Showing posts with label retrospective. Show all posts
Showing posts with label retrospective. Show all posts

Thursday, January 16, 2025







Tuesday, June 17, 2014






Maria A. Ressa
Published 4:57 PM, Jun 17, 2014
Updated 7:01 PM, Jun 17, 2014



The passion of Angelina Jolie

Angelina Jolie’s story is itself inspirational – a public transformation from the wild child whose mother allowed her a live-in boyfriend at age 14, who admitted she was bisexual and who once harmed herself

LONDON, United Kingdom – Passion can inspire change.
That’s the fundamental idea behind the unlikely partnership of British Foreign Minister William Hague and Angelina Jolie bringing global focus to sexual violence in conflict.
“Angelina brings what governments cannot bring,” said Hague. “She has the power to speak to the whole world, to raise awareness, to change attitudes.”

“That’s why I’m here,” said Tsonka Petkova at the Fringe exhibition of the Global Summit to End Sexual Violence in Conflict in east London. The ExCel venue was far from the center of London, but she came because she wanted to support Angelina Jolie.



“She’s very passionate, and I want to aspire to be someone like her,” said Petkova, who has a degree in occupational and organizational psychology. Originally from Bulgaria, she’s lived most of her life in London. “She’s a global human being. She sees we’re all connected, and I want to think like that. She’s pushing us to be better.”

It was a global meeting like no other. That was what Hague promised, and that was what it was.
“Today in our networked world, relations between countries are made up of a network of ties between individuals, businesses, NGOs, campaigners,” said Hague. “That’s why I was determined that this would be a summit like no other that had ever been held, bringing together not just governments but a whole mix of people who help to drive opinion and bring expertise.”
As ministers from 123 countries met upstairs, survivors and civil society groups, non-governmental organizations set up booths downstairs – an exhibition of the suffering and help available globally. There were hundreds of discussions, music programs and plays. That was open to the public, many of whom came because of Angelina Jolie’s star power.
“I love her as an actress, and with Brad Pitt, obviously, I follow,” Petkova admitted. “I followed her travels, and I read the books she recommended, and she opened my eyes about a whole world out there, and that I can do more.”

As a member of the Philippine delegation and of media, I had access to all the sessions (some of which were closed to the public and media). I've reported on numerous summits - from the annual ASEAN, APEC, OIC, and others, but this was different. In terms of engagement and mood, the closest I could compare it to in terms of exuberance was the 1995 Beijing Women's Conference.



There was no doubt having Angelina Jolie and her partner, Brad Pitt, there had an effect.
I was sitting with the ministers’ delegation when the couple entered, and the ministers around me craned their necks for a better view. One murmured, "They're not human."

Wild child turns advocate
In many ways, Angelina Jolie’s story is itself inspirational – a public transformation from the wild child whose mother allowed her a live-in boyfriend at age 14, who admitted she was bisexual and who once harmed herself.
She is twice divorced, better known in her younger days for her tattoos, hard-drug use and a searing kiss with her brother. Not to mention, she could also be classified as a home-wrecker - after all, Brad Pitt left his wife, Jennifer Aniston, after meeting Jolie on the set of their movie, Mr. & Mrs. Smith.
But Jolie has transcended all this. The wild girl is now a woman with a cause, and she has the power to take the world with her.
Those who knew her said the transformation began in 2001 when she filmed her movie, Tomb Raiders, in Cambodia and adopted a son from there. Now she and Brad Pitt have 6 children, 3 of whom are adopted.
That was the same year she travelled to Sierra Leone as a UNHCR Goodwill Ambassador. That was when she began to immerse herself in humanitarian issues leading to at least 40 field trips to affected nations, including a recent visit to Bosnia that moved her to tears.
The tragedy in Bosnia-Herzegovina brought Jolie and Hague together in more ways than one. After Hague saw her film, he asked her to work with him.
In 2011, Jolie wrote and directed In the Land of Blood and Honey, a romance set against the backdrop of the Bosnian war from 1992-1995. Jolie immersed herself in the conflict which killed more than 100,000 people, and where the UN says up to 60,000 women were raped by men who were systematically using rape as a tool for ethnic cleansing.
On the 3rd night of the conference, Jolie introduced a screening of her film.
“I struggled to understand how it was possible for people to be capable of such crimes, and why it so often took the form of brutal sexual violence,” Jolie said. “And I was horrified by the fact that it took so long for the rest of the world to intervene to stop it. It just really seemed incomprehensible.”





During her summit statements, Jolie brought up the kidnapping of the schoolgirls in Nigeria by Boko Haram, the rapes in India and Pakistan, Liberia, the Democratic Republic of Congo.

A celebrity who listens
This is no shallow celebrity endorsement.
The same passion that drove her when she was younger is still apparent.
Jolie spent the entire 4 days in the ExCel venue talking to people, walking around the booths, visibly moved by the stories of the survivors.
At the beginning, she was swarmed, and at least 6 people in red T-shirts as well as her security, walked with her to help part the crowd, but slowly, the crowd got used to her.




A member of the Philippine delegation describes one encounter because she was right behind Jolie when a man stopped her.
“I was overwhelmed and speechless,” said the delegate. “She was so human and very, very sincere. This Congolese guy called her, ‘Angelina, Angelina.’ He said, ‘Say something about Congo,’ and she said, ‘what do you want me to say?’”
“The guy didn’t even have an ID. He wasn’t a delegate. He was part of the public. It didn’t matter to her. When the man was speaking, she said, ‘Ok, what is your message to me? What do you want me to do?’”
“She was really listening, and she knew what she was talking about. When it became sloganeering, she cut him and said, ‘Ok, you want me to say something about corruption in government’ and she mentioned other problems. She held the guy’s hand, and before they ended the conversation, she asked for his name. ‘Ok, Brando, I’ll be back here tomorrow.’”
Two nights later before her film was shown, Jolie outlined the effect she wanted to have on her audience.
“If I have a hope, it is that it will make people more understanding and more thoughtful about Bosnia-Herzegovina, which needs more support today than it is getting from the international community,” said Jolie.
“I also hope that when you watch this film, you think about Syria. It seems unthinkable that nearly 20 years after the siege of Sarajevo, we see Syrian cities like Homs and Aleppo besieged and bombarded – that 9 million Syrians have been driven from their homes and nearly 3 million refugees are in neighboring countries, all bearing stories of murder, starvation and rape.”
“And it does feel at the moment that the international community has given up on trying to restart negotiations, but our response to such desperate humanitarian suffering can never be to give up.”


At the summit close, Jolie shared the stage with US Secretary of State John Kerry and Britain’s Foreign Secretary William Hague.
Jolie’s words about Syria the night before were echoed by both men as they discussed Iraq, saying the power vacuum in Syria helped create what they have to deal with today.With the ongoing crisis in Iraq, what either man said was breaking news.
As the two men discussed possible military action and responses to the ongoing crisis, Jolie reminded the world about the core of the summit: “Warzone rape is not simply a women’s issue. It is not a humanitarian issue. It goes to the heart of international peace and security.”
It’s unprecedented to hear from a Hollywood actress at a time like that, but expect to see more because Hague described the summit as “a strong example of the future of foreign policy and how it should be conducted.”



Perhaps that's the right approach in the age of social media, when direct access to the public makes a difference, and a woman like Jolie can turn star power into a spotlight on international issues.

