Wednesday, June 7, 2017








Right now, Bill Condon’s Bride of Frankenstein is set to be the next film in Universal’s Dark Universe cinematic universe, which may seem a little odd since there hasn’t even been a Frankenstein movie. It’s also a little odd because even though Bride of Frankenstein is amazing, the titular character plays a minor (but memorable) role in the overall plot. It’s really the story of the monster trying to understand humanity and Dr. Frankenstein being pulled back into his evil work by the nefarious Dr. Pretorius.

When we spoke with screenwriter David Koepp last October about the movie, he said the film will dive more into the Bride character, painting her as a “sympathetic” and “tragic” figure in a tale of “female liberation.” Steve Weintraub recently spoke with producer Alex Kurtzman about the film while doing press for Kurtzman’s new film, The Mummy, and here’s what he had to say:

“David Koepp wrote the script. It’s really good. If you look at the original Bride, it’s one of the weirdest movies ever made. It’s truly a strange movie, and the Bride doesn’t appear until the end of the film, and she’s been built to be Frankenstein’s mate and takes one look at him and rejects him immediately. He gets so angry, he pulls a lever and the building explodes and that’s the end of the movie, and you’re like, “I have no idea what just happened, but it was amazing!” It’s fascinating to me that as a character with no dialogue for generation after generation after generation has been remembered. And I think she’s been remembered for her defiance and remembered for independence. She’s certainly been remembered for her iconic look. And I love that and I think Bill is going to do something amazing with that.”

It seems that the idea with Bride is to take her few moments on screen and try to expand that into a character centered on “defiance” and “independence.” We still don’t know what the plot will entail, but at least there’s a clear idea of the central character taking shape. While I adore James Whale’s original movie, I definitely think there’s room for a remake in terms of exploring the character in a way that hasn’t been done before. Whereas the producers behind Dark Universe will have to strain to find new takes on the Mummy, Dracula, and Frankenstein, there’s lots of open road when it comes to the Bride of Frankenstein.

Be sure to come back for our full interview with Kurtzman. The Mummy opens Friday and Bride of Frankenstein opens February 14, 2019.



thr

Review

An inauspicious beginning to a would-be franchise.

Some have noted that Universal must hate to be opening Alex Kurtzman's The Mummy in the second week of Wonder Woman's run, with that hit sure to suck millions out of its box-office haul. But Wonder Woman isn't all bad for the newly launched "enterprise," dubbed Dark Universe, with which the studio hopes to exploit characters it introduced way back in the 1920-50s: After all, it proves that such a series of interrelated movies (like DC's "extended universe") can still succeed after the well has been poisoned by outings so terrible any executive with taste would have pulled the plug. Sure, it's hard to muster anything like desire for another Dark Universe flick after seeing this limp, thrill-free debut. But who knows? Maybe shifting gears to a female protagonist in 2019's Bride of Frankenstein will do the trick.

Then again, the fact that Uni's recent D.U. hype mentions only the Bride's groom, to be played by Javier Bardem, may show it's more heavily invested in big-name dudes than in making heroes of women. Dudes like Russell Crowe, whose Dr. Jekyll apparently will be the glue holding these pictures together as a series. Or like Tom Cruise, who gave his all to one long-running franchise by reviving Mission: Impossible, and, judging from The Mummy, should perhaps not be asked to do so again.


— AP Entertainment (@APEntertainment) June 7, 2017


LOS ANGELES (AP) — Is The Invisible Man any match for Iron Man at the box office?

That’s the question Universal Pictures will be testing with their Dark Universe — a connected, multi-film revival of the studios’ classic monster properties from the 1920s through 50s, including The Invisible Man, Dracula, Frankenstein and the Phantom of the Opera. It launches this Friday with “The Mummy,” starring Tom Cruise.

The studio already has flashy talent lined up in front of and behind the camera for this expanded universe, including Johnny Depp as The Invisible Man, Russell Crowe as Dr. Henry Jekyll and Javier Bardem as Frankenstein’s Monster. The Dark Universe has a Danny Elfman-composed theme and a nostalgic trailer looking back at the days of Boris Karloff, Lon Chaney and Bela Lugosi. Creatives Alex Kurtzman and Chris Morgan are stewarding the endeavor.

