Showing posts with label Melena Ryzik. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Melena Ryzik. Show all posts

Monday, March 24, 2025




Angelina Jolie Wants to Pick Up Where Warhol and Basquiat Left Off

The actress is building a community of artists, thinkers and doers of all kinds, in a storied building in downtown Manhattan.



By Melena Ryzik

March 24, 2025

It was a Saturday night, and behind the graffiti-scrawled facade of Atelier Jolie, her downtown creative space and gallery, Angelina Jolie was in conversation with the artist Shirin Neshat.

The topics were heady: the plight of refugees, the rights of women, how to wrench meaning from exile; the value of art in all that. Jolie, ethereal in a cream dress with an embroidered capelet, was gracious. “I’m so happy to be with all of you,” she said to the invited 50 or so guests, adding that she sought community to “keep trying to understand ways to help.” For her, being an artist was a means of communication: “I want to know if you feel the same pain.”

Jolie listened intently to Neshat, the Iranian visual artist and filmmaker, a striking figure with kohled eyes. “Art doesn’t come from intuition,” Neshat said. “It has to come from the life you have led. It has to relate to the world.”

At the reception, notables like the musician Jon Batiste and the author Suleika Jaouad (his wife), and Jack Harlow, the chart-topping rapper, mingled amid the artwork. A Sufi dancer in a crimson gown twirled between the tagged-up walls.


The artist Shirin Neshat, center, in conversation with Jolie and the moderator Claude Grunitzky. “Art doesn’t come from intuition,” Neshat said. “It has to come from the life you have led.”Credit...Argenis Apolinario

And Jolie, the Oscar-winning actress, humanitarian and object of global fascination, was not the red-hot center of attention. Which is just how she wants it. “I like to see what other people make,” she said. “That’s part of my creativity.”

For a little over a year, she has endeavored to build Atelier Jolie into a hub for artists and makers — and chefs, students and Broadway stars. The building comes with an almost unparalleled artistic pedigree: 57 Great Jones Street was once owned by Andy Warhol, and inhabited by Jean-Michel Basquiat, who had his studio there until his death in 1988.

Jolie’s dream was for the space to once again be a cultural locus, a clubhouse full of inspired and international creatives, and also a magnet for a curious public — to come and browse, take a class, refuel with a slice of orange almond cake at the global-cuisine cafe, Eat Offbeat.


Snips of hair collected from all around the world, as part of the exhibition “Strand for Women,” fill Atelier Jolie’s basement. Credit...Clement Pascal for The New York Times

It did not immediately work out as she envisioned. “It’s been tricky,” she said in a recent interview. “I found that this has been a lot of what not to do.”

Its initial incarnation was as a pop-up fashion studio for visiting designers, “because I think the world’s most interested in that,” she said. “People focus on fashion.”

“But,” she added, “it was very quickly clear to me that that wasn’t going to be my love,” in part because she rejected the environmental impact of the typical fashion cycle — water pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, landfill-fueling consumption. “I don’t want to tell people that they need to buy something new every few months.”

So she pivoted, expanding her web and sharing the rarest New York commodity: square footage. For free.

The French multimedia artist Prune Nourry, who helped organize the Neshat event as part of an exhibition called “Strand for Women,” has become the atelier’s artist-in-residence, with a second-floor studio where she expects to sculpt sometimes mammoth works over the next two years.


Atelier Jolie occupies a two-story building at 57 Great Jones Street in Lower Manhattan, where Jean-Michel Basquiat had his studio, and painted in the upstairs studio loft. Andy Warhol bought the building in the 1970s.Credit...Amir Hamja/The New York Times

The Invisible Dog, a beloved, 16-year-old art space, whose original multistory Brooklyn building is being redeveloped, has arrived as a resident gallery. Nourry introduced its founder and curator, Lucien Zayan, to Jolie, and he is busily programming shows and cultivating community in his new Manhattan neighborhood. In the Warhol-Basquiat era, he said, the building was a gathering place, too: “There was a big communal table in the space. People were always coming and chatting together,” he said. “That’s exactly what she wanted.”

For Jolie, a singular celebrity with a reputation for unknowability — a mystery, in an era when the famous spill all on social media — to start a public gathering space seemed an improbable move. She has been far more visible in her advocacy for others, as a high-profile envoy for the U.N. Refugee Agency. (She stepped down from that post in 2022, after more than two decades.)

But in her circles, she is known as a connector, who is quick to open her home, offer help and learn one-on-one; she has painted, danced and attended silk-screening, felting and cooking classes at Atelier Jolie. “I wanted a place where I could spend time with local artists,” she said. She hoped to conjure the vibe of a film set, she said, especially one with a crew from the far-flung corners of the world: “You can feel that feeling of being purposeful with others.”


