Showing posts with label Esquire. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Esquire. Show all posts

Monday, August 10, 2026







Esquire

A Monday with Brad Pitt

The 62-year-old has lived a singular life. He resides in the top 1 percent of the top 1 percent of all movie stars, not only today but ever, as measured by any metric you like, including intrigue. What does he have to say about all of it?

By Ryan D'Agostino, Photographs by Chantal Anderson, and Styling by George CortinaPublished: Aug 10, 2026

The dogs are trying to escape, shoving their noses through his knees and climbing all over each other attempting to paw their way out the glass door. He’s got it open just a few inches and is trying to calm them.

The whole entryway is solid glass, a tall plate-glass door flanked by tall plate-glass windows, or walls, so the whole scene is visible: him gently motioning for the dogs to sit, his mouth moving as he shushes them, them scampering around at his feet. Then he hollers across the driveway through the crack in the door: “You’ll get mildly molested for a couple of minutes, then they’ll leave you alone.”

He’s wearing a T-shirt the color of egg yolk over a bright-white T-shirt, gold parachute pants that shimmer, and white sneakers. It’s somehow pretty much the coolest outfit ever.

In the foyer, the two doodles, Sundae (“as in hot fudge”) and Vandy (“came with the name”), do as he said they would, their nails tapping the tile floor as they dance around sniffing and panting. They’re well-behaved, and he is attentive, holding their collars to chill them out.

When the dogs are satisfied, or no longer interested, that’s when he holds out his hand and says, by way of introduction, “Hey! Brad.” As he says this, he cocks his head back just a click, and his famous golden hair sways, and he smiles his smile, the one that makes you wonder what he’s discovered about the world that you haven’t.

On the kitchen island, which is the size of some small kitchens, he goes to work. He unwraps a wedge of yellow Gouda from its supermarket shrink-wrap and slices almost the whole thing, arranging the slices neatly on a board. Then he goes after a chunk of Parmesan the same way. (People will ask later, “Was there someone helping him? Like staff?” There was not. There was Brad Pitt in his kitchen slicing cheese.)

He opens two varieties of cracker: one that resembles Wheat Thins but is better and those crispy dark-brown ones with dried cranberries or something in them. Then he unsheathes a salami from its plastic casing and slices that up too. It’s black on the outside, encrusted in black pepper.

“I was cutting one of these up last week and I walked away for a minute. Came back? Gone. The whole sausage,” he says as he nods toward Sundae. “And no problem, either. But I gave this one a breath mint after, which she needed, and right away there was just, like, trails of vomit. You know the kind that’s hard to clean up? Like finger paint?”

He carries the charcuterie board and the basket of crackers to a table at the far end of the room, past the island’s acreage, past the cozy sitting area in front of the gas fireplace (which is on), by the glass doors that open onto the patio around the pool and the palm trees he bought and had planted around the pool (“because I’m a tree freak”) and, beyond that, the endless city. He bought this home in Los Angeles last fall. He has spent a total of three sporadic weeks in it.

“Guests get the view, that’s the rule,” he says, motioning to a seat for me. He retrieves two small bottles of Perrier from the fridge and grabs us each a paper towel because he doesn’t know where the napkins are. He brings plates, thick ceramic, bright blue with a happy design of interlocking white lines.

I’m getting the royal treatment, I tell him.

“Just another day at the Pitts’,” he says.

He awoke this morning on his own time, no alarm. What time? He laughs, a quick a-ha laugh. “Well, see, it doesn’t matter! The point is, it’s such a luxury,” he says. He read the news for a bit on his phone. He played a little sudoku. He jumped into the gym, got a sweat in. Had a shower. Cleaned his closet.

“I say cleaned,” he says. “I moved some shit around.”

He sits back in his chair and says, with the smile again, “Yeah, just a good old day.”

If this were a story about my neighbor, or my brother-in-law Joe, as interesting a person as Joe is, you wouldn’t have read this far. Guy opens the door, guy settles the dogs, guy puts out some cheese and crackers. Guy cleaned his closet earlier. But it’s a story about Brad Pitt, who resides in the top 1 percent of the top 1 percent of all movie stars, not only today but ever, as measured by any metric you like: raw talent, total earnings, handsomeness, box-office gross, natural magnetism, the overall quality and entertainment value of his canon so far. And also intrigue. His protracted divorce from Angelina Jolie, how his children don’t talk to him and reportedly dropped his last name, whatever heartbreaking thing is going on there—you’ve perhaps heard about this, and maybe that is part of the reason you keep reading.

Once the novelty of Brad Pitt preparing grocery-store hors d’oeuvres fades, what comes next is an adherence to the conventions of this meeting. He’s in a new movie, which of course is what he’s had me over here to talk about. The movie, though, turns out to be about something real to him. It turns out to be about resilience in the face of desperation and grabbing at shreds of hope, and when we get into that territory, this meeting, this afternoon, turns into something unexpected. Rare, even. I didn’t see it coming.

"Remember the Beavis and Butt-head episode—”

We’re talking about getting old, and we’ve just established our age difference: eleven years. (Pitt is sixty-two.) He laughs, and for a flicker of a second he sounds like Floyd, his stoner character from True Romance, which came out more than three decades ago.

“I can’t remember the scenario, but they were being chastised by an older person, and the comeback was just [Beavis voice] ‘You’re old.’ [Laughs.] That was the insult!”

His eyes are as blue and excitable and seductive as they were in that motel room in Thelma & Louise, before most people knew his name. But he is sixty-two, and there used to be a lot of guys who were older than guys like him. Men like Redford, Hackman, Newman, Duvall, Sutherland. “It’s a strange passing,” he says, stopping what he’s doing. “There was a comforting buffer over us, and now with them gone it’s like losing parents in that way. You’re the last stop.”

Robert Redford was fifty-five and already a legend when he directed Pitt in A River Runs Through It in 1992. (They also made Spy Game together in 2001, directed by Tony Scott—“There’s another fucker I really miss! He was such an original.”) Today Pitt doesn’t love his performance in River as Paul Maclean, the daredevil little brother, the kid who rode the rapids and dated Indians and gambled too much and died young. But he stole the movie, and three years later he received his first Oscar nomination, for Best Supporting Actor in Terry Gilliam’s 12 Monkeys.

“God, I want my fifties back,” he says, locking in on me a second. “I would do more. Your fifties are just—man, anything that’s on your mind, go. Go attack it. Go attack it now.”

In his fifties Pitt starred in eleven movies, produced seventeen, and won an Academy Award, for Best Supporting Actor in Once Upon a Time . . . in Hollywood. He’s attacking his sixties hard too. Just now he’s coming off two and a half years of continuous work, the longest stretch of his career. There was the release of the blockbuster F1, including an extended international press tour. Then he shot, in succession, Heart of the Beast, an intense man-and-his-dog story coming out this fall, in New Zealand; a new film written by Quentin Tarantino and directed by David Fincher, in which Pitt picks up his Oscar—winning role as Hollywood stuntman Cliff Booth; and, finishing just a few weeks ago, The Riders, a dark thriller set to come out next year.

We pull down the little Perriers pretty quick, and I point out that he offered me wine earlier. At an awards ceremony in 2020, he thanked his friend Bradley Cooper for helping him get sober and talked more deeply about his sobriety on Dax Shepard’s podcast, Armchair Expert, last June. I ask him if the wine is something for guests?

“No, I got—I was sober for seven years. And then I got back off the wagon.” Little laugh. He raises his famous opposing-diacritic eyebrows and holds a finger up: “In a more restrained manner. I got overconfident a couple times, went, Yep, nope, not good for me. Not in big quantities.”

“You can have a glass of wine.”

“Yeah. Well . . . I can have a few. But I can’t have a lot. I have to be professional about it.” He likes mornings now anyway, and you can miss a lovely morning when you drink too much the night before, and it’s just not as interesting. Mornings are interesting, and he doesn’t want any more of them to go by unseen. Even on a day like today. His place affords travel-magazine views of the city, but today clouds blot out the blue from horizon to horizon, like pulled cotton. It’s typical for this time of year, but most hosts would have apologized for the sky not being blue on the day of my visit. Not Pitt. He surveys the sky, smiles, and says, “June gloom. I love June gloom. It’s just so much more contemplative and introspective.”

