Showing posts with label Blade Runner. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Blade Runner. Show all posts

Monday, May 14, 2012

Ridley Scott's Women Warriors



Ridley Scott talks about his history of directing kick-ass leading ladies

Ridley Scott: My Warrior Women

May 14, 2012 1:00 AM EDT

The Prometheus director on his kick-ass leading ladies.


The lead in my new film Prometheus was always going to be female, like Sigourney Weaver in the original Alien. Then I came across Noomi Rapace when I was watching The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo about two years ago, and was taken with this little punk in the lead who seemed to own the street.

As a protagonist, she’s a very physical woman who’s almost as agile as an acrobat. She’s also got a real brain in her head. No one’s going to be disappointed. It’s odd because Sigourney is about six feet and Noomi is about 5 feet 5, but you don’t notice the difference onscreen. And she sure does kick some ass in this movie. Her character evolves in a very clever way.

Prometheus originated from a very simple question that haunted me after the first Alien, and no one answered in subsequent Alien films: who was the “Space Jockey”—the big guy in the seat? We didn’t know if it was going to be a sequel or a prequel. I think you might not even argue it’s a prequel because it moves so far away from the original.

Thelma & Louise. The budget was very slender because nobody wanted to make it. I first came on as producer, and I was selling the notion to four or five male directors that the movie should be an epic about two women on their journey for freedom. One director who turned me down said, “I’ve got a problem with the women,” and I said, “Well you’re meant to, you dope!” So I thought that I should direct it myself.

All the relationships in my life have been with strong women, and I think I get on better with them. My mother was a big part of bringing up three boys, so I accepted that as the status quo. Oddly enough, I find it quite engaging to be working with a female when I’m directing. There are a lot of men who feel they’re being emasculated by having the woman in charge; I’ve never had that problem. The stronger the woman, the better for me.

Now I’m working on a project with Angelina Jolie called Gertrude Bell, which is a period piece about a woman who was partly instrumental in seeing King Faisal to the throne of Iraq. And funnily enough, I started my first meetings on the Blade Runner sequel last week. We’ll definitely be featuring a female protagonist.


As told to Marlow Stern. Prometheus is in theaters June 8.

Monday, November 7, 2011

Making of Blade Runner


Mindhole Blowers: 20 Facts About Blade Runner That Might Leave You Questioning Ridley Scott's Humanity