“We’ve all watched her play many remarkable roles,” said Kerry. “But perhaps her most lasting legacy actually comes from a role that she plays in real life, and that is the role of fierce and fearless advocate.” - Rappler.com











BBC’s John Humphrys accused of ‘everyday sexism’ by Lady Warsi

Minister attacks presenter over claim that William Hague ignored issues such as Iraq to attend summit with Angelina Jolie


Critical: Baroness Warsi accused Mr Humphrys of sexism




John Humphrys
John Humphrys has been accused of 'everyday sexism' by Tory peer Lady Warsi. Photograph: BBC
The BBC’s John Humphrys has been accused of “everyday sexism” by a government minister.
Foreign Office minister Lady Warsi was responding on Monday evening to criticism levelled at the Radio 4 Today programme presenter by Labour’s Lady Thornton.
Thornton, an opposition frontbencher speaking from the backbenches, had expressed her “irritation” at Humphrys’ comments in the programme that morning.
In a terse exchange with the foreign secretary, Humphrys suggested William Hague had been a bit “star struck” by being photographed with movie star Angelina Jolie while attending a sexual violence in war summit in London.
Critics have suggested Hague should have been focusing on the emerging crisis in Iraq instead.

 Angelina Jolie and William Hague attend the Global Summit to End Sexual Violence in Conflict. Photograph: Peter Macdiarmid/Getty Images
 
In the Lords during a statement on Iraq and last week’s London summit, Thornton asked if Warsi was “as irritated as I was and I’m sure other people were by the comments John Humphrys made on the Today programme this morning”.
She said: “He seemed to suggest that because Angelina Jolie is a very beautiful and famous woman, somehow that undermined her support, which has been totally admirable and long term, for this issue - and somehow that meant our foreign secretary didn’t have his eye on the ball of other issues.”
Warsi defended Hague, insisting he was “incredibly passionate” about the issue of sexual violence towards women in conflict zones.
She added: “In terms of the comments, well, you know, everyday sexism, what can we say.
“If there are men out there who believe women can’t be beautiful and brainy maybe they should read the foreign secretary’s speech in Washington last year when he said it is finally time for women to take their place at the important tables where decisions are made ...”

Saturday, June 14, 2014









......
On the Queen’s Birthday Honours list, the name stood out from those of charity workers, teachers and civil servants: Angelina Jolie – Honorary Dame Commander of the Most Distinguished Order of St Michael and St George, for her campaigning work “for services to UK foreign policy and the campaign to end war zone sexual violence”. This means that the Hollywood A-lister has become one of a tiny group of US citizens to be honoured by the British establishment (though they can’t use their titles).
It was an extraordinary accolade – doubly so when you consider that the demure Jolie, who last week hosted a London summit dedicated to ending war rape in her capacity as special envoy for the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, is the same Jolie who, not long ago, was making headlines for her tattoos, hard-drug use and intimately kissing her brother in public.
......
Indeed, so drastic has been her rehabilitation that Jolie’s status is now among the tiny section of Hollywood stars deemed untouchable. According to US pollster Q Scores, which determines celebrities’ likeability factor, Jolie’s score is 23 – meaning 23 per cent of US adults consider her “one of [their] favourite personalities”, while 85 per cent of adults know who she is. This compared with a 15 per cent likeability score and 46 per cent awareness for the average actress.
.......
 She’s Hollywood royalty, a megabrand,” says one film insider. Indeed, a recent poll named her, along with Pitt, as the celebrities most sought-after for endorsements. “Jolie has formed a strong emotional bond with American consumers, which is on the rise,” confirms Henry Schafer, executive vice-president of Q Scores.

Perhaps her appeal comes from her chameleon-like qualities. She has a sex-bomb persona (she is regularly named the world’s most beautiful woman by magazines such as Vogue) but is simultaneously a “madonna”, the mother of six children, three of whom are adopted.

“What’s remarkable about Jolie is she’s the best at everything she touches,” says Christina Hopkinson, author of The A-List Family. “When she was in her bad-girl phase, she was the baddest imaginable. Now she’s a mother, she’s the ultimate earth-mother of three boys and three girls – even her twins were the perfect boy-girl combination.
.....

Dorie Clark, author of Reinventing You: Define Your Brand, Imagine Your Future, uses Jolie as a prime example of reinvention. “Because her negative brand attributes centred around too much predatory sexuality,” she says, “motherhood and her clear devotion to her children showed a different, gentler side and balanced out her reputation.”

The couple’s fame rose as they travelled the world with their huge “rainbow family”, alternatively making films or doing good – be it campaigning to help New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina, or working in Haiti after the 2010 earthquake.

Many suspect that Jolie has brilliantly manipulated her narrative so the husband-stealing/wild-child persona has been airbrushed by the human saint. Whatever the motives, for more than a decade she’s travelled frequently to some of the most insalubrious corners of the world, bringing huge publicity to previously unfashionable causes.

“Frankly, if a celebrity isn’t genuinely interested in poverty and is simply trying to get good press, there are better ways to do it. Travelling to Darfur or Congo is dangerous, expensive and uncomfortable, and the outhouses have bats, scorpions and camel spiders,” says Nicholas Kristof of The New York Times, who spoke with Jolie at a 2008 session at the Council on Foreign Relations about justice in Darfur.

While she plays the celebrity game, it always seems to serve a higher purpose than personal vanity or greed. Pictures of her newborn twins were sold for a $14 million donation to her Jolie-Pitt Foundation. Those who have worked with her say her behaviour is strikingly un-divalike and professional.

Still, a suspicion persists that her youthful eccentricity (her father once tearfully described her as having “serious mental problems”) has never gone away, but that her restlessness is now being channelled to positive ends.

Now Jolie is reinventing herself again, as a director. Her latest, second, film Unbroken, about a Second World War hero, is hotly tipped as a 2015 Oscar contender. But before picking up another golden statue, there is the matter of a visit to Buckingham Palace to collect her gong.





Wednesday, June 4, 2014




From the archives


1. "Deconstructing Angelina Jolie." The mystery, mayhem that make Angelina Jolie one of our few remaining true movie stars.   Posted July 28th, 2010, 10:07 AM by
"When you listen to the women who don’t like Angelina Jolie, it’s impossible not to hear something in their voices that tells you they consider her a threat to all those nice, sensitive girls. But we'd already seen evidence of that on screen. No action heroine of Jolie's will ever commit a killing as lethal and thorough as the one Jolie administered to Winona Ryder in Girl, Interrupted. Cast in a supporting role in Ryder's pet project—The Bell Jar as princess fantasy—Jolie, as the bad girl, without breaking a sweat, stomped all over the picture's moon-eyed, poetic suffering leading lady. It was akin to hearing the Sex Pistols in 1977 and believing, for a moment, that you'd never have to listen to the Eagles again."




Tuesday, June 3, 2014






Angelina Jolie: Her 10 Sexiest Roles


Hollywood's most dangerously hot actress has hinted that she might be making her next project – a film about the life of ancient Egyptian queen Cleopatra – her last. Tragic, no doubt, but at least she's leaving us with this collection of incredible celluloid moments. Reflect and enjoy

Gallery at site





Monday, June 2, 2014






Mighty Maleficent: Why Angelina Jolie Is the World’s Highest-Paid Actress




Because she triumphs in many genres. Because she's popular here and abroad. Because she can out-stare any male star. And because she's Angelina Jolie!