He stares out, grinning proudly, as if he’d built the city himself, arranged the view.

“Lovely.”

The World Cup is playing on mute on a flat-screen. Paraguay–Germany. Pitt occasionally peeks to his right to see what’s happening. Instead of the sound of the game, on the Bluetooth he’s got an album playing on repeat that he’s had on repeat for a week: So Help Me God, by Kelsey Lu, a singer and cellist. It’s dream music, carnal; Lu’s voice is a ribbon in the wind. A warm L. A. breeze fills the room, the doodles sleep, and the good old day feels, for a moment, without time. He’s brought over a bowl of plump green grapes, their skins wet, and he plucks a few from their stems and pops them into his mouth one at a time, like popcorn.

On the screen, a Paraguayan player trips, rolls on the pitch like a rag doll, and clutches his leg as if it had been chainsawed.

“I’m gonna start a class for flopping, because these guys are terrible,” he says. He stands and pretends to fall. His hands go limp on his wrists, his feet stumble, he grimaces in exaggerated, fake pain. “It’s some of the worst acting I’ve ever seen. I know drawing a foul is part of the gamesmanship, but man, they need a lot of help. And I’m going to start with [Brazilian star] Neymar, because as balletic as he is on the pitch, man, he needs some help. I’m going to show him how to sell it, do it with understatement, how not to do it too often so it reads as real. I got a whole curriculum.”

He walks over to the fridge to retrieve more hydration, this time two diminutive cans of grapefruit seltzer. He is not finished with the topic.

“It’s one of those things that’s accepted but that no one likes—like forties acting, when the female actors would swoon.” He holds the back of his hand to his forehead and says in a high-pitched lady voice, “ ‘Lawd!’ Bad acting drives me crazy. It’s why I can’t watch porn.”

Pitt is an acting fan the way a little boy is a baseball fan. He is a student of it, an acting enthusiast. When he talks about an actor or a performance he loved, he speaks in bursts of admiration, his easy, sandy voice filling with awe. Mention James Gandolfini, for example, and he is suddenly reverential, whispering, “God, he was good in Killing Them Softly,” a great, wiry little thriller from 2012. “That hotel scene. I felt like I was watching Brando at his best for two days straight. I was just a passenger, enjoying every minute of it.”

The other guy Pitt had the most scenes with in that movie was Richard Jenkins, the dry, soulful, and hilarious character actor.

“Jenkins!” He throws his hands up in the air, gets all smiley, 
and makes a noise like he just ate the best bite of pie he ever had. “Also one of my all-time favorites. I just had an instant friendship with him. Never disappoints. He’s so goddamn funny.”

He watches everything. He calls himself more of a viewer than a reader. (Except scripts. As both an actor and a producer, he reads a lot of scripts.) He falls asleep watching a show most nights. The Penguin, with Colin Farrell. That was another one. “How do you emote the way he did with an inch of rubber on your face? I’m telling you, it’s impossible to get any kind of emotion out, but he did it! And with a limp, and with having to sit through the chair for prosthetics—that drives me crazy. I had poison ivy a lot as a kid, on my face and neck from, you know, rolling around the woods,” he says, scrunching his face and rubbing his neck as if he had poison ivy right now. “That stuff drives me crazy. I cannot do it.”

He’s been offered roles in streaming shows, and he would take one if it felt right. “Winslet’s done a couple,” he says, of Kate Winslet, whom he doesn’t know but whose acting he loves. “She’s fired some beauties. Mare of Easttown. Staggering. But then this last one she did, The Regime, was just bonkers. She just commits, man. I love her commitment. I’ve tried to put in that level of commitment, certainly in Riders, this last thing I did, coming off watching Kate.”

Long before The Riders comes out, we’ll see Pitt in Heart of the Beast, written and directed by David Ayer. (Ayer also wrote and directed Fury, in which Pitt played a tank commander at the end of World War II who lived, and fought, by a code whose brutality, and purity, made him a hero.) In every role Pitt takes at age sixty-two, he wants to do something he’s never done before as an actor—even some small thing, even in just one scene, a single tendril of emotion he’s never spun in front of a camera in any of his movies before. That’s enough for him.

Beast is the story of an ex–Special Forces soldier flying a small plane in Alaska with his dog, who worked with him as a K-9 in the Army. The plane crashes, and man and dog are stuck, miles from nowhere, alone. A fellow traveler in the form of J.K. Simmons passes through the story like a ghost, or a fool. (“J.K. Simmons! Another great actor! Fuckin’ Whiplash! What an incendiary performance.”)

“Beast is a love story,” Pitt says. The movie moved me. I tell him this because it’s true. I tell him it pulled me toward a remote part of my own mind. Made me think about the things we do for each other. Pitt and the beautiful German shepherd who plays Odin are playing anyone who’s ever had to decide what to do when there is nothing left to do, which is to say they are playing all of us.

"What’s that ink?” He’s leaning forward, looking at the tattoo on my left forearm.

“That’s good,” he says, I guess of the craftsmanship? “I like that.”

“That?”

I rub a finger over it.

“That’s my brother. His initials, in nautical flags. He died a few years ago.”

He sits back in his chair.

“Oh, man.”

“Mike. Freak heart attack. Forty-six. He loved sailing. So.”

“That’s beautiful.”

“Thank you.”

“And really well done. How long ago, can I ask?”

“Yeah. It’s been about five years. A little more.”

Immediately, he says, “Ohhh. You’re just getting to the point where you can swallow it.”

Oh. Like he felt it. Like a man who has known loss.

Quite suddenly, that’s what Pitt is. A man who has known loss. Quite suddenly that’s all he is. A movie star the way I’m a writer and my brother-in-law Joe is a sound engineer and your plumber is a plumber.

He looks up, then back at me, and says, “I think grief is probably the most leveling of all emotions.”

He holds the edge of the table with his fingers and shakes his head back and forth a millimeter, a flinch, so fast you could miss it.

“That’s an understatement, even. Loss is certainly the most profound thing a human can endure. And the loneliness that can ensue is the greatest torture.” It’s the voice he used to say “attack your fifties” but less urgent, offered not as advice but shibboleth.

Pitt looks at the TV, though the game doesn’t seem to register with him at this moment, and out the windows at the gloom, and then back into my eyes. “Man, you’re on year five,” he says, shaking his head slowly now and still holding on to the edge of the table as if for ballast. “Year five, you just start breathing again.”

The conversation that follows wanders through cancer, divorce, the indignities of Alzheimer’s, dogs we have known and loved. He tells me about meeting groups of women in Africa who smiled joyful smiles and cooked delicious, nourishing food and carried on telling funny stories, and that he later learned that most of them had seen their fathers and brothers slaughtered in front of them. He tells me that since his mother died last year, his dad . . . “let’s just say it’s better to be the one who goes first.” They talk regularly, he and his dad, and Pitt is on his way to Missouri next week for a visit. They will sit on the front porch in the evenings, watching the lightning bugs and listening to the cicadas, and they will talk about the woman who is no longer there. “But we’re country people. We don’t go in depth, you know what I mean? Every now and then it’ll just be one line that cuts to the core, and then we kind of skip on.”

Pitt was telling a friend recently that he feels as if he’s too emotional sometimes, too tightly wound, which can make him wildly angry or wildly ecstatic, and he wishes he could be more even.

“And she said, ‘Yeah, you could do that. You could go to an ashram and be more even.’ But, she goes, ‘I don’t know, I believe in the human experience, and the human experience means I’m here to feel it all. Feel it all. The extreme highs and the depths of the soul-crushing lows.’ And that freed me. I heard that and I went, I’m going to stop feeling like there’s something wrong with that.”

One of the dogs, asleep at my feet, exhales a long, snorting, sweet sigh.

Those soul-crushing lows, though. I don’t know if souls can be crushed, but it can feel that way, and when it feels that way, we might never feel those extreme highs again. Or, rather, those extreme highs can feel as if they are only for other people to experience, people who haven’t known our lows or their depths.

I grab a piece of cheese and balance it on a cracker.

Brad Pitt looks at me. He pops a grape. Takes a breath.

The new palms sway just a bit in the wind.