Jolie with Prune Nourry, the artist-in-residence, in her second-floor studio. Nourry is organizing dinners and talks at the atelier. Collaboration is the thread: “That’s kind of the rule — you can’t just come in for yourself,” Jolie said. “You have to come in and also be there for other artists.” Credit...Clement Pascal for The New York Times

In Nourry, Jolie has found another artist striving for community. With her nonprofit Catharsis Arts Foundation, Nourry has planned monthly talks at Atelier Jolie as part of her residency. The first, with Dr. Rita Charon, a Columbia University medical professor and literary scholar who created the field of narrative medicine, drew other searching minds, like David Byrne. The topics vary (in March, Neshat spoke about Iranian liberation), but the themes are similar — whether “art can heal,” Nourry said.

Jolie said, “It’s like a platform for discussion. It’s not dictating.”

Nourry, 40, and Jolie, 49, met nearly a decade ago through a mutual friend, the filmmaker Agnes Varda, after Nourry was diagnosed with breast cancer. Jolie, who lost her mother, grandmother and aunt to cancer, and who underwent a preventative double mastectomy in 2013, advised Nourry early on. And she co-produced Nourry’s 2019 documentary, “Serendipity,” in which Nourry takes stock of her own illness through art making. In the introduction to one of Nourry’s books, Jolie recalls being in her Paris studio, looking at her sculpture of a breast carved in wood, which had split during fabrication. “Isn’t it even more beautiful?” Nourry asked her.


Nourry’s studio at Atelier Jolie. Credit...Clement Pascal for The New York Times

Nourry’s light-filled space at Atelier Jolie (which once housed Basquiat’s bed), is filled with anatomical models and history books. In “Strand for Women,” people from around the world snip off a bit of hair, in solidarity with the #WomanLifeFreedom movement for women’s rights and justice. (Jolie donated some strands with her daughters.) The locks hang in the basement at Atelier Jolie, below what looks like a minidress made of hair, by the Iranian-German artist Homa Emamy, seen in an exhibition here presented with the help of Invisible Dog.

Collaboration is the thread: “That’s kind of the rule — you can’t just come in for yourself,” Jolie said. “You have to come in and also be there for other artists.”

Through Eat Offbeat, Nourry hosted an “archaeological dinner” with an Afghan chef who cooked a traditional meal covered in clay. “Everyone had a little hammer, like an archaeologist, and had to break the clay to get the dish,” Nourry said. It was a reference to the ancient Buddhist monuments, a source of national pride, that were destroyed by the Taliban in 2001, and to Nourry’s own sculpted Buddhas.


Lucien Zayan, founder of the Invisible Dog Art Center, now the resident gallery at Atelier Jolie, aims to draw a crowd there.Credit...Clement Pascal for The New York Times

The chef Gladys Shahtou helps Jolie make sambuxa, a spiced Sudanese stuffed pastry.Credit...Clement Pascal for The New York Times

Atelier Jolie is barely one-fifth the size of the 30,000-square-foot Invisible Dog, a nonprofit that opened in 2009 in a former factory. But Zayan said that he and Jolie, from their first conversation, shared a conceptual blueprint that incorporated performance; viewed dining as a form of cultural discourse; and gave artists studio access. “When you create work in the space, that makes a huge difference,” he said, “because you leave the spirit, the soul, in the space. It’s not just hanging art.”

Atelier Jolie, a for-profit public benefit corporation (a certified B Corp) with the goal of social good, is not charging Invisible Dog any rent for its yearlong residency. In Brooklyn, the gallery needed $500,000 annually “just to open the door,” Zayan said, and regularly held fund-raisers. Now donations can support work directly. “We’re doing well, and we’re building a new model," Jolie said of the financial prospects of Atelier Jolie, which has an eight-year lease on the building.

Zayan aims to make it a destination for downtown and beyond, just as Invisible Dog was in the Boerum Hill section of Brooklyn. And Jolie has been an eager partner. They communicate almost daily, he said. “When you email her, you never know where she is, what time zone, but she answers you immediately. She’s very involved.”

Fashion is no longer as central to the atelier, but Jolie still gave a studio stint to Zarif, a brand created by artisans in Kabul. With its founder, Zolaykha Sherzad, Jolie sketched a capsule collection of embroidered jackets and capes, which she wore to the Neshat talk. Jolie offered the atelier “as a platform to highlight the craftsmanship, their talent, their resilience,” Sherzad said of her team of Afghan weavers and tailors.


The avant-gardist Valerj Pobega, who had an early residency, painting one of her garments. Credit...via Atelier Jolie; Photo by Qori Camargo

Mimi Plange, a New York designer, leads a needle felting class regularly.Credit...via Atelier Jolie; Photo by Qori Camargo

Though films still take up much of Jolie’s life, she has been spending more time in New York lately, for the gallery and as a producer of “The Outsiders,” the Tony-winning Broadway musical. Cast members turn up at the atelier, helping her think through how the space can serve young artists. “To see these worlds all coming together, that’s what’s so exciting,” she said.

