “Eternals.” For those who have seen the film and are curious about who these characters are, read on.

“Eternals” briefly introduces two other notable Marvel characters in its post-credits scenes. Eros (Harry Styles) appears aboard the Eternals’ ship at the end of the film, revealing he is Thanos’s brother. Eros is a fellow Eternal who is mostly known for being a womanizing, carefree party boy. In the comics, he teamed up with various heroes to take down his genocidal brother and joined the Avengers for a time, but he tends to be invested in more worldly pleasures.

Additionally, Dane Whitman (Kit Harington), who previously appeared to be Sersi’s non-superpowered boyfriend, is seen opening a box containing a sword at the end of the film. In the comics, Whitman is a scientist who discovers that his uncle Nathan is secretly a medieval-themed villain known as the Black Knight. On his death bed, Nathan asks Whitman to take up the mantle of the Black Knight and use his weapons and research for good rather than evil. Whitman has been a member of the Avengers, and he most commonly wields a magic sword known as the Ebony Blade.
 

Indiewire ‘Eternals’ Post-Credits Scenes: Chloé Zhao Details How She Crafted an MCU-Changing Surprise

The Marvel Cinematic Universe has never shied away from tossing major narrative bombs into its films after they’ve — quite literally — ended, but Chloé Zhao’s “Eternals” offers a few more twists to the formula. Not only does the Oscar winner’s first Marvel feature conclude with plenty of table-setting for more action to come, it does that within both the film’s primary running time (kinda new!) and in a pair of post-credits scenes (the usual land of all those late-breaking twists).

Zhao’s eons-spanning epic introduces the titular Eternals — essentially, a race of immortal beings who have been (secretly) hanging out on Earth for thousands of years — and sees what happens when their apparent dedication to the safety of Earth’s inhabitants is threatened by a wide variety of forces. That’s the short version, but suffice it to say, it ends with some of the Eternals proving victorious (and some, well, very much not), only strengthening their bond with their Earthly home.

And then Zhao and co-screenwriters Patrick Burleigh, Kaz Firpo, and Ryan Firpo throw all that for a loop, ending the film with the remaining Eternals divided, though still in service to the same idea: to find the rest of their brethren and let them in on some major secrets. It’s an exhilarating end, the kind that sets up plenty of new adventures, but one also steeped in some serious drama (what, audiences will wonder, is going to happen to Sersi, Kingo, and Phastos, who have been swept off the planet to face their very mad maker, Arishem? And what about Thena, Makkari, and Druig, who have headed out in their spaceship to wrestle up the rest of the Eternals?).

It’s plenty to ponder, and Zhao only extends that straight into a pair of post-credits scenes. Zippy, information-packed post-credits sequences are nothing new to the MCU, but Zhao handily combines both fan service and good, old-fashioned bluster to present a pair of scenes that seem poised to change both the MCU and any subsequent “Eternals” features in major ways.

1. The Eternals Get Two New Compatriots
The first scene finds Thena (Angelina Jolie), Makkari (Lauren Ridloff), and Druig (Barry Keoghan) tooling through space in the Eternals’ decidedly slab-shaped spacecraft. All is not well, however, because the trio is worried: They haven’t heard from their earthly pals in weeks and fear the worst. They’re right to! Turns out, Sersi (Gemma Chan), Kingo (Kumail Nanjiani), and Phastos (Brian Tyree Henry) have been whisked off the planet to get a major talking-to from Arishem, their creator and also primary antagonist. That’s where “Eternals” ends, with the trio learning that Earth is about to be tested for their transgressions, kind of a risky move for concluding any massive franchise film.

Help is on the way, both in the form of the space-y Eternals realizing that they need to go back to find the rest of their family, and wait, is that Harry Styles? Yes, yes it is. Meet Pip the Troll (CGI, not Harry Styles) and his best pal, Starfox AKA Eros, AKA Harry Styles. The duo appear on the Eternals’ ship, because they too realize that something bad is happening and that they need to assist their brethren. And they are indeed brethren, as Eros refers to them as his “fellow Eternals” almost immediately.

There’s plenty to unpack here, but it all stems from an original, early idea that Zhao had. “They very much wanted me to pitch to them what I wanted the post-credits to be, so I pitched the idea of Pip the Troll and Eros to Kevin [Feige] a long time ago, just when we started shooting the movie, because I loved the idea of other Eternals existing in the universe,” Zhao told IndieWire. “Once you’ve seen the film, you understand why.”

One important thing to note: Eros is the brother of Thanos (yes, that Thanos), who is also an Eternal. So yes, they are brethren. And yes, Eros knows a thing or two about beating back super-powered bad guys. Zhao dug into that very idea, stretching it out to include the very nature of the Eternals themselves.

“The fact that, in the comics, Eros was on Titan, made me think that if Eros was an Eternal, maybe Titan has similar responsibilities as Earth,” Zhao said. “Could Eros have affected someone like Thanos the way that [former Eternals leader] Ajak [Salma Hayek] has affected earthlings? And what does that mean? On top of that, how did he get away? He’s clearly just chilling.”

Pip and Eros are, in comic book lore, long-time compatriots and pals. They’re also very different, and that’s something Zhao wanted to play up, comparing them to fellow space travelers Han Solo and Chewbacca, offering a decidedly “Star Wars” vibe to the whole thing. And, from the start, Zhao said she could only imagine one human playing the divine Eros.

“The dynamic between Pip and Eros made me think of Han and Chewie,” Zhao said. “I thought they were very dynamic characters. When I went to pitch this, there was only one person I thought could play this, and that was Harry Styles. I saw him in ‘Dunkirk’ and kept tabs on him. I thought he was very interesting visually. So for the post-credits sequence to exist, I needed a yes from Kevin and a yes from Harry, and luckily they both said yes.”

2. Dane Grapples with His Fate
Eros and Pip are not the only new characters introduced in the film’s final moments; they’re not even the only new characters forced to grapple with the weight of their superheroic fates. While details about the film’s post-credits scenes have been floating about the internet world for weeks, one of them is not entirely surprising, if only because a minor character’s name pretty much gives it away from the start, at least to the Marvel faithful.

Early in the film, we meet Dane Whitman (Kit Harington), a good-natured schoolteacher who has been romancing Sersi for some time. Over the course of the film, Dane is privy to plenty of shocking details about the Eternals, and as the film ends, he attempts to share his own major secret with Sersi. But that’s a secret that shouldn’t surprise: “Dane Whitman” is the name of the third incarnation of the Black Knight, a long-time member of the Avengers and a classic superhero in his own right.

Before Sersi is swept up by Arishem, Dane tries to tell her about the weird thing he’s just learned about his own family. Before he can explain, Sersi is gone, leading directly to the final scene, in which Dane wrestles with said secret. While the exact details of this Dane’s fraught family are not dispensed just yet, the general shape of it — it’s a legacy that began in medieval England, a birthright from which Dane can’t hide, and also an excuse to wield a massive sword — is in place in just one scene.

Dane, clearly horrified by Sersi’s disappearance, stands over a large box, eventually cracking the thing open to reveal a massive sword. It’s the Black Ebony, the typical weapon of the Black Knight, and it’s even got a kicky little Latin phrase inscribed on the top of its box: “Mors Lucrum Mihi,” which he translates to “Death is my reward.” But is he actually ready for that? It’s not just the audience thinking that, there’s also a chilling voice asking it aloud. Zhao confirmed to Fandom the voice belongs to none other than Blade, who is coming to the MCU played by Mahershala Ali. Looks like the MCU just got another new hero. And, as a closing title card tells us, “the Eternals will return,” and this time, they’re going to have even more help.

