Showing posts with label Larry Rohter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Larry Rohter. Show all posts

Friday, December 30, 2011

NY TImes on Foreign Language Films

The Oscars

Saying ‘Ciao Bye-Bye’ to Old Borders


Marja-Leena Hukkanen/Janus Films
Blondin Miguel in the Finnish director Aki Kaurismaki's film “Le Havre,” which was shot in France with a French-speaking cast.
WHEN giants like Ingmar Bergman, Federico Fellini and Akira Kurosawa still roamed the earth, foreign-language films tended to adhere to certain guidelines, which helped American audiences know what to expect from them. More often than not directors and screenwriters were working in their native tongues, addressing some aspect of their society or culture, and shooting with a cast that shared their background.
But as 2011 ends, a look at the 63 movies competing for a shot at the Academy Award for best foreign-language film suggests that many of those old rules — or boundaries and barriers if you prefer — are disappearing. Increasingly the films in contention for the Oscar are made in a way that is truly international, both in terms of subject matter, which is becoming less introspective and more engaged with the wider world, and practical matters like casting, financing and even choice of language.
Consider, for example, “Le Havre,” Finland’s submission, written and directed by Aki Kaurismaki, best-known in the United States for his two “Leningrad Cowboys” films and his Finland trilogy. His new work was shot in France with a French-speaking cast and offers a warmly sentimental take on an issue that has divided France for a generation or more: how best to deal with the unceasing flow of immigrants and refugees from the country’s former colonies in Africa and Asia.
Last year four of the five foreign-language films nominated for the Oscar, including the eventual winner, Denmark’s “In a Better World,” focused on interactions between characters from prosperous Western countries and people from troubled parts of the developing world. As if to make clear that this is not just a passing fancy, at least five of this year’s submissions also address the issue of migrants and refugees seeking sanctuary in the industrialized West, and from multiple points of view.
In addition to “Le Havre” we have the Italian neo-neorealist film “Terraferma,” in which poor fishermen shelter the African immigrants they encounter on the high seas from the police who would deport them; Romania’s “Morgen,” an absurdist comedy about a Kurdish man trying to get to Germany with the aid of a Romanian ne’er-do-well; and the Netherlands’ “Sonny Boy,” about a Surinamese student who becomes enmeshed in World War II. Canada’s subtly nuanced submission, “Monsieur Lazhar,” whose title character is an Algerian refugee teaching in a troubled Montreal school, also fits easily into this category.
Or look at Wim Wenders’s “Pina,” the German candidate. A visually dazzling performance documentary, shot in 3-D, about the choreographer Pina Bausch and the dance company she created, it has dialogue in nine languages, the result of Mr. Wenders’s decision to let dancers speak in their native languages. Last year’s Oscar race featured the Mexican director Alejandro González Iñárritu’s “Biutiful,” with its mixture of Spanish, Mandarin and Wolof, and a pair of films, Canada’s “Incendies” and Algeria’s “Outside the Law,” that alternated between French and Arabic; but Mr. Wenders has taken the polyglot notion to an unprecedented level.
This year’s competition also makes clearer than ever that the era in which “foreign” film could be almost a synonym for “European” (even allowing for the prestige enjoyed by directors like Kurosawa and Satyajit Ray, who was awarded an Oscar for lifetime achievement a few months before his death in 1992) has long since passed. It’s still early in the process, but there seems to be a consensus that the film to beat on Oscar night, Feb. 26, is “A Separation” from Iran, a highly praised combination of family drama and legal thriller directed and written by Asghar Farhadi that also appears to be the front-runner for the Golden Globes.