Jolie loved the squat, sprayed-up building (which had recently housed a restaurant) when she first saw it in 2023 with one of her daughters. “I wasn’t interested in being on the Upper East Side,” she said, explaining why she sought out the downtown neighborhoods she had wound through in her 20s, while studying film at New York University. But, she said, “I was also intimidated by the history.” She got in touch with Basquiat’s sisters, who gave the atelier their blessing, and turn up at events.

The architects Bonetti Kozerski, who designed the Pace Gallery flagship in Chelsea, oversaw a renovation, preserving walls covered in graffiti by Al Diaz, who created the SAMO© tag with Basquiat. Basquiat’s early comics are still pasted up there, too — a portal to another New York legacy. The facade changes constantly, as taggers continue to leave their tributes.


Zolaykha Sherzad, creator of Zarif, a brand that works with artisans in Kabul, looking through the capsule collection she designed with Jolie. Credit...Clement Pascal for The New York Times

In conversations this month, Jolie seemed frustrated that the atelier was viewed as another exclusive downtown boutique. “The act of creation should be accessible to everyone,” she said.

“It’s what I need as an artist,” she added. “It’s what I want for my children — to learn about other people and discover and connect and share and play.”

She was speaking from a Manhattan hotel room; the New York apartment she bought in her 20s is now inhabited by one of her sons, and is a crash pad for his five siblings. Mom is welcome — sometimes. “The other day I said I was going to pop by, and he was like, can you just give me a day to clean?” she said. “I thought, I appreciate that, you should clean up for your mother. But also, how bad is it?” She laughed, and I got a glimpse of the less studious Jolie that friends know.

“Whenever I’ve seen Angie in the field, she loves to sit with a group of people, whoever it is, and just feel part of that community,” said Giles Duley, a British photographer and chef who met Jolie through her U.N. work.

Last summer, Duley, who lost both legs and an arm to an explosive device in Afghanistan in 2011, exhibited his images of unexploded land mines at Atelier Jolie. “I did a talk in there, and people sat on the floor and kind of perched on the side of tables and chairs,” he said. “It’s certainly not a place full of airs and graces.”

At the event with Neshat — on International Women’s Day — Jolie answered questions from Bronx high school students and greeted artists from the Middle East and Europe. Her friend Mustafa, the 28-year-old Canadian-Sudanese musician, brought Harlow, the rapper, as his guest. He marveled as Jolie worked the crowd. “This is not her at her most comfortable,” Mustafa confided, adding that she put herself there to spotlight the work of those around her.

As Jolie moved through the rooms of her gallery with a cup of tea, she paused to take in the unlikely scene. “Sometimes I think, what are we doing?” she said. A clutch of women had found their place beside her, urgently wanting to talk about art and activism. “And then I think, no, this is everything.”


Thursday, January 26, 2012

NYTimes: Route to Oscars

The Carpetbagger

Unlikely Routes Lead to Oscars

Roger Arpajou/Sony Pictures Classics
Owen Wilson in Woody Allen's “Midnight in Paris,” which earned four Oscar nominations this week. More Photos »