Additional reporting by Eric Kohn.

Uproxx: Chloé Zhao Explains Key Decisions In ‘Eternals’ And Could ‘Star Wars’ Be In Her Future?

There are more than a few things in Chloé Zhao’s Eternals we’ve never really seen before in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Most of the conflict in Eternals comes from within the Eternals themselves. One of the main arguments in the film comes from the Eternals’ primary mission, which is to protect Earth, but only up until a point. After this point, Earth will be destroyed, which will bring millions of new planets and life to existence. Ikaris (Richard Madden) believes the group should finish its mission. Most of the other Eternals, led by Sersi (Gemma Chan), have grown to like Earth and do not like this plan and vow to stop it from happening. (Some possibly minor spoilers ahead.)

But then something truly interesting happens when Kumail Nanjiani‘s character, Kingo, a fan favorite throughout the movie (at least he was at my screening), decides not to fight. He believes they should complete the intended mission, which would sacrifice Earth. But he also will not use violence to defend his position. So, he simply leaves. A scene in the movie that seems like something very personal to Zhao herself. Which, as she confirms, it very much is personal and she doesn’t know what side she’d be on if put in this situation.

Another scene we discussed (which, in reviews, has caused some controversy) is that of Phastos (Brian Tyree Henry), an emotional wreck while lamenting about the part he played with the mass destruction at Hiroshima. It is a very pointed decision for Zhao to use this particular moment in human history and, ahead, she explains why.

And then there’s Star Wars. Before this interview, I was told by a friend of Zhao’s that she’s a huge fan of Star Wars. With emphasis on the word “huge,” while extending the “U” sound. “Huuuuuuuuge.” I, innocently, bring this up to Zhao who, once I did, well, she had that look on her face like, “something might be up and I’m sure as heck not going to tell you about it right now.” Could the Oscar-winning director be interested in helming a Star Wars movie?

A scene I’m curious about, there’s a battle about to start and Kumail Nanjiani’s character, Kingo, says he doesn’t agree with what they are fighting for, but won’t try to stop the rest of the Eternals. This felt like something personal to you. Is there anything to that?

Oh, man. Thank you. First of all, three days of press, thank you, you’re the only person ask me about that.

Really? I thought you’d be like, “This question again?”

I really, really thank you for that, because that is one of my, personally, most important moment in the film. Because we would like to, through this film, the idea to challenge some of the foundations of this genre. We really do feel like we’re entering the revisionist stage of superhero genre – I think at the edge of it. And the idea of black and white morality, the ideas of humans are automatically worth saving, things like that. What does strength look like? And also, the idea that you have to always punch your way through everything. You have to be violent physically to be heroic, as long as you’re on the right side. So we’re trying to have a movie where there isn’t… I mean, obviously, we want Earth to survive, but it’s going to be a tough decision and Kingo is an extremely complex character.

He loves Earth. He’s having a good time.

He loves Earth, but he has strong beliefs, just like Ikaris. He’s no different than Ikaris in terms of his faith for the Celestials and believing in the greater good: The fact that human beings and Earth doesn’t have the right to break out of the natural order. He believes that. However, the big difference between him and Ikaris is that he might believe something personally, but he does not believe that he should hurt other people for his beliefs.

That seems like you saying that, too.

I think if we give humanity the choice, how many of them would choose? I’m curious, because it would be a tough one for me. It would be a tough decision for me, personally. And I think a lot of us might sit this one out. We might be like, “You know what, I’m not going to play God. Maybe we should sometimes humble ourselves and let nature take its course.”

See, that’s the thing I can’t figure out, if you’re on Sersi or Ikaris’s side? I honestly don’t know.

It’s a tough one. And I have friends around me who have different opinions about it and they change. Sometimes they would go, “Actually, today because of what happened in the world, I’m more with this person now.” So, it was a decision, not easy to make. A lot of discussion went into it. We also talked to Kumail about it. It is a brave decision for superhero film character to take.

And you said there were discussions. How serious did those discussions get? Because I could see some difference of opinion there.

Very serious, because we are putting a character at risk, for the audience, a beloved character at risk. Because we have 10 characters, we have to try to do something different, give each of them a different perspective. And I would say this is personal. I think it’s one of the bravest things someone did in this movie is decide not to fight, not to hurt people for their beliefs.

Right. I’ve never seen anything like that before. I’m glad there was something to that.

Thank you. There’s a first sex scene, first this and that, but there is also this first. I’m glad, I’m so happy you recognized it.

When I talk to directors of Marvel movies and ask if they want to do another one, I kind of already know what the answer is going to be, I’m just curious how they’re going to word it. with you, I have no idea. You just won an Oscar. Maybe you’re like, “I’d like to do one and then do something else.”

I’ve been a fan of the MCU, and this process. I loved working with the team at Marvel. So I’ll be back working with them in a heartbeat with the right project. And with Eternals, we really were encouraged to leave everything on the table. Don’t think about the future. Don’t plan everything out. Make the best film we can make. Don’t leave anything. Everything out of my sleeves. It’s all here. So, now in this very moment, this film is more yours than mine.

No, it’s not. It’s yours.

No.

I saw the credits, you’re in them. I’m not in them.

I know, but this is yours, because the film is going to grow with you, with the audiences, and it’s going to find its own identity. It’s out of my hands now. So we will see how things go. And then there’s no need to plan the future until we see this child’s new growth period and how things turned out.

I’m also curious how you picked the eras and places for the flashbacks. Like Hiroshima, a very interesting choice that I feel was a very pointed choice.

Wow. You are really on point. You’re the first person asking me that.

That’s very surprising.

No, it’s very surprising to me as well. I think, again, the weight of it, I think people might even feel uncomfortable asking, because there’s so much. And then that is also a discussion we’ve had many times, and including in post-production, in the edit. Personally, I do think it’s a crime against humanity. It’s not about which side you pick. It’s also a turning point in the psyche of us as a species. And after that moment, we’re never the same again. So for Phastos – who had this big belief and faith and positivity about who we are, of humanity – he believes as long as they advance, advance, advance, advance, they would be perfect. They would be fine. And that was a big wake-up call for him.

And then, from that disappointment, he has to focus on the smallest thing about humanity: not the biggest accomplishment, but the love of a family, the love of a lover, of his husband. And that’s when he can regain our humanity. It’s similar to us today. We turn on the news, we look at the big, clear picture, it could get pretty bleak. But if you go home, you look into the eyes and your parents or your child, your lover, you might regain some faith in humanity. And that’s sort of Phastos’ arc, and why Hiroshima was in the film.

On a lighter note, someone who knows you said you are a huge, and put a bunch of u’s in the word “huge,” Star Wars fan. I did not know that.

[Laughs] It’s true.

You should do one of those. I’d be in for one of those movies too from you.

[Laughs] Would you? I love how you buttered me up with those questions for the first 10 minutes? No, just kidding. No, look, I’ll be lucky if I get to play in the Star Wars universe. But, as you know, again, just like the MCU, the universe is so grand with so many incredible characters. And I think if I ever get the chance, it’s got to be the right story, the right character.

Well, obviously I would have liked to see a take from you in Star Wars anyway. But now knowing that you’re super into it, even more so now.