“Yeah,” he says. “I was never suicidal in any way. It just was not my makeup. In fact, if I have any afflictions, it’s probably being a congenital optimist. Which has helped many times, and it’s also gotten me—I’ve walked foolishly head-on into a Mack truck because of my optimism. Or, as my forever-funny friend David Fincher will say, Yeah, you see the glass as half full, but it’s half full of urine. Anyway, I’ve never been suicidal except for one little period. And in that one little period, I just thought—I just couldn’t—just didn’t see a way out. The pain was so oppressive that—I wasn’t going to act on this, but I could feel—I could feel the cold steel of the bullet in my head, and it felt like relief. And I thought, Oh, okay, now I understand—I understand suicide, in the sense that it’s just relief. It’s just looking for relief from the pain. But I also think we have incredible survival instincts. And for me, that immediately kicked in, but it was just . . .”

He pauses, his head kind of rolling around on his neck, grappling, groping.

“Yeah. Like, listen: This shit ain’t easy.”

He stares at me.

“And you’re talking to a guy who won the lottery.”

Only Pitt, Jolie, and their children know exactly what’s going on between them all. Her allegations, his quiet, outside of whatever is said in rooms with lawyers and arbiters. But I ask him, less interested in the drama than in its consequences: When we talk about those moments, the ones when the pain was so oppressive that he could imagine feeling cold steel as relief, are we talking about them?

“Kid stuff?” I ask.

He leans forward on an elbow, takes half a breath, and looks across the table at me. “Family stuff,” he says.

He nods, looking at me. I nod.

“Family stuff,” I say. Something changes in the room, something molecular, for just a second. Crossed wires. A frame in black-and-white.

“Family stuff,” he says. “We could leave it at that.”

They’re into penalty kicks now. Each team gets five
kicks, and should they still be tied after five, it’s sudden death.

They’re tied after five.

“This is why sports is the great thing,” he says, in a crouch, holding his hair. “It’s a whole lifetime in one minute.”

On the credenza in front of the television sit nine small bowls, all different but of a set, each imperfect in a handcrafted way so that, all together, they are perfect. In a brief break in the game I ask him whether they are relics from his career of world travel.

“Nah, I was into matcha for a moment and I purchased elaborate matcha bowls,” he says, shaking his head and looking at the bowls as if for the first time in a while. “I’m all in. Whatever I’m doing, I’m all in.”

I don’t know why, but I ask him if he can tie a bow tie.

“Uh,” he says. “No. And you know how many years I’ve said, ‘I’m gonna learn’? And then I get to the event and I haven’t learned, so I just clip her on and go about my business.”

“You don’t even have someone tie it for you? You just clip her on?”

“Just clip the fucker on. I don’t think I’ve been to an award ceremony without a clip-on.”

“You accepted your Oscar wearing a clip-on bow tie.”

“One hundred percent.”

The players line up, one after another. The goalies squat. Pitt has no stake here, doesn’t care who wins, and hates that one team must.

“I hate—I hate—”

The world-travel part of Pitt’s life is for real. (And he’s a terrible packer, he says. He packs entire suitcases he never opens. He tells me that his girlfriend of several years, Ines de Ramon, is not only good at packing but puts the clothes neatly in the hotel dresser drawer. Pitt says he’s “learning.”) Beast, for example, was filmed in New Zealand because the tax breaks there make it less expensive. Just then his mind jumps to the metastasizing practice of using AI to create visual effects for movies that otherwise might be too expensive to make at all. “There’s a lot of pushback against AI, but AI is going to be the very thing that, if used as a tool, is going to help these mid-budget films, forty- to ninety-million-dollar budgeted films, get made,” he says.

And then my mind jumps to the lurking practice of using AI to replace actors. Could a director have made Heart of the Beast starring an AI version of Pitt, the way someone last December created an AI video of him fighting Tom Cruise on a rooftop? He pauses, looks at the ceiling.

“Well, they would have got it—no, because—well, it depends on who’s creating it, you know? Who’s behind it, who’s telling the story,” he says, working through his answer in real time. “Who’s saying, ‘I want to see this emotion from him,’ and then being able to mine through whatever AI provides and going, ‘More in this direction,’ and tailoring it in that way. So they could, but the final product might not be my choices and what I found and discovered in the thing.

“Look, it’s gonna be a very interesting experiment. They’re telling us all to—”

He looks out the window.

“I get great hawks out here. So beautiful. To scan ourselves. I’ve been scanned for the last twenty years, and I’ve always put in my contract: I own them and I destroy them. I should have kept them! All this time I’ve always had them destroyed, because I’m paranoid Ozark boy.”

It’s an interesting thought, this idea of a Brad Pitt that is merely the collection of every emotion he’s expressed and move he’s made in previous movies. It’s especially interesting considering that the real Brad Pitt is looking for things to do that he’s never done before, that aren’t yet part of the Pitt algorithm, as if he’s trying to outpace himself.

“I heard an AI song the other day that was pretty damn good,” he says. “But it had a repetitive nature to it. It’s not going to be the same as hearing her voice—a woman’s voice, a person’s voice.”

He rubs the back of his head.

“I saw a show the other week in Paris. I saw Flea and Thom Yorke get up onstage and they did Marvin Gaye. With Flea’s jazz band,” he says, looking up at me. “Ohhh, it was off the charts, full of joy.”

He points a finger, says, “AI can’t do that.”

Pitt is playing Cliff Booth again, the Hollywood stuntman character that won him his acting Oscar, in a movie that comes out November 25. (Could the director, David Fincher, have used AI to concoct a Pitt performance for this movie culled from his performance in Once Upon a Time . . ., in which he played the same character?) At one point, the Booth movie was dead. Tarantino had declared that he would direct ten movies in his lifetime and then retire, and it was set to be his tenth. Then he decided that for his final film he wanted to do something new, not a movie that could be construed as a sequel.

So that was the end of the Booth movie.

But then Pitt got to thinking. What about Fincher? Fincher had directed him in Seven, Fight Club, and The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, and their friendship is strong. Pitt wrote to Tarantino, asking if he could at least show Fincher the script.

“Quentin gave me his blessing,” Pitt says. He’s getting excited telling the story. “Finch and I were on a plane and I gave him the script, and by the time we landed he said, ‘I’m doing it.’ ”

The movie isn’t a sequel, really. It’s “the continuing adventures of . . .” I saw the first twenty-four minutes of the film in a small screening room at Fincher’s L. A. office, and it’s a movie lover’s dream. Fincher’s kill-shot direction of Tarantino’s ace script and Pitt carrying the whole thing with a smirk? Make another one.

Rather than a sequel, Pitt compares it to the kind of episodic television Tarantino has said he grew up watching, with characters you could follow from adventure to adventure, but each episode also stood on its own. The Rockford Files. Joe Mannix in Mannix.

“Alias Smith and Jones and all that stuff,” Pitt says, listing them off. That one was a short-lived western episodic that ran for a couple years in the early 1970s. “It was based on Butch and Sundance. And I’ll tell you a funny story.”

He rubs his chin, smiling. “I loved Butch and Sundance. I’d seen that in kindergarten, so I’m probably in first grade, and I love this show Alias Smith and Jones. Maybe I’m in second grade. They start the second season, and I saw on the news that one of the lead actors had killed himself. I was at my grandma’s little three-room house with my folks, and I had to go into the bedroom and silently cry, because I didn’t want them to see me cry. Because I was embarrassed. Because that wasn’t the era for that. Do you know what I mean? Boys and tears.”

I know what he means. I nod a little, my own hand on my chin.

Pitt has been rethinking that Stephen Stills song lately, “Love the One You’re With.” He always hated it, because to him it was about settling for something less than, or at least different from, what you really wanted. His current interpretation is that it’s about appreciating what you do have rather than lamenting what you don’t. The friends who hung in with you, the family who understand you, the people who are still here. He calls it focusing on the positive.

Pitt will sometimes be in his car, rolling along, and see people sitting at a café, eating and laughing, and he will think how happy and carefree they look. He will feel something like envy. Maybe he will think of his children. He will certainly think of his dad, creaking around in the darkened rooms of the old house, all by himself, and he will feel something like anger.

At God? At the world? At those carefree people?