By Cindy Davis | Posted Under 



harrisonyoungkiss.jpg Toward the beginning of his Blade Runner commentary, Ridley Scott says, “It is a director’s job to dictate what you want,” and by gum, does Scott ever know how to wield authority. He also states that a director “needs to be as user-friendly as possible, knowing how to lead people down a path to understand the world you’re going into.” This is clearly where he fails his own edict, evidenced by the documentary Dangerous Days: Making Blade Runner. Does the end justify the means? Most fans would answer a resounding, “Yes,” but it is clear that even 25 years after the film was made, many of the cast and crew harbor deep resentment. Still, the film is stunningly beautiful — a tremendous feat when one sees the bare bones of what Scott had to work with — and in moments that teeter near the brink of reality, its moral implications remain relevant.
(For the record, I watched The Final Cut, the director’s preferred version. Most of this information came from the documentary, as Scott’s commentary was nearly entirely self-masturbatory egoism and pointless.)
1. Blade Runner is based on Philip K. Dick’s novel Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? The title came from the William S. Burroughs novella, Blade Runner (a movie), which was a proposed film adaptation of another novel, Alan E. Nourse’s The Bladerunner.
The first script was written by Hampton Fancher, primarily a television actor (“Gunsmoke, The Fugitive, Bonanza”). A friend of his told Fancher, “I think science fiction is going to happen,” and suggested Dick’s novel. Fancher said he didn’t like it much, but he came up with the idea of a detective who chases androids; they just wanted to make money.
2. Producer Michael Deeley (The Deer Hunter, The Italian Job [1969]), read both the book and Fancher’s script ideas and didn’t like either very much. Deeley said he thought the script “dumbed down” the book. Fancher found a comic book he liked called “Mechanismo,” in fact, he wanted to give the film that same name. He wrote another script that Deeley thought was much better, but Deeley didn’t think the name worked. To try to get financing, they decided to call the film, Dangerous Days.
Ridley Scott was beginning work on Dune when he got the Dangerous Days script, he turned it down. Then, Scott’s brother Frank died and the director pulled out of Dune, saying it was partially because of a poor script and the time that was going to be necessary to put into the film.
3. Some time later, Associate Producer, Ivor Powell (Alien) was working on a commercial with Ridley; Powell read the DD script, thought it was powerful and convinced Scott to re-read it. This director finally decided to take on the project and called Michael Deeley. They were originally financed by Filmways Pictures, but the company was small and having financial difficulties, so though they were already building sets and doing pre-production, the group sought out new financing. The film was eventually financed partially by Warner Brothers and other investment groups.
4. Unsatisfied with the script as it was and unable to get quick and accurate revisions done by Hampton Fancher (who also resisted the changes), Scott brought in a second script writer, David Peoples (12 Monkeys, Unforgiven). Overworked and emotional, Fancher said he cried after reading the new script. Peoples said he understood Fancher’s exhaustion after having revised the script at least ten times already.
5. Scott began doing drawings; his creativity was inspired by the look of a French Comic, Métal Hurlant (Screaming Metal).
Scott drawings.png
6. The character of Roy Batty (Rutger Hauer) was changed a lot. One script opened with Batty crawling out from under a pile of “dead” replicants. Another had Batty killed at the beginning of the film. Production Executive, Katherine Haber showed Ridley Scott several of Rutger Hauer’s films and Scott hired the actor without having met him. When Hauer first came in, he wore a zippered nylon jumpsuit, a sweater with a fox on the front; he had cut his hair the way he thought Batty should look and wore green “Elton John sunglasses.” Haber said she loved the look on Scott’s face. Over their first lunch meeting, Scott bonded with Hauer over Métal Hurlant, with which Hauer was already familiar. The actor gave his own ideas about the character and felt Scott was receptive to them. It was Hauer’s idea to hold the dove when he was dying, at the moment of his death the dove would be release and fly away. Because there was so much rain, the bird was too wet to fly and just hopped around the roof. Hauer also came up with his character’s often quoted ending words: “All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.”
rutgerdove.jpg
7. Hampton Fancher wrote his script with Robert Mitchum in mind for Rick Deckard. Other actors listed on his script as possibilities were: Dustin Hoffman, Peter Falk, Al Pacino, Nick Nolte and Burt Reynolds. Hoffman was interviewed by Scott for “hours and hours” and “months” were spent trying to make it work, but Hoffman had his own ideas which kept getting further and further from the story they wanted to do. Actress, Barbara Hershey suggested Harrison Ford to Deeley (and possibly Scott). Ford was doing Raiders of the Lost Ark at the time, so Deeley and Scott flew to London to watch dailies; they loved him. Ford was unhappy that he was not (as he had been used to with previous directors) a part of the whole filmmaking process and that Scott did not tell him what to do. He was said to have only come out of his trailer when he was shooting scenes.
8. Elaborate screen tests were done for the Rachel (Sean Young) character. Scott preferred an unknown actress and said that Young reminded him of Vivien Leigh.