We did Comic-Con for Eternals, the first time they announced the project. And I went on the stage with this T-shirt and Kevin, first thing he said once I got on stage was, “Tell them what’s this on your T-shirt.” And it was, “I had friends on that Death Star.” It was a very sad Stormtrooper sitting in a chair, crying.

You can contact Mike Ryan directly on Twitter.


Variety How ‘Eternals’ Pulled Off Those Wild Post-Credits Scenes: ‘I Still Can’t Believe It Happened’

The first post-credits scene follows the movie’s cliffhanger ending. After Sersi (Gemma Chan) successfully leads the Eternals to stop the emergence of a Celestial from inside the Earth — which would have obliterated the planet — the lead Celestial, Arishem (David Kaye), arrives on Earth and yanks Sersi, Phastos (Brian Tyree Henry) and Kingo (Kumail Nanjiani) into space. As he looms over the Earth, Arishem announces he’s putting them on trial for the death of a Celestial, and their experiences with humanity will decide whether the planet will ultimately survive. End of movie!

The mid-credits scene opens on the Eternals’ spaceship, where Thena (Angelina Jolie), Makkari (Lauren Ridloff) and Druig (Barry Keoghan) are traveling to find other Eternals to tell them of the Celestial’s deception. Unaware of Arishem’s wrath, they’re worried that they haven’t heard from their compatriots on Earth in weeks.

Suddenly, a small, swirling vortex appears in their ship, and out pops Pip the Troll (voiced by Patton Oswalt), who, with a rhetorical flourish, heralds the impending appearance of Eternal — and brother to Thanos — Eros, a.k.a. Starfox.

Wearing a similar uniform to his fellow Eternals, out steps Eros, as played by music superstar and budding actor Styles, who warns Thena, Makkari and Druig that their friends are in danger — and he knows how to help them.

“The idea of Eros and Harry came to me at the same time,” she said. “It wasn’t like I created this character and I think about different people [to cast].” Zhao says she’s been following Styles’ nascent acting career ever since he made his feature debut in Christopher Nolan’s 2017 World War II epic “Dunkirk,” playing a morally questionable British soldier desperate to escape the invading Nazi army. Given Styles’ willingness to explore less-than-honorable behavior on screen — and his gender-bending music persona as an omnisexual object of desire — Zhao thought the 27-year-old was a perfect fit for Eros, whose ability to stimulate and control the emotions of others makes him the ultimate galactic Lothario.

“Seeing his career, where he’s going, what he’s representing, him as an individual — he’s very interesting, unique,” Zhao said of Styles. “And I thought that is Eros. That’s that character. He just happened to be Thanos’s brother. I had this whole thing made up in my head, what their backstory is. I just was very, very excited when Kevin [went], ‘Let’s do it.'”

According to the filmmaker, it did not take much convincing to get Styles to sign on to the play the role. “I think everyone loves working with Marvel,” she said. “He was game, yeah.”

Zhao shot the scene in one day, with Styles hiding his face in hoodie when he was walking to and from set. “And then to see him come on set and just bring Eros to life, it was great,” she said.

Eros wasn’t the only major new character Zhao introduces in “Eternals” through a post-credits scene, either. When looking for a contemporary love interest for Sersi in the film, Zhao says she gravitated to one of the character’s historic boyfriends in the comics: Dane Whitman, a.k.a. the Black Knight.

“I go, ‘Who’s that? Black Knight? Oh, there’s an actor who’d be great to play that!'” she said.

The actor was Kit Harington, who at the time was just concluding his eight-season run as the sword-wielding warrior Jon Snow on the HBO behemoth “Game of Thrones.” Similarly, Dane Whitman has a rich and complicated history in the Marvel Comics, with a lineage that dates back to the medieval legend of King Arthur and a legacy as the superhuman warrior the Black Knight — whose abilities come from a cursed sword called the Ebony Blade.

None of that, however, is in “Eternals” until the end credits scene. When Harington was approached by producer Nate Moore for the role, he was told upfront that Dane would not play a sizable role in “Eternals” beyond a stand-in for Sersi’s connection to humanity.

“I was a big fan of that character,” Zhao said. “I thought he would be very interesting to have a human character also with his own complicated [history]. You can sense he doesn’t know what’s going on [with the Eternals], but there’s something special about him. It’s fun.”

It’s not until the very end of the film that Dane begins to hint to Sersi about that “something special” — but he’s cut off when Arishem appears and snatches Sersi from the face of the Earth.

Cut to the “Eternals” end credits scene, with Dane warily regarding an ancient looking box that holds an even more ancient looking sword with metal that undulates and whispers as if it’s alive: the Ebony Blade. Dane paces back and forth, trying to psych himself up to pick up the sword — which Marvel comics fans know will bestow him with great power and long life, but at the cost of Dane’s eroding sanity and innate goodness. (Hence the ominous carving on the inside of the box, which Dane reads out as “Death is my reward.”)

Just as Dane is about to touch the Ebony Blade, however, Dane hears someone else in the room, who we hear but never see, say “Sure you’re ready for that, Mr. Whitman?”

As some fans have already surmised, that voice belongs to Mahershala Ali, who Feige announced in 2019 will play Marvel’s favorite half-vampire, Blade, in a reboot of the franchise originally headlined by Wesley Snipes.

“I knew the line that was being said, because it was said out loud and it was in the bit of script that I got,” Harington told Variety the day after the “Eternals” premiere. “I only knew that was Mahershala’s voice just about three weeks ago. Chloé texted me saying that’s what they were doing. It really excited me, hearing that. He’s one of my favorite actors out there at the moment.”

Harington said that he hoped to allude to Dane’s fate as the Black Knight in the scene with how he regarded the Ebony Blade. “Up until that point, all we’ve seen is a really good guy that we hopefully like,” he said. “I like the idea that this thing is not good for him. With that sword, and what I’ve read about it, what I wanted to capture in that moment was this idea of addiction.”

But the actor is loathe to make any pronouncements about the future of the character. Dane and Blade do have a history in the Marvel comics, something Harington said was broached when he was first talking with Marvel about the role.

“I had some inkling that there was going to be a kind of crossover there, from early conversations,” he said.

But if it seems like this scene means Harington will costar with Ali in a “Blade” movie, or that Ali will appear in a “Black Knight” movie, that is going much further than Harington is willing to say out loud.

“I don’t know what the future is, and I have no idea,” he said. “There’s nothing written. Nothing I’ve been told. I haven’t got a clue. Honestly, genuinely. It’s funny, isn’t it? You say these things, and people are like, ‘You do! You know!’ And I have no idea. I’m assuming that that would be the case. But who knows?”

For her part, Zhao is also tight-lipped about her knowledge of where the cliffhanger ending and post-credits scenes in “Eternals” are leading.

“All I can say is it does have a very big repercussion on the future of the MCU,” she said. And what about her future with Marvel Studios?

She smiled. “I would be back working for Marvel if they want me any day.”


NY Times: ‘Eternals’ Review: When Super Franchises Walk the Earth!

A pleasing cast and the director Chloé Zhao, who won a best picture Oscar for “Nomadland,” give Marvel’s latest a steady heartbeat.