When she got the script for “Midnight in Paris,” Letty Aronson, Woody Allen’s longtime producer, wasn’t buying it. “When I first read the script, honestly, my impression was: Who’s going to come to this movie?” Ms. Aronson said. “Nobody even knows Gertrude Stein anymore.”
Mr. Allen disagreed. “Woody felt that you didn’t really have to know those people to appreciate the film,” said Ms. Aronson, who is his sister. He may have been right. The movie has been the top grossing film of Mr. Allen’s directing career, and on Tuesday, when the Oscar nominations were announced, it earned four nods, for best art direction, director, picture and original screenplay (his 15th nomination in the writing category).
But the movie almost didn’t get made; shooting in France was too expensive. So Mr. Allen shelved the script until the French government passed a film tax credit. Production began in Paris in 2010, and “Midnight in Paris” had its premiere at the Cannes Film Festival last May.
“The Artist,” a French film shot in the United States that is part of this year’s wave of cinematic nostalgia, , also struggled to find financing. “The meetings were very short,” said the producer, Thomas Langmann. “Each time we say, ‘It’s silent and black and white,’ they said, ‘Well, what’s your next project?’ ”
In the end Mr. Langmann, who grew up immersed in classic movies as the son of the French filmmaker Claude Berri, staked his own millions on “The Artist.” He was rewarded with 10 Oscar nominations, including one for best picture.
Each season the nominations are unveiled with the pomp and ceremony of a royal event; months of buildup have the precision — and sometimes the cost — of a political campaign. But many films that the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences winds up honoring had a near-miss path to the screen, built on serendipity, determination and, most often, leaps taken. It’s a reminder that even in the technologically advanced, highly manipulated and demographically parsed moviegoing era, filmmaking may not be that far removed from the classics that this year’s nominees often refer to.
That’s the theme that the Academy wants to underscore, anyway. With the slogan “Celebrate the movies in all of us,” meant to summon our collective memories of cinema; an online and billboard campaign featuring seminal moments from films like “Sunset Boulevard” and “Driving Miss Daisy;” and Billy Crystal hosting the ceremony, Feb. 26 could be a pretty retro Oscar night.
But the Oscars have to strike a tricky balance, between nostalgia for the kind of communal cultural event that is rarer and rarer in these multiscreen days, and the unexpected turns that draw viewers into the telecast. That’s where the nominees and movie back stories come in.
Neatly combining wistfulness and surprise is “The Tree of Life,” Terrence Malick’s sweeping story of Americana (and Earth), which earned a spot on the best-picture list and nods for Mr. Malick and his cinematographer, Emmanuel Lubezki. The new rules about how to tabulate the best-picture candidates, meant to reward films that voters were passionate about rather than ones they merely liked, may have been most beneficial to “The Tree of Life,” which had art-house and critical currency. (“So far one movie is overshadowing everything else for me, and that’s ‘Tree of Life,’ ” the director Wim Wenders, an Academy member, said a few weeks before the nominations.)
The new voting system also seems to have helped usher in “Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close,” Stephen Daldry’s critically panned film. Gasps were heard in the press room when it was called as a best-picture nominee on Tuesday, but Mr. Daldry has a perfect track record with the Academy: Each of his three previous films (“The Hours,” “The Reader” and “Billy Elliot”) received Academy recognition.
Max von Sydow, the 82-year-old star of films by Bergman and William Friedkin, among many others, received only his second Oscar nomination ever, as supporting actor, for his turn as the mute companion to the boy in “Extremely Loud.” (In a move that is both classy and canny Mr. von Sydow sent a handwritten note expressing his gratitude to the Academy. “I don’t know what to say,” it read.) His nomination adds some tension to the supporting actor category, where Christopher Plummer, another 82-year-old showbiz veteran receiving only his second Oscar nomination (for playing a gay dad in “Beginners”), was generally considered the front-runner.
It’s no secret that the Academy sometimes bestows its admiration years late and for a body of work rather than for a particular project. (See: Scorsese, Martin, and “The Departed.”) So here is Gary Oldman, generally acknowledged to be one of the greatest actors of his generation, receiving his first Academy nomination, for his turn as a cold-war-era spook in “Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy.”
That evocative adaptation of that John le Carré’s novel also found a place on the best adapted screenplay list (with a nomination for the writers Bridget O’Connor and Peter Straughan), a distinction that eluded “The Help.” This even though that film, directed by the newcomer Tate Taylor from a screenplay he based on Kathryn Stockett’s best seller, made the best-picture list and had the biggest box office of any of the other major nominees. (Aha: surprise.)
Voters did recognize the performances in the “The Help,” from the leading actress Viola Davis and her simpatico co-stars Octavia Spencer and Jessica Chastain, now competing against each other for best supporting actress. A favorite throughout awards season, Ms. Davis has impressed with seemingly off-the-cuff speeches that tie together the civil-rights struggles of “The Help” and the unlikelihood of getting a film with a multiracial cast made. 
Her competitor and sometime co-star Meryl Streep, a best actress nominee for her portrayal of Margaret Thatcher in “The Iron Lady,” has also repeatedly paid tribute to her fellow performers, a gracious-off that, along with the presence of the repeat nominees Glenn Close and Michelle Williams, makes the actress race one of the most interesting. (Then again, Ms. Streep, the most nominated actor of all time, might as well be her own category at the Oscars.)
In the acting and other major races the Academy favors period films as usual. Entries like “War Horse” are clearly historical, and though seemingly contemporary, both “Moneyball” and “Extremely Loud” take place in the recent past. That leaves “The Descendants” as the only best picture nominee set in the present. It too had an unusual path to the screen: It joined the writer-director Alexander Payne and, making their feature-film debut, the writing team of Nat Faxon and Jim Rash, comedians who met at the Groundlings in Los Angeles. They labored to make a film that was dulcet yet funny, in the style of the kitchen-sink 1970s films that Mr. Payne loves. (All three are up for adapted screenplay.)
With acknowledgement in bellwether categories “The Descendants,” “The Artist” and “Hugo” are the most heavily favored for the top prize. By marrying 3-D technology and a story about the origins of cinema, Mr. Scorsese’s “Hugo,” which led the field with 11 nominations, probably comes closest to embodying the Academy’s message. The cast of children, dogs, and — as Mr. Scorsese has noted — the mischievous Sacha Baron Cohen, made it a challenge to produce. “We were a little afraid when we started, because none of us knew the 3-D process and it was our first digital film,” said Thelma Schoonmaker, the editor and a nominee for “Hugo.”
Ms. Schoonmaker, who has worked with Mr. Scorsese for most of her career, winning Oscars for “Raging Bull,” “The Aviator” and “The Departed,” said that a win for “Hugo” would feel extra special. “For us it’s a very joyous thing, if we can open more minds to the great films that have come before us,” she said.
“The fact that people go away from it with this great feeling,” she added, laughing, “is very different from what our films usually do.”