“It’s a hard one to square,” he says. “But I’m going to go back to: I think the challenge is to hold both. Grief, if you survive it, leaves a gaping hole, but it also leaves profound beauty. It’s an aching beauty, but it’s beauty.”

The question is, or one question is, when you feel like that actor in Alias Smith and Jones did, or like Pitt did during the family stuff—and we’ve all felt that way, whether we admit it to ourselves or not—what can a person do? How do you climb out of it?

“Wow,” he says and stays silent for a moment. Then: “I don’t see it as climbing out of it. It’s going through it and trying and trying and trying and trying to the point of exhaustion and then trying again. I don’t want to ignore the place where you run up against the wall. But I just one day woke up, and it just felt a little sunnier and the air felt a little sweeter. Just microdoses of it.”

As Kelsey Lu sings, a Paraguayan player knocks Germany out of the tournament with one kick. An upset. Our conversation goes to things like schedules, movie screenings, and the winding down of the afternoon. He’s rummaging around for a sticky note and a pen to give me his email address, muttering, “Where the . . . ?”

And then, as if a switch were flipped, he snaps back to the idea. He needs to finish the thought. He stops looking for a pen.

He says, “Maybe we’re looking at it the wrong way. Maybe we’ve got to start with letting go of all control, that need, that belief about the way things should be or what should have been or how things are supposed to be and then trying to control it, trying to hammer and tong it into some kind of shape, which is impossible. Maybe that’s really the road to waking up and the sun’s a little brighter one day and the air’s a little sweeter. And that in itself is acceptance, I would say.”

I’m looking at the little matcha bowls, nodding a little. The Paraguay players are rolling on the grass, hugging each other now, shouting, joyful. I think I see a German cry.

Pitt says he’s going to order Korean barbecue for dinner tonight. From Genwa, the place on Wilshire. It’s the best. He uses Postmates. And then maybe he’ll watch something.


Tuesday, May 21, 2019

Eequire



Quentin Tarantino, Brad Pitt, and Leonardo DiCaprio Take You Inside 'Once Upon a Time In...Hollywood'

As the director unveils his highly anticipated ninth film, Esquire sits him down with his headlining stars for a provocative three-way Q&A about Hollywood past and present. But what's Charles Manson and River Phoenix got to do with it?



“HEY. HEY. GOT A SECOND?”
Quentin Tarantino is in my face. He’s smiling, polite. But still, in my face. Nose-to-nose like.
“Listen,” he says, and he starts fast-twirling his index finger in a tight circle, like he’s winding dental floss around it. “I’ve come up with a few questions that could be really good for you to ask.”
His voice is hushed, conspiratorial, but since this is Tarantino, it’s also stage-whisper loud. And naturally, the words tumble out of his mouth with an urgency I would, in any other encounter, describe as Tarantino-esque. But in this case, that’s redundant.

We’re on the patio of a house in the Hollywood Hills. A minute earlier, I was alone under the eaves, looking at Tarantino, Brad Pitt, and Leonardo DiCaprio standing near the pool, all of Los Angeles unspooling into the horizon behind them. For a moment, I found myself staring at the three of them, thinking, Well, damn. Don’t exactly see this every day.

I’m waiting for them to finish being photographed so that we can talk about how they came together to make Tarantino’s new movie, Once Upon a Time in... Hollywood, and what they learned through that creative process. Today will be the first time all three of them have been in the same room since they wrapped production in November. For the past six months, Tarantino has been racing to finish cutting the film, to premiere it at Cannes. Still, he found time to phone me two days ago, to give me some backstory on the film’s development. Yet it seems since then, he’s also had time to think about what we could discuss. 

Pitt: "Quentin gives you these speeches, the kind that you wished you had said on the drive home."  Polo shirt by Prada. Alexi Lubomirski


“But here’s something important,” he says. “I don’t want it to seem like you are asking a question.”
It occurs to me that Tarantino is, in fact, directing me on how he wants me to deliver my questions—my lines.

When we spoke on the phone, Tarantino told me, “This film is the closest thing I’ve done to Pulp Fiction.” What that means in tone and feel, I can’t reveal. But what that means in terms of structure is this: Think multiple characters (some real, some imagined) and story lines that are seemingly unrelated . . . until they are not. Until they intersect and intertwine in surprising ways. This film, Tarantino says, is also “probably my most personal. I think of it like my memory piece. Alfonso [Cuarón] had Roma and Mexico City, 1970. I had L. A. and 1969. This is me. This is the year that formed me. I was six years old then. This is my world. And this is my love letter to L. A.” 

DiCaprio: "I grew up in this industry... I’ve seen the trials and tribulations."  Suit by Dior Men; polo shirt by Salvatore Ferragamo; shoes by Paul Stuart; socks by Falke.


The story, in short—and without giving away too much—goes like this: It’s 1969, a year of tremendous upheaval, not just in America’s streets but also on the backlots of Hollywood. The Golden Age is ending. The original studio system, which has been a source of stability and structure for fifty years, is collapsing as the under-thirty counterculture rejects traditional plotlines and traditional leading men. It’s the year Easy Rider and Midnight Cowboy and The Wild Bunch break big—films that celebrate the antihero and upend the definition of what a matinee idol looks like. It’s against this background that we meet Rick Dalton (DiCaprio), a declining star and a veteran of TV westerns. Rick has, through a combination of ego and dumb decisions, blown his chance to cross over into movie stardom like Steve McQueen (Damian Lewis). About the only thing he can count on is the friendship of his longtime stunt double, Cliff Booth (Pitt). (Meanwhile, Rick’s agent, played by Al Pacino, is trying to get him to do a spaghetti western.)

Then, one night, Rick realizes he might just be one pool party away from turning his career around. His new neighbors, it turns out, are the golden girl of the moment, Sharon Tate (Margot Robbie), and her husband, Roman Polanski (Rafal Zawierucha), who is, thanks to Rosemary’s Baby, the hottest director in town. The stories of Rick, Cliff, and Tate unfold over three days or, as Tarantino says, in three acts: February 8, February 9, and, finally, August 8—the night when Charles Manson (Damon Herriman) dispatched four members of his “Family” to the house next to Rick’s on Cielo Drive in Beverly Hills, where they found Tate, hairdresser Jay Sebring (Emile Hirsch), and three others. It was the night when, as Joan Didion famously wrote, “the sixties ended abruptly . . . the tension broke . . . the paranoia was fulfilled.” Once Upon a Time...in Hollywood is a film that vibrates with ambition, with the entire cast performing at the height of their talent, inside a brilliant story.

It’s also a film that almost never got made. Mostly because Tarantino spent five years writing it as a novel before “I let it become what it wanted to become,” he says. “For a long time, I didn’t want to accept it. Then I did.”

It’s late afternoon when Pitt enters the living room and drops down in the center of a semicircle couch. Tarantino has already claimed the right-hand side. We’re waiting for DiCaprio. Pitt settles in, looks down, and then points to his lap, where his pants have blossomed into a small . . . rise. He looks up and says, “There’s nothing I can do about boner pants, is there?”

Tarantino looks back at him, confused.

“Remember that Curb Your Enthusiasm episode?” Pitt says. “Where the woman thinks he popped one in the movie theater?” Tarantino laughs.
I offer Pitt a pillow. For his lap. He tries it for a minute and then flips it to the side.
DiCaprio enters and sits down, and we’re off.

Michael Hainey: I don’t know if this is a group-therapy session or a version of The Dating Game. So let’s just jump in. Brad and Leo, what attracted you to these roles? If I understand correctly, you are two of the only people who have read the entire script.

Brad Pitt: Which, in order to read, I had to go to Quentin’s house and sit on his patio.
Pitt: "We all came of age in this industry about the same time." DiCaprio: "We’re all nineties babies." Pitt: "We all speak the same language."   On DiCaprio: Suit by Dior Men; polo shirt by Salvatore Ferragamo. On Pitt: Polo shirt by Tom Ford; trousers by Prada; Breitling watch worn throughout, his own. On Tarantino: Jacket, shirt, and trousers by Dolce & Gabbana; vintage scarf, his own.


Leonardo DiCaprio: I sat on the patio too!

Quentin Tarantino: There was only one copy! I remember one of you made a comment: “I like this dirty cover page.”

BP: I went back weeks later and there was, like, a collection of more stains. The stains had been building on the page.