Producer Joe Roth said of Maleficent, “There was no point in making the movie if it wasn’t her.” The “her” in question is Angelina Jolie, who played the role of the sorceress fairy badmother in Roth’s live-action origins story based on the Disney animated feature Sleeping Beauty.

No one but Jolie could have incarnated Maleficent with such plausible majesty. And nobody else could have led this troubled production, with only so-so entertainment value, to a $70-million first weekend at the North American box office — plus another $100 million in foreign markets.

The year’s biggest opening for a movie with a female lead, Maleficent certifies the standing of Jolie as the one actress who can open big movies to big numbers. In action and fantasy films — genres usually dominated by men — Jolie, who turns 39 on Wednesday, has consistently appealed to audiences of all demographics. Fanboys worship her; women admire her; kids flock to see her as Sleeping Beauty’s nemesis or to hear her growl as the sexy Tigress in the Kung Fu Panda movies.

From her first superheroine role in Lara Croft: Tomb Raider — which earned $275 million globally in 2001, back when that was real money — Jolie has been the one actress who can stand up to any male star and stare him down. Unlike Tom Cruise or Adam Sandler, she’s not an aging kid in arrested development; unlike them, she hasn’t been in an expensive flop since Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow a decade ago. And her films almost always earn more money where it counts, in foreign markets. Jolie’s exotic mixture of brains and glamour makes her the one reliable international star, and one of the few of either gender to make people in every country pay to see her.

The box-office numbers for Jolie’s last four mainstream live-action movies prove her worth. Mr. & Mrs. Smith, the 2005 spy romance that introduced her to her future partner Brad Pitt, opened to $50.3 million and grossed $186.3 million in North America and nearly $300 million more abroad. In her 2008 Wanted, the male lead James McAvoy added little marquee luster, yet the suppervillain movie earned $50.9 million its first three days in 2008, $134.5 for its domestic run and more than $200 million overseas. Two years later, Salt, another solo action film, took in nearly $300 million worldwide. The Tourist, a spy comedy with Johnny Depp, was no great shakes at home ($67.6 million), but it earned $211 million abroad, putting the film solidly in the black.

In sum, Jolie’s films have earned $4.88 billion globally, and she’s sure to pass the $5-billion threshold shortly, as her new film opens in China and Japan. That’s why, despite her not having appeared on screen since The Tourist nearly four years ago, Jolie commanded a $33-million salary for Maleficent, making her the only woman in the 2013 top-10 list of highest-paid actors (tied for ninth with Denzel Washington). For the third time last year, she perched atop Forbes magazine’s list of the top-paid actresses.

Her box-office clout stems in part from the limitations of her statuesque regality. Jolie is not the girl next door — unless you live on Olympus. And though she is one of the most famous celebrity mothers — and played a brave, forlorn mom in Clint Eastwood’s Changeling — her iconography makes her unsuitable for maternal roles. In a way, Maleficent domesticates this least domestic of all actresses, by turning her into Sleeping Beauty’s surrogate mother. But audiences have come to see Jolie toss thunderbolts of righteous wrath, not to nurture. Her fans should know that she’ll be in full feral form soon in a third King Fu Panda and a second Salt.

Behind the screen, Jolie works tirelessly for UNICEF and has directed two indie films: In the Land of Bloody and Honey, a political drama in the Bosnian and Serbian languages ($300,000 when it played in all of 18 theaters in 2011), and the forthcoming Unbroken, the true story of an Olympic runner imprisoned by the Japanese during World War II; that film, for which Joel and Ethan Coen contributed to the script, opens Christmas Day.

And last month Variety reported that she and Pitt will collaborate in some fashion on a Jolie script, the details as yet undivulged. It won’t be Maleficent, but it might, Jolie’s world of fans hope, be magnificent.











Angelina Jolie Just Had the Biggest Opening Weekend of Her Career





Despite some spotty reviews, Angelina Jolie’s spin on an old Disney classic had a huge weekend at the box office, raking in $70,000,000. That makes Maleficent the fifth highest grossing film of the year, coming in just behind Godzilla ($93,188,384) and a trio of comic book franchise films The Amazing Spider-Man 2 ($91,608,337), X-Men: Days of Future Past ($90,823,660), and the one to beat, Captain America: The Winter Soldier ($95,023,721). Maleficent is also the highest-grossing female-led movie of the year so far, but I imagine that will all change in November when Katniss returns for The Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 1. If not sooner.

But perhaps the most interesting aspect of this monster hit is that this is the strongest opening weekend of Angelina Jolie’s career. That’s right, Maleficent even beat Jolie’s biggest film to-date, Mr. and Mrs. Smith ($50,342,878). Fake cheekbones and spinning wheels triumphed over Brad Pitt and a sex scandal? Who would have thought?

It’s tempting to use Maleficent’s numbers as an example of how an older woman (one well-known for being a mother, no less) can still hold tremendous sway at the box office, disabusing Hollywood of the notion that female leads have a sell-by date. But it’s also useful to remember that despite her large brood and lengthy career, Jolie is still only 38 years-old. Regardless, it’s word of mouth that will turn Maleficent into a bonafide, enduring hit and, spotty reviews be damned, the social media buzz is overwhelmingly positive. It may not have an equally popular soundtrack, but we might have another Frozen on our hands.




The Hollywood heavyweight hinted in an interview with the BBC that after playing Cleopatra, she could "finish" with acting

Maleficent is dominating the box office, but Angelina Jolie sounds as if she’s already planning her Hollywood exit.
While promoting the film in the U.K., Jolie stopped by the BBC and confirmed that she’d been involved in talks about bringing Cleopatra back to the big screen. “There’s been lots of different ideas of directors and lots of different discussions,” said Jolie, who would, obviously, play the Egyptian queen herself. “The script has been written by Eric Roth, who is a dear friend and a brilliant writer.”
Though the project is still in the planning stages, Jolie even hinted that such an iconic role could serve as her swan song in front of the camera. Discussing the role of Cleopatra, Jolie said, “She’s complicated, it’s complicated to get this one right. I think we’re getting there. It’s getting close. I imagine the preparation for it is going to be big. It’s one of those that you think maybe that’s the one you put everything into and that’s where you end it, that’s where you finish—in a great way. What could you do beyond that one?”
At this point in her career, Jolie is almost as well known for her humanitarian work with the United Nations, where she was appointed the special envoy for the High Commissioner for Refugees in 2012, as she is for her films. The Cleopatra hint echoes a comment Jolie made during a news conference last month, when she said she planned to scale back the number of acting roles she took on, saying, “I would like to focus on writing and directing and above all I would like to focus more on my work with the U.N.”






$70 million: Domestic dollarage earned by Maleficent, Angelina Jolie’s first time onscreen in 3.5 years. (Her last was The Tourist in late 2010.) The Disney baddie project (P.S.: Grantland is owned by Disney) made Jolie $20 million more than her previous best openers, 2008’s Wanted and 2005’s Mr. & Mrs. Smith. The debut didn’t approach the $90 million mark reached this year by Godzilla, The Amazing Spider-Man 2, Captain America: The Winter Soldier, and X-Men: Days of Future Past, but it did handily best 2012’s Snow White and the Huntsman ($56.2 million) and Mirror Mirror ($18.1 million). Around the world, Maleficent earned a total of $170.6 million. It can be tough for summer movies to stay successful when something giant is always around the corner, but this one might have legs.







