Jake Coyle, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS#BradPitt talks family, #WarMachine after stepping back into the limelight for the first time since his separation https://t.co/3zOhoxbc9I' pic.twitter.com/AZloSffUuu— AP Entertainment (@APEntertainment) May 15, 2017
May 15, 2017, Last Updated: 1:40 PM ET
NEW YORK (AP) — Brad Pitt and Gen. Stanley McChrystal — the
inspiration to Pitt’s four-star Afghanistan commander in the upcoming
Netflix war satire “War Machine
“— would seem to be worlds apart. One, an affable member of Hollywood’s
elite; the other a hard-charging lifetime military man. But Pitt found
one connection with his character: a swollen ego, and the damage done.
“Hubris is a trap and it’s the trap of every great nation that has been number one for too long. You start believing your own stink,” Pitt says. “Anytime I’ve gotten in trouble, it’s because of my own hubris.”
Pitt, at the moment, may be particularly empathetic to such a drastic swing as the one that sank McChrystal via an infamous Rolling Stone profile . Pitt is now, for the first time since Angelina Jolie Pitt filed for divorce from him last September, stepping back into the limelight. He hasn’t been timid. In his first post-separation interview, to GQ , Pitt was unusually candid, speaking frankly about his struggles with alcohol and the pains of dividing their family.
Pitt was similarly forthright in a wide-ranging interview last week with The Associated Press. He called directly — “Hey man, it’s Brad” — and over the course of half an hour, discussed his present state of mind, his current attitude about acting and his alarm at the possibility of expanding the war in Afghanistan. Why the openness?
“I’ve got no secrets. I’ve got nothing to hide,” said Pitt. “We’re human and I find the human condition very interesting. If we’re not talking about it, then we’re not getting better.”
It’s undoubtedly a fraught period of transition for the 53-year-old actor. He said he’s spending his time now “keeping the ship afloat” and “figuring out the new configuration of our family.” ″Kids are everything,” he said, of their six children. “Kids are your life. They’re taking all the focus, as they should anyway.”
He’s getting through it, he assured. “I’m not suicidal or something,” Pitt said, laughing. “There’s still much beauty in the world and a lot of love. And a lot of love to be given. It’s all right. It’s just life.”
Pitt was most keen to discuss “War Machine” and the strong passions behind it. The film, written and directed by the Australian filmmaker David Michod (“Animal Kingdom”), is based on Michael Hastings’ 2012 book “The Operators,” which chronicled McChrystal’s tumultuous and short-lived stewardship of the war in Afghanistan.
“War Machine,” which debuts on Netflix May 26, takes a slightly fictionalized approach. Pitt’s character is named Gen. Glen McMahon, but the events and personalities covered correspond accurately with McChrystal’s downfall. The switch, made after the project was announced, saved the film from some potentially thorny legal issues.
“We had no interest in impugning General McChrystal or any of his guys,” said Pitt. “For me, the problem is more systematic.”
“The impetus for me was a visit to Walter Reed,” added Pitt, who visited the military medical center in 2014 . “Those young men and women — who are absolutely heroic in a very harrowing situation — their lives are forever changed and so are their families. It just really made me question who is spending this currency of dedication. Who’s writing the check? Who’s making the order?”
Particularly galling to Pitt was the request last week by advisers to President Donald Trump and military officials for several thousand more American troops in Afghanistan, a war that has already spanned more than 15 years. It’s time to rethink what “winning” means, he says.
“Nothing that we’ve ever done has said that more troops are going to do anything but cause any more damage, more loss of life and limb,” said Pitt. “We talk a lot about supporting our troops but I think supporting our troops is much more than giving them money and a pat on the back. I think it’s being responsible to how we use that ultimate dedication.”
Trump’s top advisers have said the president has not made any final decision about adding more troops in Afghanistan.
In “War Machine,” Michod summons some of the spirit of war comedies like “Catch 22" and “M-A-S-H.” The film captures an American military driven by politics, illusions and personal aspirations. Pitt’s general, with a deeper, gruffer voice than McChrystal’s, comes charging into Afghanistan with outlandish delusions of grandeur and departs amid self-inflicted scandal.
“We were tapping into a melding of war and comedy — two things that used to co-exist quite conformably, but in this day and age don’t,” said Michod. “It’s very interesting to see how the two coexist in the public sphere given how strangely earnest all conversation about war has gotten in a possibly warped way. But there’s something almost truer in that kind of great comedy treatment of decades past than the nature of the discussion that goes on today.”
Michod grants it’s an approach that makes for some wild swings of tone in “War Machine,” but he says a mix of absurdity and tragedy is ultimately more realistic.
“At core, the thing to me that’s most powerful about ‘War Machine’ and what made it feel important to me was that it was about the way personalities can have an incredibly powerful and often a powerfully damaged ripple effect across the world,” said Michod. “The movie is called ‘War Machine,’ but that machine is made up of individuals, individuals with their own strengths and ambitions.”
Pitt said he discussed the film with McChrystal. “I feel for him,” said the actor. “He’s a product of us. He’s us.” McChrystal, who retired from the Army shortly after resigning command, has since launched a management consulting firm and penned a memoir. He declined to comment for this article.
