I've seen Silver Linings and agree with the enthusiastic reviews. I haven't seen the latest Twilight and while I am not a fan of the previous films, this one sounds like it could be worth watching even just for the action-packed climax alone.
From NYTimes.
The Calm Before the Kablooey
‘Silver Linings Playbook,’ Directed by David O. Russell
NYT Critics' Pick
Jennifer Lawrence and Bradley Cooper in "Silver Linings Playbook." More Photos »
By MANOHLA DARGIS
Published: November 15, 2012
“Silver Linings Playbook,” the exuberant new movie from David O. Russell, does almost everything right. The story tracks the feverish, happy, sad, absurdly funny ups and downs of a head case named Pat Solatano, played by a surprisingly effective, intensely focused Bradley Cooper, just as he returns to his parents’ home after eight months in a mental institution. Pat had been put away for a scarily violent crime, but now, having shed fat and the defense it offered him, and feeding on the shiny philosophy of the title instead, he feels ready to tackle the world. The world may not be ready.
What the world is — at least, as it’s
personified by the family and friends zigzagging through the movie
fielding jokes, confessing fears and tightly holding onto a man who
nearly spun into the void — is welcoming, accepting, loving. “Silver
Linings Playbook” is an outright comedy, but like Pat, it’s a bipolar
one that swings between passionate highs and intentionally painful lows.
When Pat’s mother, Dolores (a sensational Jacki Weaver), brings him
home from the asylum— briefly accompanied by his pal in kookiness, Danny
(Chris Tucker) — her husband, Pat Sr. (a moving Robert De Niro),
complains that she didn’t tell him about springing their son. Dolores,
her Kewpie Doll eyes darting with animal panic, responds the only way
any loving mother and wife could: “It’s all under control.”
It isn’t, and not by a long shot, at least
as far as these characters are concerned. Mr. Russell, on the other
hand, a virtuoso of chaos, has supreme command over a movie that
regularly feels as if it’s teetering on the edge of hysteria, in respect
to the characters and director both. But Mr. Russell doesn’t just
choreograph bedlam, he also tames it, and worrying that it might all go
kablooey with one shout too many is one of the pleasures of his work,
which includes films like the aptly titled “Flirting With Disaster.”
Like a singer who quavers tauntingly, thrillingly close to going
off-key, Mr. Russell never loses control. Watching him pull back from
the brink can be a delight.
The movie is adapted from the 2008 novel of
the same title by Matthew Quick, which Mr. Russell has gently bent to
his own purposes. In the book Pat was hospitalized for years, which
knocks him into a heavier, potentially more alarming mental-health
diagnosis than the guy in the movie who breezes out of a psychiatric
facility. Not that the character, with Mr. Cooper’s Hollywood smile
straining maniacally, appears or sounds ready for ordinary human
contact. Shortly after he returns home Pat immediately takes up the
physical and psychological regimen that he created while locked away and
believes will win back his estranged wife, Nikki (Brea Bee). That she’s
taken out a restraining order against him is a minor obstacle.
Pat’s struggle to get Nikki back serves as
his nominal quest, the mission that catapults him out of the house and
running around the neighborhood wearing a large plastic garbage bag. He
wears the bag to sweat off calories, but it’s also a conspicuous
metaphor for a life that has been outwardly trashed. This being a David O. Russell movie
it’s also a funny sight gag that keeps on giving, whether it inspires
one of Pat Sr.’s double takes or whether Pat is running side by side
with — and sometimes being chased by — a neighbor, Tiffany (Jennifer Lawrence,
aching, tender, lovely). She enters the picture early during an
entertainingly inappropriate dinner given by Pat’s friend Ronnie (John
Ortiz, warmly appealing), and his bullying wife, Veronica (Julia Stiles,
nicely chilled), an encounter that deeply unsettles Pat.
Tiffany, a heartbreak beauty, at once
disturbs Pat and gives him fresh purpose. For reasons of her own she
convinces him that she can pass a letter from him to Nikki,
circumventing the law. In return Tiffany wants Pat to become her partner
for a dance contest, a narrative turn that suggests the movie will soon
be careening perilously into whimsy. Instead it deepens beautifully,
and then it expands. Tiffany and Pat begin rehearsing in the dance
studio in the home she has built in her parents’ garage, practicing
moves with a tentative step, shuffle, step, shuffle. She leads and he
follows, together and apart, and through bungled, awkward turns they
fall into each other’s arms and into the larger, somewhat wary embrace
of those around them.