TOH

Career Watch

Features by Susan Wloszczyna
June 2, 2014 6:30 AM


Angelina Jolie COURTESY OF GETTY
 
Reviews were split down the middle: “Maleficent” was both magnificent and Grimm failure.  The "Wicked"-style live-action reworking of the animated classic "Sleeping Beauty" that focuses on the vengeful fairy who places the curse on a young princess scored a so-so 51% positive ranking on Rotten Tomatoes.

However, even some of the harshest critics couldn’t resist star Angelina Jolie’s chillingly seductive brand of visual hocus pocus -- jutting cheekbones, curvaceous horns, crimson-lacquered lips combined with the mesmerizing allure of a silent-movie  siren --  as the human incarnation of the Disney cartoon icon. Peter Rainer of the “Christian Science Monitor” praised her as “a genuinely heroic presence,” despite being otherwise underwhelmed.

Those who were kinder to the CGI-jammed fantasy were even more effusive.  As Moira MacDonald of the “Seattle Times” observed, “There's really only one special effect in "Maleficent" worth mentioning, and that is Angelina Jolie.”

Wanted

As for moviegoers, the $70 million opening  -- a Jolie record -- for a rare female summer action adventure suggests that they, too, were transfixed by the sight of the right actress in a perfect-fit role.

Signature line:  “I'm playing the villain, baby, just like you want. I try to give you everything you want.”  -- As Lisa, the brutally honest sociopath, in “Girl, Interrupted” (1999).

Career peaks: Well, well … as Maleficent herself would say. The actress, who turns 39 on June 4, has summoned her bad-girl persona from the past and it worked. Think back to the period before motherhood, humanitarian causes and Brad Pitt. Jolie, the so-beautiful-it-hurts daughter of movie star Jon Voight, favored knives, cutting, and drugs, bedded both men and women, had a bizarre-o three-year marriage to Billy Bob Thornton and seemed  on a path to self-destruction. Remember when she would feed the press such quotes as, “When other little girls wanted to be ballet dancers I kind of wanted to be a vampire?”

Jolie at the 2012 Oscars

After a series of mediocre films in the early ‘90s, she found her breakout roles in TV movies:  As Southern politician George Wallace’s second wife in 1997’s “Wallace” and as a tragic supermodel  in 1998’s “Gia.” She then managed to overshadow star Winona Ryder and win a supporting Oscar as a scary and sarcastic mental patient  in “Girl, Interrupted.” After that, Jolie found her calling as an action hero, one inspired by a video-game vixen in 2001’s “Lara Croft: Tomb Raider” in addition to a 2003 sequel.

Zoom to Angelina 2.0. Not only was 2005’s “Mr. and Mrs. Smith” her biggest box-office hit to date ($478 million worldwide), she ran off with her co-star and future fiancé Brad Pitt. Since then, that long-running soap opera relationship (along with her roles as a philanthropist and a mother of six) have eclipsed her work output. She has mixed “quality” films that have garnered critical plaudits, including  2007’s “A Mighty Heart” and 2008’s “Changeling,” with more mainstream fare. Her box-office hits have been either animated (2008’s "Kung Fu Panda" and its 2011 sequel) or action (2008’s "Wanted," 2010’s "Salt"). Until now: "Maleficent" is the perfect mix of both.

Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt at 2012 NYFCC Awards

Biggest assets: Those eyes, those lips, that face – combined with her now-glowing public image. Jolie’s astonishing beauty, old-fashioned glamour and statuesque presence are well-suited to outsized roles such as Maleficent or Lara Croft.  And now that her PR smarts have turned the tide on her public image as a Hollywood wild child and home wrecker while capitalizing on her adoption of three in-need children, her efforts as an U.N ambassador and her brave revelations about her preventative double mastectomy to ward off cancer in 2013, moviegoers have warmed considerably towards her.

Gossip fodder:  Where to start? Where to end? For the first half of her career, the chatter about her offbeat goth-girl lifestyle and romantic companions often upstaged her acting feats. But after getting involved with the United Nations in 2001 and adopting her first child, son Maddox, from an orphanage in 2003, Jolie cleaned up her act--and controlled her publicity. All that good will, of course, was threatened by scandal-shouting headlines after being linked with then-married Pitt in 2005. Eventually the popularity of pitting Brangelina against Pitt’s ex-wife Jennifer Aniston ran out of tabloid steam. Both actors have become so savvy in doing damage control and handling how they are perceived by the public these days that their careers have hardly suffered.


Jolie on the set of "In The Land of Blood and Honey"

Awards attention:  Won a supporting Emmy and Golden Globe for “Wallace.” Won the trifecta – lead Emmy, Golden Globe and SAG – for “Gia.” And pulled off another three-way – supporting Oscar, Globe, SAG  -- with wins for “Girl, Interrupted.” Nominated for a Globe and SAG as lead in “A Mighty Heart” and earned lead Oscar, Globe and SAG nods for “Changeling.” Nominated for a Globe as a lead in 2010’s “The Tourist.” Honored with the Academy's coveted Jean Hersholt Humanitarian Award last year.

Honorary Oscar Winners Jolie, Lansbury, Martin

Latest misfire: Despite earning three laughable Globe nominations in categories for musicals or comedies – it was neither -- the nearly universally panned "The Tourist" failed to capitalize on what should have been an exceedingly combustible first-time pairing of two superstars, Jolie and Johnny Depp. Considering what they probably earned for taking part in the $100 million romantic thriller, $68 million in domestic ticket sales seems pretty paltry indeed.

Biggest problems: Jolie is so larger-than-life, it makes it difficult for audiences to accept her in roles as an everyday person. As her “Changeling” director Clint Eastwood, who has nothing but praise for her acting abilities, has noted: “She’s somewhat hampered sometimes by having this gorgeous face, the most gorgeous face on the planet. She’s on covers and all that stuff.” Besides, most screenplays pale when compared to her own well-documented existence as a global vagabond do-gooder with a large brood of adorable kids and equally stunning companion. That might be one reason that it has been four years since she was last seen on a movie screen (she was only heard in “Kung Fu Panda 2”). The other is her pursuit of a directing career.

Jolie directing 'Unbroken'

Career advice: Jolie made another wise move when she took refuge behind the camera as a writer, director and producer of the 2011 Bosnian War film “In the Land of Milk and Honey.” Despite mixed reviews, it proved she was seriously committed to her craft – not always easy to do as a celebrated sex symbol.  That she is continuing down that path is probably a good thing for the most part. Her second directing effort, “Unbroken,” the true story of  an Olympic athlete who survived being a  World War II POW,  opens this Christmas.

Still, fans might be disappointed if Jolie decides to call it a day as a performer. As she told USA TODAY recently, "I became an actress because my mom wanted me to become an actress. It took me until my mid-30s to realize I actually didn't. I actually wanted to write and direct and be more involved in politics and humanitarian issues. I'll do a few more films and enjoy it and if I'm blessed to have a good career, but I've never loved it like I love other things.”

It would be a shame if Jolie fails to use her current box-office muscle to portray more fabulous female characters.  But given that she has a sizable list of upcoming acting projects, a retirement from the screen is not exactly imminent.

Next step: So far she has resisted many possible sequels, but we'll see if she goes along with plans for “Salt 2,” “Wanted 2” and “Kung Fu Panda 3.” And Disney will surely pursue another go-round for hit “Maleficent.” Also tempting is the news that Jolie has written a script – one that she describes as “a little independent experiment” -- that might finally reunite her and Pitt as co-stars. But the only production news that will be more exciting than when her long-awaited take on “Cleopatra” gets off the ground is when the pair finally announce a wedding date.