By Manohla Dargis
Nov. 4, 2021
Updated 12:29 p.m. ET

Throughout “Eternals,” the latest — though certainly not the last! — from Marvel Studios, you can see the director Chloé Zhao fighting to cut this industrial-strength spectacle down to human size. Her efforts are mostly evident in the sincerity of the performances, and in the heartfelt moments that punctuate the movie, creating pinpricks of warming light. But it’s a titanic struggle. And as Zhao keeps lubricating the machinery with feeling and tears, her efforts seem to mirror the battle that her likable superheroes are waging against a force seeking to thoroughly control their destinies.

Created by the comic-book seer Jack Kirby, the Eternals first swooped onto the page in 1976 (“When Gods Walk the Earth!”) and have been resurrected a few times since. With Marvel bringing the Avengers movie cycle to a close (for now), it was a given that it would dust off another group of potential super-franchisers. To that end, Marvel brought in Zhao (“Nomadland”) to start the engine with a cast culled from across the entertainment world. Angelina Jolie is here, with sad hair and glamour-puss makeup, and so are Gemma Chan, Salma Hayek, Don Lee, Kumail Nanjiani, an indispensable Brian Tyree Henry and two dewy heartthrobs from HBO’s “Game of Thrones.”

Among Kirby’s lesser-known creations, the Eternals are godlike humanoids primarily borrowed from Greek mythology but with oddball spellings: Thena, Ikaris, Sersi and so on. They have an elaborate history and a charge to safeguard humanity. (To judge from the wretched shape we and the planet are in, they haven’t done a very good job.) As a character explains in the movie, they interfere in human conflicts when need be, a role that evokes that of the United Nations Peacekeepers. But since humanity keeps getting attacked by snarling enemies called Deviants, the Eternals keep stepping into the fray, an interventionist habit that more strongly suggests that of the United States.

Written by Zhao with several others, “Eternals” follows the Marvel house style visually and narratively. It’s busy, borderline clotted, and by turns works as a war movie, a romance, a family comedy and a family drama. It’s best categorized, though, as a getting-the-band-back-together flick: A group of former playmates reunite — warily, eagerly — to make music again or, in this case, kick cosmic butt. Unfortunately, the movie spends an inordinate amount of its two-and-a-half hours revisiting the group’s greatest hits, all while the Eternals explain a lot of stuff. The flashbacks interrupt whatever momentum Zhao builds, while the yammer only further muddies an already convoluted story.

As the potential first installment in a new series, the movie serves as an extended meet-and-greet, so it’s heavy on introductions (who are they, what do they do?) that delineate the powers, sensibilities, histories and relationships of the 10 Eternals. It’s a crowded marquee but, as in the Hollywood star system, some lights shine brighter than others. The headliner is Sersi (Chan), a caring, somewhat reluctant champion who’s living in London and dating Jon Snow, a.k.a. Kit Harington’s Dane Whitman, when Deviant trouble roars into that dirty old town. The enemy incursion instigates the reunion and the amusing entrance of Jon Snow’s bro, Robb Stark, a.k.a. Richard Madden, who plays Ikaris. He and Sersi have history; it’s not complicated.

The actors are the movie’s great superpower and give it warmth, even a bit of heat, and a pulse of life that’s never fully quelled by the numerous clamorous action sequences. Henry, Lee and Barry Keoghan (the terrifying kid in “The Killing of a Sacred Deer”) are particularly crucial to keeping your sympathies engaged. Henry’s character, Phastos, is the most vivid, partly because his superhero has an identifiably real side, but primarily because of the actor’s unforced sense of empathy and delicate expressivity. Lee offers some much needed comedy and makes a surprisingly effective foil for Jolie (inspiring visions of a Mr. and Mrs. Eternal spinoff), while Keoghan adds some prickly menace.

Zhao’s three previous features are all modestly scaled dramas about disenfranchised characters whom the commercial mainstream tends to ignore. She likes to engage old forms and new ideas, and is interested in issues of identity and in foundational American virtues like self-reliance. In “The Rider,” the lead character is a Native American who’s a cowboy; “Nomadland” tracks a woman in her 60s who, in the aftermath of the Great Recession, travels the open road. The intimacy of her earlier work, its scope and relative quiet, may have made her seem like an unusual choice for Marvel, but her movies steer clear of overt politics, in the way of most American indies, which makes her a fine fit for a global company that’s interested in alienating exactly no one.

Mostly, Zhao has one of the most important qualifications for this gig: she’s good with actors. For all their special effects and endless brawling, Marvel movies are as character-driven as any Bond movie and they need charismatic performers and appealing personalities to hold their many prefabricated moving parts together. (There’s a reason so many Marvel directors are Sundance Film Festival alumni.) “Eternals” also benefits from Zhao’s feel for natural landscapes and her love for wide open spaces. It doesn’t happen enough, but sometimes, when the movie quiets down, the Eternals and their worlds converge, and the larger questions of existence percolating through this story — why are we here, who am I? — finally resound more strongly than even its branding.






Friday, October 29, 2021

Random Fuzzy

Chloe Zhao is an indisputably talented and knowledgeable director who made the movie she dreamt of making as a fan.  Guided and supported by Kevin Feige, they made a love letter to Jack Kirby whose comics, esp. the eponymous Eternals, are very dense both in design and substance.  They knew from the start it would be a hard sell, not just because these were obscure characters but because they were introducing a new mythology based on Kirby's work that even hard core comics fans didn't take to.  They went further outside the box from the familiar and formulaic of Marvel's past successes, going deeper, broader, and exploring more complex ideas and characters than others had attempted.  It's the reason why their first move was to recruit Angelina.

The cast, who apparently bonded very well, expressed pride in their director, their diversity, their groundbreaking film, and being part of the MCU.  They made a film that's bursting with ambition they all felt proud of.  They would have been a lot happier if it had landed better.

Critical reception is an undeniable part of the discussion but how Eternals scores relative to the other MCU films is less important since they've intentionally tried to shake things up with far less accessible material.  Nevertheless, as Clayton Davis said in Variety, its RT score landing lower than Thor Dark World and Iron Man 2 is baffling.  Greg Ellwood noted that some of the takes on Eternals are nuts.  There are clearly extraneous factors at play, and as Variety commented, the low overall score was not for reasons onscreen.  

I think the key take away for Feige and Zhao, who are used to receiving universal raves, is that their ambitions for the film were fine but they needed to make the delivery of their message easier.  A big part of that is managing audience expectations.  The film has many surprises but some of those didn't have to be a surprise.  The audience could have been better prepped instead of seeing much of what they were led to expect upended.  The story shifts and pivots so it demanded the audience listen carefully to long expositions and take note of the visual details that give important clues.  Superhero movie audiences are not used to having to think a lot about the plot and nothing that was said or shown beforehand prepared them.  Eternals tackles many deep and big ideas -- humanity, love, purpose, family, loyalty, unity, duty, betrayal, guilt, truth and free will among others.  All those ideas in one superhero movie is what sets it apart and makes it more ambitious than the Marvel movies that came before it.  The many twists and surprises and frequent time jumps were a distraction that made the task of following 10 new characters and their complex story more difficult and some who went in expecting a breezy eternals vs. deviants film simply gave up trying.

Angelina said, "There was a final script, but I don't know if it's secrets or also all the individual character development that everybody was doing as it was going along, so you would be surprised by your fellow actors, or some things they added or choice that was made that made something more than you'd expect.  I went into it still not sure what the end was going to be.  I knew what happened to me in the end, but I was surprised at what happened to the other people in the end.  I had no idea.  I had no idea what happened to the other group in the end."  Zhao said,  "We really were encouraged to leave everything on the table. Don’t think about the future. Don’t plan everything out. Make the best film we can make. Don’t leave anything. Everything out of my sleeves. It’s all here."  And indeed it is.  The one year delay in its release may have led Zhao to over think and over stuff it beyond the audience's capacity to appreciate.  Her dense script would make a good novel.