MH: What pulled you guys into this project?
LD: Well, first off, the chance to work with Mr. Tarantino. And certainly this time period was fascinating. It was this homage to Hollywood. I don’t think there’s been a Hollywood film like this—and by that I mean a film set in Hollywood and about Hollywood—which gets its nails dirty, getting into the everyday life of an actor and his stunt double. 1969 is a seminal time in cinema history as well as in the world. Rick and Cliff, they’re part of the old guard in Hollywood, but they’re also trying to navigate this new world of the hippie revolution and free love. I loved the idea of taking on this struggling actor who is trying to find his footing in this new world. And his pal who he’s been with through all these wars in Hollywood. Quentin so brilliantly captures what’s going on in the changing of America but also through these characters’ eyes how Hollywood was changing. It was captivating when I first read it. The characters had the imprint of Quentin’s immense knowledge of cinema history. You are in awe of the detail, and you know it’s fucking authentic. [Laughs.]

BP: It’s layers deep. Beyond any of my understanding. Even the title, Once Upon a Time in...Hollywood, is an homage, and it’s connected.

MH: Quentin, what are you saying with this title? On one hand, it evokes a fairy tale. On the other hand, it echoes a Sergio Leone western or a gangster movie.

QT: Well, there is a fairy-tale aspect, so the title fits pretty good. But this is a memory piece also. So it’s not historical fact per se. It is a Hollywood of reality—but a Hollywood of the mind at the same time. I was so happy with the title, but I was afraid to put it into the atmosphere. Whenever I referred to this project, I referred to it as Magnum Opus. A movie came out two years ago called Once Upon a Time in Venice.I go, “That was scary.”

BP: Once Upon a Time in Burbank . . . [Laughs.]

MH: Brad, what attracted you to this script?

BP: Certainly the period is great fun. QT is the last purveyor of cool. If you land in one of his films, you know you’re in great hands. Quentin gives you these speeches, the kind that you wished you had said on the drive home, that you think of a day later. I felt the script was an evolution of Quentin’s voice. I mean, we know Quentin Tarantino as an auteur sending film in a singular, original direction. But I found this an evolution—and an amalgamation of what we loved about his other eight films.

QT: I didn’t try to do that, but it just started happening.

BP: And it felt really good-hearted, like warm-hearted.

LD: That is very true.

BP: And doing this with Leo was really cool and a rare opportunity. Then there was just the whole thing, where we all grew up with the lore of the lead actor and his stuntman. That relationship and craft. I mean, there are epic stories of these duos: Burt Reynolds had Hal Needham. Steve McQueen had Bud Ekins. Kurt Russell had his guy. Harrison Ford had his. These guys were partners for decades. And it’s something that is not the same in our generation, as the pieces became more movable. 


DiCaprio: "1969 is a seminal time in cinema history... Quentin so brilliantly captures through these characters’ eyes how Hollywood was changing."  On DiCaprio: T-shirt by Jungmaven; jeans by Outland Denim. On Tarantino: Jacket and shirt by John Varvatos; trousers by Dior Men.


LD: It’s also this authentic Hollywood story in the sense that our characters are the voyeurs of the majesty and glamour of Hollywood. We’re the outsiders. We’re the guys who are there day to day, trying to get the work. Brad and I are watching Hollywood change, but we’re in the grind. And we have this connected relationship where we have each other’s backs. Through thick and thin. That’s the perspective Quentin took, and it seems like these characters could truly exist. And then this Manson stuff is happening around us. The Polanski–Tate story.

MH: Brad, how was working with Quentin on this different from working with him on Inglourious Basterds?

BP: It felt like walking right back in. I have an immediate comfort on Quentin’s sets. It’s the atmosphere. It’s the conversations we have, which are just fun. You know, we all kind of came of age in this industry about the same time.

LD: We’re all nineties babies.

BP: We all speak the same language and understand the same seismic events or minor events in our community. [Turns to DiCaprio.] One of my first jobs was guest-starring on your show.

LD: Growing Pains?

BP: When you were just starting.

MH: It’s astounding to think you all hit at the same time. Quentin, you have Reservoir Dogs in ’92 and then Pulp Fiction in ’94. Brad, you have Thelma & Louise, A River Runs Through It, and Interview with the Vampire in ’91, ’92, and ’94. And Leo, you do What’s Eating Gilbert Grape in ’93. All three of you have been on top in Hollywood for a quarter century now. 

QT: Brad’s even in True Romance in 1993. The first script I wrote! And he almost steals the show in the third act. [They all laugh.]

LD: “Don’t fucking condescend me, man.” [DiCaprio turns to Pitt and smiles.] I love that line.

BP: There is an immediate comfort, stepping into Quentin’s dialogue. It’s why actors want to work with him—you should have seen the line of people trying to get into this film. Offering their services, just to be a part of this thing, even just for a day.

MH: Quentin, anyone I talk to tells me how joyful your sets are. How if you call for another take, you’ll say, “Let’s do it one more time! Why?” And then the entire crew yells . . . 

QT, BP, LD: “ . . . because we love making movies!”

BP: It’s that great spirit. True.

LD: His sets are so magnetic. You don’t walk onto sets like this anymore, where everyone has respect for the process. There’s this celebration of a way of making movies that has slowly become an antiquity in this industry. Quentin puts a tremendous amount of thought into making these characters come to life, making the authenticity of the period come to life. There’s also this freedom—an energy—we feel on his set. It’s become a rarity to have a process the way he has it. And that is: taking the time to fucking Get. It. Right. At all costs.  

BP: And to know when you got it.

MH: Quentin, what did Brad and Leo find in the characters that you hadn’t put on the page?

QT: Quite a bit. Brad was already aware of the history of different actor-stuntman teams. So he immediately was like, “Oh, this is like Steve McQueen and Bud Ekins.” Which means, you know, Leo’s character is sort of the poor man’s McQueen. 

On Pitt: Polo shirt and trousers by Prada. On Tarantino: Jacket, Saint Laurent by Anthony Vaccarello; shirt by Prada; trousers by Dior Men.


BP: Which would make me the poor man’s Bud Ekins.

QT: [Laughs.] Brad immediately thought that the idea was hip and really wanted to lean into it. But there’s an interesting thing as far as Cliff is concerned: We follow three different people in Hollywood, and they represent the three social strata of the town. We follow Sharon, who is truly living the Hollywood life. Then Rick, who is doing better than he thinks he’s doing. He has a house, some money, and he’s still working. Then Cliff represents a guy who has dedicated his entire life to this industry and has nothing to show for it. [DiCaprio and Pitt laugh.] He is part of Hollywood, but he lives in Panorama City in a trailer. Make no mistake: Hollywood is his life, but he is nota citizen. These three social strata are important to the story.
And there’s a neat aspect when it comes to Cliff and then to Brad, developing Cliff’s character: He and I are very similar in age, so this is an equal memory piece for Brad. In 1969, we were both five, six years old. We both remember the shows that were on TV and what was on the radio.
But with Leonardo, who didn’t grow up in the same era as Brad and me, I needed to find references for him. And that gave it a freshness, watching Leo watch old western TV shows I’d given him. Then I’d invent a movie that Rick could have starred in, like The 14 Fists of McCluskey, which is like a poor man’s Dirty Dozen. I said to Leo, “If Rick’s rival, Steve McQueen, does The Magnificent Seven, Rick is the kind of guy who would have been in the third sequel, as the second lead.”

MH: Leo, what did you bring from your life?

LD: Or the third or fourth.

QT: No, you’re the second guy. You’re like Monte Markham, who also played Death in the first remake of Death Takes a Holiday.

BP: Yeah, those remakes should have stopped there. [Pitt starred in Meet Joe Black, the third remake of Death Takes a Holiday.]

MH: Quentin, you’re touching on something. In acting, there’s how the character is written, and then the experiences or memories an actor brings to the character. Brad, what did you pull from your life?

BP: I had growing-up flashbacks, because the flavors were all there. For instance, in the movie, Cliff lives next door to a drive-in theater. In Missouri, I grew up a few streets over from the drive-in theater, and I would go hang out at my friend’s house so we could watch movies from his backyard. It’s just a lot of crossovers for me. I think it has something to do with Quentin’s writing. Surely it must. Cliff’s close to my father’s age. A little older.