It’s no wonder why Universal is trying it out. In the hierarchy of Hollywood franchises, it’s hard to beat the idea of the shared universe, which superheroes dominate.

“Universal desperately wants a universe to call their own, especially since they are one of the only studios that hasn’t been able to capitalize on the comic book craze,” said Jeff Bock, a senior box office analyst for Exhibitor Relations.

Nearly every major studio has at least a scrap of that coveted intellectual property too; Disney has the Marvel Cinematic Universe (and Star Wars), Warner Bros. has the DC Extended Universe, Sony has Spider-Man and Fox has X-Men, but Universal Pictures has remained ardently outside of the comic book squall. Instead, it’s focused on homegrown franchises, like the $5.1 billion “Fast & Furious” films, the $3.6 billion “Jurassic Park” films and the $2.7 billion “Despicable Me” films, to name a few.

“This is an incredible opportunity for Universal to set itself apart by leaving Marvel and DC to compete head to head with their superhero line-ups while offering a fresh take on the notion of interwoven characters and stories,” said Paul Dergarabedian, a senior media analyst for comScore. “There are unlimited creative possibilities.”

The idea of the Dark Universe, including the name, has been on the table for quite some time. While Universal officially announced the name in late May, the company has been scooping up trademarks for more than 600 types of branded items, from energy drinks to canned vegetables and television shows going back to November 2014.

It’s also likely been an expensive investment.

“For the studios’ sake, this better pay off, as they’ve invested a fortune already. Tom Cruise, Danny Elfman, Bill Condon, Russell Crowe, Alex Kurtzman, Javier Bardem ... these people demand big up-fronts and even bigger back-end deals,” Bock said. “I’m not saying they’re betting the farm on this thing, but they’re certainly blowing through truckloads of that ‘Fast & Furious’ cash.”

Universal has actually been waging its own experiments with its monsters for years, long before Marvel and its “Avengers” films made the interconnected universe an aspirational business model. The most successful attempt was “The Mummy” reboot from 1999, with Brendan Fraser, which spawned two sequels and a spinoff. Others attempts floundered — like “Dracula Untold” in 2014 and “The Wolfman” in 2010 — and went back into the vault. Even this present-day set “Mummy” reboot has been in various stages of development since 2012.

What is new is the idea that the monster films will all relate to one another. “The Mummy” promises to get this interconnectedness going immediately by introducing Crowe’s Dr. Jekyll character as the leader of a shadowy multinational corporation, Prodigium, which is committed to destroying evil in the world (not dissimilar sounding to Marvel’s overarching S.H.I.E.L.D.)

Whether or not that means anything to an audience is still up for debate for some. Forbes contributor Scott Mendelson isn’t sold on the idea that moviegoers necessarily care about shared universes.

“The only way to make this thing work is to make a bunch of good and crowd-pleasing star-driven monster movies that will get audiences excited outside of their existence in a shared universe,” Mendelson wrote. “Make individual stand-alone movies that audiences want to see, and the cinematic universe will take shape.”

The kick-off might not be that epic either. “The Mummy,” which cost a reported $125 million to produce, is tracking to open in the $30 to $40 million range this weekend. Even the 1999 “Mummy” opened to $43.4 million, and that’s not accounting for inflation.

“Could it work? Sure. On an international level it probably will. The problem with ‘The Mummy,’ of course, is the fact that reboots are a dime a dozen these days and North American audiences have definitely soured on them,” Bock said.

It’ll be a long time, too, before the next installment hits theaters. Bill Condon’s “Bride of Frankenstein,” which has not yet cast its leading lady, is the only other Dark Universe film with a release date (Valentine’s Day 2019).

That’s not a death knell for the Dark Universe, though. Bock said “The Mummy” just has to perform decently worldwide to lay the groundwork.

“Plenty of goodwill and growth will come for future installments as ‘Bride of Frankenstein,’ ‘Creature From the Black Lagoon,’ and ‘The Invisible Man’ sound much more promising — and the key here — are something this generation likely hasn’t seen before,” Bock said.


No comments:

Post a Comment