I liked the film more than I expected to.  It has themes and characters that are Shakespearean.  It had Zhao's stunning golden hour landscape shots interspersed with equally beautiful closeups with the camera lingering leisurely.  Its Marvel DNA is evident in the action and the bittersweet resolution but it is never drowning in CGI or overly busy or superfluous action sequences.  It is a very smart film.  A lot of thought was given to every detail and every twist.   It is so dense I am eager to see it again as I am sure there are points I missed.  I think it will age well. 

Angelina lavished praise on the team at Marvel and Marvel promotion has been focused on her from the start.  It's an acknowledgement that she is the big audience draw even if it oversold the size of her role.  Thena is very dynamic and exciting to watch in action mainly because you can see it's really her with minimal reliance on stunt doubles or special effects.  She also has more dramatic heft.  She said she does not want to make a solo film without her eternals family but the next Eternals will undoubtedly have much more of a now functional Thena.  She has plenty of time, the only other future project she referenced having was directing -- Unreasonable Behavior based on Dan McCullin's autobiography with Tom Hardy.

The big question is whether Zhao will direct Eternals 2.  The cast will undoubtedly want her back.  She said she would return to work for Marvel in a heartbeat with the right project -- probably a reference to being given the same freedom to stick to her vision.  Marvel supported her vision for Eternals knowing it was very ambitious and tinkered with audience expectations, and its support hasn't wavered.  Victoria Alonso, Marvel Studios’ president of physical and postproduction, visual effects and animation production recently said, "“We have tried to stir it up and sometimes the critics are not with us. That’s OK. That’s OK. We thank you for being a critic. We thank you for writing about us. And the fans will decide."  Eternals may still make more globally than Shang Chi.  It is less than $100M behind Black Widow after just its 2nd weekend.  Zhao had said, "So we will see how things go.  And then there’s no need to plan the future until we see this child’s new growth period and how things turned out."  Word of mouth is helping the general audience find it.  But Zhao's confidence in her original vision may have been shaken by the hysterically hostile reaction from critics.  The decision on whether to stay the course will probably go all the way up to Disney CEO Bob Chapek.  It will be a measure of how brave and bold they all are willing to be.  




With Everyone Fighting Over ‘Eternals,’ What’s Next for Marvel’s Future?

By Adam B. Vary

“Eternals” was always meant to shake things up.

When Chloé Zhao first met with Marvel Studios about the possibility of directing the film, she was told from the start by the company’s executives that “Eternals” was seen internally as a reset button for the Marvel Cinematic Universe after the conclusive events of 2019’s “Avengers: Endgame.” It would be a way to cleanse the studio’s storytelling palate from the Infinity Saga, and set up the next decade of MCU narrative possibilities. While characters in “Eternals” do mention other Marvel luminaries (Thanos, Iron Man, Steve Rogers etc.), no one from the previous 25 feature films in the MCU makes an appearance — the first time that’s ever happened in the MCU. (Even “Doctor Strange” includes Thor in its post-credits scene.) It’s as close to a clean slate as an MCU movie has ever been.

“This was Marvel’s hope, you know,” Zhao told Variety the day after the film’s world premiere in October. “From the beginning, they told me that this film will explore the origin of the MCU, therefore redefining a lot of things. It will have repercussions to the future of the MCU.”

Divisive critically and less-than-stellar commercially, it’s fair to say that “Eternals” has indeed made quite an impact for Marvel Studios — if not quite like the company intended. But let’s not overstate things: Why else would Marvel hire a filmmaker with as singular a creative vision as Zhao — to tell a story that re-writes no less than the origins of human civilization and the universe itself — if not to shake up what a Marvel movie could be?

On a basic level, “Eternals” does set the stage for a cataclysmic event for the MCU at some point in its future. The Eternals, led by Sersi (Gemma Chan), stop a new Celestial from emerging within the Earth and destroying the entire planet. Arishem (David Kaye), the lead Celestial, subsequently appears looming over the Earth, pulls Sersi, Phastos (Brian Tyree Henry) and Kingo (Kumail Nanjiani) into space, and announces that he will judge the fate of the entire planet on their experiences with humanity.

One would expect that, say, Bruce Banner, Doctor Strange, and the leaders of Wakanda will have some opinions about the giant, petrified corpse of a Celestial poking out of the Indian Ocean, let alone a planet-sized god suddenly zapping into orbit and then just as suddenly zapping away. It’s unclear whether Arishem’s threat to destroy the Earth was heard only by the Eternals or the entire planet, but either way, that’s the kind of high-stakes storytelling the MCU thrives on.

But “Eternals” — as a film and as a critical and social media lightning rod — poses an even more intriguing and existential question about the future of the MCU: How will its titles tell those stories?

Since its earliest days, Marvel Studios has earned a reputation, fairly or not, for sanding down its filmmakers’ singular voices to fit inside its cohesive cinematic universe, typified by the lasting sting of Martin Scorsese’s pronouncements in 2019 that Marvel movies are not cinema. It’s true that other filmmakers — especially James Gunn (with the two “Guardians of the Galaxy” movies) and Taika Waititi (with “Thor: Ragnarok”) — have brought more idiosyncratic filmmaking voices to the MCU. But “Eternals” feels like an active rebuke against Marvel’s image as a superhero factory. The studio hired Zhao specifically so she would infuse “Eternals” with an aesthetic and narrative sensibility that stood apart from the rest of the studio’s output to date.

“It’s sort of a National Geographic approach,” Zhao told Variety. “It doesn’t do this crazy thing. It’s just shows you what it is, and then you immerse.” This appears to have been a happy collaboration; Marvel Studios chief Kevin Feige even half-joked to Variety in April that he hoped to be talking up “Eternals” as an Oscar contender following Zhao’s best picture and director wins for “Nomadland.”

Feige can probably keep his tuxedo in storage: Fans and critics alike have found “Eternals” to be an uneasy, even off-putting mix — not quite the MCU, not quite Zhao — and have had no problem expressing their displeasure all over the internet. The reaction has effectively called out Marvel for doing the thing everyone seemed to want them to do: Give an A-list filmmaker greater leeway to make an MCU movie their way.

So will Marvel do it again? The company’s slate is already scheduled for the next two years, from Waititi’s “Thor: Love and Thunder” (due July 2022), which just wrapped, to Peyton Reed’s “Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania” (due July 2023) which is already in production. So any fallout from “Eternals” won’t be evident until the fall of 2023 — and whomever is announced to direct Marvel’s (as yet unannounced) next slate of movies.

It’s also worth underlining that, one, Marvel wanted “Eternals” to be different, and two, Marvel chose “Eternals” as the film to be different. Created by Jack Kirby in a limited run in the 1970s, “The Eternals” was never central to the great Marvel comics narrative. Sure, the title’s origin story for the universe has reverberated throughout the Marvel canon, but as a limited, carved-out narrative many comics fans were free to outright ignore. And, again, Zhao knew this going in.

“We get to really play and make a standalone movie, which I think is a tribute to Jack Kirby,” she said in October. “If you think about Jack Kirby’s ‘Eternals’ run, it was created very much on the periphery of these really popular characters. He was telling stories about something so much bigger through this little group of outcasts.”