Robert Frost wrote that
“home is the place where, when you have to go there, they have to take
you in.” Mr. Russell must agree because he has always played with the
definition of family, pushing at its normative boundaries with humor and
tales of incest, addiction and insanity. Like almost all his features
“Silver Linings Playbook” features a large cast that seems to grow with
each scene. Pat is alone in a room when you first see him in the movie,
but as he nears the ridiculously wonderful finale he’s fighting for
space, crowded in the frame and being jostled by family and friends in
his parents’ house where, between plot twists and poignant details (his
father’s worried caress of a good-luck charm, his mother’s anxious
cooking), he find his place and a filmmaker’s worldview shines.
As its title announces, “Silver Linings Playbook” honks, waves and
pleads for happiness. Not long into the story Pat angrily tosses out a
copy of “A Farewell to Arms”
and rails about Hemingway’s sucker-punch finale. The world, Pat yells —
at his parents, the neighbors, us — is hard enough. It’s both comical
and somewhat pitiful, but it also feels like an authorial declaration
because it dovetails with Mr. Russell’s belief in joyous, transporting
cinema. It’s no wonder that Tiffany shows Pat a clip from “Singin’ in the Rain,”
that blast of pure euphoria. Happy endings used to be de rigueur in
American movies, and while they often still are, the feelings
accompanying them tend to feel as canned as Katherine Heigl’s laughter,
maybe because filmmakers no longer buy them, or think that we don’t.
Don’t get me wrong, I like a bleak,
despairing cry in the dark as much as the next existentially anguished,
post-film consumer, but there is a great deal to be said for delivering
the bad news on screen with a pratfall. Mr. Russell’s affinity for sight
gags and the slap and tickle that makes lovers of combatants derives
from his affinity for screwball comedy, a genre that emerged in the
1930s and that he borrows for his own singular purposes. His movies
embrace different problems and character types — a strung-out drug
addict rather than an alcohol-soaked swell — but like the classics of
the form, they have zippy, at times breakneck pacing, rapidly fired
zingers and physical comedy that, taken together, reflect the wild
unpredictability of the greater world.
The world in “Silver Linings Playbook” looks
different from the way it does in old screwball comedies, of course,
but it too is racked by pain and worry, and there are lost jobs and
pensions amid its hiccupping laughter. For all its high-flying zaniness
the movie has the sting of life, and its humor feels dredged up from the
same dark, boggy place from which Samuel Beckett extracted his yuks.
“Silver Linings Playbook” is crammed with people talking and shouting
and weeping and also yielding to what are sometimes called boundary
issues but which here turn out to be the mad, loving scrambling of
people finding and saving one another. These are characters who get in
one another’s faces and occasionally punch a loved one right in the
kisser. They must go on, they can’t go on, but together they do.
Movie Review
Infusing the Bloodline With a Problem Child
‘The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn — Part 2’ Ends the Series
From left, Christopher Heyerdahl, Michael Sheen and Jamie Campbell Bower in "The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn — Part 2."
By MANOHLA DARGIS
Published: November 15, 2012
Heads pop like Champagne corks in “The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn — Part 2,” the final chapter in the megamillion-dollar series about love, war and franchise immortality. And why not? Even with the lavish blood bath that slathers this movie red and pops those tops, these are joyous times for Bella (Kristen Stewart), who has risen revived, restyled and stone-cold dead after dropping a new addition to the Cullen family, those veritable vegan vampires who snack on woodland creatures instead of humans. After Bella nearly died during pregnancy in the last movie, her undead husband, Edward (Robert Pattinson), saved her by piercing her neck, thus at long last making a vampire out of her.
Now, with newborn Renesmee, baby makes
three. Played by what look like digitally altered tots and an actual
flesh-and-blood girl (Mackenzie Foy), Renesmee is the nominal
centerpiece for the final movie and its reason for being. As half-human,
half-vampire, and conceived while Bella was still breathing, Renesmee
turns out to be an instant problem child. Not only does she look as
creepy as the baby Brad Pitt in “The Curious Case of Benjamin Button,”
she’s sprouting as fast as a magical beanstalk and, worse yet, has
attracted the attention of the Volturi, a vampire coven in Italy with
papal-like authority. Led by Aro (a fabulous, flamboyant Michael Sheen),
the Volturi come to believe that Renesmee is an “immortal child” whose
milk teeth will instigate a large-scale calamity.