Leigh.jpg
young.png
9. Young and Ford never clicked; Ridley Scott is said to have talked Young through her performance. During the sex scene, Scott told Ford to push Young against the window ledge and because she wasn’t expecting it, Young cried. She said that Ford turned around and dropped his pants, mooning her, to make her laugh.
10. Daryl Hannah (Pris) auditioned—the fight scene—in a gymnasium. Having been a gymnast her whole life, she asked Scott if she could incorporate some gymnastics; Scott didn’t know what she meant so she demonstrated her flips. However, when it came time to film a male stunt double was used to do the flips, after a female stunt woman was run through so many rehearsals that she became exhausted. For her screen test, Hannah found the blonde wig and inspired by Klaus Kinski in Nosferatu the Vampyre, gave herself the black eye make-up. Daryl said Harrison Ford insisted that when she stuck her fingers up his nose and grabbed his head, she “really do it.” She felt badly because his nose was bleeding and she was really hurting the actor.
darylhannah.jpg
11. Edward James Olmos (Gaff) was known and brought in by the casting director. Olmos came up with the idea of Esperanto/Cityspeak and went to the Berlitz Language School to learn different languages to put together.
EJOBR.jpg
12. Joanna Cassidy (Zhora) worked with her own pet snake, “Darling.” Scott originally envisioned Zhora doing an elaborate “mud dance,” where she and the snake transformed into each other and then into one being, but it would have been too expensive to do.
Zhora.jpg
13. Visual Futurist/Illustrator Syd Mead was brought in; Scott said that Mead “nailed the future of cities like Tokyo; he knew where cities were going.” The artist was brought in for a few days, but ended up staying months (which added a large over-budget cost). He designed Sebastion’s car and the “killer” parking meter, everything in the future world.
14. The ongoing actor’s strike gave the art department a big advantage, they had nine months in pre-production. According to Michael Deeley, Ridley Scott “micromanaged” the art department, looking at every single drawing done by Mead and illustrators, Sherman Labby, Mentor Huebner and Tom Southwell. Auto fabricator, Gene Winfield said 27 vehicles were made from Syd Mead’s drawings; he had 50 people working in 3 shops (18 people working on fiberglass), 18 hours a day, 7 days a week. It took them 5 1/2 months to complete the cars. The taxis were built on VW van chassis and the sedans on VW chassis lengthened by 12 inches. The spinners had working gears (with all the inside gadgets functioning, as well) and were on rolling tables; the one flying spinner was on a lift and had no engine, but everything else worked.
15. The Hades landscape was all miniatures set up on a plywood table. Thousands of etched brass cutouts gave the illusion of a dimensional scene. They filled the darkened miniature room with smoke, then using fans and smoke detectors (the detectors would sense when the smoke level dropped and cause more smoke to puff) to maintain the same level of smoke at all times during filming. This was done because if the smoke level changed, it would cause flickering on film. Around 20,000 light tubes were used to light up the miniatures. The explosions were previously shot on 35 mm film. White cards were placed behind the towers, the explosions projected with the 35 mm camera and then the whole thing reshot with 65 mm camera.
Thumbnail image for hadeslandscape.jpg
16. The two locations Ridley Scott liked and wanted to use were LA’s Bradley Building and Union Station. Because the Bradley Building was occupied, shooting could only be completed from 6 pm to 6 am and it had to be clean every day. Cork substituted for dirt and it effectively soaked up the rain water, so every morning after filming, the cork could easily be swept up.
bradbuild.jpg
17. Shooting conditions on set were considered horrendous and miserable by most; to try to get the look on film that he wanted (while attempting to keep under budget), Scott filmed at night on the New York street set, in rain and smoke. There were about 33 days of night shooting. Cast and crew often had to wear masks because of the never-ending smoke being pumped in. Edward James Olmos marveled at how realistic it looked, adding that Scott brought in giant theater speakers and set them up on the building roofs. The score (by Academy Award-winning [Chariots of Fire] Greek composer, Vangelis) was then blasted during filming, causing the set to come alive.
18. In an interview, Ridley Scott said he’d rather work with English crews than American, because when he’d ask for something, they would just say “Yes, gov’nor, and go get it.” This so upset the crew that they got t-shirts made-up and wore them on set; the shirts read: “Yes, gov’nor, my ass.” In response, Scott wore a shirt that read “Xenophobia sucks.” Almost all the on-set accounts of the production were of constant tension between the director and just about every person involved with the film.
19. Toward the end of production, when the budget had been exceeded and the schedule overrun, studio executives came on set several times, threatening to shut down filming. Though the crew would always expect production to end, it was said that Scott always prevailed after contentious meetings and he would just keep going. At one point, notices that everyone was fired were sent out, but again, Scott refused to quit until the film was done.
20. Though he only saw a segment of the film’s special effects on the news, Philip Dick said, “It was my own interior world. They caught it perfectly.”