Just compare “Eternals” to the next film in the MCU: “Spider-Man: No Way Home.” Debuting in just over a month, “No Way Home” is widely expected to be the highest-grossing film of the year, and the first pandemic-era release to open with over $100 million domestically. Co-produced with Sony Pictures, “No Way Home” also promises to remake not just the MCU, but Sony’s growing suite of Marvel adaptations by unleashing the looser narrative constraints of the multiverse. In fact, no matter how “Eternals” changes the MCU, the multiverse — introduced by the recent Disney Plus series “Loki” and “What If…?” — already has, by opening up an infinite number of possible strands to explore, and paving the way for versions of Tom Holland’s Peter Parker to exist within the MCU and Sony’s separate Marvel-verse.

Also, not to put too fine a point on this, but while Jon Watts has proven to be a lively director of Holland’s “Spider-Man” films, his previous output — including the indie films “Clown” and “Cop Car,” and video shorts for the Onion — had not established him as a unique cinematic voice. If anything, Watts is far more of what most Marvel Studios observers think of when they talk about Marvel’s “house style”: a highly effective and competent craftsperson who disappears into their movies.

Not coincidentally, since his inception in 1962, Spider-Man has lived at Marvel’s very center, so it would stand to reason that Marvel and Sony wouldn’t want to take a big, risky swing with such a valuable character.

And yet, Sony did just that with 2002’s “Spider-Man,” directed by Sam Raimi. A horror auteur with an unmistakable style honed over years as a no-budget indie filmmaker, Raimi brought his sensibility whole cloth to “Spider-Man” and its 2004 sequel, which is still widely considered one of the best comic book movies ever made. By 2007’s bloated “Spider-Man 3,” however, studio demands and commercial considerations had drained away much of Raimi’s voice. The movie made more money than any Spidey film before it ($895 million), but it was widely derided as an embarrassment, and Raimi left the franchise. That prompted the reboot with Andrew Garfield and director Marc Webb, which suffered from the same sense of bloat and creative anonymity, which ultimately drove Sony to its unprecedented partnership to make Spider-Man movies with Marvel Studios.

Meanwhile, Marvel Studios’ follow-up to “Spider-Man: No Way Home” — “Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness” — is directed by, yes, Sam Raimi. Much like with Chloé Zhao, it’s hard to imagine why Marvel would hire Raimi and not want him to do his thing. We’ll know soon enough; the film has wrapped and is currently scheduled to debut in May 2022.



Uproxx: Chloé Zhao Explains Key Decisions In ‘Eternals’ And Could ‘Star Wars’ Be In Her Future?

There are more than a few things in Chloé Zhao’s Eternals we’ve never really seen before in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Most of the conflict in Eternals comes from within the Eternals themselves. One of the main arguments in the film comes from the Eternals’ primary mission, which is to protect Earth, but only up until a point. After this point, Earth will be destroyed, which will bring millions of new planets and life to existence. Ikaris (Richard Madden) believes the group should finish its mission. Most of the other Eternals, led by Sersi (Gemma Chan), have grown to like Earth and do not like this plan and vow to stop it from happening. (Some possibly minor spoilers ahead.)

But then something truly interesting happens when Kumail Nanjiani‘s character, Kingo, a fan favorite throughout the movie (at least he was at my screening), decides not to fight. He believes they should complete the intended mission, which would sacrifice Earth. But he also will not use violence to defend his position. So, he simply leaves. A scene in the movie that seems like something very personal to Zhao herself. Which, as she confirms, it very much is personal and she doesn’t know what side she’d be on if put in this situation.

Another scene we discussed (which, in reviews, has caused some controversy) is that of Phastos (Brian Tyree Henry), an emotional wreck while lamenting about the part he played with the mass destruction at Hiroshima. It is a very pointed decision for Zhao to use this particular moment in human history and, ahead, she explains why.

And then there’s Star Wars. Before this interview, I was told by a friend of Zhao’s that she’s a huge fan of Star Wars. With emphasis on the word “huge,” while extending the “U” sound. “Huuuuuuuuge.” I, innocently, bring this up to Zhao who, once I did, well, she had that look on her face like, “something might be up and I’m sure as heck not going to tell you about it right now.” Could the Oscar-winning director be interested in helming a Star Wars movie?

A scene I’m curious about, there’s a battle about to start and Kumail Nanjiani’s character, Kingo, says he doesn’t agree with what they are fighting for, but won’t try to stop the rest of the Eternals. This felt like something personal to you. Is there anything to that?

Oh, man. Thank you. First of all, three days of press, thank you, you’re the only person ask me about that.

Really? I thought you’d be like, “This question again?”

I really, really thank you for that, because that is one of my, personally, most important moment in the film. Because we would like to, through this film, the idea to challenge some of the foundations of this genre. We really do feel like we’re entering the revisionist stage of superhero genre – I think at the edge of it. And the idea of black and white morality, the ideas of humans are automatically worth saving, things like that. What does strength look like? And also, the idea that you have to always punch your way through everything. You have to be violent physically to be heroic, as long as you’re on the right side. So we’re trying to have a movie where there isn’t… I mean, obviously, we want Earth to survive, but it’s going to be a tough decision and Kingo is an extremely complex character.

He loves Earth. He’s having a good time.

He loves Earth, but he has strong beliefs, just like Ikaris. He’s no different than Ikaris in terms of his faith for the Celestials and believing in the greater good: The fact that human beings and Earth doesn’t have the right to break out of the natural order. He believes that. However, the big difference between him and Ikaris is that he might believe something personally, but he does not believe that he should hurt other people for his beliefs.

That seems like you saying that, too.

I think if we give humanity the choice, how many of them would choose? I’m curious, because it would be a tough one for me. It would be a tough decision for me, personally. And I think a lot of us might sit this one out. We might be like, “You know what, I’m not going to play God. Maybe we should sometimes humble ourselves and let nature take its course.”

See, that’s the thing I can’t figure out, if you’re on Sersi or Ikaris’s side? I honestly don’t know.

It’s a tough one. And I have friends around me who have different opinions about it and they change. Sometimes they would go, “Actually, today because of what happened in the world, I’m more with this person now.” So, it was a decision, not easy to make. A lot of discussion went into it. We also talked to Kumail about it. It is a brave decision for superhero film character to take.

And you said there were discussions. How serious did those discussions get? Because I could see some difference of opinion there.

Very serious, because we are putting a character at risk, for the audience, a beloved character at risk. Because we have 10 characters, we have to try to do something different, give each of them a different perspective. And I would say this is personal. I think it’s one of the bravest things someone did in this movie is decide not to fight, not to hurt people for their beliefs.

Right. I’ve never seen anything like that before. I’m glad there was something to that.

Thank you. There’s a first sex scene, first this and that, but there is also this first. I’m glad, I’m so happy you recognized it.

When I talk to directors of Marvel movies and ask if they want to do another one, I kind of already know what the answer is going to be, I’m just curious how they’re going to word it. with you, I have no idea. You just won an Oscar. Maybe you’re like, “I’d like to do one and then do something else.”

I’ve been a fan of the MCU, and this process. I loved working with the team at Marvel. So I’ll be back working with them in a heartbeat with the right project. And with Eternals, we really were encouraged to leave everything on the table. Don’t think about the future. Don’t plan everything out. Make the best film we can make. Don’t leave anything. Everything out of my sleeves. It’s all here. So, now in this very moment, this film is more yours than mine.