Tuesday, January 10, 2012

NYFCC 3











January 10, 2012, 12:10 pm

Brad Pitt, Denbygate and Other Scenes From the Critics Circle

 

There was higher-than-normal security at the New York Film Critics Circle awards dinner, but it wasn’t for fear of a showdown between David Denby and Scott Rudin. (Not that anyone had forgotten about Denbygate – more on that later.)

Though the critics circle dinner has seen everyone from George Clooney to Meryl Streep – sometimes at the same time — Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie making the scene together made a palpable difference on Monday night. They briefly did the red carpet, Ms. Jolie in a leather skirt and white blouse, Mr. Pitt walking with a cane, and then coolly decamped to the bar. Mr. Pitt was being honored as best actor for his work in “The Tree of Life” and “Moneyball,” which also won for best script, but Ms. Jolie reported that he wasn’t nervous. “Not that he shows me,” she said, as he leaned on the bar nearby. “There are other things in the world that should make you nervous. When your children are healthy and – these kind of things, it’s lovely,” she continued. “You know, we’re all artists, and we’re all in this business, so it seems friendly.”

Ms. Jolie was mostly right. The event proceeded genially, though there were some boos and hissing at any mention of The Village Voice, which fired its longtime film critic, J. Hoberman, last week. (Mr. Hoberman, a member of the circle, was on hand to present an award, so John Anderson, the group’s president, referred to The Voice only as “the publication whose name should not be mentioned.”)

Mr. Pitt wound up giving one of the best speeches of the night – funny, personal and poignant – though he added that he was glad it wasn’t televised.

“This is a really big honor for me, considering I’m a guy who had never ridden in an airplane until I was 25,” he began. “That first trip was here in 1989 to New York. I had an audition for a soap opera. But I had to put myself up, and I stayed at a friend’s apartment. That apartment was in the Village on Christopher Street. My first impression of the city was: my god, there’s a lot of guys around here. But they’re so nice.”


The audience roared; Mr. Pitt, who seemed to speak without notes, grinned. He thanked the critics for their work, deftly poking fun at the difference in star wattage. “This is a real pleasure for me to see some of the faces behind the formidable names that instill such fear and reverence in the film industry,” he said, “although I thought you’d be taller.”

Mr. Pitt also didn’t shy away from the flap over David Denby’s embargo-breaking review of “The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo” in The New Yorker, which drew a withering response from the movie’s producer, Mr. Rudin, at the time. “We are complex, we are mysteries to ourselves, we are difficult to each other, we live in continual flux and instability and conflict,” Mr. Pitt said. “Christians and Muslims, Democrats and Republicans, Denby and Rudin.”

It turned into the evening’s recurring joke. “By the way, let’s admit the real reason David Denby couldn’t be here,” said Albert Brooks, the critics’ best supporting actor. “He was picking up Scott Rudin’s dry cleaning.”

Other highlights:

– “My acceptance will be 30 pages longer and include references to Gilbert and Sullivan.” — Aaron Sorkin, following Steven Zaillian, his co-writer and fellow winner of the screenplay award.

– “’Moneyball,’ I think you all know by now, was not an easy movie to make. There are easy movies, there are hard movies, there’s 50 feet of crap, there’s ‘Heaven’s Gate,’ and then there’s us.” – Mr. Sorkin.

– “I never had a very good idea, actually, before this. I didn’t know that until now.” – J.C. Chandor, writer-director, accepting the best first film award for “Margin Call.”

Meryl Streep at the New York Film Critics' Circle awards. 
Carlo Allegri/ReutersMeryl Streep at the New York Film Critics’ Circle awards.
– “I take courage from Margaret Thatcher. Because of the beautiful transparency of the Internet, you can find out exactly how many people in the New York Film Critics Circle voted for you and how many rounds of voting there were, and so I’m happy to report that Margaret Thatcher was the longest serving prime minister of the 20th century, and she never got more than 30 percent of the votes, like me.” – Meryl Streep, accepting her best actress award for playing Ms. Thatcher in “The Iron Lady.”