Little about “War Machine” is typical for a Hollywood production. It would have never gotten made, Pitt said, without Netflix. The streaming service bankrolled the film for $60 million, making it one of Netflix’s most ambitious projects yet.
“The degree of difficulty on this one was ten,” said Pitt, “which is what makes it worth it for me to go get in front of the camera now.”
Through his production company Plan B, Pitt has become a remarkably successful producer. He was behind two of the last three best-picture winners (“Moonlight,” ″12 Years a Slave”) as well as other acclaimed releases like James Gray’s “The Lost City of Z.” At times, Pitt — though he’s prepping numerous projects, including a possible “World War Z” sequel — sounded almost as though his movie star days are behind him.
“I feel myself as I’m older gravitating more to the producing side than being in front of the camera,” said Pitt. “It’s a big commitment, a film, and it does take you away from your family. I just have to balance that. It’s not less important, itself, it’s just not as important as family. (‘War Machine’) I loved because it’s after something and we don’t know where we’re going to end up. It’s a delicate tightrope to walk.”
___
Follow AP Film Writer Jake Coyle on Twitter at: http://twitter.com/jakecoyleAP
“Hubris is a trap and it’s the trap of every great nation that has been number one for too long. You start believing your own stink,” Pitt says. “Anytime I’ve gotten in trouble, it’s because of my own hubris.”
Pitt, at the moment, may be particularly empathetic to such a drastic swing as the one that sank McChrystal via an infamous Rolling Stone profile . Pitt is now, for the first time since Angelina Jolie Pitt filed for divorce from him last September, stepping back into the limelight. He hasn’t been timid. In his first post-separation interview, to GQ , Pitt was unusually candid, speaking frankly about his struggles with alcohol and the pains of dividing their family.
Pitt was similarly forthright in a wide-ranging interview last week with The Associated Press. He called directly — “Hey man, it’s Brad” — and over the course of half an hour, discussed his present state of mind, his current attitude about acting and his alarm at the possibility of expanding the war in Afghanistan. Why the openness?
“I’ve got no secrets. I’ve got nothing to hide,” said Pitt. “We’re human and I find the human condition very interesting. If we’re not talking about it, then we’re not getting better.”
It’s undoubtedly a fraught period of transition for the 53-year-old actor. He said he’s spending his time now “keeping the ship afloat” and “figuring out the new configuration of our family.” ″Kids are everything,” he said, of their six children. “Kids are your life. They’re taking all the focus, as they should anyway.”
He’s getting through it, he assured. “I’m not suicidal or something,” Pitt said, laughing. “There’s still much beauty in the world and a lot of love. And a lot of love to be given. It’s all right. It’s just life.”
Pitt was most keen to discuss “War Machine” and the strong passions behind it. The film, written and directed by the Australian filmmaker David Michod (“Animal Kingdom”), is based on Michael Hastings’ 2012 book “The Operators,” which chronicled McChrystal’s tumultuous and short-lived stewardship of the war in Afghanistan.
“War Machine,” which debuts on Netflix May 26, takes a slightly fictionalized approach. Pitt’s character is named Gen. Glen McMahon, but the events and personalities covered correspond accurately with McChrystal’s downfall. The switch, made after the project was announced, saved the film from some potentially thorny legal issues.
“We had no interest in impugning General McChrystal or any of his guys,” said Pitt. “For me, the problem is more systematic.”
“The impetus for me was a visit to Walter Reed,” added Pitt, who visited the military medical center in 2014 . “Those young men and women — who are absolutely heroic in a very harrowing situation — their lives are forever changed and so are their families. It just really made me question who is spending this currency of dedication. Who’s writing the check? Who’s making the order?”
Particularly galling to Pitt was the request last week by advisers to President Donald Trump and military officials for several thousand more American troops in Afghanistan, a war that has already spanned more than 15 years. It’s time to rethink what “winning” means, he says.
“Nothing that we’ve ever done has said that more troops are going to do anything but cause any more damage, more loss of life and limb,” said Pitt. “We talk a lot about supporting our troops but I think supporting our troops is much more than giving them money and a pat on the back. I think it’s being responsible to how we use that ultimate dedication.”
Trump’s top advisers have said the president has not made any final decision about adding more troops in Afghanistan.
In “War Machine,” Michod summons some of the spirit of war comedies like “Catch 22" and “M-A-S-H.” The film captures an American military driven by politics, illusions and personal aspirations. Pitt’s general, with a deeper, gruffer voice than McChrystal’s, comes charging into Afghanistan with outlandish delusions of grandeur and departs amid self-inflicted scandal.
“We were tapping into a melding of war and comedy — two things that used to co-exist quite conformably, but in this day and age don’t,” said Michod. “It’s very interesting to see how the two coexist in the public sphere given how strangely earnest all conversation about war has gotten in a possibly warped way. But there’s something almost truer in that kind of great comedy treatment of decades past than the nature of the discussion that goes on today.”
Michod grants it’s an approach that makes for some wild swings of tone in “War Machine,” but he says a mix of absurdity and tragedy is ultimately more realistic.