No, it’s not. It’s yours.

No.

I saw the credits, you’re in them. I’m not in them.

I know, but this is yours, because the film is going to grow with you, with the audiences, and it’s going to find its own identity. It’s out of my hands now. So we will see how things go. And then there’s no need to plan the future until we see this child’s new growth period and how things turned out.

I’m also curious how you picked the eras and places for the flashbacks. Like Hiroshima, a very interesting choice that I feel was a very pointed choice.

Wow. You are really on point. You’re the first person asking me that.

That’s very surprising.

No, it’s very surprising to me as well. I think, again, the weight of it, I think people might even feel uncomfortable asking, because there’s so much. And then that is also a discussion we’ve had many times, and including in post-production, in the edit. Personally, I do think it’s a crime against humanity. It’s not about which side you pick. It’s also a turning point in the psyche of us as a species. And after that moment, we’re never the same again. So for Phastos – who had this big belief and faith and positivity about who we are, of humanity – he believes as long as they advance, advance, advance, advance, they would be perfect. They would be fine. And that was a big wake-up call for him.

And then, from that disappointment, he has to focus on the smallest thing about humanity: not the biggest accomplishment, but the love of a family, the love of a lover, of his husband. And that’s when he can regain our humanity. It’s similar to us today. We turn on the news, we look at the big, clear picture, it could get pretty bleak. But if you go home, you look into the eyes and your parents or your child, your lover, you might regain some faith in humanity. And that’s sort of Phastos’ arc, and why Hiroshima was in the film.

On a lighter note, someone who knows you said you are a huge, and put a bunch of u’s in the word “huge,” Star Wars fan. I did not know that.

[Laughs] It’s true.

You should do one of those. I’d be in for one of those movies too from you.

[Laughs] Would you? I love how you buttered me up with those questions for the first 10 minutes? No, just kidding. No, look, I’ll be lucky if I get to play in the Star Wars universe. But, as you know, again, just like the MCU, the universe is so grand with so many incredible characters. And I think if I ever get the chance, it’s got to be the right story, the right character.

Well, obviously I would have liked to see a take from you in Star Wars anyway. But now knowing that you’re super into it, even more so now.

We did Comic-Con for Eternals, the first time they announced the project. And I went on the stage with this T-shirt and Kevin, first thing he said once I got on stage was, “Tell them what’s this on your T-shirt.” And it was, “I had friends on that Death Star.” It was a very sad Stormtrooper sitting in a chair, crying.

You can contact Mike Ryan directly on Twitter.










Wednesday, May 12, 2021


Fussy critic: Found it an entertaining, breezy, escapist thriller with the same justice-is-served Sheridan DNA as Sicario and Wind River but with lower ambitions.  Has some flights of fancy and odd choices — a heavily pregnant Allison riding a white horse through a burning forest, Angelina’s sometimes distracting wig — but satisfyingly delivers on its promise.  Just as Hannah's self sacrifice and bravery in protecting and saving Connor sweeps aside the doubts that have haunted her, Angelina's frequently lauded performance elevated her and the excellent Finn Little's story.  Two damaged, imperfect characters charmingly bonding as they helped each other get through their physical and emotional hurdles made their journey engrossing and enjoyable to watch.  It works well as a taut thriller but would have been better if Warner / Sheridan took the plot seriously and gave it the depth that the audience was led to expect "from the writer of Sicario and co-creator of Yellowstone."  They could have explained how Hannah became the unlikely but respected leader of a team of brawny smokejumpers, showed the botched mission instead of jerky flashbacks with drowned out dialogue, and revealed the anomalies Connor’s dad uncovered that could have raised the stakes and made it a 90's style thriller adapted with the concerns of a 2020s audience.  Those scenes may have well been shot but didn't make the final cut as they kept the film short.  (Perhaps Sheridan may be interested in releasing an extended cut.)  A deeper story could have been the difference between scoring in the 60s vs. 80s on Rotten Tomatoes and getting an A Cinemascore vs a B.  It may have also helped the box office a bit.  It was expected to make $2M opening weekend and made $2.8 so it already outperformed expectations.  Warner hardly spent on promotion and they may have used the budget instead to appease talent reps after the uproar over the unilateral decision to stream their entire slate on HBOMax.  Warner Studios execs may have also been understandably distracted by the just announced spinoff that puts the studio under Discovery and effectively leaves little incentive or reward for improving their current slate's performance.


BoxOfficePro

Third place went to Warner Bros.’ Those Who Wish Me Dead, the new Angelina Jolie thriller that is also currently streaming on HBO Max. Unfortunately, Jolie’s star power couldn’t overcome a tepid theatrical marketing campaign, leading to a quiet $2.8 million debut from a very wide 3,188 locations. (Top markets for the film were Los Angeles, New York, Phoenix, Dallas and San Francisco.) The Cinemascore for the film came in at a “B,” while a mixed critical reception puts it at a middling 64% “Fresh” rating on Rotten Tomatoes.
 




















Rotten Tomatoes

Tuesday, October 15, 2019

























Friday, November 6, 2015











 theplaykist

AFI Review: 'By The Sea' by Angelina Jolie Pitt, Co-Starring Brad Pitt and Mélanie Laurent