The decision to squeeze two generously
padded movies (this one runs a swollen 115 minutes) out of the
concluding volume in Stephenie Meyer’s four-book series never made story
sense, even if it has lucratively served the studio bottom line. (The
first movie raked in more than $700 million internationally, and the
series has topped $2 billion.) The director Bill Condon, however, who brought wit, beauty and actual filmmaking to Part 1,
along with those enormous receipts, has nicely cultivated the art of
the stall for Part 2. Working from a screenplay by Melissa Rosenberg,
who adapted all the “Twilight”
books, he doesn’t have a lot to play with here, but he makes do and
sometimes better than that, largely by turning his cameras into
surrogates for the franchise’s adoring fans.
From the first extreme close-up of Bella
fluttering open her dark, feathery eyelashes, Mr. Condon makes this
“Twilight” an intensely tactile and intimate experience. Taking his cues
from the Golden Age of Hollywood — the close-ups of Bella and Edward bring to mind those of Elizabeth Taylor and Montgomery Clift in “A Place in the Sun.”
He bathes his stars in a gleaming light that gives their pale faces a
luxurious alabaster sheen. This is one movie that should have been shot
in 3-D if only to allow the fans to caress the air. The glammed up Ms.
Stewart, hair flowing and jaw squared, finally looks like the star she
has become over the course of the series.
Alas, she also acts kind of dead. Apparently
becoming a vampire robs you of the power to put across an emotion
persuasively, and while Bella looks lovely or at least strikingly
styled, she’s also pretty much a stiff. Mr. Pattinson, by contrast, has
rarely appeared more relaxed, and his character has never seemed more,
well, human. You have a lot of time to look at their faces, to examine
their micro-movements, the cut of their clothes, the curl of their hair —
and also idly to wonder what was going on between these two tabloid
favorites during production — because, beyond a quick hunt and an
alfresco nosh, not much happens during the initial, narratively thin
stretch.
Watching the Cullens pose and smile in their
modernist digs, gathered around the piano with frozen aristocratic
languor, grows tedious. But, much like the scene of Jacob (Taylor
Lautner), the franchise’s favorite pinup, strolling into the story with
visibly erect nipples, this family album serves a conspicuous purpose.
It quickly becomes evident that Part 2 is primarily an extended final
bow — part victory lap, part farewell tour. Drawing out the inevitable
gives fans the chance to linger in a world that has become a
passionately beloved cult complete with its own conventions, Web sites (and their inverse, hate shrines, dedicated to loathing the series) and academic tomes
(“Interdisciplinary Approaches to Twilight: Studies in Fiction, Media
and a Contemporary Cultural Experience”). It’s a fan base that has again
also proven the might of the female movie audience.
Despite the slow start Mr. Condon closes the
series in fine, smooth style. He gives fans all the lovely flowers,
conditioned hair and lightly erotic, dreamy kisses they deserve. Just as
smartly he also shakes the series up with an unexpectedly fierce,
entertaining battle that finds the Cullens, flanked by their wolf
friends and various vampire allies, facing down the Volturi. Set on a
snowy field, this whirlwind of clashing fangs and flying fur rouses
Bella to action. It also injects the movie with an invigorating energy
that the movies have rarely sustained since the first “Twilight,” when
Catherine Hardwicke, a messy but spirited director, introduced Bella and
Edward. It turns out that there’s something to be said about watching
these two lovebirds tap into their inner monsters. It’s bloody good fun
while it lasts.
“The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn — Part 2” is rated PG-13 (Parents strongly cautioned). Heads roll (and pop).
From Time Out London
3 stars out of 5
There’s much talk of ‘forever’ in the fifth and final instalment (or so we’ve been promised) of ‘The Twilight Saga’, the screen’s most vanilla vampire chronicle. It’s an apt word to stress, signifying both the deathless devotion the series has inspired in legions of ferocious fans and the interminable tedium these rather inelegantly protracted films present to the unconverted. Neither camp’s minds are going to be changed by Bill Condon’s alternately thudding and thrilling closer, but that is as it should be: right down to the celebratory parade of every participating player across all five films in the end credits, ‘Breaking Dawn – Part 2’ is less a freestanding film than a victory lap for a franchise that hasn’t wavered in its commitment to its fanbase.