– “I’m proud of our attempt to get at something human in someone that we all thought was very weird.” – Ms. Streep.

Stars Shine at the New York Film Critics' Circle Awards (Photos)

 

"The Help’s" Viola Davis and Jessica Chastain are among the ladies who graced the carpet dressed in simple, elegant looks.







Angelina Jolie New York Film Critics Circle Awards - P 2012
For the first critic awards of the season, the red carpet looks were mellow compared to Hollywood standards. The 2011 New York Film Critics Circle Awards, which named The Artist best picture of 2011, welcomed a crop of casually, chic stars (although a few looks had some glittery, metallic punch) to Crimson in Manhattan’s flatiron district Jan. 9.
Angelina Jolie wore a Ferragamo blouse, pencil skirt and pumps while accompanying Brad Pitt—who took home the best actor title for Tree of Life and Moneyball. Pitt, who spoke quietly at the podium, accepted the award humbly: “It never crossed my mind that I’d be here,” he said, “I consider it a great privilege, I thank you for this, it means so much to me.”


And they say critics don’t matter! An organization populated largely by people whose clothes don’t quite fit them managed to bring out a crowd of nattily dressed A-list talent for the 77th New York Film Critics Circle Awards last night in New York. The fact that Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie pulled up to Crimson—a fairly seedy event space on Manhattan’s lower Broadway—and made their way past a shouting throng of cameras and autograph-seekers to arrive just after the advertised start time, is a testament to the enduring power of the keyboard.

Meryl Streep, Jessica Chastain, Viola Davis, Albert Brooks, Robert De Niro, Kevin Spacey, and Francis Ford Coppola were also on hand to receive or present awards. (Pitt navigated the faux-wood-paneled room, with its gaudy red-velvet curtains, while leaning on a cane, no less. Apparently he had a damn good excuse to get out of the proceedings; he is suffering from an anterior cruciate ligament injury, which Twitter tells me is quite painful.)

Your blogger spent most of the night worrying about Brad and Angelina’s well-being. Would they actually tuck into the rubber chicken (and sea bass) on offer from the black-clad waiters with ties that matched the curtains? It seemed that they did, flanked at their table by agent Bryan Lourd and a guy with Lords of Flatbush hair who turned out to be one of the screenwriters of Moneyball and, with Aaron Sorkin, an award recipient. I was less concerned about Meryl Streep, who spent the interminable interval between the salad and the main course out of her seat, working the immediate area around her table. (She shared it with Harvey Weinstein, who for some reason had a follow spot trained on him throughout the night—perhaps because his films The Artist and The Iron Lady, and their stars, were acknowledged frequently throughout the proceedings.)

But the biggest emphasis was on the critics in the room, as evidenced by the standing ovation J. Hoberman received when he was introduced by M.C. John Anderson of Variety. Hoberman’s recent dismissal from the Village Voice (referenced throughout the evening as “the publication that will not be named”), where he served as critic for nearly 25 years, has been the talk of the film community over the past week. “I thought you’d be taller,” Brad Pitt told the group at large, in a charming speech that included a recollection of his first visit to the city. It was 1989 and he found himself on Christopher Street. "My first impression was: There are so many guys,” he remembered. “And they're so nice!"

Albert Brooks, who won an acting award for Drive, gave the funniest speech of all, disparaging people who say they don’t read reviews. “If you have a living relative, you know what the reviews are!” he said. Meryl Streep herself admitted that she looked at the group’s reviews. She noted that she’d checked the N.Y.F.C.C. Web site and found that she got only 30 percent of the vote for the best-actress award. “Margaret Thatcher was the longest serving prime minister in England’s history and she never got more than 30 percent of the vote!” Streep noted cheerily. (She won the award, naturally.)

Stylish Angelina goes hell for leather in sizzling skirt

10 JANUARY 2012 Having stolen the show the night before in a beautiful dusky pink Elie Saab jumpsuit, Angelina Jolie knew she had to pull out all the stops for her second red carpet appearance in as many days.

And she certainly didn't disappoint, setting flashbulbs blazing once again as she stepped out in yet another super stylish ensemble at the Critics Circle Awards in New York.

The brunette beauty embodied chic as she sashayed down the red carpet in a silky ivory blouse and tight leather Ferragamo skirt that made the most of her slender frame.

She struck a smouldering pose with Versace-clad boyfriend Brad Pitt, again carrying a cane for support following a ligament tear.







 




Brad Pitt honoured at NYFCC Awards

Help
  
Brad Pitt scooped best actor at the New York Film Critics Circle Awards (NYFCC) on Monday for his performance in Moneyball and Tree of Life.

Silent film, The Artist, won best picture and best director. The film's director Michel Hazanavicius said the award was "very special" as the film had initially faced difficulties getting financed.
Uggie the dog from the Artist even got a mention on the red carpet from the film's lead actor Jean Dujardin.