By Katie Walsh | The Playlist

A vintage convertible zips along vertiginous roads atop sunbaked white cliffs to a grooving ‘60s tune. Stars Angelina Jolie Pitt and Brad Pitt bring to mind Liz Taylor and Richard Burton in their resort wear glam, which is a fine reference to open “By the Sea,” an arty, retro trip through the stiff-but-soused relationships unfolding during the transition from the Greatest Generation to the Sexual Revolution. A decided left turn from her biopic “Unbroken,” Jolie Pitt’s film is an experiment in deeply personal, highly stylized filmmaking that is only partially successful in its efforts. “By the Sea” will most likely be remembered as a cult curio in Angelina Jolie Pitt’s filmmaking career. It’s an ambitious project that strives for a European New Wave vibe, steeped in musings on trauma, grief, and what makes a marriage. It’s hard to imagine that anyone will love this film — it’s too reserved to inspire fervent emotional connection — but with serious contemplation, it’s entirely respectable in its attempts to grapple with the subject in this manner. 
By The Sea
Taylor and Burton are a clear inspiration, but so are Scott and Zelda — Fitzgerald that is. Pitt plays Roland, a famous writer who has soaked his brain in too much booze to get any words on the page. The couple have installed themselves in a hotel in the South of France for Roland to write, but he wiles away his days drinking in a seaside boîte, pouring his heart out to the patient proprietor, Michel (Niels Arestrup). Vanessa, a former dancer, has the quality of a lovely, broken doll; a mannequin who keeps up appearances but is so medicated she barely appears to be human. The couple listlessly goes through the motions, barely interacting, retreating into their substances of choice. 
By The Sea
It’s clear that they, or at least she, have suffered some kind of great loss that is too big to even speak of. Vanessa has imprisoned herself in this imposing hotel and in her unhappy relationship, so much so that she seems paralyzed, physically and mentally. Reflecting her sedated subjectivity and aching beauty, the compositions of the film are lovely, but the camera is completely inert, capturing Vanessa almost as if she’s in a still photograph, a fashion spread. She’s beautiful but she’s doesn’t exist in three dimensions. The cinematography is by frequent Michael Haneke collaborator Christian Berger (he shot “The Piano Teacher,” “Caché” and “The White Ribbon”), and it is exquisite, the South of France via Vogue. 
By The Sea
Roland and Vanessa’s icy world is shaken by the arrival of a newlywed couple in the room next door, Lea (Mélanie Laurent) and Francois (Melvil Poupaud), representative of the fresh ‘70s scene. They’re natural, loose, and comfortable; and lusty, as Vanessa can hear. Soon, she’s spying on the hot young couple through a hole in the wall, and in sharing the sexy secret with her husband, their marriage is reawakened in some ways, for better or for worse.
By The Sea
Jolie Pitt is playing with a lot of advanced ideas in this film, about female psychological pathology, grief, and repressed sexuality. It’s fascinating to see a film reflect such a feminine experience and inner turmoil in this way, and acknowledge the ways in which voyeurism and mental sensuality connect to the corporeal. The rigidity of form and performance only add to Vanessa’s subjective experience of her numbness and detachment. As Vanessa, Jolie Pitt has the funereal stiffness of an aging flower arrangement. The film unfolds as a slow, moody tone poem, almost elegiac in its mourning for the couple that they once were, represented by the newlyweds next door. 
By The Sea
Not all of the pieces quite fit together. The script is often painfully obvious, having characters speak subtext out loud, with lines such as, “good woman? Have I become that dull?” and “now my outsides match my insides,” that are far too on-the-nose. This culminates in a climax that speaks aloud their dark secret, one that was far more interesting when it was just ambiguous. There are also moments when it’s hard to entirely buy Roland. He’s the drunken scamp with a loyal heart of gold, and that’s just too good to be true. There are a few funny lines, and moments of clarity, but the script is definitely the weak link here. For a film that looks and feels as avant-garde as it does, the script doesn’t put enough faith in the audience to accept ambiguity or pick up underlying meanings.
By The Sea
It’s fascinating that Jolie Pitt, known for her high profile marriage and brood of many children, would choose to make a dark, philosophical period piece about a childless couple in the throes of marital stagnation (or crisis). In her introduction to the film at AFI Fest, she mentioned that the film was about grief, informed by the loss of her own mother, and especially with Michel’s character, this story comes through. It feels achingly personal at times, and perhaps the characters, period setting, and ostentatious wardrobe are shields against Jolie Pitt’s true personal heart, and drawing connections to her own life.
By The Sea (skip crop)
Jolie Pitt’s performance is near Kabuki, which is in stark contrast to the other, naturalistic performances she plays against. This serves to isolate Vanessa within the space; she’s an alien in a foreign land, which must be how she feels always. This acting style, coupled with the melodramatic but arch tone and unhurried pace, results in a film that’s more difficult and complicated than necessarily enjoyable, or even entirely successful. But Jolie Pitt’s insistence on creating a piece that reflects the harsh inner state of a person suffering to understand herself as a wife and as a woman in the world is commendable, and fascinating in her growth as a filmmaker. [B]












‘By the Sea’ Review: These Characters Can’t Take a Vacation From Their Problems [AFI Fest]


By the Sea is very much an art film. Angelina Jolie Pitt‘s romance wears its European influences on its sleeve, but some American titles come to mind while watching the writer/director’s third film: What About Bob? and the work of Mike Nichols (Carnal KnowledgeCloser). The former title may appear odd, but By the Sea is about characters trying “get away from it all” in paradise. Unlike Bob, these characters can’t take a vacation from their problems. Their bags — full of cigarettes, a typewriter, and impeccable clothing — aren’t the only baggage these tired lovers bring with them on their getaway.


Roland (Brad Pitt) and Vanessa (Jolie Pitt) aren’t half the people they used to be. Roland, a once promising writer, doesn’t have any stories left to tell and is an alcoholic. Vanessa, a dancer-turned-wife, is ambivalent, suffering from a past event. The New York couple head to Malta. Roland is looking for a story to tell, but he’s really looking for a way to save his marriage. Even when the married couple shares a hotel room together, they might as well be on opposite sides of the planet.
Two French honeymooners, Lea (Mélanie Laurent) and Francois (Melvil Pouopard), make matters worse for the couple, or better, depending on how one interprets the film. Between their two hotel rooms, there’s a peephole, which both Roland and, mostly, Vanessa, take advantage of, watching the couple in their most intimate moments.

Roland and his wife see the couple that they used to be in the honeymooners, and this is one of the more deftly handled plot points in By the Sea. Admittedly, the long-winded first act is rough around the edges. Jolie Pitt’s script relies heavily on repetition, especially in the first 30 minutes, often hammering in points that the filmmaker’s images are already showing the audience. There’s a little too much telling instead of showing in the opening of the film, which is odd, considering how elegantly shot By the Sea is. When Jolie Pitt and her DP, Christian Berger (The White Ribbon), communicate more with silence, that’s when this romance takes flight. The contrast between the gorgeous locations and the characters’ turmoil is striking. It’s almost impossible to even enjoy the gorgeous sights. The camerawork and story becomes increasingly claustrophobic, turning this paradise into hell.
Once the film picks begins trusting its audience more, Jolie Pitt’s script is as finely tuned as her shot choices. The repetition grows richer, highlighting the roller coaster ride of Roland and Vanessa’s relationship. The opening and ending, especially, tie together beautifully. Not only from a character standpoint, but also because of how Jolie Pitt and Berger visually express how the characters have changed. The married couple are in a very different place by the end of the film, and the camerawork shows you that. I won’t spoil the arc by explaining the difference in framing, but I will say it illustrates how far the actor has come as a director.


Unbroken is a fine movie. It’s well-shot and there are fine performances, but it still feels like Jolie Pitt is testing the waters as a filmmaker. She’s making all the right choices, but despite Unbroken‘s inspiring true story, it lacks focus and, strangely, emotion. There’s plenty of emotion on display in By the Sea. This is a warts and all kind of romance, making it all the more romantic.
By the Sea is about two assholes. Roland even calls him and his wife assholes, which they very much are. The worse they act, the more human they become. In the first act, Roland is constantly trying to “fix” his wife. When she leaves her sunglasses awkwardly placed on a table, he’s there to turn them upright. There are little touches throughout the film to show how they handle each other’s flaws, and when they begin to accept each other’s problems, By the Sea becomes more compelling and, surprisingly, moving.

Pitt is fantastic as Roland. From frame one, the actor is a convincing sad sack. Sure, the character looks like Brad Pitt and is clearly wealthy, but his desperation and struggle is palpable in every scene. No matter how poorly he acts, you root for the writer to pull through. Jolie Pitt has the more challenging role of the two. Vanessa is cold and distant, and why that is remains a mystery until the third act. At times the character can’t even explain her irrational actions. It’s an ego-less performance, a deeply unlikable character Jolie Pitt fully embraces. Never does the writer/director attempt to excuse or justify Vanessa or Roland’s actions, she just presents them as is.

By the Sea is a handsomely made and confidently acted picture. It’ll surely be divisive, and kudos to Pitt Jolie for writing and directing an uncompromising movie. This is by no means a movie for everyone. Although, it must be said, By the Sea is actually pretty funny at times. This romance could’ve been nothing but two hours of misery, but there’s genuine humor and warmth to the story, all of which is earned. In spite of the first act and some of the more unsubtle and ethereal dialogue, By the Sea is a refreshingly honest, sexy, and clever romance.

7.5 out of 10