Sunday, June 1, 2014









Angelina Jolie is a box office queen with Maleficent, but Seth MacFarlane is shooting blanks in his big screen debut, A Million Ways to Die in the West. posted on June 1, 2014, at 4:01 p.m.



The conventional wisdom in Hollywood is that franchise movies with identifiable brand name characters are far more valuable at the box office than the movie stars who play them. Hugh Jackman on his own isn’t much of an audience draw; Hugh Jackman as Wolverine, however, still very much is.
But this weekend, one bone fide superstar — Angelina Jolie — asserted just how much power a single actor can still hold over the box office. Meanwhile, a man who has created his own wildly popular comedy brand — Seth MacFarlane — proved there are limits to his jack-of-all-trades success.
The Jolie-led Maleficent opened with an estimated $70 million, the best box office debut in the actress’ career, even when adjusting for inflation. It is also one of the highest opening weekends for a solo female star ever, behind only the first two Hunger Games movies. To be sure, Maleficent was an opulently designed, big canvas movie based on one of Disney’s most beloved animated features, 1959’s Sleeping Beauty.
But the film was sold almost exclusively on Jolie’s otherworldly face. By contrast, Columbia Pictures presented The Amazing Spider-Man 2 largely as a confrontation between Spider-Man and Electro, not between Andrew Garfield and Jamie Foxx. Jennifer Lawrence kicked major butt as Mystique in X-Men: Days of Future Past, but that film featured a sprawling ensemble cast — and was sold as such. Maleficent’s main draw was all about seeing Angelina Jolie embody one of the best Disney villains of all time: Come see Angelina with horns! And wings! And cheekbones that could cut you! It’s nearly impossible to imagine any other actress working today who could take on that role with as much anticipation — and ultimate success — as Jolie, and that is a mark of a true movie star.

photos dailymail




Friday, May 30, 2014




Angelina Jolie pursued a dream to be an actor ... but it was her mother's dream, as she reveals to Amanda Hooton.

May 31, 2014

This is how celebrity works. One duck-egg-blue day in Los Angeles, you find yourself speed-walking down a terracotta path at the Hotel Bel-Air. Hustling beside you is the global PR of Walt Disney Studios, a natty Brit. You thought your interview was in an hour, but no, says the natty Brit, it's now, and no, you don't have 30 minutes, you have 25, and no, there's no time to go to the toilet. This is what happens when you've been flown halfway around the world to meet perhaps the most famous movie star alive, and perhaps the most beautiful woman on the planet. The rules of normal life no longer apply.

The natty Brit swings left into a corridor, and takes a flight of stairs two at a time. At the top, another PR stands in the gloom, guarding a door. It opens and ejects a journalist. Propelled from behind, you plunge forward and into the light.

If this story were a movie, such light would signify a revelation. But in fact, Angelina Jolie is side-on, pouring a glass of water at a cabinet to your left, so your first, anticlimactic vision of her is of a slim figure in profile, head bent, one knee cocked. She is wearing all black: skinny black jeans and a loose black top. She turns, smiles, steps around a coffee table to a sofa on your right. You shake hands. You think she seems strong: a strong grip. Tattoos on her inner arms. Broad shoulders. Slim - but not skeletally slim. All this hits you in a second. So it is not until your second second that you register Angelina Jolie's face.

Tres Jolie: Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie at Kensington Palace in May this year. Dynamic duo: Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie at Kensington Palace in May this year. Photo: Getty Images
Great beauty is hard to describe. Even Homer only managed "white-armed Helen"; so much is subject to collective opinion and individual mood. But Jolie, in the flesh, is a kind of fact. Every now and then - once in a generation? Once in a century? Once in an age of heroes? - a face appears that makes the launching of a thousand ships seem reasonable. Jolie has that face.

Clint Eastwood - not easily impressed - once called Jolie "the most beautiful woman on earth", and this may, quite literally, be true. You might say, "No, a more beautiful woman may be living in darkest obscurity somewhere," but in fact you realise, as soon as you meet the 38-year-old Jolie, that beauty like this is absolutely incompatible with anonymity. As soon as a single other Homo sapiens caught sight of it, the gig would be up.

Jolie's colouring is all in shades of brown: honey- brown hair, pale-gold skin, amber-green eyes. Even her lips - as extraordinary in life as on film - are caramel pink. She has not a single line, mark or blemish on her face, but manages to look as if she hasn't had Botox or work done of any kind. (She may have, of course, which means she's found the best cosmetic surgeon in world history, which in turn raises the question of why more stars haven't done the same, which in turn suggests she hasn't.) She does seem to be wearing false eyelashes, but they're like no false eyelashes you've ever seen: they seem to have been applied one by one, possibly under a microscope by a highly skilled eyelash genie.



Maleficent: Angelina Jolie with her daughter Vivienne Jolie-Pitt, who was the only young Aurora not to cry at the sight of Jolie.

She also has an unexpectedly lovely voice, low-pitched and clear. Obedient to the PRs listening at the door, and the loudly ticking 25-minute stopwatch in your head, you ask about her latest movie.
It is her 38th, in a career spanning everything from mental patient in Girl, Interrupted (for which she won an Oscar in 2000) to pneumatic cartoon heroine Lara Croft. It is a Disney production, entitled Maleficent, and revolves around the wicked fairy/queen/witch (Disney doesn't get bogged down in details) who curses Sleeping Beauty. Jolie plays Maleficent, notable for her unearthly green beauty, a faint sibilance in her voice, and her prosthetic cheekbones, even higher and more angular than Jolie's own.

What is most notable about this film, however, at least in celebrity terms, is that Angelina is not the only Jolie in it. Her 10-year-old son, Pax Jolie-Pitt, and her nine-year-old daughter, Zahara, have brief walk-on parts, and the blonde, dazzlingly cherubic child who plays the young Sleeping Beauty (aka Aurora), is Jolie's youngest daughter, five-year-old Vivienne. How did this happen?

"Complicated history": With her brother, James Haven, and father, Jon Voight, in 1994.
 "Complicated history": With her brother, James Haven, and father, Jon Voight, in 1994. Photo: Getty Images

"Well, Aurora needs to be a kid who can really, genuinely see me with love, and not be afraid," explains Jolie pleasantly. "And I'm there with my horns and my accent and my pointy teeth, saying things like, 'I hate you! Go away!' "
Children did, apparently, run screaming from the set at the sight of Jolie in costume. "Two little children broke down in tears, and one said, 'Mummy, please make the scary lady stop talking to me.' " Vivienne, however, took it in stride. "She's the mummy's girl: she's the one who's constantly attached to my kaftan at home." Jolie smiles. "Actually, she's very good in her scene. It made us slightly uncomfortable."
The "us" here is, of course, Brad Pitt: mega movie star in his own right, Jolie's partner of a decade, and the father (adoptive and biological) of her six children. You know this, of course, but even this small mention is surprising. Most celebrity interviews are understood by both parties as a kind of duel to the death: you with your cunningly disguised "tell me about your personal life" sword thrusts, they with their elaborate "let me describe yet another intensely boring detail about my work" defensive ripostes. Yet here is Jolie, rolling happily on with what interests her, which also happens to be what interests everybody else, which is real life (strange as it may seem to apply the concept to a plane-piloting, UN-ambassadoring, nation-hopping, film- star-partnering superwoman).