Initially “The Flowers of War,” China’s submission, looked like it might be a contender too, if only because it was made by Zhang Yimou, who has three previous nominations and a global reputation. Those chances now seem slim to none. Reviews have been negative, which is not always fatal and did not prevent the film from getting a Golden Globe nomination. But Academy members are unlikely to vote in a way that condones security agents of an authoritarian government beating up an A-list, Oscar-winning actor like Christian Bale, the film’s star, as happened last month when he was in China for the premiere.
Nonetheless the film, shot in English as well as Japanese and Nanjing dialect, is a watershed, an attempt by the Chinese film industry to connect with the outside world, not just its own captive market of 1.3 billion people. The closing credits indicate that numerous crew members are foreigners based in Beijing, and Chinese film figures have talked, or at least they did before the Bale debacle, of making that city into an international film production center like London with its Pinewood Studio or Rome with Cinecittà.
Even countries we think of as English speaking are getting in on the act. Britain, for example, has submitted a film in Welsh and Spanish, “Patagonia,” that stars Matthew Rhys and the pop singer Duffy in a drama about Welsh colonists in Argentina. Ireland’s candidate, “As If I Am Not There,” is based on a novel written in Serbo-Croatian about the Balkans wars and was shot in that language. And New Zealand’s entry, “The Orator,” about a taro farmer who wants to become a village chief, is described as the first feature film in Samoan.
As the latest installments of “Mission Impossible,” “Transformers,” “Batman” and other franchise films continue to lumber across the screens of American multiplexes, it would be easy to conclude that the United States is being left out of this process. But a handful of American artists — working mostly as directors — have also chosen to get involved.
In the Land of Blood and Honey,” Angelina Jolie’s directing debut, is a harrowing story of the Bosnian war of the 1990s that was filmed in the local language with actors from the former Yugoslavia. Though it did not qualify for the Oscars, it has received a Golden Globe nomination. The director Joshua Marston, after making “Maria Full of Grace,” a Spanish-language drama about the Colombian drug trade that received an Oscar nomination in 2004, has returned with “The Forgiveness of Blood,” shot in Albania with Albanian actors and about a family feud in that Balkan country.
But Mr. Marston’s experience may also serve as a cautionary tale about the Academy’s slowness to recognize and adapt to the rapidly changing circumstances of film production that has become internationalized in every sense of that word. Albania initially submitted “The Forgiveness of Blood” as its choice, but the movie was disqualified when the Albanian director Bujar Alimani, whose film “Amnesty” had been passed over, complained that Mr. Marston’s film contained too much American content. When the Academy then accepted “Amnesty” as a replacement for “Forgiveness,” Mr. Marston was moved to protest, wondering why “Le Havre” could be allowed to compete as Finnish, and he could not represent Albania.
Still, filmgoers should expect to continue to see more of the same in 2012. Just look at “Norwegian Wood,” the first big foreign film release of the year in the United States, opening on Friday. Based on the novel of the same name by the Japanese writer Haruki Murakami, whose title comes from the Beatles song, it was filmed by Tranh Anh Hung, a French director of Vietnamese origin, with a Taiwanese cinematographer, Mark Lee Ping Bin, and music by Jonny Greenwood, of the British band Radiohead, and the German experimental rock group Can.
This trend, of course, has been a long time developing. French-Italian co-productions have been a feature of the international film scene since the foreign-language Oscar was first awarded in 1947, and Kurosawa won the second of his three Oscars in 1975 for “Derzu Uzala,” the tale of a Siberian hunter that was shot in Russian and represented the Soviet Union, not his native Japan.
No doubt the French and the Italians will also continue to make frothy comedies and the Scandinavians their autumnal existential dramas. Or at least filmgoers should hope so. But for purposes of representing themselves to Americans at Oscar time, countries around the world seem to see the multilingual, outward-looking film as a promising, if not yet already dominant, mode. Better get used to it.