That’s a gentle way of saying that ‘Part 2’ does little to prove the necessity of splitting Stephenie Meyer’s concluding novel, ‘Deathly Hallows’-style, into two halves. The bulk of the book’s most savoury action – sullen teen Bella Swan’s long-delayed sexual awakening, mutant pregnancy and conversion to the bloodsucking faith – was covered in last year’s gratifyingly bonkers exercise in junior Cronenbergia. That leaves the follow-up a rather talky affair for its first half: while the Cullen clan pad around their luxury woodland lodge, discussing intricate global vampire politics and wearing gilets, the film most resembles an underexposed Next catalogue.
By and by, however, an engaging sense of humour emerges, even flirting with self-parody when Taylor Lautner’s lupine Jacob – whose eerily marzipan-like consistency, even in wolf form, remains his sole interesting feature – perfunctorily gets his kit off before Bella’s horrified dad. Across both the ‘Breaking Dawn’ films, that playfulness has been Condon’s chief gift to the series. It pays off grandly in a riotous showdown between the heroes and the malevolent, Michael Sheen-led Volturi tribe, which finds an absurdly ingenious way both to preserve and subvert the contentiously passive climax of Meyer’s novel.
Most energised of all, for once, is Kristen Stewart, often unfairly maligned for a performance restricted by the maddeningly morose behaviour of Bella in human form. Reborn as a vampire, her newly red eyes visibly glint with the pleasure of finally getting to kick some ass, leaving all memories of Edward-Jacob love tussles for the inconsequential dust they are. If we learn anything from this silly but satisfying finale, it’s that everyone could stand to get some vampire in them.
From BoxOffice.com
Lincoln expands to a wide release this weekend and it should do very well on its own terms even though it will be overshadowed by Breaking Dawn - Part 2 and Skyfall.
The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 2
PROS:
- The franchise has become remarkably consistent in its opening weekend and long-term performances. The finale should continue that pattern, despite the fact that Breaking Dawn - Part 1 indicated some minor audience drop-off.
- Could a finale factor be in play here as it was for Harry Potter in 2011?
- Will this year's Pattinson-Stewart drama help create any last minute curiosity in the franchise?
CONS:
- The buzz for Twilight's finale hasn't seemed to measure up to that of the final Potter film in 2011, so the hardcore fans may continue to be the driving force which would largely prevent a box office bump from the predecessors.
- Did this year's Pattinson-Stewart drama push away any die hard fans?
- Skyfall's strong opening could have a negative impact
Lincoln
PROS:
- Steven Spielberg, one of the most beloved presidents in history, and the all-star cast will demand attention from audiences, especially now that word of mouth is building after a successful limited opening last weekend.
- The marketing push began early and focused several TV spots during key television events, including the presidential debates.
CONS:
- Historical dramas are hit and miss, something Mr. Spielberg himself encountered with 1997's Amistad.
- Opening weekend demand could be softer than expected, but this is the kind of film that's built more to play through the holiday and Oscar seasons.
Early Studio Estimates
Weekend Predictions
From Time Out London
The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Part Two (2012)
3 stars out of 5
There’s much talk of ‘forever’ in the fifth and final instalment (or so we’ve been promised) of ‘The Twilight Saga’, the screen’s most vanilla vampire chronicle. It’s an apt word to stress, signifying both the deathless devotion the series has inspired in legions of ferocious fans and the interminable tedium these rather inelegantly protracted films present to the unconverted. Neither camp’s minds are going to be changed by Bill Condon’s alternately thudding and thrilling closer, but that is as it should be: right down to the celebratory parade of every participating player across all five films in the end credits, ‘Breaking Dawn – Part 2’ is less a freestanding film than a victory lap for a franchise that hasn’t wavered in its commitment to its fanbase.
That’s a gentle way of saying that ‘Part 2’ does little to prove the necessity of splitting Stephenie Meyer’s concluding novel, ‘Deathly Hallows’-style, into two halves. The bulk of the book’s most savoury action – sullen teen Bella Swan’s long-delayed sexual awakening, mutant pregnancy and conversion to the bloodsucking faith – was covered in last year’s gratifyingly bonkers exercise in junior Cronenbergia. That leaves the follow-up a rather talky affair for its first half: while the Cullen clan pad around their luxury woodland lodge, discussing intricate global vampire politics and wearing gilets, the film most resembles an underexposed Next catalogue.
By and by, however, an engaging sense of humour emerges, even flirting with self-parody when Taylor Lautner’s lupine Jacob – whose eerily marzipan-like consistency, even in wolf form, remains his sole interesting feature – perfunctorily gets his kit off before Bella’s horrified dad. Across both the ‘Breaking Dawn’ films, that playfulness has been Condon’s chief gift to the series. It pays off grandly in a riotous showdown between the heroes and the malevolent, Michael Sheen-led Volturi tribe, which finds an absurdly ingenious way both to preserve and subvert the contentiously passive climax of Meyer’s novel.