Creeping beauty: Angelina Jolie as Maleficent.
Creeping beauty: Angelina Jolie as Maleficent.

"We're hoping, I think, that the kids don't become actors," she confides. "We want them to be happy, and do whatever they're interested in, but I think we're hoping to show them so many other ideas and other options that they won't want to act. If they do, I hope they act and also ..." she pauses, perhaps trying to be diplomatic, "... do something else. I'd like them to do other things with their lives." She shakes her head. "We're a bit nervous about that."

You try, and fail, to imagine Jolie and Pitt worrying about their kids like normal people. You also try, and fail, to care about asking more movie questions. Instead, you ask her if she and Pitt have an acting-prevention plan. Jolie puts her elbows on her knees, looking exactly like a mother gossiping beside the school gate - except, of course, that she looks absolutely unlike any other imaginable mother on earth.

"Well, we think it's almost good that they come to set," she says, "and we let them come to a premiere here and there. We don't want to keep them from it: we want them to see it so they can get bored by it." She looks triumphant. "And our eldest does seem quite bored about it all; he finds it a little fun, but he's very into music and he's not that taken by film."

Ambassador: In Kenya in 2009 as a Special Envoy to the UN High Commissioner for Refugees.
Ambassador: In Kenya in 2009 as a Special Envoy to the UN High Commissioner for Refugees. Photo: AustralScope

You can't help thinking that this might mean she and Pitt will be dealing with a wannabe rock star in 10 years' time, not a third-generation actor (Jolie's father, Jon Voight, is also an Oscar-winning actor; his most famous role was in the 1969 hit Midnight Cowboy), which might not be a notably easier path. How much influence does she think parents really have over their kids?

"I think very much children are exactly who they are when they're born," she says. "And if there's a trauma, it can drastically change who they are, but if there isn't, they will most likely be ... We look at our kids, and if you look at baby photos of them, the way they were, the way they looked, what their kind of energy was - whether they were a sweet, elegant, private little person, or a funny, open person, or a bold person, or whatever - they're still exactly the same. There's so much that they're born with. And we believe that you have to just encourage the individual and support them, but don't get in their way too much.

"And what's fascinating," she goes on, "is that you could say, 'Well, you'd be more similar to the children who have a genetic link to you,' but I'm not. Maybe one of them, but then I'm also very similar to [her adopted son] Maddox. So it doesn't have an impact that some are genetically connected."

Speaking of genetics, several years ago Jolie explained that she couldn't imagine having biological children. Now she has three. With 15 of your 25 minutes down, you throw caution to the wind. What changed her mind? "It took me a really long time," she says easily. "It was very important to me that I came together with a man to whom it didn't matter whether we ever had children, and who was completely content to only adopt. And when I saw Brad with our children and I saw that they really were his children, and there was nothing missing for him, then it became clear to me that this was a journey we should go on together, and that it was another way of being parents.
"It was an additional way, not changing the course of our family - we would still adopt, and we did. But it was very important that it wasn't because he felt like something was missing with an adopted child. I waited for that moment to make sure he didn't see it that way."

Jolie herself knows about things missing in childhood: Jon Voight left her mother, Marcheline Bertrand, when Jolie was two. Bertrand raised Jolie and her older brother, James Haven, as a single mother, and Voight has been an unreliable, sometimes overtly hostile figure in his daughter's life, criticising her in the press, once even suggesting she was mentally unstable. Yet last year, when she received the Jean Hersholt Humanitarian Award (an honorary Oscar awarded to a member of the film industry for humanitarian work), he was in the audience, on the same table as Brad and Maddox. How is their relationship these days?

"We have a very complicated history," says Jolie, speaking slowly. "And we got to a place where we made an agreement, so my children would know him, that we would just never speak about the past. So we don't really, we just, we don't ..." She pauses. "One of the things you tend to do, especially in families where you fight often, or have a deep history or a lot of pain, there's this constant desire for people to try to correct it, or reinvent it, explain it.

"With us, we just got to a point where there was no going back, and there was going to be no ... We were never going to come to terms with certain things, and my mother's no longer alive to defend herself. So we kind of know each other today, as we are today. And we don't discuss the past, and it's not really a father-daughter relationship, as much as we try to be friends to each other at this time." She pauses again. "It became very simple, that I didn't feel it was right for my kids not to know him, and him not to know them. But you know, it has to be kept simple. So we don't go backwards."
Jolie's mother Marcheline, whom she clearly adored, died in 2007, at only 56, after an eight-year battle with ovarian cancer. During her speech last year in accepting the Jean Hersholt Oscar, Jolie made an unusual reference to Marcheline in the context of the slick, everyone's-a-winner awards ceremony. "My mother loved film," she said. "But she never had a career as an artist; she never had the opportunity to express herself beyond her theatre class."

Her eldest son Maddox, now 12, was in the audience, and Jolie went on to address him directly, telling him how happy she was to be his mother; how wonderful and privileged and fortunate her life was. The happiness of parents, she seemed to be saying, really matters to children.

"Yes," she says, leaning forward. "Yes, that's very true. Exactly. My mom was the greatest mother, and she couldn't do anything about the fact that we were often in a situation where I was worried about her, or wanting to take care of her. And I do hope my children never have to do that. But already they see that their father takes care of their mother, and that's something that I didn't see. So that's an extraordinary thing. And I think about it often - I'm very conscious of telling my kids how happy I am in my life. Even if I seem tired, or whatever: that I'm happy to do homework!"
She gives a slightly goofy laugh. "I want them to know that their lives take priority, and their concerns are more important than any of my concerns. Their needs are more important than my needs and my turn is passing and their turn is next. And I'm happy to do that."

As a mother, Jolie asks her children to travel constantly in pursuit of her and Pitt's film work, and exposes them to the disturbing, albeit absolutely real, problems of refugees and people in conflict all over the world through her role as a special envoy to António Guterres, the UN High Commissioner for Refugees. But by her reasoning, this is far better than asking them to carry the anxiety of knowing she's unhappy, and feeling, as children, that they need to fix it. This is what happened to her, she says: she became an actress because her mother wanted her to.

"Well, you want to be what they think would be the best thing for you," she says, smiling. "And she really wanted to be an actress, then she wanted it for me. But it took me only until a few years ago to realise that I don't know if I ever really wanted it. And that's a weird thing to realise: you wanted to fulfil a dream - and I've had a great life and learnt so much - but maybe it wasn't my dream. It was very interesting to me to try to do something else creatively and realise how much more it fit me than the thing I'd been doing all my life."

It's hard to imagine Angelina Jolie ever having done anything she didn't want to do. The very laws of the universe, you can't help thinking, would rise up and prevent it. But then, the universe is a fickle mistress. Last year, Jolie underwent a preventative double mastectomy, having discovered she carried a BRCA1 gene mutation that, without surgery, gave her an 87 per cent chance of contracting breast cancer.

It's likely she will have more preventative surgery in the future, most probably an oophorectomy (removal of her ovaries) to eliminate the chance of ovarian cancer (the other cancer for which her mutation puts her at high risk). More immediately, she'll finish the film she directed recently in Australia, Unbroken, and co-chair the Global Summit to End Sexual Violence in Conflict. She might also get married - belatedly, you realise she's wearing the extremely enormous, extremely beautiful white-and-yellow diamond ring that Pitt designed for her in 2012 when the pair announced their engagement - or adopt another baby.