Jessica Chastain was recognised as best supporting actress for her performances in Tree of Life, The Help and Take Shelter.

And Albert Brooks said he was happy to be listed in the "classiest of groups " after he took best supporting actor for his role in Drive.

BBC Video at site 


And the winner is ... is ...

Last Updated: 12:19 AM, January 11, 2012

Robert De Niro struggled mightily to pronounce the name of “The Artist” director Michel Hazanavicius at the New York Film Critics Circle Awards Monday. The acting icon presented Hazanavicius with the best director award. But after trying to spit out the 12-letter name — with numerous valiant attempts of “Huzzah, Hazzah” and “Hazzona” — from the stage, he finally, exasperatingly exclaimed, “You’ve got to change your name. You’ve got to shorten it.” The French director was a good sport, saying he had only learned to spell his own name “two years ago.” (For the record, it’s pronounced AR-ZAN-A-VISHUS.) The experience didn’t cause De Niro to avoid other trickily named directors: He was also seen hugging Asghar Farhadi and introducing the Iranian helmer of “A Separation” to industry insiders. Brad Pitt, who won the best actor award for “Moneyball” and “The Tree of Life,” kept his arm around Angelina Jolie at his table for most of the night, prompting one jealous female film exec to say, “If a man kept his arm around me that much, I’d be in love with him, too.” Meryl Streep was presented with a best actress award for “The Iron Lady” by her “Doubt” co-star and upcoming Golden Globes competition, Viola Davis of “The Help.” But despite the presence of Pitt, Jolie, Streep and Albert Brooks, the night felt like more of a family dinner. Emcee John Anderson led the room in singing “Happy Birthday” to Sony Pictures Classics co-president Michael Barker.

Albert Brooks Rules the New York Film Critics' Circle Awards 

11:37 AM, January 10, 2012  Kyle Smith

Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie were in the house. Meryl Streep was there. And yet the annual awards dinner of the New York Film Critics' Circle was stolen by one Albert Brooks last night at Crimson in Manhattan. Brooks said he had hoped Debbie Reynolds (a friend of his father and the woman who played the title role in "Mother," a Brooks film which won him the NYFCC's screenwriting honors in 1996). Reynolds, alas, couldn't make it. Peter Travers filled in, saying Reynolds had sent a note saying, "Your father was great ad so funny you received all of his talent and so much more." Travers, who added that "making a movie was like a war and after the war a critic comes in and shoots the wounded," yielded the stage to a very dapper-looking Brooks, who saluted Aaron Sorkin (who earlier in the evening had praised Brooks' screeenplays). "I feel so guilty for selling my Academy copy of 'The Social Network,'" Brooks said. Then, continuing the night's theme of mocking the David Denby-Scott Rudin feud (ably recounted by my senior colleague here ), he said, "The real reason David Denby isn't here is he was picking up Scott Rudin's dry cleaning."
Referring to "Mother," Brooks said, "I felt that acceptance speech was very funny, so I may recycle a line or two from it. If can people can make all these remakes...." He said he was watching a TV show about James Stewart that noted he had won the NYFCC honors for Best Actor (1959, for "Anatomy of a Murder"), "and I'm thinking, 'I got something from them! This is not the People's Choice! This is the real thing!" Needless to say, this brought the house down (though the meta-laugh is even funnier if you consider the Bolshie elitism of this group of committed democrats who look down on the unwashed flyover-state masses).
Brooks went on to talk about how much critics meant to him--we were the ones (just about the only ones, alas), who supported his movies like "Modern Romance" and "Defending Your Life". "I've heard the expression, 'critic-proof,'" he said. "I would be the opposite of critic-proof. I'm critic-prone." He said he'd get up at 5 in the morning to go down to the newsstand to get all the periodicals the day one of his movies opened and if the review was a rave, he'd buy up all the copies and send them to industry friends and colleagues. "If they were bad,you bought them all up and threw them away. I bought up 2000 Time magazines." Brooks said he often hears showbiz types say they never read the reviews but "You don't have to read the reviews. If you have a living relative, you're going to know what the reviews say." A case in point was his Meryl Streep movie "Defending Your Life," which was universally praised, even by Gene Shalit. "I got a positive pun! [lapsing into Shalit's gravely Groucho voice] 'This is the first movie where he doesn't have to defend his life!'" Nevertheless, his mother called him up to tsk-tsk, "That critic in LA Magazine doesn't get you at all." Said Brooks, "I got the New York Times! I got Gene Shalit!" But he had to drag out of his mother what the guy from LA Magazine ("it's free in the lobby of the apartment building" and its critic "a year later he became a food critic") had said.
Brooks struck a very funny and very true note when he said, "Every man needs some woman to tell a good thing to or it didn't happen. It doesn't matter if you're gay or straight. For many years there was no one in my life so I kept knocking on my mother's door." Now he has his wife Kimberly, though, and "as God is my witness she has never mentioned anything from LA Magazine."
Brooks is priceless. Give him an Oscar please.