Most energised of all, for once, is Kristen Stewart, often unfairly maligned for a performance restricted by the maddeningly morose behaviour of Bella in human form. Reborn as a vampire, her newly red eyes visibly glint with the pleasure of finally getting to kick some ass, leaving all memories of Edward-Jacob love tussles for the inconsequential dust they are. If we learn anything from this silly but satisfying finale, it’s that everyone could stand to get some vampire in them.
Author:
Guy Lodge
Time Out London
Time Out London
From BoxOffice.com
Weekend Predictions: 'The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 2' & 'Lincoln' (Wide)
The anticipated finale to the Twilight series unleashes this weekend as fans pile into theaters one last time since the five-film series began four years ago.Lincoln expands to a wide release this weekend and it should do very well on its own terms even though it will be overshadowed by Breaking Dawn - Part 2 and Skyfall.
The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 2
PROS:
- The franchise has become remarkably consistent in its opening weekend and long-term performances. The finale should continue that pattern, despite the fact that Breaking Dawn - Part 1 indicated some minor audience drop-off.
- Could a finale factor be in play here as it was for Harry Potter in 2011?
- Will this year's Pattinson-Stewart drama help create any last minute curiosity in the franchise?
CONS:
- The buzz for Twilight's finale hasn't seemed to measure up to that of the final Potter film in 2011, so the hardcore fans may continue to be the driving force which would largely prevent a box office bump from the predecessors.
- Did this year's Pattinson-Stewart drama push away any die hard fans?
- Skyfall's strong opening could have a negative impact
Lincoln
PROS:
- Steven Spielberg, one of the most beloved presidents in history, and the all-star cast will demand attention from audiences, especially now that word of mouth is building after a successful limited opening last weekend.
- The marketing push began early and focused several TV spots during key television events, including the presidential debates.
CONS:
- Historical dramas are hit and miss, something Mr. Spielberg himself encountered with 1997's Amistad.
- Opening weekend demand could be softer than expected, but this is the kind of film that's built more to play through the holiday and Oscar seasons.
Early Studio Estimates
| # | Title | weekend | Locations | Avg. | Total | Wks. | Dist. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 2 | $141,300,000 | -- | 4,070 | -- | $34,717 | $141,300,000 | 1 | Lionsgate / Summit |
| 2 | Skyfall | $41,500,000 | -53% | 3,505 | 0 | $11,840 | $161,337,108 | 2 | Sony / Columbia |
| 3 | Lincoln | $21,000,000 | 2124% | 1,775 | 1764 | $11,831 | $22,418,836 | 2 | Disney / DreamWorks |
| 4 | Wreck-It Ralph | $18,312,000 | -45% | 3,622 | -130 | $5,056 | $121,479,290 | 3 | Disney |
| 5 | Flight | $8,615,000 | -42% | 2,612 | 565 | $3,298 | $61,335,810 | 3 | Paramount |
| 6 | Argo | $4,070,000 | -38% | 2,210 | -553 | $1,842 | $92,022,480 | 6 | Warner Bros. |
| 7 | Taken 2 | $2,100,000 | -48% | 2,063 | -424 | $1,018 | $134,624,389 | 7 | Fox |
| 8 | Pitch Perfect | $1,260,000 | -51% | 1,122 | -269 | $1,123 | $61,076,358 | 8 | Universal |
| 9 | Here Comes the Boom | $1,200,000 | -52% | 1,350 | -694 | $889 | $41,019,015 | 6 | Sony / Columbia |
| 10 | Hotel Transylvania | $900,000 | -63% | 1,248 | -1318 | $721 | $142,691,598 | 8 | Sony / Columbia |
Weekend Predictions
| Title | Weekend Gross | CHG LW% |
|---|---|---|
| The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 2 | $145,000,000 | -- |
| Skyfall | $48,000,000 | -46% |
| Wreck-It Ralph | $19,500,000 | -41% |
| Lincoln | $17,500,000 | 1753% |
| Flight | $10,000,000 | -32% |
| Argo | $4,300,000 | -35% |
| Taken 2 | $2,500,000 | -38% |
| Pitch Perfect | $1,600,000 | -38% |
| Here Comes the Boom | $1,500,000 | -41% |
| Hotel Transylvania | $1,400,000 | -42% |