It feels, sitting there opposite her, that you could ask about any or all of these things, and Jolie would answer. But then the door swings open, and the natty Brit is standing there, looking meaningful. Your time - all 23 minutes of it - is up. You stand up, say goodbye. She smiles. And out you go, back into the dim corridor. Oddly, it now doesn't seem so dim, nor the room so bright. It's just that both fame and beauty polish a person so they catch the light, and in Jolie's case the dazzle is almost blinding. But the person is there all the time. Which is a nice surprise about the way celebrity works.

Lead-in photography by Sofia Sanchez and Mauro Mongi/trunkarchive.com/Snapper Media






This review is one of the most insightful I've read.



grantland

Toil and Trouble

Angelina Jolie redeems ‘Maleficent’ and Charlize Theron almost saves ‘A Million Ways to Die in the West’
by Wesley Morris on May 30, 2014
....
Both Snow White movies were in some way also about older actors ceding the floor to younger actors — Roberts to a missing-in-action Lily Collins; Theron to Kristen Stewart. It just seemed too soon for what essentially felt like a concession. I say, just do the Shakespeare. Like a lot of films since The Little Mermaid, both movies also wanted to address the “princess problem.” They wanted to turn the princesses into tough cookies. There is feminism in these movies, but it’s on crutches. Their most appealing ingredient isn’t the ingenue but the hatefully jealous older star.

That’s the hook for Maleficent, too: Come watch Angelina Jolie be awful to Princess Elle Fanning. Jolie hasn’t appeared in theaters since 2010 with Salt and The Tourist, which means she hasn’t been in an (arguably) good film since Changeling in 2008. So the invitation to watch a star who has always struck me as canny about her image fall into the evil-queen trap seemed like one that should be refused. But Jolie knows what she’s doing. It’s as if she has seen the cartoons and the attempts to redress princess politics and deduced that what’s been missing is feminism that can stand on its own two feet — that what’s been missing is her. She makes this movie something to see. I might feel that way even if she acted more than she does, but her return from a prolonged absence only enhances the mystique of a star we only think we know.

In Maleficent, she arrives a happy, airborne fairy with antelope horns, gargoyle wings, and high, digitally adjusted cheekbones that Henry Moore could’ve sculpted. There’s a war on between humans and woodland creatures. She’s the commander and vanquishes the king’s forces. As a girl, Maleficent befriends a human boy named Stefan, who dreams of living in the royal castle. And, as a man (Sharlto Copley), he becomes so mad for power that when the king falls ill and asks for proof of Maleficent’s death, Stefan betrays his old friend to secure the throne. He steals Maleficent’s wings. And Jolie, aided by the hysterics of James Newton Howard’s score, wails in anguish. When King Stefan’s daughter, Aurora, is born, Maleficent crashes the christening, in a helmet and cape, and puts the baby under that ridiculous spell. Three dingbat pixies (Imelda Staunton, Lesley Manville, and Juno Temple) disguise themselves as peasants and raise the baby in a cottage outside the kingdom, while Maleficent hangs back and plays pranks on them all.

Sleeping-Beauty-HP

The movie’s screenplay is credited to Linda Woolverton, who’s been writing scripts for Disney since Beauty and the Beast. It’s as if she has fused Game of Thrones with different versions of Sleeping Beauty — by Charles Perrault, the Brothers Grimm, and Disney. The result doesn’t make any sense. The other iterations did — more than Maleficent does, anyway. But there’s a method to the writing’s badness. To tinker with the politics of the story, the movie has chosen to tie itself in a dramatic knot: There’s really no conflict between Maleficent and Aurora, whom Fanning plays as a carefree teenager. The girl loves the woman, who learns to love her back.

It’s King Stefan and his army who have it out for Maleficent. (Copley’s become the most elastic embodiment of nastiness; it’s never the same villainy twice with him.) She seems perfectly killable, but they try chaining her up. For sport. For torture. On the one hand, it’s perfectly obvious what Maleficent is up to. But considering how flagrantly the movies have gone out of their way to celebrate misogyny, this one might have too much subtlety to be construed as blatantly feminist. Although, by the time Aurora discovers what her father once did to her surrogate mother, what else could this movie be?

Frozen does more with similar ideas (coldness and innocence and the resuscitative power of love) and without any of the defensiveness. Boys like that movie not because it’s feminist, per se, but because it’s fun. The feminism just looks like the way it is. Maleficent’s director, Robert Stromberg, is an effects artist and designer making his first movie, and revisionism is almost all he has. Some of the silhouettes and production-design ideas have the exciting ominousness of silent-era expressionism. But the movie doesn’t work — as a tract or as entertainment — without Jolie.

While her stardom has come almost entirely from her years of shooting at people on the run, this is Jolie in a new mode. There’s a vibrancy here that’s new for her. Over a year ago, the news broke that she underwent a preventive double mastectomy. I don’t want to overemphasize a connection between that decision and a reconsideration of her onscreen femininity, but here she is using one of those Hollywood contraptions to capture another dimension of her own womanliness. And she’s extraordinary. This is studiously calibrated, respectfully edited movie-star acting.  There isn’t a false close-up or cutaway. There’s barely any camp. She’s personalized her acting. You watch her screaming because of Maleficent’s stolen wings and think, for a moment, about Jolie’s surgery and her six children and the movie she directed in Bosnia. She had to do all that living in order to reinterpret an angel of death. Good parts turn her solemn. She’s better in crap.

If we accept that there’s something formative in exposure to so many princesses, shouldn’t it hold that for generations of moviegoers there’s also something damagingly formative about the evil-queen experience? Jolie is the perfect star to address the problem. She’s of the Faye Dunaway school — pitched somewhere between Network and Supergirl. Dunaway herself was of the Crawford school, having played her in Mommie Dearest, a career-immolating evil-queen part that makes the queen Crawford co-inspired for Snow White seem like Shirley Temple. Jolie seems to know the history and feel a duty to correct it. You feel a little absurd being moved by something as shoddily put together as this. But it likes these women — even the nincompoop pixies. It believes in its star. There are a couple of scenes in which Fanning looks at Jolie with radiant, admiring affection you can feel. She’s not looking at an evil queen. She’s gazing at a superhero.

Read the rest at grantland

Thursday, May 29, 2014


A thoughtful, well-researched piece.




Angelina Jolie’s Perfect Game

Angelina Jolie has the best publicity game in Hollywood. Here’s how she does it. posted on May 29, 2014, at 1:57 p.m. 


....