Matt Donnelly

Can you get more gorgeous than Angelina Jolie tonight at the National Board of Review?

Can you get more gorgeous than Angelina Jolie tonight at the National Board of Review? #brangelina


Back home at the Waldorf



Wednesday, May 18, 2011

More from the NY Times

May 17, 2011, 10:15 am

Scenes From a Cannes Gala

Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt at the Monday night screening of
Yves Herman/Reuters

Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt at the Monday night screening of “The Tree of Life” at Cannes.

CANNES, France— As expected, Terrence Malick skipped the gala premiere of his film “The Tree of Life” on Monday night, but he was in town, according to a publicist for Fox Searchlight, which is releasing the film. He attended a cast dinner after the premiere, she said, but was apparently too shy for any public festivities. “He’s like a big teddy bear,” she said. “You just want to protect him.”

There was enough to talk about and gawk at without the reclusive director. All day long, bloggers and cinephiles had been weighing in on the long-gestating film, Mr. Malick’s fifth feature, after seeing early screenings; it already had an 88 percent score (“fresh”) on RottenTomatoes.com as of yesterday evening. (Our own Manohla Dargis found it “beautiful, nonlinear, trippy, flawed.”)

And the premiere, held at the Grand Théâtre Lumière, the largest theater here, drew a cavalcade of stars like Rob Lowe; Jude Law, a jury member; Mia Wasikowska; Zoë Saldana; Mick Jagger; Gwen Stefani (in a plunging black sequined jumpsuit); and Gavin Rossdale (with a little ponytail). (The red carpet D.J. – a Cannes thing – played “Hollaback Girl” as they posed for photographers). By convention, the film’s stars – Brad Pitt, Sean Penn and Jessica Chastain – walked the red carpet together, posing for photos. But then Mr. Pitt let his castmates go into the theater, descended the grand staircase, and fetched Angelina Jolie. As the French announcer gushed, calling them the first couple of movie stardom, they worked the red carpet, greeting a few fans and administering a kind of royal wave at the top of the stairs.

Inside the theater, even the black tie crowd was a bit starstruck. The film got a three-and-a-half minute standing ovation, though the applause was not thundering; afterward, festival employees, young women in black dresses and gold ribbon belts, formed a human shield along the aisles so the celebrities could leave unencumbered.

They were supposed to turn up at an afterparty on the beach. Judging by the crowd surging at the gates, word had gotten out. When a security guard let a French actress push past the waiting horde, there was vitriol. “There are a lot of people who are well-known here – just not in France,” an American woman hissed. “Isn’t this an American movie?”

Yes, but it was a French party, which means, we’ve come to realize, no food. Still, there was a startling view of the nearly full moon over the yachts of the Riviera, and, eventually, a hopping dance floor. Ms. Saldana came, as did Jane Fonda and Ryan Gosling, but none of the cast members made it. Mr. Gosling said the movie affected him viscerally. “I loooved it,” he said. It’s his third time in Cannes. “If you like weird conversations, like me, this is the place,” he said as he slipped out.


May 18, 2011, 8:30 am

Brad Pitt Discusses ‘The Tree of Life’


Manohla Dargis, a chief film critic of The New York Times, and Melena Ryzik and Dennis Lim are reporting from the Cannes Film Festival.

CANNES, France — The Cannes Film Festival being the world capital of auteur cinema, “The Tree of Life” was greeted with the sense of occasion befitting a Terrence Malick movie. But for much of the assembled press at this glamour-hungry event, it was also — and perhaps more to the point — a Brad Pitt movie. In fact, a good number of journalists left the film’s Monday morning press screening early to get in line for the press conference, where Mr. Pitt was the star attraction. (Mr. Malick, as expected, was not there.)

In Mr. Malick’s absence — he is in town, but squarely out of the public eye — Mr. Pitt has shouldered the bulk of the promotional duties (walking the red carpet on Monday night with Angelina Jolie) and also, as has happened with many of Mr. Malick’s collaborators over the years, assuming the role of spokesperson, fielding questions about the making of the film and its larger meanings on behalf of the media-shy auteur. (Mr. Pitt is also a co-producer of “The Tree of Life” through his company Plan B, which he runs with Dede Gardner.)

Mr. Pitt spoke about the film in an interview at the Carlton Hotel on Tuesday. Here are audio clips from the conversation

Audio Clips at site.
The Times at Cannes

Cannes Film Festival

Manohla Dargis, a chief film critic of The New York Times, and Melena Ryzik and Dennis Lim are reporting from the Cannes Film Festival.