MH: Leo, what did you bring from your life?

LD: I grew up in this industry, and I have a lot of friends I’ve known since I was thirteen who are actors. I’ve seen the trials and tribulations. Some of the struggles I immediately recognized—the search for your own identity and the search for success in an industry that rejects 99 percent of actors from this elite class of being able to choose your own work. I have many friends in that situation. They all love moviemaking, but do a lot of them feel like they belong to the club? Rick, his whole life is wanting to belong to that club. He’s constantly feeling rejected. Almost had that one shot where, if things would have played correctly . . . 

MH: So you know these guys—

LD: Oh, yes. But what I really loved about this movie is there’s a lot of love in the story of Cliff and Rick’s relationship. Because through all of this, they are like a family. They’ve created a family unit and a connection that’s going to let them survive the stomping of their dreams.

MH: It’s one of the echoes I love in this film. The layers. I mean, this is a story about guys who act in westerns, at a time when the western—which has always been a metaphor for American manhood and the idea of the rugged individual—is totally changing. Look at the different versions of westerns that came out in 1969, and what they say about manhood and how we see America: True Grit. Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid. Easy Rider. Midnight Cowboy. The Wild Bunch. And here you are, Rick and Cliff, in a period piece that riffs on an essential dynamic of the western: the duo. The buddies.

QT: One of the things that Leonardo did—my prose was telling him a lot of the backstory—was he said, “I need a little more to play.” [Bangs table.] He said, “I need to act through something.” In talking about different actors of that era, I said something that intrigued him. I brought up—I think I can say this—

LD: Ralph Meeker?

QT: No, I love that. But Pete Duel.
LD: Oh, yeah.

QT: It started when Brad brought up Alias Smith and Jones [a western on ABC, 1971–73], and we both loved it when we were kids. As we were talking, it occurred to us that because of that show, it was the first time he and I had ever heard of suicide. In real life, Pete Duel, who played Hannibal Heyes, killed himself.

BP: I remember I was at my grandma’s house when I learned this. And I remember walking into a dark bedroom. It was a little tiny house. I went into the bedroom where it was dark and I burst into tears. I was so upset.

Pitt: "I see something else happening with the younger generations.... I’ve always believed every good film finds its eyes, inevitably. But there’s a shift in attention span."  Shirt by Emporio Armani; trousers by Prada; vintage loafers from Palace Costume & Prop Co., Los Angeles; socks by Gold Toe. 


LD: I remember your conversation that day. I had no idea about the show and the actors, but you both said you had that exact same reaction.

QT: The fact that we both learned about suicide because of Pete Duel at age eight or whatever was . . .
LD: For me, that made it this really strong reality. For this town. And having also seen that happen with some of my contemporaries in the industry, how that wear and tear and constant disappointment can lead to that. I really wanted to infuse at least the feeling for the audience that suicide is an absolute possibility for Rick.

QT: From us talking about it, we realized why Pete Duel did it. In retrospect, he was bipolar. He was drinking to self-medicate. So then we thought: Maybe Rick has a drinking problem. I had not written him in that way, but there always was this crazy swing of his emotions. Now there was a rooted cause, and that was the one Leo responded to. [Claps hands.]

MH: Leo, there’s a scene where the child actor on your western, a girl, phones you when you are in a bad place. It is a poignant moment.

LD: Very. Not to define Rick’s journey, but it’s a journey not only of acceptance but of appreciation. When you are in his position, constantly looking for that foothold to stardom and doors keep shutting in your face, after a while you start to realize: Can I be happy where I am? Is there satisfaction in not achieving that goal? It’s a journey for Rick of his dreams constantly being trampled on, the effects of questioning himself on an everyday basis. Self-hatred. But can he get to a place of acceptance and appreciation for being in this industry? Is there any celebration of that, or is it just a constant source of disappointment? That’s the arc we were going with for Rick. But like I said, it’s Quentin’s celebration of this industry and all those who kept at it, even if all those dreams they had as a young spitfire didn’t come to fruition.

MH: Was it better to have tried or not to have tried, right?

LD: In a lot of ways, I think that is the story.

MH: You touched on a theme a minute ago. On the surface, this is a film about actors in 1969, dealing with change in Hollywood. But what is powerful and universal is that, at the root, this is a story about two men battling forces that many men are confronting right now. That is: What happens to me when I am in the middle of my career, in the middle of my life, and the industry I am working in doesn’t want me, or the job I have had for decades, it’s changing, or going away? Can I reinvent myself? So many guys are facing that anxiety right now.


LD: I think you said it basically right on.

BP: Exactly. Who am I now? Where’s my meaning?

MH: Because for men, identity comes from work. And you play two men trying to understand who they are, what’s left, what’s their purpose, if they lose that identity. Can they reinvent themselves and determine their future?

QT: Rick comes to town in ’55. He’s a young, good-looking guy. He thinks, Hey, I’m in Missouri. Let me get the fuck out of here and go where good-looking guys make money: Hollywood. I’ll get some tight jeans and hang around Schwab’s drugstore.
BP: That was me in ’86. [Smiles.]

QT: Hey, and it worked, too. Good on ya!

MH: Except it wasn’t Schwab’s. Where was it?

BP: Taco Bell. Wait, sorry. Shakey’s Pizza.

MH: Which location?

BP: [Smiles.] A very good question. In fact, there were two. At first, I went to the one in North Hollywood. Then I made some money and got to advance to the one in Hollywood, on Sunset Boulevard. You could eat for $1.49. It was all you could eat, and that would be your meal for the day. You would just cram as much food as you could, then you were good till the next day.

QT: Those Mojo potatoes! I’m sure in your early days you played pool at Barney’s Beanery, too.

BP: Yep, sure did.

QT: But the thing is, Rick was sold a bill of goods everyone else was sold. To be a young leading man is to be macho and masculine and sexy and handsome and chiseled.

MH: Well, for his generation, that’s the epitome of manhood, of male identity.

QT: Exactly. And that’s how you got on a western show back then. 


BP: And everyone came from that. Burt Reynolds. Clint Eastwood.

QT: All those guys. Now, in 1969, the new leading men are the exact opposite. They are skinny, shaggy-haired guys. There’s a pansexuality about them. And it’s the hippie sons of famous people. So it’s Peter Fonda. It’s Michael Douglas, Arlo Guthrie, or Michael Sarrazin.

MH: What’s fascinating—there is the rise of the pretty leading man, but there is also the rise of the anti–leading man. Again, look at 1969. Dustin Hoffman plays Ratso Rizzo in a corrupted western, Midnight Cowboy. And then, who is the complete embodiment of the new anti–leading man? Charles Manson! He’s hairy and charismatic and young. Plus, he gets the chicks. And he literally steals the old dream factories from these guys; he’s living on an old movie set. Manson usurps it all! Even the headlines. He becomes more famous than all of them.

BP: Right! Well put, well put.

QT: In the film, there’s a sequence that takes place on Spahn Ranch. Through the whole movie, we’ve been hanging out on real
Hollywood-western soundstages where phony versions of this kind of masculine drama are being played out for cameras. Then we end up on Spahn Ranch, on this dilapidated western backlot, and those masculine rituals are played out—but this time with real-world consequences, and no one’s acting.

MH: Brad, there’s a great moment in the film that embodies Cliff. If Rick can never see outside himself, you are a guy who’s more aware of the wider
world. Like when you’re at the red light and that Manson hippie girl walks in front of your car. It’s a great moment you give us, with your eyes. We see a guy recognizing, literally, that he’s seeing the new players coming onstage. Maybe I’m reading too much into it. . . .

QT: No, you’re reading it right.

MH: How do you see Cliff?

BP: He’s at peace with his mac and cheese. Even if he doesn’t have milk. He’s content with his place in life. Pretty thrilled just to be alive that day. I just felt like he would be all right wherever he landed. He would figure it out. He isn’t asking for that much. So when he sees that girl, he knows something new and exciting is coming along. This is not the lady at Denny’s.