Jolie is exquisitely beautiful. She’s a talented actress, she has a beautiful family, and seems, in truth, quite happy. She’s handled her publicity with enviable skill. But that skill isn’t the product of training, or planning, or even a well-laid-out strategy. And like many in her position, Jolie never went to college. But she is clearly intelligent and experienced — and, most crucially, humbled by that experience.
Her savvy, then, stems from the same thing that makes us write better as we grow older or think more expansively after traveling abroad, the thing that happens when you realize your relative insignificance, or have to make difficult decisions, or experience pain, or witness suffering. It’s the sort of skill that can’t be taught, and that’s the reason Jolie doesn’t need a publicist: Everything she says and does in public is guided by her myriad, textured, educating experiences of the world.
So many celebrities embarrass or otherwise scandalize themselves because their sphere of operation is so limited and privileged: It’s hard to not be angry about the paparazzi when they compose the boundaries of your existence; it’s easy to come off as superficial when appearance is the only thing on your mind.
But it’s both telling and instructive that the best person at the contemporary publicity game is also the one most invested in a life outside of Hollywood. And that, more than any beauty or acting tip, is what not only all celebrities, but anyone interested in making themselves into a compelling person of worth and note, should learn from Angelina Jolie.












guardian

Angelina Jolie springs back to life from a career slumber in Maleficent

The UN Special Envoy and director makes a long-overdue return to stellar acting after a case of potential, interrupted

Ryan Gilbey The Guardian, Thursday 29 May 2014 11.42 EDT


Jolie shows how enchanting an actor she can be in Maleficent. Photograph: PR


Whether it's Wicked or The Wolverine or Butch and Sundance: The Early Days, origin stories tend to resemble unsightly extra limbs grafted on to bodies that were getting along fine without them. No child has ever asked: "But what exactly were the psychological factors contributing to Cruella de Vil's sadism?"

Disney's Maleficent, a live-action fantasy that fills in the gaps around 1959's Sleeping Beauty, is an exception. It adds layers of nourishing detail to the title character, a supposedly evil fairy who generally seemed lacking in motivation. I know she didn't get invited to the christening of Princess Aurora, but throwing a curse on the host's daughter always seemed a trifle disproportionate. Couldn't she simply have slashed the king's tyres or started a poison-pen campaign like any normal person? Thanks to the movie, we now know the real reason she wasn't on the guest list: she and the king had history. Their relationship ended badly – to say the least – when he cut off her wings. As a relationship faux pas, that's up there with sleeping with her best friend or keeping his Facebook status set to "single".

The film has no greater asset than Angelina Jolie, who brings contradictory qualities to the part of Maleficent. She is camp but not insincere. She has a steely disposition that can bend lithely into playful humour. She wrings every line for succulent effect, but resists the overwrought. And though she has never been shy about using her eyes the way other people use full-beam headlights along dark country lanes, makeup has now rendered her positively otherworldly. With silicone-filled prosthetics added to her face, her cheekbones resemble banisters. The combination of ostentatiously curved horns, a withering scowl and a leather catsuit have turned her into a cross between Tim Curry in Legend, Faye Dunaway in Mommie Dearest and Diana Rigg in The Avengers.

Most of all, she is back to being Angelina Jolie again. She gives such a deliciously driven performance that there should be no embarrassment in labelling it a comeback – or a reawakening after a deep and stubborn sleep. The film features her most dynamic work since her Oscar-winning, star-making turn in Girl, Interrupted. As the psychiatric patient Lisa Rowe in that 1999 movie, she behaved as though she were the first person to invent cockiness, confrontational eye contact or even vulnerability itself. But this was not to be a happy ever after. At least not immediately.
The curse of international fame sent Jolie into her own anaesthetising sleep, clutching her Academy Award like a favourite teddy. Gone in 60 Seconds, Lara Croft Tomb Raider, Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life, Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow: it was as though she had enrolled in a class run by Cuba Gooding Jr entitled "How to Squander Your Oscar".

It wasn't her popularity that waned, only her quality control. Mr & Mrs Smith – on the set of which she met her fiancé Brad Pitt and spawned the phenomenon known as Brangelina – was a hit, as were other violent action vehicles such as Wanted and Salt (a Tom Cruise project retooled for Jolie). But when box-office success can greet a travesty like The Tourist, which has taken years to exhaust its usefulness as an all-purpose punchline to any Hollywood joke, something is wrong. At least when Nicole Kidman makes a film as wretched as Grace of Monaco, she has a good 10 or 15 stunning performances behind her that can serve as an inbuilt rebuttal. Jolie possesses no such safety net. Almost before it had begun, hers was a case of potential, interrupted.

Now and then, she would stir from her dozing to be briefly marvellous. She was authentically racked as the widow of the murdered journalist Daniel Pearl in A Mighty Heart, and she wore an array of splendid lipsticks and cloche hats as a bereft mother in Clint Eastwood's Changeling. But there was a sense that the world had lost Jolie to her own celebrity. Perhaps the pressure of the Brangelina sensation was too daunting to allow her to choose her parts sanely. And it would be perfectly understandable if her children or her charity work (she is a UN Special Envoy) consumed her time. Whatever the reason, her film career had become a triumph of theory over practice.

Maleficent is the kiss that disturbs her from that state. It is a textbook example of how to engineer a comeback. It's hardly uncommon in such circumstances for a star's off-screen persona to enhance the character, and vice versa – the classic case being the troublesome, abrasive Bette Davis playing Margo Channing, a character who shared precisely those qualities, in All About Eve. The crossover between actor and character gives the audience the impression that we are sneaking a peak into the performer's psyche, while the autobiographical element deepens the fiction in turn. The word "baggage" is commonly used pejoratively. In acting, however, it can be magically beneficial. Casting Angelina Jolie as a woman who overcomes her natural antipathy to children is an in-joke we can all smile at: she and Pitt have six.

Comebacks in recent years have tended to hinge on some manner of recovery or redemption, none more so than that of Robert Downey Jr, whose off-screen trajectory is best described as rise-and-fall-and-rise-higher-than-ever. Cocksure was always his default setting, even before the court appearances and prison spells started to overshadow the movies. Now it feels like each success he enjoys, each wry and conspiratorial aside to the audience, is informed by our mutual knowledge of what he has been through, and what he almost lost.

A figure such as Mickey Rourke is more complicated. Despite having negotiated the comeback trail with aplomb, when he took the masochistic lead in The Wrestler, there has never quite been the same Downey-esque reassurance that he is out of the woods. What stops us from enjoying Rourke's return too much is the spectre of recidivism. Downey is surely in too-elevated a position to make the same swan-dive from grace that he did before. Even once the awards started piling up for The Wrestler, Rourke never quite seemed to shed his self-destructive edge.

Unlike those actors, Jolie never fell foul of the law. She didn't even butt heads with the studio brass like Bette Davis. All she could be accused of doing is choosing projects unbecoming of her talent. That's why Maleficent feels so victorious: it's a harmonious fusion of both what Hollywood wants from her, and the talents that have been underexploited until now. Of course, all this talk of a comeback will be rendered moot if Jolie decides she doesn't want anything of the sort. She has been busy with her film-making career, first directing In the Land of Blood and Honey, set during the Bosnian war, and now the forthcoming second world war adventure Unbroken, scripted by the Coen brothers and starring Jack O'Connell. "Acting is going to take more of a back seat," she said recently. "I'm sure there'll be a few more films, but I'm happy that I'm able to be selective and have fun with characters like Maleficent. But I would like to focus more on writing and directing and, above all, I would like to focus more on my work with the UN."

On the basis of Maleficent, it would be a loss to cinema if she chose to stay behind the camera entirely. When she peers through the window at the infant Aurora, and tries to nip her own maternal affection in the bud by insulting and hissing at the child ("I hate you," she says coolly), she is freer and funnier than she has ever been on screen. Her most devastating moment, though, is surely the amputation of her wings, and not only because Jolie plays it so passionately, howling and clenching every tendon in despair. No one who has undergone a double mastectomy, as Jolie did last year, could overlook the symbolism of such a scene, intentional or otherwise. It's the sort of spectacle that feels both too raw for disposable entertainment to contain, and too important for it not to.


Read the original post at guardian