Tuesday, December 6, 2011

NY Times: Jolie's First Directing Effort is Serious


Behind the Camera, but Still the Star


Dean Semler/FilmDistrict and GK Films
Angelina Jolie directing on the set of “In the Land of Blood and Honey,” about the war in Bosnia.
Once the red carpet follies were over, the war correspondent Christiane Amanpour introduced the film, calling it “remarkable and courageous” while warning that there was “no way to sugarcoat” the atrocities it portrays. The afterparty, at a nightclub high atop a hip New York hotel in the meatpacking district, complete with the usual supercilious doormen, rotating disco ball and thumping music, was co-sponsored by the Council on Foreign Relations and the human rights group Women for Women International.
Multimedia
Yana Paskova for The New York Times
Ms. Jolie arriving for the New York premiere of “In the Land of Blood and Honey” on Monday.
Dean Semler/FilmDistrict and GK Films.
Zana Marjanovic and Boris Ler in “In the Land of Blood and Honey,” the first film directed by Angelina Jolie.
That was the atmosphere on Monday night at the New York premiere of “In the Land of Blood and Honey,” a harrowing look at the fratricidal Bosnian war of the 1990s: an unusual convergence of foreign policy seriousness and Hollywood glamour. But that is the way that Angelina Jolie, who wrote, directed and co-produced the film, operates these days.
“I’ve had fun as an actress,” Ms. Jolie said in an interview over the weekend at the Waldorf-Astoria. “It’s a very fun job, and I’ve had great experiences. But my heart has been on these foreign policy issues, and my interests are there. So to be able to combine them and be part of international affairs that way, working toward solutions and being part of a good dialogue with good people, felt like a nice evolution to me.”
  “In the Land of Blood and Honey,” which opens on Dec. 23 and is Ms. Jolie’s directorial debut, tells the stories of Ajla, a Bosnian Muslim woman, and Danijel, a Serbian police officer, who meet in Sarajevo just before the war starts. Through them it examines the broader conflict, which killed more than 100,000 people, displaced 2 million more and introduced the term “ethnic cleansing” to the lexicon of war. Ms. Jolie, who chose not to act in the film, said that among the experts she consulted while making the film were Richard C. Holbrooke, the architect of the Dayton accords, which ended the conflict in December 1995; Gen. Wesley Clark, the former NATO commander; and the foreign correspondent Tom Gjelten, who covered the Balkan wars for National Public Radio.
When the war broke out in 1992 Ms. Jolie, now 36, was, as she put it, “a young punk” who “wasn’t paying too much attention” and was “not very politically involved or aware.” (Her breakthrough role, in the HBO movie “Gia,” was still six years away, and her days as catnip to glossy magazine editors and gossip columnists everywhere had not yet arrived.) But in recent years, even as news media accounts breathlessly followed every twist of her life with Brad Pitt and their six children, she has drawn much attention for her work as a good-will ambassador for the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and her lobbying on behalf of displaced people.
She and cast members described her new film as stemming from the same humanitarian impulse. “It’s another one of her missions, actually,” said Rade Serbedzija, a Croatian Serb actor who has played villains in Hollywood productions like “Mission: Impossible II” and “The Saint” and plays a malevolently nationalistic Serbian general in Ms. Jolie’s film.
But Ms. Jolie is also aware that, given her image as a Hollywood star, her pursuit of more weighty matters may expose her to ridicule. For every critically acclaimed movie by George Clooney or Sean Penn, there’s a mercilessly mocked Madonna or Kevin Spacey vanity project.
“Maybe people will see this film and judge it differently, in a negative way, because I made it,” she said. “But at the same time, I don’t think I could have gotten it made unless I had a strong career.”
Without her involvement, she added, the film, which cost under $15 million, “might not have been made at all, especially because of this subject matter, which in Hollywood is famously difficult.”
As she views it, her celebrity is both blessing and burden. She is on the cover of Newsweek this week and is scheduled to appear on “Charlie Rose” this month, trying in every appearance to get the public interested in her film and the issues it raises, including rape as a war crime and the ethics of international intervention.  
“I’d like it to be good for something,” she said of her fame. “When you’re young, and somebody sits you down for an interview, you don’t know what to say or why you’re there, because you haven’t formed yourself. I still don’t completely know what to say or do, but I at least have some focus, purpose and direction as to what can be put out in the world that is thoughtful and helpful — as opposed to just what you’re wearing.”
Ms. Jolie laughed, as if at the absurdity of her situation, then said that trying to advance causes that interest her “makes more sense of the madness of it all — because it is such a weird world.” 
But she also noted that “with certain outlets and certain reporters it is an uphill battle” to deflect focus away from her and onto her film and its cast. Indeed, on the red carpet on Monday night, cast members had to field questions about what it was like to work with Ms. Jolie and how much time her children spent on the set. And then there was this: “Angelina has a lot of tattoos. Did you see them?”
Ms. Jolie said, “It baffles me that with so many people we’ve had to ask, ‘Don’t you want to meet such an extraordinary group with such an extraordinary history?’ ”
For example, Vanesa Glodjo, a Bosnian who was raised outside Sarajevo and plays Ajla’s older sister, was wounded by shrapnel in the head, leg and hand when a mortar hit her house during the war. Fedja Stukan, who plays a particularly thuggish Serbian soldier, fought for two years in Bosnia, then feigned insanity and fled to Germany.
For them, both as citizens of what was once Yugoslavia and as actors, Ms. Jolie’s desire to make a film about their experience came as a welcome surprise. They were particularly pleased that she decided to shoot two versions of the film — one in English and the other in Bosnian.
Cast members described Ms. Jolie on the set as a calm presence, mindful of gaps in her own knowledge of the war and open to their suggestions. Mr. Serbedzija drew a parallel to Clint Eastwood, who directed him in “Space Cowboys” more than a decade ago.
“She reminds me very much of his style, because both of them are so gentle, so quiet, without any performing,” Mr. Serbedzija said. “They are not directors trying to explain too much. No, it’s understanding actors, almost whispering what to do.”
For her part, Ms. Jolie seemed ambivalent when asked whether “In the Land of Blood and Honey” could be the start of the kind of second career as a director that Mr. Eastwood and Robert Redford have had.
“I loved being on the other side of the camera, watching the other actors,” she replied. “I loved the experience of doing it, but I’m not confident yet that I am good at it. So I don’t know.”
Nevertheless, she said she had started on another script, one that the producer Graham King, who worked with her on “In the Land of Blood and Honey” and “The Tourist,” her previous film, has asked about.
“He came up to me and said, ‘What’s the next one?’ ” she recalled, “and I said, ‘Afghanistan.’ And he started laughing, and I said, ‘I’m not kidding.’ ”