LD: As I’m thinking about it, I’ve had these relationships in the industry too. You need your support system. You need that guy you can sit there and watch TV with and not say a fucking word with for five hours. You need to know somebody is there. When we were doing the movie, my relationship with Brad clicked. It was very early on where he improvised a line and it changed everything. In the scene, as it was written, I’m coming to set hungover and I am basically getting my fate handed to me, discovering what my future is going to be in this industry. And I’m really down. And in the scene, Brad ad-libs. He just comes out with this line: He looks at me and says, “Hey, you’re Rick fucking Dalton. Don’t you forget that.”

QT: That was a thing Brad just said—and it ended up becoming a thing.

MH: How did you find that line, Brad?

BP: True story, this was probably early nineties. I was on set and I was whining about something and lamenting something. I was pretty low. And this guy was basically saying to me, “Get your head up, hold your head up. Quit your whining. You’re Brad fucking Pitt. I would like to be Brad fucking Pitt.” It did me a favor. I needed to hear it. That day, I flashed on that. The way Quentin’s scene was constructed, it reminded me of it.

MH: Speaking of the nineties, as we said, you guys all popped at the same time. And what’s interesting is, yes, the business is always evolving, but what courses through the streets of Hollywood is eternal. The insecurities, the neuroses—whether it is 1919 or 2019, that never changes. Again, you all have twenty-five years of winning the lottery. So I’m curious: Are there other things that remind you of where you are right now in your own careers? 

LD: I’ve been listening to podcasts about the history of Hollywood, the transition from silent films to talkies, the advent of television, the musicals in the sixties, the directors’ era of the seventies. And now we’re talking about streaming services. I don’t want to act as if I’ve been around since fucking silent cinema, but I see this as a huge shift in the way movies are going to get done, what gets financing. The studio system has tons of content, libraries of things that they can make movies of, but in a lot of ways they are hemorrhaging. They’ve become—much like in the twenties—these corporate empires that have taken over the artistic vein of moviemaking. We’re now in an era when there’s a flush of cash into streaming. But with an overflow of content, there’s a lot of garbage out there. Now I do see a lot of chances being taken for story lines, certainly documentaries, certainly giving some artists opportunities to make out-of-the-box story lines that I don’t think ten years ago would have been possible. But these types of films that Quentin is doing are also becoming endangered species.

BP: No question.

LD: I’m not saying celebrate this movie, but let’s celebrate filmmakers who are still holding on to the craft of making movies, and let’s hope that in that transition into whatever this is going to be, this type of filmmaking will still exist. There are some dark ages coming up.

BP: The positive of the new landscape is you see more people getting opportunities. But I see something else happening with the younger generations. I was dismayed at how many twenty-year-olds have never seen Godfather, Cuckoo’s Nest, All the President’s Men—these films that are in the Bible to me. And they may not even get to see them. I’ve always believed every good film finds its eyes, inevitably. But there’s a shift in attention span. I’ve been hearing from newer generations that they’re used to something shorter, quicker, big jump, and get out. And the streaming services work that way; you can move on to the next one if you’re enticed. What I always loved about going to a cinema was letting something slowly unfold, and to luxuriate in that story and watch and see where it goes. I’m curious to see if that whole form of movie watching is just out the window with the younger generations. I don’t think so completely.

QT: It requires the right kind of movie—one that hits the right kind of nerve where it becomes a conversation. Get Out achieved that. Everyone was talking about it, and the whole metaphor of the Sunken Place was something everyone started to use. It sparked genuine conversation. It used to be movies were the pop-culture conversation and it was much rarer for a TV show to break into that place. But now that’s where it is.

MH: Brad and Leo, you play these guys who are in the middle of their careers, and you’re in the middle of your careers and your lives— 

BP: The middle—you’re being generous. [Laughs.]

MH: When you look back at the beginning of your careers, how do you think you are different from when you broke into Hollywood?

LD: The first years are seminal. At that point it just becomes about opportunity. And in a weird way, I really connect with myself as a young man trying to get into the industry. Growing up in L. A., in Silver Lake, was the only reason I became an actor. Had I lived anywhere else, my parents would not have [laughs] picked up shop and moved—it was the sheer proximity to auditions. But once I got my foothold and I got that one movie, I said, “I’m doing movies now. I’ve been doing television and here’s my shot.” Any young actor I’ve ever spoken to, I say, “The first thing you gotta do is learn as much as you possibly can about the history of what the fuck has been done in the industry.” If you’re coming here and want your shot, then you need to learn about cinema’s past. ’Cause there have been some performances in films that probably can never be duplicated.

MH: Well, you can steal from them too.

LD: My attitude is the same as when I started. When I talk to these two guys, it’s like, we know we were given that one shot and we do not want to disrespect that opportunity, which is why we’re just trying the damn best we can to make the best things we can. Because we understand that it is fleeting. Tastes change; culture changes. And I feel very blessed to have gotten that ticket to be able to do movies. So I feel very connected to that fifteen-year-old kid who got his first movie. And that hasn’t changed.

BP: I feel the same. It’s always been about quality. In the beginning it’s wild, and it’s loose, and it’s fun—you’re chasing, you’re chasing, you’re chasing. And you’re seeing what opens, and certainly you’re experiencing a lot of doors that close. But you just refine your craft. When I think of myself then and now, as far as the approach, it’s just a refinement of craft. Becoming a craftsman after a few decades of doing this. It’s allin service to story, and along the way you gain more wisdom and knowledge about story. But as far as an actor’s approach of being able to free yourself to see what you discover at the moment in the scene—you can just get there quicker, you know? Listen, the first few years on sets are just trying to block out the forty, fifty people who are standing around, and the lights, and the cables, and the cameras, and it’s a very foreign environment. Over time it becomes a home. And it becomes your community.  

MH: If you were to give Rick and Cliff advice, what would it be?

LD: Stop fucking drinking! [Everyone laughs.] I watched a whole bunch of old films to prepare for this movie, and somewhere along the line I watched Gun Crazy [a 1950 film noir] and I was like, “Wow!” It was the seminal independent film where people didn’t have all the opportunities that Orson Welles would have had at the time with Touch of Evil—and I think about people working with some not-huge stars, a director who was pretty damn good but hadn’t made anything unbelievable. And with all the chips stacked against them, that combination of ambition got together to make something that was a phenomenal piece of art. And that’s what I would tell Rick: There’s always a shot. Maybe not quite the opportunities that you had hoped for, but there’s always a shot to do something magnificent—and to get out of that story that you have in your head that keeps playing like a computer virus, that story that says you’ve been screwed over by the industry, by society, by the changing of times. You know, I just hate hearing, “Everything happens for a reason. The universe is watching over you.”
[Laughs.] Actually, no. There’s no universe watching over, specifically, you. What about the rest of the world? It’s like this idea that “I have been cursed.” That’s what I would tell Rick.

QT: But it can all change in a moment. Three years or four years after the movie takes place, think about where Rick couldbe. The thing is, you get one audition and now your life is different. I’m always curious when I talk to actors about the one role that started everything. Brad, I remember I asked you, “What was it like when you auditioned for Thelma & Louise?” And you said, “Actually, another guy had the part.”

BP: Two. The first left to do another film because he got offered a lead, and then the second guy fell out. I think it had something to do with chemistry. But I don’t know for sure.

QT: But I am always curious about: Okay, this moment is going to change your life, but you don’t know it. It’s just one of four auditions you’re doing that week.

MH: I want to hear about the structure of the film. It takes place over three days. That’s it. 

LD: It was hard for me to wrap my head around that concept, because I don’t think I’ve done a film where the narrative takes place over just a couple days. I always look at “Where’s the beginning, where’s the middle, where’s the climax and the crescendo?” I think this script was actually a real benefit to us as actors; it freed us up in a lot of ways. I certainly felt it, I think Brad felt that. We were given this incredible backstory. Quentin literally handed us our character’s life and we discussed it, and there were some things we agreed with and didn’t agree with, but we were given this road map of who these guys were. All that character history naturally infused its way into these two days in a really organic way. Stuff didn’t need to be explained. It was just there in the gestures, and there in the relationship. Usually, I’m like, “Let’s explain everything about the character. . . .” Quentin’s like, “No, this is just two days. We’re going to get glimpses of Rick’s condition and what Rick’s mentally and emotionally going through.” As an actor, you get this sort of weird relaxation from it, and that’s the beauty of great filmmaking: Not everything needs to be, as my father says, Irving the Explainer. [Everyone laughs.] It’s the audience filling in the gaps that makes this movie, I think, very courageous. But doing a film that’s set over only two, three days? It is an experiment that I don’t think I’ve ever done before. [Looks to Pitt.] Have you done it?