“At core, the thing to me that’s most powerful about ‘War Machine’ and what made it feel important to me was that it was about the way personalities can have an incredibly powerful and often a powerfully damaged ripple effect across the world,” said Michod. “The movie is called ‘War Machine,’ but that machine is made up of individuals, individuals with their own strengths and ambitions.”
Pitt said he discussed the film with McChrystal. “I feel for him,” said the actor. “He’s a product of us. He’s us.” McChrystal, who retired from the Army shortly after resigning command, has since launched a management consulting firm and penned a memoir. He declined to comment for this article.
Little about “War Machine” is typical for a Hollywood production. It would have never gotten made, Pitt said, without Netflix. The streaming service bankrolled the film for $60 million, making it one of Netflix’s most ambitious projects yet.
“The degree of difficulty on this one was ten,” said Pitt, “which is what makes it worth it for me to go get in front of the camera now.”
Through his production company Plan B, Pitt has become a remarkably successful producer. He was behind two of the last three best-picture winners (“Moonlight,” ″12 Years a Slave”) as well as other acclaimed releases like James Gray’s “The Lost City of Z.” At times, Pitt — though he’s prepping numerous projects, including a possible “World War Z” sequel — sounded almost as though his movie star days are behind him.
“I feel myself as I’m older gravitating more to the producing side than being in front of the camera,” said Pitt. “It’s a big commitment, a film, and it does take you away from your family. I just have to balance that. It’s not less important, itself, it’s just not as important as family. (‘War Machine’) I loved because it’s after something and we don’t know where we’re going to end up. It’s a delicate tightrope to walk.”
___
Follow AP Film Writer Jake Coyle on Twitter at: http://twitter.com/jakecoyleAP
AP
Highlights from AP interview with Brad Pitt
In a recent interview, Brad Pitt spoke to The Associated Press about his new film, "War Machine," in which he plays a slightly fictionalized version of Gen. Stanley McChrystal; stepping back into the limelight for the first time since Angelina Jolie Pitt filed for divorce from him; and his future in movies. Here are excerpted highlights:___
ON ACKNOWLEDGING A DRINKING PROBLEM
I've got no secrets. I've got nothing to hide. We're human and I find the human condition very interesting. If we're not talking about it, then we're not getting better.
___
ON WHY HIS CHARACTER ISN'T NAMED GEN. STANLEY McCHRYSTAL
We had no interest in impugning General McChrystal or any of his guys. For me, the problem is more systematic. And the impetus for me was a visit to Walter Reed. Although those young men and women who are absolutely heroic in a very harrowing situation, their lives are forever changed and so are their families. I just really made me question who is spending this currency of dedication. Who's writing the check? Who's making the order?
___
ON SENDING MORE TROOPS TO AFGHANISTAN
Nothing that we've ever done has said that more troops are going to do anything but cause any more damage, more loss of life and limb. So why are we not questioning this? It seems time for some kind of hearing. I don't trust a governmental I hearing. It needs to come from the people. We talk a lot about supporting our troops but I think supporting our troops is much more than giving them money and a pat on the back. I think it's being responsible to how we use that ultimate dedication. I guess it's this idea of American exceptionalism that I question the definition of. We are exceptional is so many ways. But it doesn't mean we can just throw might at any problem. We're sending them into a culture that we don't understand.
___
ON NETFLIX AND 'WAR MACHINE'
It wouldn't have gotten made without Netflix. The reality for the studios is it just doesn't make sense for them on paper. They can take the gamble up to $35 million on a risky film. And then otherwise they focus on big tent-poles which seem to be safer and make the big payoffs. It's not their fault in any way. The numbers just don't run for them. Now with Netflix and other entities like Netflix, it becomes a whole new delivery system for these kinds of films I prefer to gamble on. For us, it's opened up a whole new world of possibilities. I'll stick work with studios, I'll always do that, at least I think so, as long as they're around. Because they are still films that deserve to have the big-screen, cultural experience.
___
ON BEST-PICTURE WINNER 'MOONLIGHT'
That's what I'm most proud of. That's Barry Jenkins' - and the cast and crew -that's their vision, but to be able to help get it over the hill - a difficult movie, a challenging film like that, that feels good. That feels really good. I like that job.
In the May ratings period, talk shows scurry to sign up big stars.Brad Pitt to visit Stephen Colbert https://t.co/MhEIgoK5J4— tvguyhal (@tvguyhal) May 15, 2017
“The Late Show With Stephen Colbert” has one of the biggest: Brad Pitt. The actor visits the CBS show on Tuesday. His film “War Machine” will be released May 26 on Netflix.
The lineup this week from Colbert:
Monday (tonight): Danny McBride, Jane Krakowski and a musical performance by Metallica.
Tuesday: Pitt, Gina Rodriguez, Ben Falcone and a musical performance by Jesus and Mary Chain.
Wednesday: Julie Chen of “The Talk,” Matt Walsh and David Ortiz.
Thursday: Ricky Gervais, Corey Hawkins of “24: Legacy” and a musical performance by The xx.
Friday: Jennifer Garner, Demetri Martin and Paula Poundstone.