Sunday, November 6, 2011

Blade Runner sequel

Blade Runner directors cut.jpgWhile speculating on possible projects in the Action Sci-Fi post, I had dismissed that it could be the Blade Runner sequel, but reading about Ridley Scott's recent update on the project made me think further about it.

Ridley Scott said that he was "close to finding a writer that might be able to help (him) deliver," and then added that "we're quite a long way in, actually."

At this point, it matters less if this is the project that's being cast in NY.  What's more interesting is if Angelina and Ridley Scott are in fact working on it since many sites interpret his remarks to mean this will be his next project. 

So my thoughts:

1) This could be the project that Angelina met with him about last Sept. 10 in London.  She was clutching a fairly thick script -- over half an inch -- with parts marked off with post-it notes.  Not long after their meeting, there was word that Scott Z. Burns was being eyed to work on the Blade Runner script.



2) Angelina was earlier rumored to be circling a part in Scott's Prometheus that eventually went to Charlize Theron, but even movie bloggers doubted she would go for such an ensemble role.  It's possible the source got the genre right but the title wrong.

3) She would be taking over from Harrison Ford which would be fitting.

4) It would certainly explain the desire for secrecy surrounding the aforementioned action sci-fi project.

5) The original Blade Runner was set in L.A. but they could easily move the setting of the sequel to NY or any other city given the futuristic backgrounds that will be used.  And the need for models is understandable given some of the scenes that were in the original.

6) If it is also set 40 years into the future, extras will need to be fitted ahead for their costumes, but if Burns just got hired last Sept., an Oct. casting call seems too soon.   Scott still has to finish post on Prometheus so the earliest it can start filming is July after Prometheus opens and Brad wraps his supporting role in 12 Years A Slave

It would be a pretty exciting project if this was what they discussed.  I am not ruling out that they may have also discussed the Gertrude Bell biopic which I am sure Angelina would love to do.  But she can't do Cleopatra, West with the Night and Gertrude Bell in succession.  I am excited about Cleopatra in particular esp. if Fincher or someone of equal stature is directing.  But the Markham and Bell biopics can wait as they are less age sensitive than her action-related roles.

Blood and Honey starts screening for the press on Monday so we should have a definitive update on her projects not long after.

In the meantime these are my best guesses on the most high profile projects that seemed closest to production:

Cleopatra - [25.02] Target release 2013 -  A poster on IMDb said preparations were proceeding but I don't think they'll start production until things have settled down in Egypt and neighboring countries for safety and insurance purposes.  While they can film some desert scenes in Malta, Morocco or other areas with similar topography, the scenes in the Nile have to be filmed in the Nile.  There's also the question of Fincher's availability since he has House of Cards up next and 20,000 Leagues is in pre-producton. If Fincher does 20,000 Leagues after House of Cards, he won't be free until mid 2013. Angelina seems to have her heart set on having him direct and Mike Flemming said he was keen to direct her so they'll have to sort things out. 

Maleficent -- [23.58] 2013 - If they can't get a director that meets with Angelina's approval right now, they'll have to wait until someone she likes becomes available.  Aronofsky is filling his time doing TV ads and music videos so he may not be taking on full feature projects before Noah.

Salt 2 - [22.47] 2014 - Whatever script Kurt Wimmer turns in will probably still need quite a bit of work, and then comes the search for a director that passes muster w/ Angelina.  Theoretically though, this could start sometime next year.

Unforgiven - [22.96] Given that it is a remake and the script should be fairly easy to adapt, I am assuming Christopher McQuarrie has already finished and submitted an acceptable draft.  They were originally targeting a May 2011 start so this could go into production on short notice.  Again, the big hurdle would be finding an acceptable director. 

The Tiger - [21.77] 2014 - Like Unforgiven, this could go into production on short notice since it doesn't require elaborate preparation.  If Aronofsky hadn't dropped out this could have been next in the queue.

So we go back to Blade Runner - [21.84] 2014 - It is certainly possible that this could leap frog over everything else and be her next project if she has nothing set to go before mid 2012. It has an esteemed director, a big star who can compare to Harrison Ford when he made it, and if they already have most of the script,  they can be ready to go as soon as the script is finished.


Warner Bros/Everett
WSJ Harrison Ford and Ridley Scott on the set of ‘Blade Runner’ in 1982.

Untitled Blade Runner Project [21.84]
Status - (2014), In dev't, Regular, OWA
Production Co - Alcon Entertainment
Studio - Warner Bros.
Director - Ridley Scott
Producer - Broderick Johnson, Andrew A. Kosove
Writers -
(source) - Phillip K. Dick
Production execs -
- 9/26/11: Scott Z. Burns said to be top choice to write. 


Director says, "It's liable to be a sequel."


Director Ridley Scott has spoken for the first time about his upcoming sequel to his sci-fi classic Blade Runner.

The new movie was announced in August, but until now there had been no word from Sir Ridley himself.

Speaking to The Wall Street Journal's Speakeasy blog, Scott dropped a few cryptic clues about the much anticipated follow-up, saying that the new project is "liable to be a sequel."

Scott also revealed that the production was further ahead than we had anticipated: "I think I'm quite close to finding a writer that might be able to help me deliver," he explained, adding, "we're quite a long way in, actually."

He also stated the film is moving forward, "not with the past cast, of course." When pressed on whether Deckard would reappear, Scott said, "No, not really."

Prometheus, Scott's sequel to his other groundbreaking sci-fi classic Alien, opens on 1 June 2012.