QT: Well . . . Titanic is only a couple days. Right?

LD: [Goes silent. Then:] Truuuuue.

MH: I don’t remember that movie. What happened?

BP: Yeah, how does it end? [Laughs.]

LD: [Laughs. Looks at Hainey and Pitt.] I guess you’re right. [Laughs again.] I stand corrected. I guess it is.

MH: Let’s talk about expectations around this film. The lights come up at Cannes—what do you want people to think?

BP: I don’t tend to think that way. For me, it’s the experience of the film. And when you’ve had an experience that enriched your life in a way, when you know there’s good work on the table, and when you know you’re in great hands . . . then you know it’s going to be something that you can get up and feel good about. That’s the—I’m not being evasive—I’m telling you that’s the reward. Where things land afterward . . . I think all good films find their place.

LD: Brad and I were talking about the anticipation for it. It’s a different sense with this one, a different kind of expectation. I heard some of my friends talk about it after they saw the trailer, and they were like, This is exciting, because it’s a throwback to the type of cinema we’ve been yearning for. I recently went to a couple movies, and I don’t want to pooh-pooh anybody else’s parade, but I saw seven trailers, and they all morphed into one. I felt like I sat for fifteen minutes in this intergalactic world of people jumping in and out of different realms of reality and then dragons. There was just this collage of . . . things. I was like, “Was that one trailer or seven?” [Laughs.]


This is the closest thing I’ve done to Pulp Fiction," Tarantino says of his new film.  On DiCaprio: Suit by Dior Men; polo shirt by Salvatore Ferragamo. On Pitt: Polo shirt by Tom Ford; trousers by Prada; Breitling watch worn throughout, his own. On Tarantino: Jacket, shirt, and trousers by Dolce & Gabbana; vintage scarf, his own.
Alexi Lubomirski


MH: And let’s talk about Charles Manson—you have this three-act movie, but Manson looms over it, like Chekov’s gun, creating this . . .

QT: One of the things we don’t want to try to help you solve here but what you’re poking around about is, yes, this is a Hollywood movie in the same vein as, like, The Stunt Man or Singin’ in the Rain or any other movie about Hollywood. And there’s a good-hearted spirit
to it. Then you ask, “How does the Manson Family fit in?” Well, that’s the trick. And that is, actually, how it is supposed to work: “How does this rancidness figure into everything?” And I want the audience asking that question, and I hope that’s one of the things that helps lead you to the theater. It’s like we’ve got a perfectly good body, and then we take a syringe and inject it with a deadly virus.

MH: One of the many crazy facts about Manson: He was not an outsider in Hollywood. He crossed paths with many famous people in town. Like Brian Wilson. Or like Doris Day’s son, Terry Melcher, the record producer. You guys have lived in this town a long time. What six degrees of weirdness do you have?

LD: There’s all kinds of weirdness. Jesus! Wow. [Pauses.]

BP: I remember back in the early days I hung out with Brandon Lee. He drove a hearse and lived in Echo Park. We went out one night and everyone else had peeled off, and we ended up back at his place and it was like six in the morning. A real, you know, drunk and stony night, and he proceeded that night to tell me how he thought he was going to die young like his dad. And I just chalked it up to, you know, stony 6:00 a.m. talk. Then he got The Crow the next year.

MH: And his father, Bruce Lee, is depicted in the new movie.

LD: I have one. One of the most ominous and sad ones. I grew up revering River Phoenix as the great actor of my generation, and all I ever wanted was to have just an opportunity to shake his hand. And one night, at a party in Silver Lake, I saw him walk up a flight of stairs. It was almost like something you would see in Vertigo, because I saw there was something in his face, and I’d never met him—always wanted to meet him, always wanted to just have an encounter with him—and he was walking toward me and I kind of froze. And then the crowd got in my way, and I looked back and he was gone. I walked back up the stairs and back down, and I was like, “Where did he go?” And he was . . . on his way to the Viper Room. It was almost as if—I don’t know how to describe it, but it’s this existential thing where I felt like . . . he disappeared in front of my very eyes, and the tragedy that I felt afterward of having lost this great influence for me and all of my friends. The actor we all talked about. Just to be able to have that, always wanting to just—and I remember extending my hand out, and then . . . Two people came in front and then I looked back, and then he wasn’t there. [Pauses.] I actually flew later to New Orleans to meet about Interview with the Vampire to play the part Christian Slater ended up playing. [Phoenix had been cast in the role.] 

BP: I’ll tell you one of the greatest moments I’ve had in these however many years we’ve been at it in this town: getting to spend two days with Burt Reynolds on this film.

QT: Yeah.

LD: Yeah.

MH: He was originally cast to play George Spahn, correct?

QT: Yeah. The last performance Burt Reynolds gave was when he came down and did a rehearsal day for that sequence, and then the script reading. And that was really amazing.

BP: It was a fucking pleasure.

QT: I found out from three different people that the last thing he did just before he died was run lines with his assistant. Then he went to the bathroom, and that’s when he had his heart attack.

BP: Oh, man.

MH: Brad, what do you remember about those days with Burt?

BP: Well, you’ve gotta understand, for me, growing up in the Ozarks and watching Smokey and the Bandit, you know, he was the guy. Virile. Always had something sharp to say—funny as shit. A great dresser. Oh, man. [Laughs.] And I had never met him, so being there with him reminded me of how much I enjoyed him as a kid. And then getting to spend those days with him in rehearsal, I was really touched by him.

LD: And for that matter, you know, Luke Perry! [Perry plays Scott Lancer, another fictitious TV actor.] I remember my friend Vinny, who is in the film as well, we walked in and we both had this butterfly moment of like, “Oh my God, that’s Luke Perry over there!”

BP: “That’s Luke fucking Perry!” We were like kids in the candy shop because I remember going to the studios and [Beverly Hills, 90210] was going on and he was that icon of coolness for us as teenagers. It was this strange burst of excitement that I had, to be able to act with him. Man, he was so incredibly humble and amazing and absolutely committed. He couldn’t have been a more friendly, wonderful guy to spend time with. I got to sit down and have some wonderful conversations with him. It was really special.

QT: I went to the memorial, and three days earlier I had finished cutting together Luke’s last scene. It’s making me think: Grunge bands loved Reservoir Dogs. I think it was just a good tour-bus movie. Kurt Cobain was this huge fan to such a degree that I’m thanked on the third album. And I’d never met him. His people called me up and said, “Hey, would you like to get together with him?” And I go, “I’d love to, but I’m in preproduction on Pulp Fiction, so maybe at some point afterward.” But he never made it.

MH: It reminds me, years ago I interviewed Sylvester Stallone. And in his library, I see this little piece of paper framed on the wall. It was a letter that said something like, “Dear Mr. Stallone, I want to congratulate you on your Academy Award nominations for Rocky. Signed, Charlie Chaplin.” It turns out, until Stallone was nominated for an Oscar for best screenplay and best actor for Rocky, only two other people had been nominated for an Academy Award for both writing and starring in a film: Orson Welles, for Citizen Kane, and Charlie Chaplin, for The Great Dictator.

LD: No way!

BP: That’s amazing.

MH: This was 1977. So I said, “Did you meet him?” And he said something like, “It was so stupid, you know. I’m young and thinking, There’s time for that. But six months later, he was dead.”

BP: Wow.

MH: Stallone said it was one of the great regrets of his life, not grabbing the moment.

LD: You seem to be able to put a nice ending and answer on a lot of things we want to say, too.

MH: But isn’t that part of what the film is about, making the most of the time and being grateful? Because you never know what’s going to change in your life?

LD: Absolutely.



Michael Hainey is the Executive Director of Editorial at Esquire magazine. He is the author of the best-selling memoir about fathers and sons, After Visiting Friends.



The booze and the ash tray are on QT's side while Brad has milk 😀.  He has a photo smoking but only has milk or water in his glass throughout.   He smokes but doesn't drink.  Photos by Alexi Lubomirski who also shot Angelina's spread in Namibia.